The district of Cuxhaven, Germany confirmed on Wednesday, November 3, 2021, that a 12-year-old child died two days after taking the Pfizer vaccine. Police are investigating and an autopsy was ordered due to the short interval between vaccination and death.
The result of the autopsy is still pending and is expected to be released this week at the earliest. “The current status of the autopsy suggests a connection,” Kirsten von der Lieth, press spokeswoman for the district said about the vaccine and the child’s death.
NDR reported, “As can be seen from the preliminary autopsy protocol, experts from the Forensic Medicine Institute at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf consider it likely that “the death was due to the vaccination.” The autopsy has been completed but samples are still being examined.
According to a report from the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) in Langen (Hesse), the child had serious previous illnesses, including a cardiovascular before taking the vaccine.
After this tragic case, the Cuxhaven district has pulled back and will only vaccinate healthy students.
Translation: After the death of a twelve-year-old after his second corona vaccination dose, the final autopsy result is still pending. Meanwhile, the district of Cuxhaven draws its first conclusions.
From now on, only children without known pre-existing diseases should be vaccinated in the schools in the district area. All other children should go to their family doctor for vaccination, as he knows possible pre-existing diseases better, it is said. In the district of Cuxhaven, three mobile vaccination teams are in action on behalf of the district administration. Coincidentally, all three did not have a vaccination appointment in a school on Thursday. Only one shoulder min in an Otterndorf school was due. There, the company doctor, who was supposed to vaccinate the students, first postponed the appointment to wait for the final autopsy result.
Surveillance camers captured the moment pastor took down a gun-wielding man.
Burundi-born pastor Ezekiel Ndikumana managed to prevent the possible shooting of parishioners at a Pentecostal church in northern Nashville, Tennessee, according to the New York Post.
According to the police, a man later identified as 26-year-old Dezire Baganda sat in the first pew during the service. Suddenly, he pulled out a pistol and went behind the altar.
“Baganda told everyone to get up while he waved and pointed the handgun at the congregation,” Nashville police said, as quoted by the New York Post. “The pastor quickly tackled Baganda before any shots were fired.”
Authorities said the gun was loaded but never fired.
According to reports, Dezire Baganda has been charged with 15 counts of felony aggravated assault.
A new poll by Arizona Christian University has found that 39 per cent of 18-24 year olds now identify as LGBTQ.
Yes, really.
The survey, carried out in partnership with Foundations of Freedom, asked young Americans to choose a self-description, with over two-thirds of those aged 18-24 saying they were lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans or queer.
In addition, 25 per cent of Americans aged 25 to 37 also identified as LGBTQ.
A previous poll by Gallup found that 5.6 per cent of all adult Americans now identify as LGBTQ, up from 4.5 per cent in 2017.
The fact that the number has inflated so significantly in recent years clearly indicates it is being driven by social and cultural engineering.
The results of the Gallup poll also indicated that the rise was largely due to more people identifying as “bisexual.”
However, as Glenn Greenwald noted, “The vast majority of them in long-term relationships are in opposite-sex relationships (33%) rather than same-sex ones (3.7%). So 10 times more people who identify as “bi” live in hetero-appearing relationships than gay/lesbian ones.”
In other words, the cultural cache of claiming to be part of ‘LGBTQ’ when these people aren’t even in LGBTQ relationships is too tempting to resist.
Of Americans now claiming "bi" identity, the vast majority of them in long-term relationships are in opposite-sex relationships (33%) rather than same-sex ones (3.7%).
So 10 times more people who identify as "bi" live in hetero-appearing relationships than gay/lesbian ones: pic.twitter.com/iOIM0tv2ON
Greenwald went on to explain that that “masculine girls are now encouraged to identify as trans, causing a decrease in the lesbian population.”
For making this observation, as well as analyzing the statistical facts, Greenwald was labeled “transphobic.”
The fact that a whopping 39 per cent of 18-24 year olds now identify as LGBTQ, whether they follow through on that identification or not, illustrates the massive impact that establishment media and cultural institution exposure given to LGBTQ issues has had.
It would really be quite a stretch to claim that these young people are born that way and not made that way by relentless social engineering and brainwashing at the cultural and academic level.
“The proportion of young adults who identify as LGBTQ is roughly three times the proportion identified among the combined older adults of the nation,” states the Foundations of Freedom report.
“Given the moral and political implications of such an identity, that self-characterization alone raises a range of emotional challenges.”
Indeed, the fact that mental illness and depression is statistically higher amongst people who identify as LGBT raises the question of the damage that the amplification of such lifestyles by the culture is doing to young people.
Federal workers who have recovered from COVID-19 have filed a class-action lawsuit against Dr. Anthony Fauci and other government officials over a COVID-19 vaccine mandate that still forces them to get a jab.
The government not only failed to offer a carve out exemptions for naturally immune workers, or those who have recovered, but neither President Joe Biden’s executive order nor the guidance explaining it outlines why naturally acquired immunity isn’t an acceptable alternative to vaccination, the lawsuit says.
“Because they already have natural immunity, there is no coherent purpose for the federal government to require them to undertake a medical procedure to be vaccinated if they choose not to, or be terminated from their employment, their careers,” Robert Henneke, general counsel at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and one of the lawyers representing the government workers, told The Epoch Times.
Plaintiffs say the mandate violates the Administrative Procedure Act, which allows courts to overturn government actions deemed “arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion.”
They quoted Dr. Scott Gottlieb, a former Food and Drug Administration commissioner who now sits on the board of Pfizer. During recent television appearances, Gottlieb described natural immunity as “durable” and “robust” and said that government officials should start assimilating it into policy discussions. They also cited Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, an immunologist who has said it is medically unnecessary for the recovered to get vaccinated.
Dozens of studies have shown that people who survived COVID-19 have strong immunity against re-infection from the virus that causes it, with some indicating the protection is similar to or higher than that provided by vaccines.
Workers tried communicating concerns about the mandate but those “have completely fallen on deaf ears, which is why we’ve turned to litigation,” Henneke said.
“I think it’s clear that the Biden administration, the federal government, is entrenched in their position on this. And so further negotiation would be pointless and instead we’re going to seek assistance from the courts,” he added.
The deadline for federal workers to get a COVID-19 vaccine was effectively Nov. 8, because people aren’t considered fully vaccinated until two weeks after they’ve received their final jab. Agencies were able to begin disciplining unvaccinated workers on Nov. 9, according to Kiran Ahuja, an administration official.
The suit asks the federal court in Galveston, Texas, to declare the mandate a violation of the plaintiffs’ rights and arbitrary and capricious and relieve workers from complying with it.
Defendants named include Fauci, the longtime head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and Jeffrey Zients, who coordinates the White House COVID-19 response team.
The institute and the White House did not respond to requests for comment. The centers declined to comment.
Federal health officials have recently acknowledged natural immunity exists but continue insisting it is inferior to the protection conferred by vaccines. They also say people who have recovered from COVID-19 can still benefit from vaccination.
While Bill Gates openly makes his own “case for globalism” to The Los Angeles Times, he’s also partnered with these five globalist powerhouses:
1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Bill Gates is co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, where he “shapes and approves foundation strategies, advocates for the foundation’s issues, and sets the organization’s overall direction,” according to the Foundation’s website.
The Foundation touts official programs with titles such as “Global Development,” “Global Growth and Opportunity,” “Global Health,” and “Global Policy and Advocacy.”
A view shows the north office building of the newly opened $500 million Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation campus in Seattle, Washington June 2, 2011. The Gates Foundation, the largest philanthropic foundation in the world, supports work in more than 100 countries in areas of health, development, and education. REUTERS/Marcus Donner (UNITED STATES – Tags: BUSINESS SOCIETY) – RTR2N7SI
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is also officially partnered (here) with the United Nations (UN).
In 1999 alone, The Gates Foundation gave a $2.2 billion donation to support “population and health projects worldwide.
According to a 2018 Brookings Institute publication, the Gates Foundation “is the 17th largest funder and provides more than $880 million per year.”
4. World Health Organization
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation pledged an amount of $682,305,429 to the World Health Organization (WHO) for its Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI), according to Spear’s Magazine.
In August of this year, the WHO rolled out a proposal for governments to implement a worldwide vaccine passport verification system.
“This document lays out an approach for creating a signed digital version of a vaccination record for COVID-19 based on a core data set of key information to be recorded, and an approach for the digital signature,” the proposal reads. “The document leverages existing free and open standards, and is driven by the ethics, use cases and requirements for Digital Documentation of COVID-19 Certificates: Vaccination Status (DDCC:VS).”
The proposal states on page vi, “This work was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.”
The Gates Foundation is the “largest private contributor to the WHO, accounting for some 10% of its budget,” according to a Swiss broadcast group. “Only the US government pays more, and had the US pulled out as threatened by the former Trump administration, the organisation would have found itself in the unprecedented position of having the Gates Foundation as its top donor.”
The publication explains how most of the funding Gates provides to the WHO is “tied to specific agendas of the foundation.” This means that the WHO “cannot itself set global health priorities, and it is beholden to a largely unaccountable private actor. Unlike states, the Gates Foundation has little democratic accountability.”
Screenshot taken from swissinfo.ch on November 9, 2021
5. Chinese Communist Party
Xi Jinping is General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and President of China.
Jinping defended economic globalization in his first speech to the World Economic Forum at Davos, speaking of a need not only to “guide globalization” but to “deliver [globalism’s] benefits to all countries and all nations.” “[T]he global economy is the big ocean you cannot escape from,” he added.
Xi’s China imagines “globalization with Communist characteristics: The Chinese government promotes the country’s openness to the world, even as it adopts increasingly aggressive and at times punitive policies that force countries to play by its rules,” comments to The New York Times.
Deleted webpages have revealed that Bill Gates had openly praised a CCP-backed influence group called the Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries for its efforts to build “friendship,” reports The National Pulse.
The Pulse also reported how Gates has advised and addressed various groups within the CCP’s United Front, China’s top propaganda effort that the U.S. government identifies as seeking to influence the West to “take actions or adopt positions supportive of Beijing’s preferred policies.”
Moreover, Gates’s Microsoft once created an operating system explicitly for the Chinese government in collaboration with a Chinese military proxy.
Bill Gates with Xi Jinping.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation closely cooperated with Beijing to enable the sale of Chinese-produced medications outside China, new emails obtained by Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act request have revealed.
The Bill & Melinda Gates website reads, “Since opening our China office in 2007, we have supported China in addressing major domestic health and development challenges and working with Chinese partners to help the country become a stronger health and development partner for the rest of the developing world.”
“China is an important partner for us in achieving our global goals,” the site goes on to say. “We aim to facilitate the sharing of China’s experience and expertise in addressing health inequity and poverty in the poorest regions of the world.”
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) laid out GOP plans on Breitbart News Saturday for taking Congress back from the “dying” Democrat Party and making President Joe Biden a “one-term president.”
After Virginia Governor-elect Glenn Youngkin’s surprising blue-state win, followed by House Democrats’ speedy push to pass President Joe Biden’s infrastructure agenda, Republicans are narrowing down their strategy to boot leftists from power in 2022 and 2024. Issa referred to the bill’s passing — which was aided by 13 Republicans — as a “desperate act of a dying party.” He noted that Democrats, after seeing Republicans win in Virginia and nearly win in deep blue New Jersey, view the spending bills as their chance to have “some accomplishment” before voters potentially cast them out of power in the coming months and years.
“They were able to convince the left to let this go forward so that they would have some accomplishment because quite frankly, AOC [Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY)] thinks they didn’t do enough and that’s why they got defeated,” Issa told host Matthew Boyle, Breitbart News’s Washington bureau chief. “You and I and your listeners know that, in fact, what happened was there was a rejection by the true swing voters — suburban white women, and a host of others, even minorities. [They] said, ‘Oh wait a second, this part of socialism we don’t want. We want to control our kids. We want to control our lives.”‘
Issa emphasized that “returning Republicans” are planning to unite against Democrats’ next $4 trillion spending bill, notwithstanding the the actions of politicians former President Donald Trump called “RINOs” [Republican in name only], who “gave Biden and Democrats a victory on the ‘Non-Infrastructure’ Bill, where only 11% of the money being wasted goes to real infrastructure.” Issa also said Republicans who plan on staying, unlike the Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) types, are looking to Youngkin’s governor campaign as a model of how to fight Democrats and win moving forward.
LISTEN:
Boyle noted during the interview that Youngkin’s strategy exemplified how the Republican Party is not a “cult of personality,” but instead a “movement of ideas,” and more specifically pointed to how Youngkin did not disavow Trump and led with an America First agenda while being his own brand.
“If you run away from Trump, you will fail. … In fact, embrace that which the American people now strongly support from the Trump years, including engaging against the growth of China and fairness of trade, engaging against their expansion militarily, which peace through strength if I’ve ever seen it, and you reject the closing of Bagram and the abandonment of 37 million people, and you realize that we have to re-engage in the way that President Trump did, which is pushing NATO and other allies to do their fair share, but not walking away from America’s role in the world,” Issa replied. “And at the same time, reinvest in the economy. The Trump economy wasn’t just a stock market economy, it was all the way down to working people at restaurants who had good jobs and growing paychecks.”
Issa emphasized choosing now-Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT), who ” just wanted to be liked,” to challenge Barack Obama’s presidency in 2012 was a mistake not to be repeated. Issa said that if Trump himself does not run in 2024, then whoever Republicans nominate for president in the next election will closely mirror his style and substance.
“That whole process is where somebody is going to be our nominee, but it’s not going to be a milquetoast nominee and it’s not going to be someone who just wants to be liked. It’s going to be somebody who embraces, if not Trump, certainly the Trump agenda and more, because there are evolving needs by the American people,” he said.
One thing the GOP will takeaway from the experience, however, is drawing attention to Biden’s “extremism” just as they did during Obama’s presidency when the GOP heavily by emphasized several scandals, including “Fast and Furious,”Benghazi, and the IRS targeting conservatives.
“I believe we will define what’s wrong with the Obama 2.0 administration with Biden. We are going to define it very much like we did in 2010 and 2012. Then we have to make sure we have …a presidential candidate who really matches the aspirations of the the Republican Party from the bottom up. The kinds of things that your listeners are listening to. That’s what you need to hear and see,” he said.
“We’re the party of free and fair elections. We’re the party of free and fair trade, and we’re the party that believes in individual liberties,” Issa said in comparison, noting that Trump succeeded because he met the moment in 2016. “And so as you look at governor’s and a few senators and a number of other candidates, you see a lot of people who, in fact, do match the aspirations of the party. And of course President Trump is also in the fray, and that will be his decision. But, I don’t think we have any problem at all — we have, if you will, multiple candidates.”
Issa specifically mentioned Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) by name when talking about strong potential 2024 candidates.
“So who’s going to be the next president? Ron DeSantis was on my committee, and he was a young upstart when he came to the committee. And you know what? He was somebody who said ‘I will take charge. I will take responsibility.’ It’s why he’s a great governor,” he said. “We’re going to see a lot of candidates like that, but I guarantee they’re going to be ground-up people. They’re not going to be ‘go-along, get-along,’ ‘I want to be liked’ people. And that’s the future two years from now and four years from now.”
Actor Chris Pratt leaned into his Christian faith following the recent criticism he received for celebrating the birth of his “healthy” daughter with wife Katherine Schwarzenegger.
The 42-year-old posted a message about his wife on Instagram last Tuesday where he wished her a happy birthday and highlighted how much she has blessed his life.
“Guys. For real. Look how she’s looking at me! I mean. Find you somebody that looks at you like that!! You know!? We met in church,” Pratt wrote. “She’s given me an amazing life, a gorgeous healthy daughter, she chews so loudly that sometimes i put in my ear buds to drown it out, but that’s love! She helps me with everything.”
Some followers found the message disrespectful toward his previous wife, Anna Faris and their son Jack, who suffers from several health conditions. Negative comments started popping up shortly after his post.
“Celebrating one child does not undervalue another,” a follower wrote.
Another user wrote, “WOW! Forgot your boy already.”
One follower pointed out that “it’s the part about the ‘healthy’ daughter that is messed up.”
In a post shared on Saturday, Pratt said he felt “upset and depressed” about the ordeal. He went for a run in the woods and found comfort by playing Christian music from his playlist.
“I knew that if I put on my Christian music playlist and I got out in the woods and ran, that I’d feel better. But I just didn’t want to,” Pratt said.
But he went for a run anyway to clear his mind and the worship music helped him find solace during that difficult moment.
“Gosh was I right! It felt amazing!” Pratt commented. “God sat there right next to me.”
He told followers that the experience made him “emotional,” and that he “felt like there was another in the fire standing next to me … That moment really captured me. And so I just want to say, all glory to God!”
Pratt added, “Get some exercise, maybe listen to some good worship music and or maybe get the Word in because it really helped me this morning.”
Amid the backlash, his mother-in-law, Maria Shriver, encouraged him to “Rise above the noise,” while reminding him that “Your family loves you. What a beautiful life. I’m proud of you.”
Big Bird, Elmo, and Dr. Sanjay Gupta target children, encouraging them to take the experimental Covid-19 vaccine, in a Sesame Street vaccine show that aired over the weekend on CNN.
Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) was recently asked about the prospect of secession and didn’t completely slam the door on the idea.
In newly circulating comments initially made last month during a live taping of the senator’s podcast on the campus of Texas A&M, Cruz fielded a question from an audience member about the possibility of Texas seceding from the union.
“I understand the sentiment behind the question,” Cruz said. “I’m not there yet.”
The senator added, “I think Texas has a responsibility to the country. And I’m not ready to give up on America. I love this country … Texas is, right now, an amazing force keeping America from going off the cliff. Keeping America grounded on the values that built this country.”
Those comments received applause. However, Cruz then outlined a chain of events that would get him on board for secession.
“Now listen, if the Democrats end the filibuster if they fundamentally destroy the country if they pack the Supreme Court if they make DC a state, if they federalize elections and massively expand voter fraud, there may come a point where it’s hopeless. We’re not there yet.
“And if there comes a point where it’s hopeless, then I think we take NASA, we take the military, we take the oil,” he added, tongue-in-cheek.
Conservative talk show host Liz Wheeler, a guest on the podcast, asked the senator about the fate of one notable Texan in a proposed split from the United States.
“What about Joe Rogan?” Wheeler asked. “You gonna take him?”
“Joe Rogan?! He might be the president of Texas!” Cruz said.
President Biden’s approval rating has dropped to a new low of 38%, according to a poll released Monday.
A USA Today and Suffolk University poll taken Wednesday through Friday showed the latest bad news for Mr. Biden, whose approval ratings have slid throughout the summer amid supply chain woes, a bungled military withdrawal from Afghanistan and rising inflation.
The poll found that 46% of those surveyed believe Mr. Biden is doing a worse job as president than expected. That total includes 16% who voted for him in the presidential election last year.
Among independents, 44% said the president is performing worse than expected.
The poll also forecast a tough reelection fight for Mr. Biden in 2024. It found that 64% of respondents, including 28% of Democrats, do not want Mr. Biden to run for reelection.
But 58% of respondents said they don’t want former President Donald Trump running in 2024, either. That includes 24% of Republicans.Vice President Kamala Harris fared even worse than Mr. Biden among respondents, with a 28% approval rating. The poll found that 51% don’t approve of the job she’s doing.
A Harvard CAPS-Harris poll released last month found that the president’s approval rating had dropped to 43%, which was a 5-percentage-point drop from a September survey.
The president has dismissed his weak approval ratings. He told reporters last week that he didn’t run for office “to determine how well I’m going to do in the polls.”
The USA Today-Suffolk University poll was released after a roller-coaster week for Mr. Biden. Democrats had a nightmarish Election Day that ended with a surprise victory for Republican Virginia gubernatorial candidate Glenn Youngkin over Democrat and former Gov. Terry McCauliffe.
In New Jersey, Gov. Phil Murphy, a Democrat, narrowly won reelection in a race he was expected to win by 20 points.
Mr. Biden’s bad week improved Friday with better-than-expected jobs numbers released by the Labor Department. He also secured a major legislative win, with the House passing his bipartisan infrastructure bill.
The USA Today-Suffolk University poll found that respondents overwhelmingly supported the infrastructure bill, which Mr. Biden will sign in the coming days. However, they were much more split over the president’s massive $1.75 trillion spending bill, with 1 one in 4 saying the bill would help their family.
The House is expected to vote on the spending bill later this month after the Congressional Budget Office releases its score on the proposal.
Correction: An earlier version of this article misidentified those who said they didn’t want former President Donald Trump to run in 2024.
Naturally Immune Federal Workers Lodge Class-Action Suit Against Fauci, Walensky Over COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate
Federal workers who have recovered from COVID-19 have filed a class-action lawsuit against Dr. Anthony Fauci and other government officials over a COVID-19 vaccine mandate that still forces them to get a jab.
The government not only failed to offer a carve out exemptions for naturally immune workers, or those who have recovered, but neither President Joe Biden’s executive order nor the guidance explaining it outlines why naturally acquired immunity isn’t an acceptable alternative to vaccination, the lawsuit says.
“Because they already have natural immunity, there is no coherent purpose for the federal government to require them to undertake a medical procedure to be vaccinated if they choose not to, or be terminated from their employment, their careers,” Robert Henneke, general counsel at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and one of the lawyers representing the government workers, told The Epoch Times.
Plaintiffs say the mandate violates the Administrative Procedure Act, which allows courts to overturn government actions deemed “arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion.”
They quoted Dr. Scott Gottlieb, a former Food and Drug Administration commissioner who now sits on the board of Pfizer. During recent television appearances, Gottlieb described natural immunity as “durable” and “robust” and said that government officials should start assimilating it into policy discussions. They also cited Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, an immunologist who has said it is medically unnecessary for the recovered to get vaccinated.
Dozens of studies have shown that people who survived COVID-19 have strong immunity against re-infection from the virus that causes it, with some indicating the protection is similar to or higher than that provided by vaccines.
Workers tried communicating concerns about the mandate but those “have completely fallen on deaf ears, which is why we’ve turned to litigation,” Henneke said.
“I think it’s clear that the Biden administration, the federal government, is entrenched in their position on this. And so further negotiation would be pointless and instead we’re going to seek assistance from the courts,” he added.
The deadline for federal workers to get a COVID-19 vaccine was effectively Nov. 8, because people aren’t considered fully vaccinated until two weeks after they’ve received their final jab. Agencies were able to begin disciplining unvaccinated workers on Nov. 9, according to Kiran Ahuja, an administration official.
The suit asks the federal court in Galveston, Texas, to declare the mandate a violation of the plaintiffs’ rights and arbitrary and capricious and relieve workers from complying with it.
Defendants named include Fauci, the longtime head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and Jeffrey Zients, who coordinates the White House COVID-19 response team.
The institute and the White House did not respond to requests for comment. The centers declined to comment.
Federal health officials have recently acknowledged natural immunity exists but continue insisting it is inferior to the protection conferred by vaccines. They also say people who have recovered from COVID-19 can still benefit from vaccination.