Home Blog Page 224

‘Speak English, Period’: GOP Bill Targets Interpreter Loophole in Citizenship Test

Congress
Capitol Building (Tim Graham/Getty Images)

House Republicans are moving to close a longstanding loophole that allows non-English speakers to use interpreters during the U.S. citizenship test. The new bill, introduced by Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.), would require all applicants to complete the entire naturalization process in English, including the civics portion of the exam. The legislation directly challenges current exemptions that have been in place for decades, prioritizing assimilation and national unity over accommodation.

Under current U.S. law, applicants who are either 50 years old with 20 years of permanent residency, or 55 with 15 years, are allowed to take the civics portion of the citizenship test in their native language if accompanied by an interpreter. Fine’s bill would eliminate those exemptions entirely. His position is clear: “If you want to live in an English-speaking country, you should be able to speak English, period.”

The proposal builds on President Donald Trump’s March 2025 executive order that formally declared English the official language of the United States. Fine’s legislation would solidify that policy by making English proficiency a non-negotiable requirement for naturalization, aligning with long-standing conservative priorities on immigration and cultural cohesion.

Opponents of the bill argue it discriminates against older immigrants who may have lived in the country for decades but never mastered English. Advocacy groups are expected to push back, citing concerns over fairness and accessibility. However, supporters argue that language proficiency is foundational to civic responsibility and societal integration.

The bill reflects growing Republican momentum toward immigration reform that emphasizes national identity, legal consistency, and cultural assimilation. If passed, it would mark a major shift in how the United States handles citizenship for non-native speakers, particularly among older immigrant populations who have previously relied on language exemptions.

American Veterans Face Hamas Threats While Delivering Aid in Gaza

Gaza residents trapped
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP, Unsplash

Three U.S. military veterans operating with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) say they face frequent threats from Hamas operatives while delivering food aid inside Gaza. Since May 2025, the veterans have distributed over 160 million meals amid intense conflict and ongoing terrorist control in the region. Their work, intended to help Palestinian civilians, now places them in the direct path of danger from both terrorists and armed criminals.

Jason Murray, Scott Weimer, and Brandon Zielinski—all American veterans—described an environment filled with weapons, intimidation, and constant risk. They have encountered armed men wielding pistols, AK-style rifles, and grenades near distribution zones. Despite maintaining strict neutrality, they report being targeted and pressured by hostile actors within Gaza, primarily tied to Hamas and organized crime elements exploiting the chaos.

The GHF’s operations require daily coordination with the Israel Defense Forces to ensure security for its Safe Distribution Sites. Before each shift, volunteers are briefed on any security incidents or threats reported within the last 48 hours. The veterans emphasize that this preparation is essential, but even with these precautions, threats remain constant.

The team says misinformation by international media distorts the reality on the ground. According to Weimer, the narrative often ignores or downplays the control Hamas exercises over Gaza and how that directly endangers both civilians and aid workers. He stated that while their goal is to serve humanitarian needs, they cannot ignore the presence and interference of terror groups.

Despite the risks, GHF continues its mission. The veterans argue that civilians in Gaza face severe hunger and deserve aid, even as militant factions try to manipulate or obstruct the process. They stress that their presence helps ensure food reaches those in need, not Hamas affiliates.

The situation highlights the growing danger for Western humanitarian workers operating in conflict zones dominated by Islamic terror groups. It also underscores the moral complexity of providing aid in regions where terrorists often use civilians as shields and propaganda tools.

Israel in Crisis: Ultra-Orthodox Draft Battle Erupts Amid Gaza War

israel
Israel flag (Stanislav Vdovin/Unsplash)

Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Gaza is reigniting a decades-long national conflict over mandatory military service for the ultra-Orthodox Jewish population. As the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) face critical manpower shortages, pressure is mounting to end draft exemptions for the Haredi community—setting the stage for political and religious turmoil.

The “Torato Umanuto” exemption, in place since Israel’s founding in 1948, allows full-time yeshiva students to forgo military service. At that time, the Haredi population was small. Today, ultra-Orthodox Jews make up roughly 15% of Israel’s population, with projections estimating they will reach one-third by 2050. Despite these numbers, most still avoid national service, citing religious study obligations.

With over 60,000 reservists now deployed in the Gaza operation, IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir is calling for change. “All parts of the nation must share the burden,” he declared, labeling universal service a national imperative. Netanyahu’s government is under increasing strain as Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and others demand legislative action.

Likud member Yuli Edelstein proposed a compromise: those truly dedicated to full-time Torah study could remain exempt, while all others would be required to serve. However, ultra-Orthodox parties—including United Torah Judaism and Shas—oppose any change. These factions have threatened to collapse the governing coalition if conscription is expanded to their constituents.

Israel’s High Court has previously ruled the current exemption system unconstitutional, arguing it violates principles of equality. Lawmakers have repeatedly failed to pass reforms, blocked by political deals and fear of backlash from religious communities. The Gaza war has reignited legal scrutiny and public pressure.

Critics argue that without Haredi participation, the IDF is stretched thin, and national unity erodes. Supporters of the exemption warn that conscripting ultra-Orthodox men will harm religious institutions and violate deeply held beliefs. Some military officials also voice concerns about how religious recruits would integrate into mixed-gender units or adapt to military culture.

With the war ongoing and political tensions rising, the future of Israel’s military draft system faces its most serious challenge in decades.

The View Co-Host Alarmed by Sotomayor’s Comments on Trump Third Term

The View
The View (Screenshot from X/@TPostMillennial)

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor sparked controversy during an appearance on The View after remarking that the 22nd Amendment’s ban on a president serving more than two terms has “never been tested” in court. Co-host Sunny Hostin admitted she was “scared” by Sotomayor’s response, raising concerns among liberals about the possibility of President Donald Trump seeking a third term.

The exchange began when Hostin asked Sotomayor whether Trump could run again after a second term in office. Sotomayor confirmed that the 22nd Amendment clearly bars any president from serving more than two terms, but she noted that the restriction has not faced a legal challenge. The justice explained that while the constitutional language is straightforward, no court has ever had to enforce or interpret the provision in a case.

Hostin later said she was unsettled by the idea that such a fundamental safeguard had never been tested. She stressed her belief that the Constitution should stand as the highest law of the land, and suggested that any ambiguity about enforcement raised red flags. Her reaction reflected widespread unease among progressives who fear Trump could challenge established norms.

The 22nd Amendment, ratified in 1951 after President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s four election victories, was designed to prevent any one leader from holding the presidency indefinitely. It states in plain terms that “no person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.” Legal experts broadly agree the amendment is binding and enforceable, with little room for reinterpretation.

President Trump has occasionally joked about serving beyond two terms, drawing outrage from critics who take the remarks literally. Supporters point out that the amendment makes such a move impossible. Still, Sotomayor’s comments underscored that the courts have never been asked to rule directly on the amendment, leaving open a theoretical question that alarmed liberal commentators.

Caught on Camera: Charlie Kirk’s Alleged Killer Spotted Near Campus Before Shooting

Camera (Lucas Santos/Unsplash)

New surveillance video has surfaced showing the man accused of murdering Charlie Kirk near the Utah Valley University campus just hours before the fatal shooting. Tyler Robinson, the alleged shooter, was seen on camera walking toward the campus in the early morning of September 10, wearing the same clothes later identified from the attack. The footage is the first to capture Robinson in the vicinity prior to the crime.

TMZ obtained and released the footage, which shows Robinson at approximately 8:07 a.m. He was dressed in a maroon T-shirt, light-colored shorts, sunglasses, a baseball cap, and sneakers—matching the initial eyewitness descriptions. Police believe he later returned to the area in a gray Dodge Challenger around 8:30 a.m., shortly before Kirk’s speaking event.

Investigators now have a clearer timeline of Robinson’s movements. A second video, reportedly taken after the shooting, shows Robinson in dark clothing walking calmly through a residential neighborhood near the university. This change of attire has prompted further questions about premeditation and attempts to evade identification.

Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and a leading voice in the conservative Christian movement, was shot and killed while attending a public event at the university. The murder shocked supporters nationwide and has raised alarms about rising hostility toward conservative figures.

Robinson was arrested following an extensive manhunt and faces multiple charges, including aggravated murder, obstruction of justice, and felony discharge of a firearm. Prosecutors have not yet finalized formal charges, but the surveillance footage is expected to serve as key evidence in court.

The video footage highlights law enforcement concerns over growing threats to public figures, especially those who speak out on politically sensitive issues. The attack has intensified calls for increased security at university events and renewed focus on politically motivated violence targeting conservative voices.

Hoax Threats Paralyze U.S. College Campuses Nationwide

MS-13
Police (Kenny Eliason/Unsplash)

A wave of violent threat hoaxes has disrupted operations at over 50 colleges across the United States, prompting widespread lockdowns and emergency police responses. False reports of gunmen, bomb threats, and active shooters have triggered fear, chaos, and significant resource deployment, all without a single verified incident. Federal authorities, including the FBI, have launched investigations, but no arrests have been made.

Campus officials report receiving a surge of emergency calls in recent weeks, often claiming imminent danger from armed individuals or explosive devices. These incidents have forced evacuations, class cancellations, and shelter-in-place orders lasting for hours. In every case, the threats were determined to be hoaxes. Students and faculty are increasingly living under a cloud of anxiety, unsure whether to trust future alerts.

Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) have been among the frequent targets. Institutions report having to suspend daily operations after receiving violent threats that turned out to be false. Law enforcement calls these “swatting” attacks—a tactic where individuals make fraudulent calls to provoke armed police responses.

The cost in time, manpower, and emotional stress is high. Local police departments and campus security forces must treat each threat as credible, deploying SWAT teams, bomb squads, and emergency alerts. Some schools have shut down entire campuses out of precaution. Administrators are reviewing safety protocols but warn that repeated hoaxes can dull public response to real threats.

Federal officials acknowledge the attacks are coordinated but have not disclosed details about potential suspects or methods. The hoaxes often originate from encrypted platforms or overseas sources, complicating efforts to trace the perpetrators. University officials are urging Congress and law enforcement to take stronger action to prosecute those involved and deter future incidents.

The surge in threat hoaxes reflects a growing climate of fear and instability on U.S. campuses, fueled by rising concerns about mass shootings, social unrest, and ideological extremism. Students are demanding reassurance that safety systems are not only reactive but resilient in the face of escalating digital threats.

London Erupts: 100,000 Rally Against Speech Crackdowns

London (Sabrina Mazzeo/Unsplash)

Over 100,000 people marched through central London on September 13 to protest growing restrictions on free speech in the United Kingdom. The “Unite the Kingdom” rally, led by British activist Tommy Robinson, drew massive crowds and featured speeches from high-profile figures including Steve Bannon, Katie Hopkins, and Laurence Fox. Protesters accused the British government and media of silencing dissent and criminalizing political opinions.

The demonstration took place in Whitehall and was heavily policed, with more than 1,000 officers deployed. Police estimates confirmed over 100,000 participants, with some reports suggesting numbers exceeded 110,000. A counter-protest organized by left-wing and anti-racism groups drew around 5,000 attendees and was kept separate by police barriers.

During the rally, Robinson condemned the British government’s increasing censorship and the criminalization of speech deemed politically incorrect. The crowd observed a moment of silence in memory of Charlie Kirk, who was recently murdered in the United States. One notable moment occurred when a Palestinian flag was torn down on stage, drawing cheers from the audience.

Speakers criticized the rise of state-backed speech policing and the use of “hate speech” laws to target conservative voices. Steve Bannon called for unity among those resisting global censorship, warning that freedom of expression is “on life support” in many Western democracies. The rally spotlighted growing public frustration over government overreach and media double standards.

British authorities have been increasingly aggressive in regulating speech, particularly online, where conservative and Christian voices have faced deplatforming and legal threats. Protesters warned that the trajectory mirrors authoritarian tactics seen in other parts of the world. Calls for legislative reform and the repeal of speech control laws were echoed throughout the event.

The march marks one of the largest public demonstrations in recent UK history focused explicitly on free speech. Organizers vowed to continue pressure on Parliament to restore full protections for public discourse without fear of arrest or censorship.

Biden’s Presidential Library Stalls as Donors Pull Back

autopen
President Joe Biden (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)

President Joe Biden’s presidential library project is facing major financial trouble, as traditional Democrat donors grow hesitant or refuse to contribute. The library, expected to be built in Delaware, is already lagging in fundraising. Internal party divisions, legacy concerns, and donor fatigue are contributing to the reluctance.

The Biden Foundation established a 13-member board to oversee the library’s development. The board includes key Biden allies such as former Secretary of State Antony Blinken, longtime advisor Steve Ricchetti, and former U.S. Chief of Protocol Rufus Gifford. Despite the high-profile appointments, the project has failed to attract the expected wave of financial support.

Major Democrat funders have expressed doubts about the library’s viability. Concerns stem from Biden’s declining approval in his final year, compounded by repeated questions surrounding his mental and physical condition during the 2024 election cycle. The Democratic Party’s poor performance in that election further fractured enthusiasm.

John Morgan, a personal injury attorney and prominent Democrat fundraiser, revealed that he requested an $800,000 refund after learning the funds he raised for Biden were allegedly redirected to support Kamala Harris. Morgan stated, “I told them I wanted a refund. I’m not part of this.” The dispute highlights growing disillusionment within the donor base.

Corporate donors have also stayed away, citing political risk and uncertainty about how the library would represent Biden’s controversial presidency. Unlike past presidents, Biden does not enjoy a strong grassroots fundraising base, nor does he generate widespread enthusiasm from institutional supporters.

With money drying up, the scope and timeline of the library are now in question. If sufficient funds aren’t raised soon, the Biden Foundation may be forced to scale back or delay the project indefinitely. The struggle reflects deeper tensions inside the Democratic Party over Biden’s leadership and the legacy he leaves behind.

Clemson Professor Mocks Charlie Kirk’s Murder, Then Scrubs Social Media

A Clemson University professor is under fire after allegedly mocking the murder of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. The professor, identified as Melvin Earl Villaver Jr., deleted or locked down all of his social media accounts following backlash over posts that appeared to celebrate Kirk’s death. The incident raises serious concerns about the politicization of higher education and the moral collapse inside America’s universities.

Villaver is an assistant professor in Clemson’s Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, with specializations in global Black studies and audio technology. Following news of Kirk’s murder on September 10, Villaver reportedly reposted and authored several inflammatory messages on X (formerly Twitter). These included, “no one mourns the wicked,” “keep the jokes coming. It’s what he would’ve wanted,” and another that read, “Charlie Kirk recently said to a Palestinian that there’s no such thing as Palestinians. Well now look… there’s no longer such a thing called Charlie Kirk.”

By September 12, Villaver’s public profiles had been locked or removed across X, Instagram, and Facebook. Screenshots of the posts circulated widely, prompting swift outrage from conservative commentators and concern among alumni and donors. The professor’s Clemson bio emphasized his academic interest in “Blues Epistemology” and his blending of music and activism.

Clemson University has not yet issued a public statement about the incident. It is unclear whether any formal disciplinary action has been initiated. The professor’s comments appear to fall under academic freedom protections, but public celebration of a political opponent’s death raises both ethical and reputational questions for the university.

Kirk, a vocal conservative and Christian advocate, was known for speaking boldly on college campuses and challenging progressive ideology. His murder shocked supporters and further intensified scrutiny on political violence in America.

LAFD Insists Flags Stay Full‑Staff Despite Trump’s Order

Bass
Mayor Karen Bass, Governor Gavin Newsom (Photo by Eric Thayer/Getty Images)

The Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) reportedly instructed all city flags on department facilities to remain at full staff, unless Mayor Karen Bass explicitly orders otherwise—contradicting President Trump’s proclamation to lower U.S. flags nationwide in memory of Charlie Kirk. The directive stipulated that flags remain fully raised from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. each day at LAFD facilities.

Trump’s proclamation called for U.S. flags on federal buildings, military installations, and all public buildings to fly at half‑staff through sunset on September 14 as a mark of respect for Kirk. While some state governors followed the order, including in Pennsylvania and Arizona, local entities like Los Angeles are choosing not to comply without local authorization.

Mayor Bass issued a statement condemning the political violence that led to Kirk’s death, saying such acts are “unacceptable and reprehensible” and must be rejected. However, she has not yet directed that city flags be lowered to half‑staff, and the LAFD memo makes clear that flags will stay at full staff unless she does so.

Some residents and political commentators are criticizing the LAFD decision as a symbolic failure to show solidarity or respect. For many, furling the flag is a visible sign of collective mourning, and refusing to do so—even under municipal jurisdiction—is being interpreted by some as a refusal to acknowledge the gravity of the event. Others defend LAFD’s move as a matter of standard protocol, emphasizing that local governments maintain discretion over such gestures.

Legal experts note that Trump’s proclamation applies only to federal property, and local governments aren’t legally bound to comply. Still, they observe that mayors and city councils often choose to follow such orders in the interest of public unity. The discrepancy between jurisdictions in following Trump’s order has sparked debate over the role of symbolism in civic grief—and how public rituals reflect political divisions.

1...223224225...3,844Page 224 of 3,844
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2025 American Faith Media Network. All rights reserved.