Home Blog Page 2

Indiana Signs Bill Into Law Protecting Women’s Sports

womens sports
Women's Volleyball (Vince Fleming/Unsplash)

Indiana has taken a firm stand in defense of fairness and biological reality by enacting a new law that prohibits males from competing and protecting women’s collegiate sports. House Bill 1041, now officially signed into law by Governor Mike Braun, affirms that athletic competition should be based on a student’s biological sex—not self-declared gender identity.

The law is a common-sense measure rooted in both science and fairness. It states clearly that “a male, based on a student’s biological sex at birth in accordance with the student’s genetics and reproductive biology, may not participate on an athletic team or sport designated… as being a female, women’s, or girls’ athletic team or sport.” It also includes protections for students who report violations of this law, ensuring they cannot be retaliated against for standing up for women’s sports.

Alliance Defending Freedom legal counsel Erica Steinmiller-Perdomo praised the move, saying, “Indiana is right to ensure that female athletes of all ages have a fair and level playing field so that the integrity of women’s sports is protected.” She thanked Rep. Michelle Davis and Sen. Stacey Donato for their leadership, adding that Governor Braun’s action “is restoring common sense and protecting Indiana women for generations to come.”

The law passed with strong support in both chambers—71-25 in the House and 42-6 in the Senate—demonstrating that a wide majority of Indiana’s elected officials recognize the importance of protecting women’s spaces and competition.

While left-wing activists such as the ACLU of Indiana denounced the law as “discriminatory,” their argument overlooks the simple truth: allowing biological males to compete against women not only undermines the purpose of female sports but endangers hard-earned opportunities for girls and women to compete on a level playing field. The ACLU’s rhetoric continues to ignore the biological advantages men have in strength, speed, and size—advantages that cannot be erased by identity claims or hormone treatments.

Indiana’s law follows a growing national trend. At least 25 states have passed similar laws, with others implementing policies through education departments and state agencies. This movement received a major boost when President Donald Trump signed the “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports” executive order in February, affirming that Title IX protections for women should remain just that—protections for women.

At a time when common sense is under attack, Indiana is leading by example and putting the needs of real female athletes first. This law is not only a win for fairness but a step toward restoring clarity and order in an area long hijacked by political ideology.

King Charles Faces Backlash Over Easter Message

London (Sabrina Mazzeo/Unsplash)

In a message meant to honor the holiest season of the Christian calendar, King Charles delivered an Easter reflection that has drawn criticism from Christian conservatives and everyday believers alike for its emphasis on interfaith inclusion rather than a clear proclamation of Christian truth.

Speaking on Maundy Thursday, the monarch touched on the themes of “faith, hope and love,” while also highlighting what he called “the paradox of human life” — our capacity for both cruelty and compassion. He praised humanitarians, acknowledged acts of heroism in war-torn regions, and referenced the humility of Jesus washing His disciples’ feet, noting that His “love knew no bounds or boundaries.”

“One of the puzzles of our humanity is how we are capable of both great cruelty and great kindness,” he said.

“This paradox of human life runs through the Easter story and in the scenes that daily come before our eyes — at one moment, terrible images of human suffering and, in another, heroic acts in war-torn countries where humanitarians of every kind risk their own lives to protect the lives of others.”

However, in a move that many say dilutes the message of Easter, King Charles went on to suggest that the love shown by Jesus was simply reflective of broader human values, also found in Judaism, Islam, and other world religions. “The love He showed when he walked the Earth reflected the Jewish ethic of caring for the stranger and those in need, a deep human instinct echoed in Islam and other religious traditions,” he said.

This isn’t sitting well with many Britons who expect the King — as the Supreme Governor of the Church of England and the “Defender of the Faith” — to speak unambiguously about Christianity during one of its most sacred holidays. Social media erupted with criticism, with one commenter asking, “Is this a joke?” Another wrote, “Is he not the head of the Church of England? When it’s my son’s birthday, I don’t wish my daughter happy birthday too. Let Easter just be Easter.”

This isn’t the first time Charles has sparked concern among Christians. His 2024 Christmas message similarly suggested a theological equivalence between faiths, which many believers found troubling.

At a time when Christianity is under cultural and political pressure in the U.K. and across the West, many are questioning whether the monarch is upholding the faith he has sworn to defend — or quietly surrendering it in the name of pluralism.

Tulsi Gabbard Issues Statement Surrounding Newly Released RFK Files

Tulsi Gabbard
Tulsi Gabbard (Photo by Steven Ferdman/Getty Images)

In a significant move toward government transparency, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced the release of over 10,000 pages of documents related to the 1968 assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy. This release follows an executive order by President Donald Trump, fulfilling a longstanding promise to declassify records concerning pivotal moments in American history.​

The newly unveiled documents include handwritten notes from convicted assassin Sirhan Sirhan, interviews with acquaintances, and details from past investigations. One note from Sirhan stated, “RFK must be disposed of like his brother was,” referencing President John F. Kennedy . These revelations have reignited discussions about the circumstances surrounding RFK’s death and the potential for undisclosed information.​

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the senator’s son, praised the release, expressing hope that it will help restore public trust in the government . He has previously questioned the official account of his father’s death, suggesting multiple assailants may have been involved.​

Gabbard emphasized the importance of this release, stating that while the documents provide valuable insights, they also raise further questions about the assassination. She noted that the agencies are working to make an additional 50,000 pages of RFK assassination files available and will continue to search government facilities for more records.​

“President Donald J. Trump promised maximum transparency and a commitment to rebuild the trust of the American people in the Intelligence Community (IC) and federal agencies,” Tulsi Gabbard’s office said in a press release. “Part of that promise was to fully release previously-classified records related to the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy (JFK), Senator Robert F. Kennedy (RFK), and the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK).”

“Unlike the JFK assassination files — which were identified and released in accordance with federal law — files related to the assassinations of RFK and MLK had not been digitized and sat collecting dust in facilities across the federal government for decades.”

“Per the President’s directive, Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard charged her Director’s Initiatives Group (DIG) with leading the effort to digitize, declassify, and prepare the RFK and MLK files for public release,” the release continued. “Today’s release concerns files directly related to the assassination of RFK. The DIG partnered with The National Archives and other agency officials to manually scan and upload over 10,000 pages, for online viewing by the American people, to fulfill President Trump’s maximum transparency promise.”

This initiative reflects a broader effort by the Trump administration to increase transparency concerning the assassinations of notable American figures, including the recent release of documents related to President John F. Kennedy’s assassination.

The release of these documents marks a significant step in addressing longstanding public interest and speculation regarding the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy. It underscores the administration’s commitment to transparency and the pursuit of truth in historical events that have shaped the nation.

Judge Limits DOGE’s Access to SSA Data

Image via Canva Pro

Despite DOGE’s remarkable track record of saving American taxpayers $150 billion, U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander in Baltimore issued a preliminary injunction limiting its access to Social Security Administration (SSA) data, citing privacy concerns.

The case, brought by labor unions and retired individuals, claims that DOGE’s methods violate privacy protections that have been in place for decades. While Judge Hollander acknowledged the group’s goal is “laudable” and shared by many Americans, she expressed concern over how DOGE conducts its work, stating the effort “exposes a wide fissure” in SSA’s long-standing privacy policies.

DOGE, however, has clarified that it has not strayed from standard agency practices. Justice Department attorney Bradley Humphreys noted that DOGE’s methods are similar to those already used by internal auditors and agency staff. The main distinction is the scope—DOGE seeks access to larger swaths of anonymized data in order to uncover fraudulent activity more effectively. Critics argue anonymization is “extremely burdensome,” but supporters point out that such methods are often used in modern data investigations and could help the agency operate more transparently.

To address these concerns, the court is requiring DOGE staff to complete SSA training and background checks before gaining further access. Still, critics of the ruling argue that the restrictions could undermine DOGE’s ability to operate efficiently and impede its mission to make the federal government accountable to taxpayers.

DOGE, under Musk’s leadership, has already helped cancel wasteful contracts, eliminate improper payments, and slash bureaucratic bloat. Its aggressive approach to exposing government inefficiency has earned widespread praise from fiscal conservatives, watchdog groups, and the American public. A recent Economist/YouGov poll showed more Americans hold a favorable view of DOGE than not, with many applauding its initiative to investigate how members of Congress amass wealth while in office.

Despite the setback, DOGE remains committed to cutting waste and increasing transparency. The department continues to post detailed receipts of its actions—already representing roughly 30% of its reported savings—on its website, offering Americans a rare glimpse into the kind of savings that responsible governance can achieve.

Minnesota State Employee Caught Vandalizing Tesla Vehicles

Tesla
Photo by Bram Van Oost, Unsplash

In a disturbing example of left-wing hostility toward Elon Musk’s Tesla, a Minnesota state employee has been accused of vandalizing the very cars Democratic leaders have mocked in public.

Dylan Bryan Adams, a 33-year-old fiscal policy analyst for Minnesota’s Department of Human Services, was arrested for allegedly keying multiple Teslas in Minneapolis — causing an estimated $20,000 in damage. According to local crime watch footage, Adams was caught on camera walking his dog while deliberately dragging his keys down the sides of Tesla vehicles, stripping paint off the exteriors. The same dog reportedly appeared in several separate incidents, suggesting a pattern of targeted attacks.

Footage released on X (formerly Twitter) by a local crime watch group showed Adams “aggressively carving into two separate Teslas.”

A spokesperson for Governor Tim Walz was quick to distance the administration from the suspect, claiming Adams is “not a political appointee” and merely one of over 40,000 working as a state employee. Nevertheless, the timing of the arrest raises eyebrows, coming just weeks after Walz took a cheap shot at Tesla during a public rally.

At a Wisconsin event, Walz mocked the company’s declining stock, saying, “I added Tesla to [my stock app] to give me a little boost during the day — $225 and dropping.” He went further, adding: “And if you own one, we’re not blaming you. You can take dental floss and pull the Tesla thing off.” Walz later tried to dismiss the remarks as “a joke.”

But the damage may already be done — not just to Teslas, but to public trust. The incident coincides with a broader wave of anti-Tesla violence across the country. The FBI recently launched a task force and is now treating these attacks as “domestic terrorism.” Vandals have destroyed Tesla cars, dealerships, and charging stations in what appears to be a politically motivated backlash against Musk, who now leads President Trump’s cost-cutting Department of Environmental Efficiency.

Musk, who has remained defiant in the face of growing hostility, defended the company in a Fox News interview: “Tesla’s a peaceful company that has made great cars, great products — that’s all it’s done.”

This troubling incident underscores a growing trend: the weaponization of political rhetoric against private companies — and the real-world consequences that can follow.

Medical Scare Disrupts Swearing-In Ceremony for Dr. Mehmet Oz

Dr. Oz
(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

A medical emergency temporarily disrupted the swearing-in ceremony of Dr. Mehmet Oz, President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), on Friday afternoon. The incident led to the press being hastily escorted out of the room as the event unfolded at the White House.

Dr. Oz, a renowned heart surgeon and former television personality, had just begun his formal swearing-in when a commotion broke out. President Trump was delivering remarks when the situation quickly escalated. According to reports and video footage from the scene, it appeared that a young girl may have experienced a medical issue, prompting an immediate response from White House staff and security.

“Press out! Everybody get out, right now!” shouted Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, as reporters were hurried out of the event without explanation.

The U.S. Senate confirmed Dr. Oz to the post on April 3 in a 53-45 vote, largely along party lines. As CMS Administrator, he will now oversee health insurance coverage for more than 150 million Americans across Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act exchanges—a critical role in the ongoing effort to reform and secure the nation’s healthcare infrastructure.

Despite the lack of official details on the medical incident, the event reflects the seriousness with which the Trump administration is handling health care leadership at a time when transparency and competence are sorely needed.

No White House statement had been released as of publishing, and further information on the condition of the young girl involved in the emergency has not yet been confirmed.

Blue State Official Pushes ‘Big Government’ Agenda, Public Bank Idea

President Donald Trump (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

In a speech filled with progressive talking points and big government expansion proposals, San Diego County Board of Supervisors Acting Chair Terra Lawson-Remer used her State of the County Address Wednesday to urge local officials to take on responsibilities typically handled at the federal level—including potentially forming a public bank to fund affordable housing.

Speaking from the San Diego Natural History Museum, Lawson-Remer painted a picture of government overreach dressed as leadership, stating that if Washington “walks away,” San Diego County will “step up.” In reality, her message was clear: more local taxes, more spending, and more bureaucracy.

Among her proposals were a county-run managed care health plan, loosening budgetary restrictions to increase spending, and a new transfer tax on high-value property sales—measures critics say could punish success and burden taxpayers. She suggested that this one-time transfer fee on the top 1% of property sales could help “break the stranglehold” of the housing crisis. But rather than address the root causes of housing inflation—excessive regulation and red tape—her plan doubles down on government control.

Lawson-Remer also praised the Immigrant Legal Defense Program and boasted about using taxpayer dollars to bolster support for illegal immigrants, a move that continues to frustrate law-abiding citizens concerned about border security and the fair allocation of resources. In line with the usual progressive playbook, she pushed for $10 million in public funds to match state or philanthropic grants for a clean-up effort tied to cross-border pollution from Mexico, calling it a “sewage crisis.”

Notably, the acting chair floated the idea of a public bank funded by county reserves, saying money “kept in the stock market” should instead be redirected to fund housing. Critics warn that this kind of risky financial experimentation with public funds could backfire spectacularly.

Although her remarks were warmly received by progressive allies and fellow Democrats—including Rep. Juan Vargas and San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria—many conservatives are questioning the wisdom of using taxpayer money to prop up big government solutions when the county already struggles with affordability, homelessness, and crime.

The Board of Supervisors is currently split 2–2 between Democrats and Republicans, with a July runoff looming that could tip the balance. As San Diego voters weigh their options, Lawson-Remer’s speech signals what more Democrat-led governance could mean: less fiscal restraint, higher taxes, and an ever-growing government presence in residents’ daily lives.

While the acting chair framed her vision as bold and compassionate, to conservatives, it looked more like a blueprint for expanding dependency and draining local resources under the guise of progress.

Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Sentenced to Over Three Years in Prison

(Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)

A twice-deported Mexican national with a long criminal history and repeated illegal entries into the United States has been sentenced to over three years in federal prison—a move some see as long overdue in the face of a broken immigration system.

Juan Morales, 49, who has illegally returned to the U.S. at least three times, was sentenced to 37 months in federal prison after pleading guilty to illegal reentry. The sentencing took place in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.

Morales’s history reads like a case study in the failure of federal immigration enforcement. After racking up convictions for dealing meth and cocaine in both Indiana and Illinois, Morales managed to unlawfully reenter the U.S. multiple times despite prior deportations and previous convictions for illegal reentry.

The twice-deported illegal was most recently caught after being convicted in November for operating a vehicle without ever having a driver’s license. Federal authorities soon uncovered his extensive criminal and immigration background.

“While in the United States unlawfully for a third time, this defendant has repeatedly broken the law, demonstrating time and time again a fundamental lack of respect for this country,” said Acting U.S. Attorney John E. Childress.

Morales will serve one year of supervised release following his prison term—a sentence that raises concerns about what happens next, especially considering his past defiance of deportation orders.

The case underscores growing frustration with immigration policies that allow dangerous repeat offenders to slip back into the country and continue breaking the law with little consequence until caught again. Many Americans are asking how many chances are too many—and how long the system will continue to enable this cycle.

Vice President JD Vance Spends Good Friday at the Vatican

Senator JD Vance (Photo by Jeff Swensen/Getty Images)

U.S. Vice President JD Vance traveled to the Vatican over Easter weekend, joining Christians from around the world in solemn remembrance of Good Friday and the Passion of Jesus Christ. While Pope Francis, recovering from health issues, did not attend the service, Vance and his family were present at St. Peter’s Basilica, surrounded by a team of Secret Service agents as they quietly entered the sacred space before the start of the liturgy.

Now a devout Roman Catholic, Vance converted to the faith six years ago and has consistently spoken about how his Christian beliefs guide his life and public service. His visit to Rome began earlier that day with a meeting with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni—a conservative leader and strong ally of President Donald Trump.

Vance took to social media to reflect on the significance of the day and the responsibilities of his office. “I’m grateful every day for this job, but particularly today where my official duties have brought me to Rome on Good Friday,” he wrote. “He died so that we might live.”

The Vice President’s presence at the Vatican during this holy weekend underscores the importance of faith, family, and tradition—values that continue to resonate deeply with millions of Americans. While global instability and spiritual decline often dominate headlines, Vance’s public embrace of faith sends a strong message of moral clarity and cultural strength.

Following the Good Friday observance, Vatican services will continue with the Way of the Cross procession at the Colosseum, presided over by the Vicar General of the Diocese of Rome. Vance is scheduled to meet Saturday with Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican’s secretary of state, as Easter celebrations continue in the heart of Christendom.

7 Bodies, 3 States—Is a Serial Killer on the Loose?

Image via Canva

A string of human remains discovered in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island over the past two months has stirred public anxiety and raised questions about a possible New England serial killer operating across state lines. So far, at least seven bodies have been found since early March in separate locations throughout the region.

The victims have been discovered in Foster, Rhode Island; Framingham and Plymouth, Massachusetts; and New Haven, Norwalk, Groton, and Killingly, Connecticut. Law enforcement officials from Connecticut have stated there is currently no known connection between the cases and no known threat to the public. However, former prosecutor Matthew Mangino says the trend demands closer scrutiny.

“Whether it’s coincidental or not, I think it merits review and investigation, at least,” Mangino said. He urged collaboration between local and state law enforcement across all jurisdictions to assess any potential links between the cases. “You can initially see if there are any similarities between these deaths… Were these homicides? … It could be a suicide, it could be accidental,” he noted.

Brian Higgins, former police chief and adjunct faculty at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, added that at least three of the victims are women. Authorities believe the remains found in Killingly belong to a woman in her 40s to 60s.

The most publicized cases include:

  • Paige Fannon, 35, whose body was found March 6 in the Norwalk River.
  • A human skull found the same day in Plymouth by a man searching for deer antlers.
  • An unidentified woman found near a cemetery in Groton.
  • Denise Leary, 59, a mother of two, found March 8 in New Haven.
  • Michele Romano, 56, whose body was found March 26 in the woods of Foster.
  • Additional bodies discovered April 9 in Killingly and April 10 in Framingham.

Romano’s family has publicly rejected claims of a serial killer connection in her case, expressing confidence in local law enforcement and a private investigator.

Still, online speculation has grown rapidly. A Facebook group titled “New England Serial Killer” has amassed over 55,000 members since April 15, reflecting widespread public concern.

While law enforcement has not confirmed any criminal pattern, the unusual number of deaths in such a short span is now drawing national attention and prompting renewed calls for coordinated investigations.