Prince Andrew is reportedly seeking a dual-property arrangement as a condition to vacate Royal Lodge, his 30-room Windsor residence. The proposal involves taking over both Frogmore Cottage—formerly occupied by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle—and Adelaide Cottage, expected to be vacated by Prince William and Princess Kate. Andrew’s lease on Royal Lodge extends until 2078, complicating the royal household’s efforts to downsize his living arrangements.
According to reports, Andrew has resisted King Charles III’s push for him to relocate, citing both legal standing and personal preference. While he has expressed openness to negotiating an exit, his demand for two high-profile properties has drawn scrutiny from royal analysts, who say it reflects a disconnect between public expectations and royal privilege.
Observers suggest the dispute highlights broader institutional tensions. The monarchy continues to face calls for greater transparency and modernity, particularly in light of recent controversies involving royal finances, property use, and individual accountability. Andrew’s position—requesting two additional homes in exchange for leaving one—has amplified ongoing debates about entitlement, responsibility, and the balance between tradition and reform.
The final decision regarding Prince Andrew’s living arrangements may signal the monarchy’s broader direction. Whether the royal institution grants his requests or enforces a more austere solution will reflect how it navigates legacy, public perception, and the evolving standards of leadership in the 21st century.
