Home Blog Page 3578

NIH Director Does Not ‘Understand’ DeSantis Refusing to Mandate Masks on Children

Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), said he does not “understand” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’s (R) refusal to force children to wear masks in school, contending mask mandates are “not quite the huge challenge [or] burden that sometimes it’s being portrayed.”

Collins made the remark during a Sunday appearance on CNN, where he explained he did not “understand” DeSantis’s recent order protecting parental decisions about masks.

“This seems like something local officials ought to be able to decide based on their community’s circumstance,” Collins said, adding, “Being asked to wear a mask is perhaps not quite the huge challenge [or] burden that sometimes it’s being portrayed.”

“Kids are pretty adaptable,” he added.

Last week, Gov. Desantis signed an executive order directing the Florida Department of Education and Department of Health to issue emergency rules to protect parental rights in determining whether their children will wear masks in school.

“We think that that’s the most fair way to do it,” he said during a press conference in Cape Coral, explaining that he and his wife are not going to put masks on their young children.

“My wife and I are not gonna do the masks with the kids. We never have. I want to see my kids smiling. I want them having fun. Look, my kids are a little younger, but I can tell you, whatever you think of masks, you gotta wear it properly,” he said.

“My kids ain’t gonna wear that thing properly. We know that,” he continued, acknowledging that some parents may feel differently and should have the option to make that determination:

If a parent really feels that this is something that’s important for their kid, we’re not stopping that. They absolutely have every right to equip their student with whatever types of masks that they want and have them go school if they believe that that’s a protection that’s important for their children. I think that’s the fairest way to do it: to let the parents have the decision. It would not be fair if we told parents who want the kids to wear masks they weren’t allowed to do it. But it’s certainly not fair to force parents who don’t believe the masks are good for their kids to force them to have to send their kids in masks.

DeSantis’s executive action followed his vow last month that his administration will not mandate schools to require children to wear masks.

“There’s been talk about, potentially, people advocating at the federal level imposing compulsory masks on kids. We’re not doing that in Florida, okay?” he said during a press conference at Indian River State College in Fort Pierce, Florida, last month.“We want kids to be able to be kids,” he explained. “We need them to be able to breathe. It’s terribly uncomfortable for them to do it. There’s not very much science behind it.”“At the end of the day, we got to start putting our kids first. We got to look out for their education. Is it really comfortable, is it really healthy, for them to be muzzled and have their breathing obstructed all day in school? I don’t think it is,” DeSantis said, emphasizing it is “totally unacceptable and certainly unacceptable to have any level of government imposing that [mask mandates] on parents and on kids.”The debate follows the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) effectively altering its previous guidance on masking in school. While the federal health agency originally recommended masking for the unvaccinated, it now recommends everyone to mask up “including teachers, staff, students, and visitors, regardless of vaccination status.”

Congressional Report Questions “Unusual” Activity At Wuhan Lab Involving “Air Disinfection, Hazardous Waste Systems”

The lab looked into renovating key safety systems just two years after becoming operational, but it is unclear if any work was carried out.

A new Congressional report into the origins of COVID-19 points to “unusual” activity at the Wuhan National Biosafety Lab involving air disinfection and hazardous waste systems, prior to the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic.

The report by Republicans on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, obtained by Fox News, highlights how the lab in Wuhan requested bids for ‘major renovations’ to air safety and waste treatment systems in the facilities, just two years after they became operational.

The report notes that “Such a significant renovation so soon after the facility began operation appears unusual,” and that it “raise[s] questions about how well these systems were functioning in the months prior to the outbreak of COVID-19.” 

The report notes that it is unknown if any renovation work was ever carried out.

The findings will be presented in Congress this week where the Republicans will make the case that “the preponderance of evidence suggests SARS-CoV-2 was accidentally released from a Wuhan Institute of Virology laboratory.” 

Republicans will also present further evidence that the virus was genetically manipulated in the lab, according to the report.

The Republicans have built a case around a timeline that indicates the virus escaped the lab “sometime prior to September 12, 2019.” 

At this time there is a record of activity such as the WIV’s viral sequence database disappearing from the internet, and the institute ramping up security. 

The report notes that after lab workers became sick in November 2019 Major General Chen Wei, an expert in biology and chemical weapon defenses, took control of the Wuhan Institute’s biosafety level-4 lab.

The report suggests that this shows the Communist government “was concerned about the activity happening there as news of the virus was spreading.”

“If she took control in 2019, it would mean the CCP knew about the virus earlier, and that the outbreak began earlier,” the report states.

Spirit Airlines blames weather, ‘operational challenges’ for hundreds of flight delays, cancellations

According to FlightAware, Spirit has cancelled a total of 389 flights and delayed a total of 399 flights since Sunday.

Spirit Airlines says it is working “around the clock” to accommodate passengers impacted by travel disruptions at several of its hubs over the weekend.

TickerSecurityLastChangeChange %
SAVESPIRIT AIRLINES INC.26.81-0.17-0.63%

According to FlightAware, the airline has cancelled a total of 389 flights and delayed a total of 399 flights since Sunday as of the time of publication. A Spirit representative told FOX Business on Monday the cancellations and delays were due to “a series of weather and operational challenges.” 

“We needed to make proactive cancellations to some flights across the network, but the majority of flights are still scheduled as planned,” Spirit said in a statement. “We understand how frustrating it is for our Guests when plans change unexpectedly, and we’re working to find solutions. We ask Guests to actively monitor their emails and flight status before heading to the airport.”

Spirit passengers at Orlando International Airport told Click Orlando they waited in line for up to 12 hours to speak to a Spirit Airlines representative to reschedule after 33 flights have been cancelled since Sunday. 

Meanwhile, WPLG and PHL 17 have reported similar cancellations at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, Philadelphia International Airport and Atlantic City Airport. While passengers at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport reportedly claimed the cancellations were due to a pilot strike, both the Air Line Pilots Association and Spirit told FOX Business those reports are inaccurate. 

Spirit Airlines’ issues mirror those experienced by competitors American Airlines and Southwest Airlines over the summer. 

TickerSecurityLastChangeChange %
AALAMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC.20.06-0.32-1.57%
LUVSOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.49.70-0.86-1.70%

Executives at Southwest recently pledged on the company’s latest earnings call that it would work to “do better” moving forward, noting it will offer employees “premium pay” to work on days off and ramp up hiring in its large cities to help combat its operational challenges.

As for American, the airline says it has hired nearly 3,500 new team members in 2021 and plans to hire 350 new pilots by the end of the year and more than 1,000 pilots and 800 flight attendants in 2022.

No Mask? No School for You!

No mask? No school for you. Or no in-person school, that is. My mind is conjuring images of that classic Seinfeld episode called “The Soup Nazi,” where a small take-out restaurant owner made the most delicious soup in all of Manhattan. The catch? If customers did not follow his rules and ordering guidelines, he snatched their soup in a single swoop and boldly proclaimed, “No soup for you!” This same analogy is playing out in our K-12 public schools for students who do not choose to follow the mask guidelines. Unlike a television sitcom, however, this is no laughing matter.

Let’s begin by meeting the first character in our cast: Assembly Bill (AB) 130, signed by Governor Newsom on July 9, 2021. AB 130 makes significant changes to independent study. The term “independent study” is misleading, as the requirement is really for districts to offer distance or virtual learning, such as students Zooming in from home with their assigned teacher. Prior to AB 130, school districts were generally not required to offer independent study, but now it is mandatory.

Next, we meet the California Department of Public Health (CDHP). On July 12, 2021, the CDHP released a memo called “COVID-19 Public Health Guidance for K-12 Schools in California, 2021-22 School Year.” According to their guidance, “schools must develop and implement local protocols to enforce the mask requirements. Additionally, schools should offer alternative educational opportunities for students who are excluded from campus because they will not wear a face covering. Note: Public schools should be aware of the requirements in AB 130 to offer independent study programs for the 2021-22 school year.”

A third character now joins the scene: the California School Board Association (CSBA). On July 20, 2021, the CSBA made a statement on masking and independent study. As voiced by the CSBA, “under AB 130, if students are placed in independent study because they did not want to wear a mask in school, and subsequently fail to meet the attendance or engagement standards, the law requires that they return to in-person instruction, even though these students were barred from the classroom for their refusal to wear masks in the first place.”

The CSBA also provided the following infographic to further illustrate their concerns as which they described as, “Come to school unmasked —> Go to independent study —> Don’t ‘engage’ enough in independent study —> Go back to school unmasked —> Go back to independent study for not wearing a mask.”

What characters are missing from this narrative? Students. And parents. Students cannot attend school if they do not wear a mask and therefore must participate in independent study, which would be more appropriately renamed as virtual or distance learning. Then, if students are not engaged in independent study, they are sent back to in-person learning, only to then return to independent study – once again – for not wearing a mask. Other than independent study, the only other option for unmasked students is to attend school outside (while on campus), since masks are not required outdoors. This option, however, would be dependent on school districts offering fully outdoor classrooms.

What a nightmare. This does not sound like a sitcom at all… more like a psychological thriller, without the thrill. Although AB 130 certainly does have us poised on the edge of our seats, or on our knees, praying for our nation’s children.

Biden Administration Defies Federal Ruling, Processes DACA Applications

Last month, a federal judge in Texas ruled that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA), which granted pseudo amnesty for illegal immigrants under the age of 30 who were brought to the United States as minors, was illegal, and halted the program. The Biden administration vowed to fight the ruling, but, according to a report from The Washington Times, Joe Biden’s Department of Homeland Security approved at least nine DACA applications and advanced dozens more—a direct violation of the judge’s ruling.

The acting director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Tracy Renaud, claims the actions on the applications were the result of human error. All of them took place in the early days after the ruling.

“USCIS believes that the technological and systematic solutions described … will provide a stopgap to prevent the issuance of new initial DACA grants,” Renaud told Judge Hanen, who ruled that DACA had been created illegally.

DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas was the USCIS Director at the time DACA was created and oversaw its implementation.

Rosemary Jenks, the vice president of NumbersUSA, doesn’t buy the human error explanation.

“Both Secretary Mayorkas and acting Director Renaud are responsible for ensuring that every employee is in compliance with legal rulings. Their failure to do so is not surprising considering their willingness to also ignore laws enacted by Congress,” Jenks said.

Robert Law, the former chief of the office of policy and strategy at USCIS in the Trump administration, also seems suspicious of the “human error” excuse because the breaches only benefited illegal immigrants.

“The errors only go one direction and reflect a culture of the political leadership to have adjudicators rush to ‘Yes’ on all applications and petitions,” Law said.

The Washington Times reports that USCIS could face more scrutiny from Judge Hanen.

California May Require Public Colleges to Provide Free… Men’s Menstrual Products?

Men’s menstrual products aren’t even a thing, but that isn’t stopping one California assemblycritter from requiring that the state’s public colleges provide them for free.

Cristina Garcia, who represents California’s 58th district, is the author of AB-367, which states that “access to menstrual products is a basic human right and is vital for ensuring the health, dignity, and full participation of all Californians in public life.”

If my own history as a freshman at the University of Missouri many years ago is anything to go by, male California students won’t be doing anything involving health or dignity with the free tampons they find in the men’s rooms.

Garcia’s bill goes on (and on):

California has an interest in promoting gender equity, not only for women and girls, but also for transgender men, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming people who may also menstruate and experience inequities resulting from lack of access to menstrual products.

The scientific fact that non-biological women don’t menstruate and have no need for menstrual products is no reason they shouldn’t be indulged in the feelz that they have the right to menstruate, and thus to menstrual products.

At taxpayer expense, of course.

According to Campus Reform, projections “put the implementation cost at at least $750,000.”

AB-367 seems to be a spinoff of UC-Davis senior Audin Leung’s “Free the Period” organization. According to the Santa Cruz Sentinel, Leung has spent her (are we being presumptuous?) “entire college career” championing “free period products throughout campuses.”

UC-Davis used to give out more homework.

“It’s really a question about gender equity and basic human dignity,” said Jason Chen, a freshman at Stanford University and chair of the Empowerment Collective, a California student group lobbying around policies that affect young people. “As a non-menstruating individual, I don’t have to worry about where my toilet paper is going to be or if I’m going to have access to toilet paper when I’m in the bathroom.”

I’ll concede there might be some merit — setting aside the cringy pretense of describing himself as a “non-menstruating individual” — to Chen’s argument in favor of putting free menstrual products in the ladies’ rooms.

But men’s menstrual products?

AB-367 isn’t about providing an inexpensive necessity to women who might have gotten caught unawares. Garcia’s bill is about using taxpayer money to comfort the delusions of a very few who believe that they might somehow, all biology aside, magically get a period this month.

Because science.

Not for the first time, either.

In 2017, Garcia authored the similar AB-10, “relating to feminine hygiene products” on public college campuses. AB-10 was rejected for budgetary reasons, but now that California is awash in COVID relief funds and lockdown-related Big Tech profits, who knows what permanent new “free” benefit the Assembly might agree to fund.

Lindsey Graham Announces He Has COVID-19 ‘Breakthrough’ Infection

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) announced on Aug. 2 that he has a “breakthrough” COVID-19 infection, despite being fully vaccinated against the virus.

“I was just informed by the House physician I have tested positive for COVID-19, even after being vaccinated,” he said on Twitter, adding that he will isolate for 10 days.

Graham is the first senator in several months to test positive for COVID-19, the illness caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus. He’s also the first publicly known “breakthrough” case among members of Congress.

Most senators have been vaccinated against the virus.

“I started having flu-like symptoms Saturday night and went to the doctor this morning,” Graham wrote on Twitter. “I feel like I have a sinus infection and at present time I have mild symptoms.”

The senator also praised the vaccine and claimed that if he hadn’t received it, his symptoms would likely be worse, echoing claims made by federal health officials in recent weeks.

According to reporters in Washington, Graham was spotted briefly at the Capitol building on Aug. 2 and spoke with members of the press.

At 66 years old, Graham is considered to be at increased risk of developing serious COVID-19 symptoms, as more than 80 percent of all deaths attributed to the virus have involved individuals over the age of 65, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In recent months, as the vaccine was being rolled out nationwide, federal and state officials called on older Americans to be vaccinated.

Graham was inoculated in December of last year and posted pictures of his vaccination on Twitter.

“If enough of us take it, we will get back to normal lives,” Graham said at the time. “Help is on the way.”

Graham also rejected claims made earlier this year by colleague Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who has said that vaccines are unnecessary for individuals who have contracted and recovered from COVID-19. Paul announced that he won’t get vaccinated because he has already contracted and recovered from the virus, meaning he has enough antibodies to stave off a potential future infection.

A recent study found that individuals who recovered from the virus have a broad and robust immunity to it. That study, commissioned by Emory University, found that most of the patients who recovered from the CCP virus mounted a strong and wide-ranging immune response for at least the 250-day duration of the study.

On Aug. 2, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Biden administration officials “do certainly hope that Senator Graham has a speedy recovery and experiences mild symptoms, and we wish him the best of health with that.”

Border Patrol not testing migrants for COVID before they’re released across US

Migrants who illegally come across the U.S.-Mexico border and are apprehended by Border Patrol are not being tested for the coronavirus before being released from custody and allowed to travel across the United States, the Washington Examiner has learned.

“They aren’t tested at encounter. [Unaccompanied children] and family units are moved out of custody quickly. If they are infected and do not have obvious symptoms, they are sent out,” a senior Customs and Border Protection official told the Washington Examineron Monday. The official is not a union member and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Migrant families and children are “only tested once we turn them over or unless symptomatic,” the official added.

Chris Cabrera, National Border Patrol Council spokesman, said in an email Monday that the “majority of people in Border Patrol custody are not tested.”

“If an individual shows signs or symptoms of COVID-19 they will be sent for testing,” Cabrera wrote in an email. “If an individual has any type of medical emergency and is transported to the hospital for treatment, the hospital will test them as a precaution.”

It is unknown how many people were given coronavirus tests or how many had the virus when they were released. Neither person would provide an estimate calculation.

However, since February, more than 280,000 children and parents have been encountered at the southern border, according to federal data. At least 120,000 people have been released into the U.S. 

The official added that there is no Department of Homeland Security policy that requires the government to test the hundreds of thousands of people Border Patrol agents have taken into custody since the start of the Biden administration in January. 

The DHS did not deny that it does not have a policy that requires migrants to be tested by Border Patrol.

“If anyone exhibits signs of illness in CBP custody, they are referred to local health systems for appropriate testing, diagnosis, and treatment,” DHS wrote in an email. “CBP facilitates testing upon transfer or release of persons from CBP custody by coordinating with local, governmental, and non-governmental entities as appropriate.”

Local officials in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas, where more migrants attempt to get across than any other part of the 2,000-mile border, began speaking out last week, alleging that the Border Patrol was taking people into custody and then letting them go without first checking them if they have the coronavirus.

“Faced with multiple reports that migrants are being released in Hidalgo County infected with COVID-19, I am calling on federal immigration officials to stop releasing these migrants into our communities,” Hidalgo County Judge Richard Cortez said in a plea for Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to stop the releases.

The GOP Doctors Caucus wrote DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on Friday, asking if department employees were administering coronavirus tests at the border.

Cabrera told Fox News Live that “not everyone we encounter we test, only those that exhibit some type of symptoms and not everybody has symptoms that has it.”

“We’re releasing people out of the door day in and day out with actual positive tests for COVID, and more keep popping up,” Cabrera said.

In an incident that made national headlines last week, a migrant family was observed eating at a fast-food restaurant in La Joya, Texas, after one member had tested positive and been released. Rather than taking the family in at Catholic Charities’ humanitarian respite center in McAllen after the Border Patrol released them from custody, the organization put up the family in a nearby hotel. 

The incident exposed how the Biden administration has allowed migrants to be released but is still refusing travelers from overseas and will not allow noncitizens to come across the border from Canada or Mexico.

The CBP official said agents are increasingly getting sick and testing positive for the coronavirus as a result of being exposed as more people cross the border in recent weeks.

Eighty-seven Border Patrol agents who work in the Rio Grande Valley and neighboring Laredo region have tested positive for the coronavirus as the U.S. faces a new wave of the virus following the introduction of the delta variant from India.

“The DHS Secretary must prioritize the health and safety of border agents and border communities to help them through this public health emergency,” Rep. Henry Cuellar, a Texas Democrat, said last week. “Our border patrol agents have been thanklessly serving our southern border and processing immigrants, despite the dangers from the virus.”

Mexican President Rejects Child Vaccine Use And ‘Booster Shots,’ Says He ‘Won’t Be Held Hostage’ By Big Pharma

“We need to be careful because, as it’s obvious, pharmaceutical companies wish to make a profit, and would like to keep always selling vaccines for everyone.”

Mexican President Andres Manuel López Obrador has rejected efforts to use controversial COVID vaccines on small children, and also raised skepticism about the corporate media and Big Pharma’s push for “booster shots” extending years into the future. Mexican Health Secretary Hugo Lopez-Gatell Ramirez also slammed Big Pharma’s push for more COVID vaccines.

“We need to be careful because, as it’s obvious, pharmaceutical companies wish to make a profit,” Obrador said this week, “and would like to keep always selling vaccines for everyone. But we need to prioritize, we need to know if they’re needed or not. (We need to) not be subordinated to Big Pharma dictating us: ‘We need a 3rd dose, we need a fourth, we need to vaccinate children.’”

“There’s a powerful public opinion campaign induced by Big Pharma. If one explores the national and international press, and traces recommendations like these, one can perceive an important lack of scientific information to support these kinds of recommendations,” Ramirez stated. “And by contrast there are statements by Big Pharma executives that already take it for granted.”

As National File previously reported, Obrador has previously spoken out against lockdowns and mask mandates:

Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador has described coronavirus lockdowns as “dictatorship” during a recent press conference with reporters. He described such lockdown measures as “fashionable among authorities … who want to show they are heavy handed, dictatorship”, according a report by the Associated Press.

He went on to claim that the advocates of such measures have “authoritarian instincts” and do not respect the freedom of the Mexican people.“A lot of them are letting their authoritarian instincts show,” he stated. “The fundamental thing is to guarantee liberty.”

López Obrador has strongly resisted efforts to introduce lockdowns and curfews in Mexico, despite the popularity of such measures in other Latin American countries. However, just as in the United States and Brazil, many state and local officials have defied the President and introduced various restrictions at lower levels of government.

Child vaccination supporters on Twitter were outraged by the Mexican president’s comments this week.

Sarah Palin Floats Big 2022 Possibility That Has Sen. Murkowski on Notice

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin hinted at a potential Senate bid in the 2022 midterm elections to challenge Sen. Lisa Murkowski, the Alaska Republican who was one of a handful of GOP senators who voted to impeach former President Donald Trump after he left office.

Palin told New Apostolic Reformation leader Ché Ahn on July 22 that she would run to become a senator for Alaska “[i]f God wants me to do it,” according to footage shared by Right Wing Watch, a website of the liberal-left People for the American Way.

“I would say you guys better be there for me this time, because a lot of people were not there for me last time,” Palin told her audience, referring to her failed stint running for vice president when John McCain was running for president in 2008.

In her interview with Ahn on stage, Palin said “America was dedicated to God,” and that its “charters of liberty are written about and to God.”

The former governor cautioned against what she believed was a “rapid shift to the left” that would, she said, lead to the nation’s destruction.

“How dare we strip from our Creator what our Founders had dedicated to him?” she said. “How dare you try to take that back and change it for mankind, for some kind of secular use, secular enjoyment?”

After Palin finished her interview, as the video shows, Christian leader Cindy Jacobs prayed over her, saying, “But the Lord says, ‘Daughter, I am raising up an army of intercessors, and I am raising up an army of pastors and leaders that are coming around you.’

“And the Lord said, ‘When I have you take the big steps, the biggest steps,’ the Lord said, ‘You’re going to see a wave of the Holy Spirit hit, and it’s gonna hit the church.’ And the Lord says, ‘When this revival comes to this nation, and as it is coming, now, it will come with a reformation,’” Jacobs prayed.

If she does seek a Senate term, Murchowski wouldn’t be Palin’s only formidable challenge.

Palin would be taking on Kelly Tshibaka, the former Alaska commissioner for administration who announced in March that she will run against Murkowski.

Tshibaka has already won Trump’s “complete and total” endorsement.

The former president, according to Fox News, issued a statement in June expressing his support for Tshibaka.

“Lisa Murkowski is bad for Alaska,” Trump said in the statement.

“Murkowski has got to go! Kelly Tshibaka is the candidate who can beat Murkowski—and she will. Kelly is a fighter who stands for Alaska values and America First.  She is MAGA all the way, pro-energy, strong on the Border, tough on Crime and totally supports our Military and our great Vets.

“Kelly is a powerful supporter of the Second Amendment and JOBS! I look forward to campaigning in Alaska for Kelly Tshibaka. She has my Complete and Total Endorsement!”

In order to become the next senator representing the state, the candidates must first make it through the nonpartisan blanket primary.

Four candidates who get the most votes in the primary will advance to the next stage, which is the general election, where voters will choose their preferred candidates through a ranked-choice voting system that’s starting next year.