Home Blog Page 3542

Is America Headed For Tea Party 2.0?

The American people are normally a pretty flexible bunch. We have grown a pretty high tolerance level for things the government does that we don’t like – some would argue we are far too tolerant.

We mumble and grumble about it, but we work around whatever it is and live our lives.

The right had never seen a true mass protest or resistance movement, at least since the 18th Century.

Then came Barack Obama. We have all tolerated presidents we didn’t agree with, and Obama would be no different, right?

But after Bush – followed by Obama – went wild with trillion-dollar bailout schemes for Wall Street, that changed.

And the threat of a government takeover of healthcare from Obama and company pushed things over the edge.

The Rallying Cry Goes Out

In February of 2009, CNBC commentator Rick Santelli stood on the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, and began to explain how this bailouts would “subsidize the losers’” mortgages. 

He called for a “Chicago Tea Party” to protest the federal government interfering in the housing market. And a movement was born.

After the financial meltdown of 2008, Americans watched as giant financial firms were bailed out and deemed “too big to fail.”

Many of us who would be footing the bill – taxpayers – had had enough. On April 15, 2009, Tea Party rallies were held all over the country. People were tired of government intervention where there clearly was no allowance in the Constitution for it.

The movement grew to include the impending proposal of government health care, otherwise known as Obamacare. Barack Obama’s showcase piece of his presidency, conservative Americans felt, was a massive intrusion into their private medical care.

He called for a “Chicago Tea Party” to protest the federal government interfering in the housing market. And a movement was born.

After the financial meltdown of 2008, Americans watched as giant financial firms were bailed out and deemed “too big to fail.”

Many of us who would be footing the bill – taxpayers – had had enough. On April 15, 2009, Tea Party rallies were held all over the country. People were tired of government intervention where there clearly was no allowance in the Constitution for it.

The movement grew to include the impending proposal of government health care, otherwise known as Obamacare. Barack Obama’s showcase piece of his presidency, conservative Americans felt, was a massive intrusion into their private medical care.

Issues Spark Movements

The Tea Party was borne of these two major issues.

Millions of people, most of whom had never been involved in politics or even saw themselves as “political people” now realized they had to become involved and speak up abut the direction of the country.

As the 2010 midterm elections approached, the Tea Party had their own candidates, people running for office who identified as Tea Party members. The Tea Party also spawned a lot of other things as well.

Conservative websites and radio shows sprung up to further the conservative cause. And the conservative cause was pretty simple to understand: more freedom and less government.

Now, in the midst of a world wide pandemic (for which we still don’t know the cause), the government is attempting to sneak into every facet of Americans’ lives once again.

Under the guise of “public safety,” people are beginning to be coerced into getting the COVID vaccine. 

Those who wish to exercise their freedom to chose their medical care are essentially being told they will be second class citizens if they do not comply. People who just want their children to be educated are now being told they have to force their kindergartner to wear a mask for eight hours a day. 

But it doesn’t stop there. Local school boards are ignoring the wishes of parents, and introducing critical race theory into their curriculum.

After 50 years plus of striving to achieve Dr. King’s dream of all Americans being judged by the content of their character and not the color of their skin, white children are being told that from the time they enter the world, they are the “oppressor.”

Black, Hispanic, and Asian children are being taught that no matter how hard they work, no matter how smart they are, no matter how much success they achieve, they will always be victims.

Why? The color of their skin. 

The Pushback

There are lots of parallels to what is going on in the country now and the causes of the Tea Party’s birth.

The left of course, tried to blow it off as best they could. It was ‘planned,’ it was just a bunch of racist, sexist, bigoted homophobes all getting together to drag their knuckles around, and it certainly wasn’t the completely organic movement it was. 

The same thing is bubbling up now. Parents want to make medical decisions for themselves and their children. They do not want their children taught that they are cryptofascists based on the amount of melanin in their skin.

It is a matter of time before these gatherings move from the school board meeting to the town hall meeting with their Congressmen and Senators. At that point, does it go one step further, and there are rallies and more candidates who identify with this group of people, no matter if they call themselves the Tea Party or something else?

With any luck, conservatives and Republicans are waking and realizing that this is the time for action. This is the time to stand up and speak out, no matter how many times you are censored on social media.

In St. Louis, the first Tea Party gathering was on a cold February morning. About 100 or so people stood on the banks of the Mississippi and threw tea bags into the icy water. 

So gather your teabags, and dust off your Gadsden flags. It is time.

Durham Exploring Criminal Charges Against ‘Low-Level’ FBI Officials

The special counsel appointed by former Attorney General William Barr is presenting grand jury evidence and preparing a report on his two-year-long review of the FBI’s investigation into Russian activities in the 2016 election, The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday.

Former U.S. Attorney John Durham, whom Barr officially designated as special counsel last year, is reportedly exploring criminal charges against lower-level FBI officials and tipsters who may have provided false leads to the bureau in the 2016 investigation.

The Journal also reported that Durham had aimed to submit a report on his review to the Justice Department by the end of the summer but that it would likely be delayed.

The Trump administration in 2019 tasked Durham, then the U.S. attorney for the District of Connecticut, with reviewing the FBI’s probe as former President Trump railed against it as a politically motivated “witch hunt” against him.

His review has now lasted longer than the former special counsel Robert Mueller‘s investigation, which led to about three dozen criminal prosecutions against Trump campaign and administration officials and others, many of whom later received pardons.

Durham has so far brought just one prosecution, charging a former FBI attorney with altering an email used in internal discussions over whether to extend surveillance of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. The attorney, Kevin Clinesmith, was sentenced earlier this year to one year of probation.

According to the Journal, Durham’s probe is investigating whether certain tipsters had knowingly provided false information to the FBI, including allegations of links between the Trump Organization and the Russian Alfa Bank, which investigators later found no evidence of.

Durham resigned as U.S. attorney after the Biden administration took office earlier this year, as is customary for politically appointed federal prosecutors, but he was authorized to continue his work as special counsel.

Trump, who is said to have been angry that Durham did not issue any conclusions before he left office, made a pointed swipe at the federal prosecutor earlier this week.

“Does everybody remember when we caught the Democrats, red-handed, SPYING ON MY CAMPAIGN? Where’s Durham?” Trump said in a statement on Monday.

DC Federal Court Upholds Biden’s Eviction Moratorium, But Expects Dim Future for Ban

US Associate Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in June he believed the eviction moratorium could only be legally extended by legislative action, but the Democratic-controlled Congress went into recess without passing such a bill, leaving it up to the White House to keep more than 11 million American renters in their homes.

The nationwide eviction ban put in place by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been allowed to stand by a DC federal court, but only because it was found to be an extension of the previous ban, which the Biden administration had denied.

Judge Dabney Friedrich of the US District Court for the District of Columbia said in a Friday ruling that “the court’s hands are tied” by a previous order issued by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in early June, which barred the eviction moratorium from being preliminarily enjoined.

That ruling barred her from further action because Judge Friedrich argued that the August 3 order is an extension of the previous moratorium, which her court previously vacated in May, and not a new document, as the Biden administration had attempted to argue. While the old order was allowed to expire on July 31, the renewal four days later was more “targeted,” including only areas with “substantial” or “high” rates of community spread of COVID-19.

However, as Judge Friedrich noted in her ruling, that presently includes more than 90% of counties in the United States, due to the exploding numbers of cases driven by the ultra-transmissive Delta variant of the virus. According to CDC data, on Wednesday the seven-day average for daily new cases in the US was 114,190 – the highest it’s been since February 7.

Nonetheless, the basis of her May order vacating the moratorium was based on the CDC having insufficient statutory authority to order such a ban, even if in the interests of slowing community spread of COVID-19, as the CDC claimed.

“The same issue presented a second time in the same case in the same court should lead to the same result,” she noted, expressing her doubts that the Biden administration could find sufficient legal basis to avoid a repeat of the June 29 ruling by the US Supreme Court, which upheld the May strike-down.

The plaintiffs, a group of Georgia and Alabama landlords, are expected to appeal the decision.

The social lockdowns adopted early in the COVID-19 pandemic successfully blunted the virus’ spread, but they also brought economic chaos as capitalist economies around the globe struggled under the weight of sudden massive interruptions of manufacturing and commerce, throwing millions into unemployment. Facing a wave of evictions, the federal government and many US state governments imposed bans on evicting tenants who’d fallen behind on their rent, which at its height protected nearly 40 million Americans, according to the Aspen Institute.

While the reopening of the economy in the spring of 2021 created millions of new jobs and put many people back to work, millions more than before the pandemic are on unemployment and a similar number of people remain several months behind on rent to the winter of 2020-2021, when the outbreak was at its worst in the US and lockdowns the most extensive. An estimated 15 million Americans are still at risk of being evicted if the moratorium is lifted.

The ban’s reinstatement after a four-day lapse is due in large part to a protest outside the US Capitol Building led by Rep. Cori Bush (D-MO), which turned the order’s expiration into an embarrassing public spectacle for the government. While Justice Kavanaugh hinted he would rule against the moratorium in the future unless it was authorized by legislative action, Congress went into its seven-week summer recess on July 29 without having attempted to pass such a bill, with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) insisting only the White House could renew the act.

Another moratorium was also allowed to expire on July 31 that has not been renewed, which protected homeowners with mortgages backed by federal lenders who were behind on their mortgage payments from being foreclosed on. While the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau implemented several mitigating measures to give qualifying homeowners additional time and flexibility to catch up on their payments, there has been no attempt to renew the foreclosure ban.

‘Fact-checking’ site Snopes admits multiple PLAGIARISM cases by its own co-founder and CEO

Snopes bills itself as “the internet’s definitive fact-checking resource” and a beacon of truth against “misinformation.” However, the website’s co-founder has just been caught publishing dozens of plagiarized articles.

David Mikkelson co-founded Snopes in 1994, and the website has become a key player in the online information wars in recent years. Its supporters see it as a bastion of level-headed truth against an onslaught of partisan “misinformation,”while its detractors see it as yet another biased liberal outlet masquerading as a neutral ‘fact-checker’.

However, nobody’s accused the site of outright plagiarism until now. In a statement on Friday, the site acknowledged that between 2014 and 2019, Mikkelson published “more than two dozen” stories lifted from other news sites, under either the pseudonym “Jeff Zarronandia” or the generic “Snopes Staff” byline. The plagiarism was uncovered following a tip by Buzzfeed reporter Dean Sterling Jones.

According to the memo, Mikkelson has now been suspended from editorial duties and labels have been attached to the articles containing plagiarized material. 

In a separate statement, Snopes’ staffers condemned Mikkelson’s plagiarism, lamenting the “poor journalistic standards”he displayed. Mikkelson himself admitted to wrongdoing, explaining the plagiarism as “serious lapses in judgement.” 

However, Mikkelson said that he is proud of the work his site has done combating false information about Covid-19, recent elections, and… “Russian disinformation.”

According to Buzzfeed, Mikkelson ripped off other articles to save time and “speed up traffic” to his site. Beyond the two dozen or so articles initially identified, some 140 articles are now under investigation by Snopes, and more than 50 have been found to contain plagiarized elements.

Furthermore, until he was caught, Mikkelson allegedly advised Snopes staffers to engage in crafty plagiarism of their own. “He would instruct us to copy text from other sites, post them verbatim so that it looked like we were fast and could scoop up traffic, and then change the story in real time,” former managing editor Brooke Binkowski told Buzzfeed. “I hated it and wouldn’t tell any of the staff to do it, but he did it all the time.”

Shady reporting practices are the least of Snopes’ worries right now. The site is currently embroiled in a legal battle over ownership of its parent company, with Mikkelson’s ex-wife having sold her share in the company to a firm that’s now fighting Mikkelson for legal control. Multiple other cases are ongoing, and the incredibly complex legal struggle is currently costing Snopes up to a third of its revenue every year.

Biden sends 3,000 troops BACK into Afghanistan to evacuate Americans with a further 4,000 on standby in Kuwait and 1,000 in Qatar: Taliban captures 12 cities including Kandahar in advance on capital

  • Pentagon is sending troops back into Afghanistan to help evacuate some personnel from the US embassy amid the Taliban’s surging encroachment on the capital city of Kabul 
  • Diplomats are weighing how soon they could have to totally evacuate the US embassy, where some 4,000 are employed
  • The State Department last week warned US citizens to get out of the war-ravaged nation immediately
  • Taliban have now seized control of 12 provincial capitals, two-thirds of the nation
  • On Thursday, Taliban fighters captured the nation’s second-largest city Kandahar and third biggest Herat
  • By Friday, they had stormed and seized Lashkar Gah, the capital of Helmand Province in the south 
  • Taliban fighters are going door-to-door and forcing young women in captured areas into sex slavery and executing Afghan forces who surrender 

The Pentagon is sending 3,000 troops back into Afghanistan to help evacuate personnel from the US embassy amid the Taliban’s surging encroachment on the capital city of Kabul.

Those 3,000 troops, part of three infantry battalions, are in addition to the over 650 US service members still currently stationed in Afghanistan.    

Another 3,500 to 4,000 reserve forces will be stationed in Kuwait on standby, and another 1,000 will go to Qatar to help with Special Immigrant Visa processing. 

The latest move follows furious criticism of the Biden’s administration troop withdrawal that has allowed the Taliban to run rampant across the country and capture 12 provincial capitals in a week. There are also reports the terrorists are executing Afghan troops the US left to fight. 

On Thursday, Taliban fighters had captured Afghanistan’s third largest city, Herat. Hours later, the militant group captured Kandahar, the nation’s second largest city behind Kabul, giving them control of 12 of 34 provincial capitals. 

By Friday the insurgents seized Lashkar Gah, the capital of Helmand Province in the south, with the Afghanistan government rapidly losing control of the country. 

Just three major cities are believed to be under government control, and the terrorists are now in a position to advance on Kabul.

Pentagon press secretary John Kirby said on Thursday: ‘We believe this is it the prudent thing to do given the rapidly deteriorating security situation in and around Kabul.’  

Kirby said the mission is to reduce the civilian personnel presence at the US embassy in Kabul by the end of the month. He said he wouldn’t speculate what the military ‘footprint’ would look like in Afghanistan beyond August 31.  However, he said President Biden’s Aug. 31 deadline to withdraw US forces still stands.

Kirby specified the new deployment was part of a ‘narrowly-focused mission of safeguarding’ but refused to say whether the 3,000 troops would be included in that deadline. 

State Department spokesman Ned Price said the embassy would continue to focus on counterterrorism, furthering peace and security and consular work, especially facilitating Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs) for Afghans who worked to help the US military over the past 20 years. 

He said those who are leaving are ‘those who might be able to perform functions elsewhere in the world’ or who ‘may not be necessary to perform functions.’  

Price refused to classify the clear-out as an ‘evacuation,’ and stressed it’s a withdrawal of civilian personnel. 

Price also stressed that US troops were there strictly to help embassy personnel leave the country safely. ‘This is not about re-engaging in military conflict in Afghanistan.’

At the same time, the United Kingdom is sending 600 troops back to Afghanistan to help British nationals to evacuate the nation.   

‘We are in no way abandoning the people of Afghanistan. Far from it. We are going to continue doing everything we can,’ he added, when asked what kind of message the Taliban should take from the withdrawal. 

Still, with the US drawdown, Afghan interpreters for the US are terrified they may never get their chance to flee as the Taliban put a target on their backs. 

James Miervaldis, board chairman of No One Left Behind,  a non-profit that works to relocate foreign interpreters for the US, said the organization was disheartened by the escalating situation but had secured a $500,000 private grant to fly as many families out of Afghanistan as they can commercially. 

‘We have been trying to avoid this outcome in Afghanistan for eight years – through three presidential administrations, seven congresses, seven secretaries of defense, and five secretaries of state… yet here we are. No One Left Behind and patriotic private citizens will fly out as many SIV recipients as possible. We will keep our moral obligation to our allies.   

Earlier, it was reported American negotiators were seeking assurances from the Taliban that the militant group will not go after the US embassy if they overtake Kabul. 

The effort, led by Zalmay Khalilzad, the chief American envoy in negotiations with the Taliban, seeks to avoid an evacuation of the embassy’s nearly 4,000 employees, including, 1,400 Americans, two US officials told the New York Times. 

Khalilzad is working to convince the Taliban the embassy must remain open if they hope to ever receive any form of American aid as part of a future Afghan government.  

The State Department last week warned US citizens to get out of the war-ravaged nation immediately. 

Khalilzad arrived in Qatar on Tuesday to warn Taliban officials that their government would not be recognized.  

Pleas to leave the embassy untouched seem to go against the president’s public assurances that he has still has faith Afghan forces can hold on to Kabul. 

Taliban fighters could isolate Afghanistan‘s capital in 30 days and possibly take it over within 90, a U.S. defense official told Reuters citing intelligence reports as the resurgent militants made more advances across the country. 

‘But it is not a foregone conclusion,’ the official said, adding that Afghan Security Forces could reverse course by surging their resistance. 

‘They’ve got to fight for themselves, fight for their nation. The United States will insist to continue the commitments … they’ve got to want to fight. I think there’s still a possibility,’ Biden said on Monday of the Afghan military.  

‘I do not regret my decision’ to withdraw, the president continued. 

The Biden administration has faced intensifying pressure as swelling Taliban advances draw more public condemnations of the decision to withdraw. 

‘All of this is a result of President Biden believing he knows more than his military advisors. President Biden apparently learned nothing from Iraq. When it comes to Afghanistan, the worst is yet to come.’ Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., wrote on Twitter Thursday.

‘A vacuum is being created in Afghanistan for the reemergence of ISIS and al-Qaeda who will attack U.S. interests. America is perceived as an unreliable ally throughout the world. Russia, Iran, and China will become stronger in the region,’ he continued.

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said in a statement Biden is ‘completely detached from reality.’ 

‘Instead of devising and implementing a strategy to responsibly withdraw our troops and ensure that Aghanistan never again becomes a safe harbor for terrorists, President Biden set an entirely arbitrary deadline.’

‘Because of the president’s disastrous decision, security within Afghanistan has collapsed to the point where the Department of State is evacuating embassy  personnel from the country and the Department of Defense is deploying some 3,000 troops to assist in the evacuation process. We are now seeing the world’s most powerful country pleading with Taliban terrorists not to attack American citizens or murder the Afghans who had worked toward a free and democratic future.’ 

Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., a notorious hawk who has long been opposed to leaving Afghanistan, called the withdrawal an ‘unconditional surrender.’

‘America’s enemies know that the slogan “ending endless war” actually means unconditional surrender. That is what we are seeing in Afghanistan today. American weakness is dangerously provocative,’ Cheney wrote on Twitter. 

U.S. warplanes have launched strikes in support of government troops in recent days but the Pentagon has yet to say whether they will continue to offer air support once Biden’s withdrawal deadline has passed.  

The recent onslaught represents a stunning collapse of Afghan forces and renews questions about where the over $830 billion spent by the US Defense Department on fighting, training those troops, and reconstruction efforts went – especially as Taliban fighters ride on American-made Humvees and pickup trucks with M-16s slung across their shoulders. 

The insurgents have no air force and are outnumbered by U.S.-trained Afghan defense forces, but they have captured territory with stunning speed. The Taliban wants to defeat the U.S-backed government and reimpose strict Islamic law.  

In just the latest warning of atrocities being perpetrated by jihadist fighters in areas they have seized, the US now claims that Taliban fighters are executing Afghan troops who surrender. 

‘We’re hearing additional reports of Taliban executions of surrendering Afghan troops,’ the US embassy in Kabul tweeted on Thursday. ‘Deeply disturbing & could constitute war crimes.’  

Taliban fighters are also going door-to-door and forcibly marrying girls as young as 12 and forcing them into sex slavery as they seize vast swathes of the Afghanistan from government forces. 

Jihadist commanders have ordered imams in areas they have captured to bring them lists of unmarried women aged from 12 to 45  for their soldiers to marry because they view them as ‘qhanimat’ or ‘spoils of war’ – to be divided up among the victors.

Fighters have then been going door-to-door to claim their ‘prizes’, even looking through the wardrobes of families to establish the ages of girls before forcing them into a life of sexual servitude. 

Meanwhile, White House press secretary Jen Psaki came under fire for her overly-diplomatic attitude toward the brutal militant group. 

‘The Taliban also has to make an assessment about what they want their role to be in the international community,’ she said in an effort to nudge them to the negotiating table. 

In an attempt to stop the bloodletting, Afghan diplomats in Qatar said they had approached the Taliban with a deal today that would see the group included in a national unity government in return for halting the fighting.

But such talks have been stalled for years over Taliban demands to turn the country into an Islamic emirate – and there is little reason to believe they will have softened that stance after their battlefield triumphs. 

“Christian Blogger Provides Reasons To Not Take The COVID Vaccine”

The owner of the “Slow to Write” blog offers two persuasive reasons why it’s not a good idea to get vaccinated. He also posed a question for those supporting vaccine passports or mandatory vaccinations.

Samuel Sey, a Ghanaian Canadian blogger who lives in Brampton, Toronto, said that, since many of them have not been persuaded by their government to receive the COVID vaccine, they are now trying to force it.

Sey wrote on his blog on August 7 that “vaccine passports are the latest form of authoritarian approaches” imposed by their government.

However, he was puzzled by the fact that the majority of Canadians favor mandatory vaccinations.

“Canadian provinces are openly and unashamedly segregating people over the vaccine, and most Canadians support that,” he said.

As an example, he mentioned Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada, who has not only voiced support for Quebec’s vaccine passports but is also contemplating making COVID-19 vaccines obligatory for employees in federally regulated sectors.

“If that happens, some of my relatives and friends would be forced between violating their conscience so they could provide for their families and losing their livelihoods so they could maintain their conscience,” Sey wrote.

In Sey’s assessment, these vaccination passports threaten “freedom of conscience,” which is one of the basic freedoms recognized in the Charter of Freedoms and Rights of Canada.

He also observed that when governments violate people’s rights without the intervention of a significant or organized force, they become more confident in violating more of their citizens’ rights and freedoms.

“That is partly why I am not getting the vaccine. The more our governments and culture attempt to force me to get the vaccine, the more unwilling I am to get it,” he said.

He went on to explain that if he compromised his conscience over vaccination due to societal pressure, he would undoubtedly be susceptible to breaching his conscience on other matters as well.

“I do not want to legitimize authoritarianism,” he continued. “Most of the people I know who’ve gotten the vaccine tell me they did so because they wanted the government to end the restrictions.”

In response, he said that following repressive regimes is not the way to eliminate tyranny. In the same way, he argued that allowing authoritarian leaders to gain even more power is also not a formula for liberty.

“Authoritarians do not relinquish their power after they’ve attained it. There is no such thing as a temporary or circumstantial authoritarian government,” he pointed out.

Apart from his “rejection of coercion,” Sey said that another reason for his refusal to get vaccinated is that he’s not persuaded that the vaccine is his and other people’s healthiest solution.

“COVID-19 isn’t a threat to the overwhelming majority of people,” he maintained. “Essentially 99% of people are unlikely to die from the virus. Why then should it be necessary for 100% of people to get the vaccine?”

Black Canadians like him, according to Sey, are the most adamant about not getting the COVID vaccination in Canada. He criticized governments for their duplicity in presumably mourning the segregation of black people in the past while threatening to disproportionately separate them in the future through vaccination passports.

“Since critical race theorists have convinced our governments that racial disparities prove racial discrimination, shouldn’t they believe vaccine passports are systemically racist?” he proposes.

GOP Rep. Dan Crenshaw Says 2020 Election ‘Absolutely Not’ Stolen

Crenshaw criticized for saying Republicans should not “kid” themselves into believing that President Trump won the 2020 election.

QUICK FACTS:
  • Republican Senate candidate Bobby Piton interrupted Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) on Wednesday at a fundraiser in Cook County, Illinois, according to NBC News.
  • Rep. Crenshaw was telling a crowd of GOP voters that Democrats had not stolen the 2020 presidential election when Piton interjected.
  • Piton told to Crenshaw, “You’re wrong” and went on to say he had “plenty of proof” of voter fraud and that Arizona would soon “flip” back to President Trump.
  • “Don’t kid yourself into believing that’s why we lost. It’s not,” the Texas representative said.
  • Crenshaw is being labeled an “establishment Republican” by conservative media sources like National File for having “little to no respect for conservatives ideas.”
WHAT ELSE PITON SAID:
  • “It is disgusting to hear denials from a sitting do-nothing and intellectually dishonest Congressman in our House of Representatives, Crenshaw, who has done nothing but shill for the democrats and refuse to even see or hear the evidence of fraud,” Piton said in a Facebook post.
  • “Crenshaw is so sanctimonious and cocky and represents one of many intellectually dishonest Congressmen in our party who don’t care about freedom and truth,” he went on to write.
  • “Liberty loving patriots in Texas needs to jump in and primary Crenshaw!”
BACKGROUND:
  • Crenshaw went against most House Republicans when he voted to certify Joe Biden’s electoral votes on the night of the Jan. 6 unrest, even though he did sign onto Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s lawsuit attempting to invalidate the election results in four swing states.
  • National File also notes how Rep. Crenshaw stood by Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney when she called for Trump’s impeachment, and how the congressman suggested that Jesus Christ was a “fictional character.”

NY Supreme Court Sides with Project Veritas in Defamation Suit Against New York Times

Project Veritas will depose the New York Times.

QUICK FACTS:
  • Project Veritas is a nonprofit journalism enterprise and undercover reporting network founded by James O’Keefe in 2011.
  • Project Veritas sued the NY Times for defamation when Times reporters Maggie Astor and Tiffany Hsu described Project Veritas’ reporting as “deceptive,” “false,” and “with no verifiable evidence.”
  • In March, a New York judge rejected the Times’ motion to dismiss the defamation suit.
  • The Times then appealed, asking the Court to issue a stay that would prohibit Project Veritas from deposing the Times until the appeal resolved.
  • But on Thursday, the Court rejected the Times’ appeal, meaning Project Veritas will depose the newspaper.
WHAT ELSE JAMES O’KEEFE SAID:

In an exclusive statement made to Human Events, O’Keefe said the following:

As you know, we sued the Times for claiming our Minnesota ballot harvesting video was “deceptive.” The New York Times attempted to dismiss the case and we won a historic victory when the New York Supreme Court denied the motion, ruling that the terms “deceptive” and “disinformation” apply to the New York Times’ reporters’ actions and claims. The Times appealed and then asked the Court to issue a stay that would effectively prohibit us from deposing the Times until the appeal is resolved – a process that could last up to three years.

The Court today issued a mic drop of an opinion: “Here, having failed to convince the Court that [Project Veritas’] case should be dismissed, [The New York Times] also failed to demonstrate the extraordinary justification required for the imposition of the drastic remedy of a stay pending appeal.” The Court noted that “despite the fact that [the New York Times has] been permitted to file anti-SLAPP motions to dismiss for decades, the [New York Times] here failed to cite any cases in which an unsuccessful moving was granted a stay pending appeal[.]”

Ladies and gentlemen: Let the depositions begin. Stay tuned. We’re about to drop the first New York Times deposition any day.