‘There is little cultural overlap between violent extremists abroad and violent extremists at home,’ says former president.
Former President George W. Bush, the architect of the disastrous decades-long Middle East wars, compared Al-Qaeda to conservative “violent extremists” on the 20th anniversary of 9/11.
Yes, really.
Bush made the shameful remarks during a 9/11 ceremony at the Flight 93 National Memorial in Shanksville, Pennsylvania on Saturday, surrounded by fellow globalist neocons and warmongers like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
“We have seen growing evidence that the dangers to our country can come not only across borders, but from violence that gathers within,” Bush said.
About to blow a gasket. The guy who commenced the most disastrous campaign in the Middle East is suggesting the Biden talking points that the savage terrorists in the Middle East aren’t so different from the so-called white nationalists here. pic.twitter.com/gnVGGDGOJ9
“There is little cultural overlap between violent extremists abroad and violent extremists at home. But there is disdainful pluralism in their disregard for human life, in their determination to defile national symbols,” he said, presumably referring to the January 6 protest.
“They are children of the same foul spirit and it is our continuing duty to confront them,” he added.
Speaking of disregard for human life, Bush’s catastrophic war in Iraq – which was launched based on a “weapons of mass destruction” lie – resulted in the deaths of 4,450 U.S. service members and over 1 million Iraqis.
By contrast, many January 6 protesters – who simply wanted representation regarding the stolen 2020 election – are still languishing in solitary confinement despite committing no violent crime.
Watch Bush’s full remarks:
FULL SPEECH: Former President George W. Bush speaks at the Flight 93 National Memorial in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, on the 20th anniversary on 9/11. pic.twitter.com/mubnNNM2St
The Biden family profits from the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and China’s subsequent acquisition of Afghanistan’s lithium.
QUICK FACTS:
Hunter Biden owns 10% of Chinese state-owned private equity firm Bohai Harvest RST.
Bohai Harvest owns Contemporary Amprex Technology Co. Limited, the world’s largest lithium-ion battery maker.
Days before Biden’s Afghan withdrawal, Contemporary Amprex Technology announced it was soon to raise $9 billion to fund six projects aimed at boosting its production capacity of lithium-ion batteries.
Biden’s withdrawal from Afghanistan left the country’s $3 trillion in lithium reserves to Taliban-friendly China and its state-controlled equity firms like Hunter Biden’s Bohai, which owns the world’s largest lithium-ion battery maker.
TIMELINE:
In 2009, Hunter Biden (son of Joe Biden) and Christopher Heinz (stepson of the former chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, former U.S. Secretary of State, and current U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry) created the international private equity firm Rosemont Seneca Partners (here).
Rosemont Seneca Partners would be officed less than a mile from Kerry’s 23-room Georgetown mansion, and just two miles from both Joe Biden’s then-office in the White House and his residence at the Naval Observatory.
In June 2015, Rosemont Seneca obtained a 20% equity stake in Bohai Harvest RST, a Chinese private equity firm that Hunter Biden had been a board member of since its founding in 2013 until 2019.
Bohai Harvest relies heavily on an international subsidiary of the state-owned Bank of China to finance its investments, according to The Intercept.
Between June 2014 and October 2015, Rosemont Seneca Bohai wired between $10,000 and $150,979 to Hunter Biden for undisclosed purposes. In total, Hunter Biden received $708,302 from Rosemont Seneca Bohai, according to The Daily Caller.
In October 2017, Hunter Biden’s company Skaneateles LLC took 10% (here) of the Bohai stake from Rosemont Seneca, Hunter investing $420,000.
Bohai owns Contemporary Amprex Technology Co. Limited (CATL), the world’s largest lithium-ion battery maker, according to Financial Times. CATL is also a major supplier of batteries to Tesla Inc.’s Shanghai factory, notesThe Wall Street Journal.
Demand for lithium is projected to increase 40-fold above 2020 levels by 2040, according to the Institute for Energy Research (IER).
CATL’s stock skyrocketed between November 2020 and February 2021 (when Joe Biden came to power), and is currently over $500 per share, up from under $200 the same time last year.
Screenshot from yahoo.com taken September 10, 2021
China currently controls the supply chains for most of the production and/or processing of lithium, notes IER.
In May 2021, Biden announced the U.S. will rely on “ally” countries such as China to supply the bulk of the metals needed to build electric vehicles and focus on processing them domestically into battery parts, according to Reuters.
But Afghanistan is the “the Saudi Arabia of lithium” as it is naturally rich in the precious metal essential for electric vehicle batteries and battery storage technologies, like those produced by CATL.
In early August 2021, Biden signed an executive order to make half of all new vehicle sales by 2030 zero emissions vehicles (here).
President Biden Announces Steps to Drive American Leadership Forward on Clean Cars and Trucks. Target of 50% Electric Vehicle Sales Share in 2030 as part of Build Back Better Agenda &the move forward to Advance Smart Fuel Efficiency and Emission Standards. https://t.co/M79a5sqKQ3
Days before Biden’s botched mid-August withdrawal from Afghanistan, CATL said it was planning a private share placement to raise up to 58.2 billion yuan ($8.98 billion) to fund six projects aimed at boosting its production capacity of lithium-ion batteries, according to Reuters.
Biden’s administration disastrously withdrew U.S. troops from Afghanistan in mid-August 2021.
Only days after the U.S. military withdrew from Afghanistan, the Taliban took control of major cities and installed themselves in the presidential palace in Kabul.
The Biden admin. left billions of dollars worth of U.S. weaponry to be seized by the Taliban.
In early September 2021, the Taliban announced a partnership with China, namely that China will be their “main partner” in helping rebuild Afghanistan. The Taliban have an interest in China’s Belt and Road Initiative and see it as a revival of the ancient Silk Road, according to The Post Millennial.
President Biden on Thursday laid out a plan to boost vaccination numbers that includes vaccine mandates for all federal contractors, healthcare workers and businesses with more than 100 employees — who face thousands in fines if they don’t comply.
In his most forceful move yet, President Biden on Thursday ordered sweeping new federal COVID vaccine requirements for as many as 100 million Americans — including private sector employees, healthcare workers and federal contractors — threatening thousands in fines for businesses that do not comply.
In his speech, Biden made no exception for the millions of Americans with natural immunity, and did not mention exemptions for those with medical conditions or sincerely held religious beliefs — as White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki in a Wednesday press briefing had suggested would be the case.
"Biden’s efforts to coerce federal workers + those who have elected to remain unvaccinated is clearly in violation of Nuremberg Code, which has been incorporated into U.S. federal and state law. This is a sad day for ethics + rule of law.” — Mary Hollandhttps://t.co/AV0HjSxxGg
Speaking at the White House, Biden sharply criticized millions of Americans who remain unvaccinated, despite months of availability and incentives.
“We’ve been patient. But our patience is wearing thin, and your refusal has cost all of us,” Biden said. The unvaccinated minority “can cause a lot of damage, and they are.”
According to the Associated Press (AP), Biden’s latest move is driven at least in part by self-interest, as he tries to defend his own job performance on the issue most important to voters.
The resurgence of the virus has sent Biden’s poll numbers to the lowest point yet of his presidency, AP reported. An AP-NORC poll conducted in August found 54% of Americans approved of Biden’s stewardship of the pandemic, down from 66% the month before, driven by a drop in support among Republicans and political independents.
‘Most dramatic steps to date’ could spur legal challenges
Biden announced the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is developing an emergency rule to require all employers with 100 or more employees that together employ more than 80 million workers to ensure their workforces are fully vaccinated or show a negative test at least once a week.
OSHA will issue an Emergency Temporary Standard to introduce the vaccine requirement. Companies that fail to comply could face fines of $14,000 per violation, Biden said.
Biden noted many large companies already require vaccinations. “The bottom line — we’re going to protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated coworkers,” he said.
The expansive rules also mandate that roughly 17 million workers at health facilities that receive federal Medicare or Medicaid get fully vaccinated, and require vaccination for employees of the executive branch and contractors who do business with the federal government — with no option to test out, AP reported.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services will separately require vaccinations in Head Start Programs, as well as schools run by the U.S. Department of Defense and Bureau of Indian Education, affecting about 300,000 employees.
Although Psaki said Wednesday Biden’s order for executive branch workers and contractors includes exceptions for workers seeking religious or medical exemptions from vaccination, federal workers who don’t comply will be referred to their agencies’ human resources departments for counseling and discipline, to include potential termination.
As part of the plan, Biden also called on large entertainment venues to require proof of vaccination or testing for entry, and required employers to give their employees paid time off to get vaccinated.
In addition to vaccination mandates, Biden plans to double federal fines for airline passengers who refuse to wear masks on flights or to maintain face covering requirements on federal property, in accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines.
The new rules amount to the most dramatic steps to date to get more Americans vaccinated. Once cautious of vaccine mandates, the Biden administration is now wholly embracing them, CNN reported.
Administration officials acknowledged the requirement for large employers could be challenged in court. But they said their hope was that federal rules would provide legal cover for businesses that want to require vaccines for employees.
Critics react to government overreach and vaccine mandates
Instead of firing Fauci, Kennedy said, Biden is “doubling down on his failed policies by trying to coerce Americans into taking a shot that doesn’t work and might injure or kill them.”
Kennedy said Biden’s admonition that we must “trust the expert” has become a substitute for scientific literacy and common sense and a gateway to tyranny.
“His move to force universal obedience with an unwanted, ineffective and potentially dangerous medical intervention is anti science, anti-democratic and anti American,” Kennedy said.
He added:
“Americans don’t respond well to coercion. The White House crusade to silence debate and censor critics of this disastrous policy has further transformed bad policy into an attack on our fundamental values. It is therefore bound to further divide a dangerously polarized nation.”
Pre-order my book today — “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health”https://t.co/YjDHH5v84q
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott blasted Biden on Thursday after he ordered large employers to require COVID vaccines or get frequent testing, the Texas Tribune reported.
Abbott, who has resisted making vaccinations mandatory in any form in Texas, dubbed Biden’s move a “power grab,” and said Texas is already working to halt it.
Shortly after the announcement, Missouri Gov. Mike Parson tweeted a statement that read, “this heavy-handed action by the federal government is unwelcome in our state and has potentially dangerous consequences for working families.”
This heavy-handed action by the federal government is unwelcome in our state and has potentially dangerous consequences for working families. (2/3)
In another tweet, Parson said his administration “will always fight back against federal power grabs and government overreach that threatens to limit our freedoms.”
Missouri Attorney General and Republican Senate candidate Eric Schmitt called the mandate an overreach and said it “will not stand in Missouri.”
Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, vowed to “push back” against Biden.
“This is exactly the kind of big government overreach we have tried so hard to prevent in Arizona — now the Biden-Harris administration is hammering down on private businesses and individual freedoms in an unprecedented and dangerous way,” Ducey wrote in a tweet. “This will never stand up in court.”
“This dictatorial approach is wrong, un-American and will do far more harm than good,” Ducey added in another tweet. “How many workers will be displaced? How many kids kept out of classrooms? How many businesses fined? The vaccine is and should be a choice. We must and will push back.”
This dictatorial approach is wrong, un-American and will do far more harm than good. How many workers will be displaced? How many kids kept out of classrooms? How many businesses fined? The vaccine is and should be a choice. We must and will push back. 2/2
South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem said her state is ready to hold the Biden administration legally responsible for the “unconstitutional rule.”
“My legal team is standing by ready to file our lawsuit the minute @joebiden files his unconstitutional rule,” Noem wrote in a tweet. “This gross example of federal intrusion will not stand.”
My legal team is standing by ready to file our lawsuit the minute @joebiden files his unconstitutional rule. This gross example of federal intrusion will not stand.
“This is unconstitutional,” said Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-Ala.) “The U.S. Constitution does not give the president this type of authority. No where in Article 2 of the Constitution will you find anything that even remotely gives the president this kind of power.”
This is unconstitutional. The U.S. Constitution does not give the President this type of authority. No where in Article 2 of the Constitution will you find anything that even remotely gives the President this kind of power. https://t.co/3kCYjkRVHy
“This is blatantly unconstitutional. The decision to get vaccinated lies between you and your doctor – NOT the federal government. We must fight back against medical tyranny that dangerously violates Americans’ individual freedoms.”
This is blatantly unconstitutional!
The decision to get vaccinated lies between you and your doctor – NOT the federal government.
We must fight back against medical tyranny that dangerously violates Americans' individual freedoms. https://t.co/uGBfPZCGfT
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky), a physician, said in a tweet, “vaccine mandates that ignore natural immunity ignore the science, are unscientific and should not be adhered to or promulgated by the government.”
Vaccine mandates that ignore natural immunity ignore the science, are unscientific, and should not be adhered to or promulgated by the government. https://t.co/41FQRLEkxw
In a statement to Fox News, Rep.Greg Murphy (R-NC), a practicing physician member of the GOP Doctors Caucus, said he is against government vaccine mandates, saying the decision should be made by patients who have consulted with their doctors.
“As I have repeatedly said, the decision about whether or not to take the COVID-19 vaccine, like every other medical decision, is one that should be made between a patient and a doctor,” Murphy said. “The government does not know what is best for each patient, nor do they have the authority to dictate patient-doctor healthcare decisions.”
More than 177 million Americans (53%) are fully vaccinated against COVID, but confirmed cases have shot up in recent weeks to an average of about 140,000 per day, despite vaccination, according to data from the CDC.
Last month Biden announced plans to make boosters available beginning Sept. 20, even though the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had not approved a third dose for the general population.
Federal officials are moving ahead with plans to begin administering booster shots of mRNA vaccines — a decision that created tension between the FDA, CDC and Biden administration and led to two top FDA officials announcing their resignations.
On the 20th anniversary of that very dark day for America, I’d never been embarrassed of my country before. I had in fact, never been more proud of my country until a few weeks ago.
My father was a Marine Corps veteran of WWII, Korea, and two tours in Vietnam. I remember his return in 1972 as a 7th grader where he and other veterans were spat on when they came home. My mother spent 5 years in the Marine Corps as well, and I had never been embarrassed of my country after that war.
I witnessed Iranian terrorists overtake the U.S. Embassy in Tehran in 1979 while still in college and the subsequent 444 days of American hostages, and was not embarrassed of my country. I watched Operation Eagle Claw’s failed rescue attempt of those hostages that cost 8 American lives and felt pride that our brave & selfless military had even endeavored on such a monumental task.
I proudly joined the Marine Corps in 1981, witnessed the Beirut Bombing where we lost 241 American lives to terrorists, boasted with pride in our military and country in Grenada & Panama.
I served as an Infantry Officer for 31 years on 6 continents, in 48 countries, having deployed 7 times in my career, including Iraq and Somalia. My proudest, most significant moments and years were serving with the most remarkable men and women, the cream of the crop, those that are cut from a different bolt of cloth. Selfless, confident, brave almost to a fault, intelligent, dedicated, those that epitomize the best of America.
I was taught to respect those I had the privilege to lead, to never put myself ahead of the Marines that it was my privilege to lead. I don’t doubt your grief Mr. President, but I do doubt your ability to respect those that you have the privilege to lead.
I was taught that if I was ever inclined to put anything ahead of those Marines, except mission; those magnificent people, who ask so little on foreign shore & give so much; and if that ever changed or I couldn’t commit to that ideal, then I should leave the Corps immediately!
I was taught to never look at a military operation or military requirement worrying about politics over the overall good of the operation.
I was taught to never, ever treat my Marines with less dignity than they deserve.
I was taught to accept responsibility and accountability for those Marines “outside the wire” facing the enemy in close combat, who don’t get the full credit they deserve and to always put my Marines first.
You may recall, Mr. President, the accident off of San Clemente Island in July of 2020 that claimed 8 Marines’ & 1 Sailor’s lives. After a 7-month long investigation, all of those in the chain of command were relieved of duty. Everyone from the Platoon Commander, a Lieutenant, the Company Commander, a Captain, the Battalion Commander, a Lt. Colonel, the MEU (Marine Expeditionary Unit) Commander, a Colonel and the Commanding General of the MEF (Marine Expeditionary Force), a Major General. All relieved of duty “due to loss in trust and confidence in the ability to command.”
My question to you Mr. President, is what is your responsibility and accountability in this complete catastrophe of an “exit” in Afghanistan? I sir, have lost any trust and confidence in your ability to command.
If you were advised to conduct this NEO (Noncombatant Evacuation Operation) in this manner, sir, where are the resignations of our military leaders? I’m not talking about the actual combatant commanders on the ground; they were given an extremely difficult mission with one hand tied behind their backs. I’m talking about your Secretary of Defense, your Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
This has been a debacle, national humiliation, and a disgrace, and the proper response is to clean out our leadership and military like we did after Bay of Pigs and make sure they are replaced with people who know how to do their jobs. When will your investigation, Mr. President, begin to unravel the complete disregard for “those magnificent people” whom you have the privilege to lead? Now at least 13 Americans are dead, not while fighting a war, but while trying to leave one.
I was taught to never send a force into harm’s way unless they are organized, equipped, and trained for the completion of the mission. This is the greatest loss of equipment in military history. The Taliban now has access to more than $85 billion worth of U.S. military equipment abandoned by the Afghan army, including 75,000 vehicles, more than 200 airplanes and helicopters, and more than 600,000 small arms and light weapons. “The Taliban now has more Black Hawk helicopters than 85 percent of the countries in the world,” Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind said.
The American people demand that we be the premier fighting organization on the planet. Not a “nation-builder.” There is a difference between wasteful nation-building and a small residual force mostly comprised of advisors as opposed to just giving up.
Every Lance Corporal knows how to extract from a firefight; first, you evacuate your wounded, then your equipment and the last to go are your gunfighters. It sounds easy, but it is not. To impose a different set of rules on the combatant commanders on the ground is criminal in my mind, sir.
This has been a very hard several weeks for American veterans. Old wounds burn, old scars are torn open again, old memories resurface of the men and women who, instead of building up this country’s future, were flown 10,000 miles to the far side of the world — and then flown home in flag-draped coffins.
We cannot undo the pain we have caused to so many, but we hope the dead might rest easy knowing that they served their country when asked and there is no dishonor in that. Now, when we who remain are ourselves called, no matter how hard it is and how much it takes, we too must answer. This is our sacred duty now.
Whatever your views on the war in Afghanistan, we probably agree on one thing: it should not have ended this way. My flag remains at half-staff through this 9/11 anniversary. And I am saddened to say, that I have never been embarrassed of my country until this pathetic display of my President a few weeks ago.
Some of the largest tech companies have decided to respond to the semiconductor shortage by designing their chips internally. Tech analysts and business people have spoken about the semiconductor shortage and how the coronavirus pandemic has severely drained the resources required to make the chips and parts needed for everyday electronic devices.
In recent months, several markets have seen detrimental results across the board. For example, the automotive industry reported that U.S. manufacturers forecast producing 1.5 million to 5 million fewer cars in 2021. Apple anticipates that the shortage will delay iPhone production and leave a long-term impact on iPad and iMac sales.
While it is unclear when this shortage will resolve itself, some technology companies have begun to adjust their specific semiconductor needs. For example, Apple will now rely on its M1 processor for iMacs and iPads instead of Intel’s processors. Tesla said it is building its own “Dojo” chip to help train AI networks in data centers. Chinese tech company Baidu launched an AI chip in August 2021, which will help boost the computing power of its various initiatives. Amazon and Google are also making their initiatives to design CPUs and networking chips for their particular devices and services, which will help fulfill their specific desires.
For most of these companies, these decisions to go independent are solely on the design side. The Big Tech firms will still rely on production foundries such as TSMC and Samsung to do the hard work. Designing chips internally would allow companies to specialize their design needs and optimize the machines for their specific functions.
However, analysts do not believe it will fix the semiconductor shortage. “The decision from companies to design their own chips and the semiconductor shortage has little to do with each other in the short term,” said Duncan Stewart, director of TMT Research at Deloitte. “However, there could be some significant changes in market demands in the long term.”
Stewart told the Washington Examiner that semiconductor production foundries were concentrated primarily in Taiwan and South Korea for a long time. However, recent events have put significant stress on the foundries. In Taiwan, TSMC was hindered by the country’s worst drought in 50 years, which has required the company to import water from other parts of Taiwan to maintain production. While TSMC claims this has not affected production, it is illustrative of the semiconductor market’s sensitivity to events it cannot control, from pandemics to droughts.
Now companies are looking to expand outside of those two countries. “There’s a geopolitical element here,” argued Ben Blaney, the vice president of business consulting at pricing firm Vendavo. “We know that China is investing heavily in fabrication capability, and we know the EU is providing ‘incentives’ for manufacturing in the eurozone.” The White House has also made significant pushes toward investing in semiconductor foundries, with Congress and the Biden administration investing billions into partnerships with Intel and others to build local foundries.
“The chip business has long been cyclical,” Blaney argued. “In which case, one could argue that TSMC’s dominance may be relatively short-lived and regulators should let the ‘invisible hand’ do its thing. The counter to that is that demand will surely increase, if not quite exponentially, then certainly at quite a clip, as so many more humdrum items require chips, such as domestic refrigerators.”
If this demand does increase, analysts expect that semiconductor foundries will seek out whichever countries offer the most incentives and build their newly established semiconductor factories in their territories.
The College of the Ozarks in Point Lookout, Missouri is continuing its fight against a Biden policy forcing women to share dorms, bathrooms, and other public spaces with biological males.
The Christian college filed a lawsuit against a memorandum ordering the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to enforce the Fair Housing Act, which does not allow entities to discriminate based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The school filed a complaint in April against the February 11 memorandum, but a judge dismissed its lawsuit.
Now, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has agreed to expedite arguments in the lawsuit for a hearing set for November, the Christian Post reported. The Christian college maintained that the Biden policy violates their First Amendment rights, arguing that the memorandum “was issued without observance of procedure required by law, and is contrary to law, arbitrary, capricious, in excess of statutory jurisdiction, and contrary to constitutional rights.”
The College of the Ozarks added that the memorandum “requires private religious colleges to place biological males into female dormitories and to assign them as females’ roommates.” They said that the directive prohibits “all regulated entities, including the College” from “discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity both in occupancy of their dwellings and in policies governing those dwellings.”
The directive also prevents the school from mandating its students to be placed in dorms “based on their biological sex.”
College officials said that for years, students have been separated in dorms, bathrooms, and other “intimate spaces” based on their biological sex. They also claimed that the HUD “failed to take into consideration the College or other entities with similar student housing policies in promulgating the Directive.”
The Christian college’s case was dismissed in June, when U.S. District Judge Roseann A. Ketchmark, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, said that the Ozarks failed to demonstrate how the memorandum caused “a concrete and particularized harm that is actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.”
The Christian college argued that the new memorandum would violate its First Amendment rights, as it “would suffer immeasurable harm to its religious exercise, its free speech, and its students’ privacy interests.” They believe that abandoning its code of conduct “jeopardizes the College’s ability to function, harms students, and dissuades them from attending the College,” Inside Higher Ed reported.
Alliance Defending Freedom’s senior counsel Julie Marie Blake, who represents the College of the Ozarks, explained that the school, also known as “Hard Work U,” does not charge tuition and welcomes students “who agree to follow its code of conduct” and is targeted at those who have “the most financial need.”
She added that threatening the school with “ruinous fines that could be in the six figures” will endanger its much needed public service.
The Christian college lamented that the new directive will most likely cause “investigations, enforcement actions, and litigation that could impose costly discovery and legal fees, millions in penalties and punitive damages, and criminal penalties against the College and its employees.”
Stung by its rout in Afghanistan, the US is doubling down on efforts to punish homegrown dissidents. But while the post-January 6 crackdown brought it into the public eye, the domestic ‘war on terror’ has been underway for years.
As the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks looms this weekend, the Department of Homeland Security wants to make sure you’re afraid – very afraid. Americans, it warned last month, are facing an enemy so drunk on mind-warping conspiracy theories that even the most sophisticated surveillance apparatus in the world can’t stop them.
Subtlety has never been the strong point of the country’s ever-multiplying intelligence agencies and, for the 9/11 anniversary, the government is pulling out the stops for an orgy of fear not seen since the event itself. The recent DHS bulletin warned the surrounding weeks would be marked by a “heightened threat environment” – at least until Veterans Day, when a new excuse will likely be rolled out to be very afraid. It even dredged up al-Qaeda themselves, declaring the terror group had released its first English-language magazine in four whole years, apparently believing American dissidents would be inspired by their country turning tail and fleeing from Kabul.
But the DHS and its ilk have been screaming about terrorism since January 7, the day after hundreds of pissed-off Trump voters and other disaffected Americans stormed the Capitol in what has been retroactively recast as an armed insurrection – in the absence of any arms or of attempts on the life of any legislator. As with September 11 itself, law enforcement agencies are publicly atoning for their supposed catastrophic intelligence failure by cracking down on the dissidents they do know about – the equivalent of closing the barn doors as the last horse gallops across state lines – and papering over the logical gaps with rhetorical bluster. Except, in this case, the “If you see something, say something” of 20 years ago has become the more direct “snitch on your family”.
If the definition of insanity is indeed doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results, the American intelligence apparatus can be said to be well and truly batty. Bringing back home the same “war on terror” tactics that lost the war in Afghanistan, nearly fumbled it in Iraq, and have all but lost it in Syria is asking for yet another massive failure, one that will be much more difficult to recast as victory as its targets need not rely upon untrustworthy news media for information on what is happening outside their doors.
Ordering police forces – already a symbol of incipient US fascism to many after the backlash against police brutality that exploded last summer in the form of Black Lives Matter (and other actual riots) – to deploy these tactics against their fellow Americans almost guarantees a rebellion. And Americans, unlike the goat-herders in dirt-poor Afghanistan, have been stocking up on guns and ammo so much that manufacturers are staring down two-year delays in restocking.
But, while Covid-19 and the 2020 election may have unmasked the extent of the project, the designation of dissident Americans as the enemy has been underway for longer than many believe. Just as the neocons at the Project for a New American Century didn’t wait for the planes to hit the towers to write up their contingency plan for the ‘new Pearl Harbor’ existential crisis that 9/11 became, that group’s spiritual descendants have been cooking up some frightfully draconian legislation while the country was distracted with four years of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Those behind War on Terror 2.0 already have the dystopian tools at hand to wage unprecedented domestic warfare – all they need now is the proper catalyst.
This is why, nine months after the fact, we’re still hearing about the January 6 riot at the Capitol. Never mind that the only victims of that sad-sack demonstration were among the pro-Trump crowd – and that one of the supposed leaders of this big scary insurrection, Proud Boys chief Enrique Tarrio, was a known FBI collaborator. We’re told to fear “white ISIS” anyway, these LARPing boys in black having dropped seamlessly into the terror narrative where al-Qaeda and its boxcutters of doom once stood. It was “the most violent attack since the British burned the Capitol in 1814,”former Bloomberg News editor Albert Hunt wrote in an op-ed for the Hill, joining the tireless chorus that has spent so many months to try to puff up the rally into something it wasn’t.
Indeed, these ‘white supremacists’ – some of whom, to the embarrassment of the FBI and DHS, aren’t actually white – are said to be so dangerous that they must be brainwashed out of their political views if there is any hope of reintegrating them into society.
One need only look at the case of Doug Jensen, one of hundreds locked up in the aftermath of the Capitol protest. Finally released on bail after six months, having promised he’d gotten his mind right and no longer believed in QAnon and others who questioned the 2020 election results, he was caught in his garage earlier this month watching a video of Mike Lindell, a.k.a. “MyPillow Guy,” one of the leading lights (dim as they may be) in the delusional community who believed Trump would be reinstated as president last month. Sending him back to jail for such a minor transgression harks back to the McCarthy era – “are you now or have you ever been a follower of MyPillow Guy?” – and spits in the face of any notion that the country is still, as it stridently claims, ‘Our Democracy.’
The increasingly open trend towards thought reform (brainwashing) as a prerequisite for an innocent verdict (or even bail) should terrify those on the Left as much as it does the Right. But they continue to fiddle while Rome burns, “othering” their ideological foes with dime-a-dozen smears like “white supremacist.” This puts them in bed with their avowed enemies the New York Police Department, which – after being handed unprecedented powers to spy on its own citizens following 9/11 – got on the “white supremacist” hunt early, starting a unit to deal with these types (who are vanishingly uncommon in a proudly multi-cultural city like New York) back in 2019.
Equipped with dystopian technology like super-powered X-ray vans that can see human activity inside a car (or ground-floor home) and the Domain Awareness System, which constitutes the largest network of cameras, license-plate scanners and other sensors in the world, the department has primarily been using the weapons of war to bust petty criminals. One need only look at the spike in crime the city has seen over the past two years to be reminded that this tactic simply does not work – but then, that assumes the purpose is to bring down crime statistics.
The New York Times notes that “it is almost impossible to overstate how profoundly the [9/11] attacks changed American policing,” particularly in New York, which seems to be sliding into full-blown fascism thanks to the government’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Told they could no longer so much as ride a subway train bare-faced without a $50 fine, most New Yorkers have simply assumed there are cameras everywhere and dutifully masked up, even when many independently express concerns the whole masking ritual is at best a cultish rite – and at worst an effort to dehumanize one’s fellow man. After all, there are criminals about – a lot of them! – and the boys in blue are keeping us safe when they place their boots on our necks and apply just the right amount of loving pressure.
The lofty battle cry the Bush administration let loose upon sending American soldiers into the 20-year quagmire that Afghanistan would become was that we must ‘get the terrorists,’ lest they rob us of our freedoms. But instead of safeguarding them, American leaders memory-holed those freedoms as quickly as possible – the better to make “our boys” returning from Afghanistan feel right at home. The war is here, and the real terrorists – those in Washington – are already doing their victory dance. Let us hope it’s premature.
Army Sgt. Maj. Michael Carter clearly remembers the horrific scenes of the flame-filled Twin Towers imploding against the New York City skyline.
A doctor’s appointment that morning made him late for school and as he walked the hall toward his classroom, every teacher at Rancho Vista High School in Temecula had a TV on showing images of the airplanes hitting the buildings of the World Trade Center.
“I felt enraged, disconnected and I wanted to do something,” Carter said. “I saw the country in turmoil and I wanted to serve.”
Just hours later, during a birthday party for a younger cousin, he informed family members that he would enlist. His grandfather had served in the Marine Corps and he felt it was his duty as the eldest in his family to follow in those footsteps.
“I knew that was my way of fighting terrorism,” he said.
Then a high school junior, he enlisted in the Army’s delayed entry program and shipped off to basic training on July 22, 2003. He first served in the 82nd Airbourne out of Ft. Bragg, N.C., and now is an Army operations sergeant major for the Southern California Army Recruiting Battalion.
Carter is among the thousands of Americans who, in a surge of patriotism, showed up at their hometown recruiting offices following the 9/11 terrorist attacks looking to stand up for their country and become part of something bigger than themselves.
Many who signed up between 9/11 and 2011 served tours in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
On Aug. 31, the last U.S. troops withdrew from the airport in Kabul, Afghanistan, marking an end to America’s longest war, one that started as the United States pursued Al Qaeda in response to the Sept. 11 attacks.
Driven from power after the U.S. and its allies invaded Afghanistan shortly after the 2001 terrorist strike, Taliban forces took over the county in just 10 days last month as American troops withdrew.
The chaos of the withdrawal, including the bombing at the Kabul airport in which 13 American service members and at least 169 Afghans died, drew criticism for President Joe Biden and his administration.
And it led some to wonder what the impacts of those globally viewed images will mean for the future of the military and its ability to retain and recruit service members.
“Everybody who joined then not only felt an obligation but had a certain passion,” Carter said. “We owned that war.”
At first, the swell of patriotism and people flocking to enlist didn’t translate to a larger military force. Military recruitment is dictated by the requests of commanders and the budgets voted on by Congress; each branch is given an “end-strength number.”
But soon, in the years after 9/11, the branches’ numbers did swell as America’s war on terrorism took shape and requests for larger numbers of enlisted to fill new missions were made.
In FY 2000, the Army, as an example, needed 482,179 people. As the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan ramped up, the required number of troops steadily climbed from 543,000 soldiers in 2008 to 565,000 in 2011.
The Marine Corps, too, saw its end-strength numbers increase from about 173,321 in 2000 to 186,442 in 2006. Then to 202,441 in 2010, when efforts in Afghanistan really built. The Air Force also saw an influx of volunteers, with a high of 349,369 enlisted and officers taking the oath in 2005. In the Navy, in 2002, 46,155 new sailors joined.
“What we saw after 9/11 was a surge in militaristic patriotism, a way for citizens to use the armed forces as a display of strength after such a horrific attack on our home soil,” said Gregory Daddis, a former Chapman University professor who now is the USS Midway Chair in Modern U.S. Military History at San Diego State University. Daddis, who earned a Bronze Star, served in the Army for 27 years, including in Operations Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom.
“The focus on exacting revenge via a military campaign against terror allowed ordinary Americans,” he said, “the chance to participate in redeeming the nation’s honor and thus burnish their own patriotism.”
Americans seemed to collectively use war to “provide meaning to an attack that seemed so senseless to so many,” he said.
Beth Asch, a senior economist who studies military recruitment, enlistment and compensation for the Rand Corporation, said another factor played into recruitment success: Facing higher end-strength numbers, military recruiters capitalized on the swell of interest by bolstered their efforts with bonuses for those who joined, offered better pay and provided special options for those who took on specific military jobs.
Congress also implemented pay raises, making military service more attractive.
“You look at the survey data and you definitely see an increase,” she said. “The services did well after 9/11.”
While fought by a much smaller military than World War II or even the following conflicts, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were the first real test of an all-volunteer force.
Marine Master Gunnery Sgt. Ray Gallimore, who joined in 1991, watched the shift over the next decade. He saw the military drawdown its numbers with the thawing of the Cold War, only to ramp up again a bit before 9/11.
“I wanted to serve my country and was compelled to do my part,” said Gallimore, who a decade in, with the 3rd Battalion/6th Marines, helped secure the Kandahar Airfield in Afghanistan and the embassy in Baghdad shortly after 9/11.
Gallimore said he witnessed a shift in overall patriotism, not only among those who volunteered, but he saw the tangible effects across the nation, too.
“It was surreal,” he said, adding he heard stories from friends whose relatives served during Vietnam and felt they had not been supported by the people back home. He wondered how he would be treated.
“Everyone was treating us as heroes,” he said. “Everywhere you went, someone was wanting to shake your hand and thank you for serving. I wasn’t used to that.”
It didn’t end there. As he moved to a recruiting post with the Marines, the outflow of pride in the military and the country continued.
“We saw an influx of phone calls of people who wanted to do anything they could to serve, even from a lot of older retired Marines,” he said. “It was crazy, they were serious; 9/11 was our Pearl Harbor. Everyone rallied around the flag. There was a spike of young men and women who came to be a part of something bigger.”
The enthusiasm for service also extended in more cases to parents, he said.
“It was much easier to talk to parents because their children were so passionate,” he said. “It was their generation and their time to fight for democracy. Parents were more open to it.”
But as the war drew on, interest among the civilian population waned. And, the reasons people had for service changed.
“People lost sight of why we were there in the prolonged war,” Gallimore said.
He has served as a career recruiter for the Marines and is presently at the Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego. “Seeing all the casualties, views and opinions changed. It wasn’t that people were less patriotic, but they were less willing to serve.
“It made parents and kids question, ‘Why should I join?’ People lost sight of the reason we were still there.”
And now, watching the withdrawal, he said, “It pains me to see what’s going on now.”
“When we were on the ground, we obliterated the Taliban,” he said.
Still, some military branches now report they are meeting — or even exceeding — current recruitment goals and are attracting better-qualified recruits.
Of the 1% nationwide who joined to fight the war on terrorism — especially in comparison to past wars such as Vietnam where the Army’s ranks were more than 1.3 million and the Marines had nearly 260,000 — many who stepped forward, joined because military service had become a family tradition.
By 2009, when the end-strength numbers for military branches increased again because of the renewed focus on Afghanistan, economic reasons, rather than simply being patriotic, had become part of the decision process.
The post- 9/11 version of the GI Bill pays for full tuition and fees for all public universities and colleges and includes a monthly housing allowance.
College tuition and solid training for a future career factored into the equation for many considering enlistment. And, military service ensures a paycheck and benefits.
Carter’s twin sisters — Army Pvt. 2nd Class Madison David and Army Pvt. 2nd Class Jenna Davis — followed their brother and grandfather into service. But they also looked to the Army for new possibilities.
Carter helped enlist them in April 2017 through the Army’s delayed entry program. They went to basic training at Fort Jackson in 2018 after graduating from Temecula Valley High School. Both just returned from deployments; one sister was in Germany and the other in North Africa.
“They saw how well the military takes care of their families,” Carter said. “It was something they wanted and they also wanted to carry on the tradition.”
“The Army is a stepping stone,” he said. “In four years, you’ll be 10 years ahead of those who went to college. Sixty percent of those who go to college graduate with debt and never work in that field again.”
Army recruiters now focus on offering career paths for future soldiers. In the last few years, they have stepped up their recruiting along the West Coast and in more urban markets.
The Rand Corporation’s Asch said she isn’t sure how the recent withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the bloody mark left by the airport bombing in its last days, will affect the future of military recruitment.
Seeing their peers among those killed might give younger people pause when considering enlistment.
But the Afghanistan war had largely fallen out of the public eye, until recently, Daddis pointed out.
“I’m not convinced the tumultuous withdrawal will have much impact on recruiting efforts,” he said. “Nor do I think the American public will cast much blame on the soldiers and Marines who fought there. My sense is most Americans feel like they were placed in a difficult, if not impossible, situation and, for the most part, performed admirably and honorably.”
Roger Stone, former President Donald Trump‘s longtime confidant, said he believes his friend has decided to run for the White House again in 2024.
“Based on my communications with him, I now believe that he will be a candidate,” Mr. Stone said about Mr. Trump in a video uploaded Thursday. “I believe that he‘s crossed that Rubicon in his mind.”
Mr. Stone, a friend of Mr. Trump’s of more than 30 years, made the remark during an interview conducted by another close acquaintance of his, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, the publisher of the Infowars website.
Appearing on camera from the passenger seat of an occasionally moving car, Mr. Stone said in the video that he only recently determined that Mr. Trump is best suited to be the Republican Party’s nominee again.
“He‘s our best candidate. I’ve come to that conclusion. If you’d asked me that three weeks ago, I would have put a bunch of caveats on it, but not anymore. There is no one else,” Mr. Stone said about Mr. Trump.
“He is the leader. He remade the Republican Party in his image, and that’s not going to change anytime soon,” he said. “We’re never going back to being the country club party of the Bushes. You can forget that.”
Mr. Trump has repeatedly hinted at running for the White House since his presidency ended in January, and a number of his allies have suggested a 2024 campaign is in his cards.
If elected in 2024, Mr. Trump, the only president in U.S history to be twice impeached, would become the second to serve two non-consecutive terms. Grover Cleveland was both the 22nd and 24th president.
Mr. Stone, 69, briefly served on the Trump presidential campaign. He was later found guilty of multiple felony charges brought as a result of the government’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2020 election and was ordered to serve 40 months in prison. Mr. Trump granted him a presidential pardon and commuted his sentence, however. Several other Trump allies were similarly convicted but later cleared.
Shortly before saying he believes Mr. Trump will run in 2024, Mr. Stone all but admitted the former president told him as much.
“Roger, let’s get down to brass tacks. Trump told you he‘s going to run,” Mr. Jones said.
“I would never say that on the air,” Mr. Stone responded with a smirk as Mr. Jones started laughing. “But if you said it, I wouldn’t contradict you.”