Study: COVID Hospitalizations Exaggerated—48 Percent of Cases Are Mild
A new study suggests the data on COVID-19 hospitalizations is exaggerated by the fact almost half of those hospitalized have mild or asymptomatic cases, The Atlantic reported.
Hospitalization data has been significant during the pandemic because those numbers tend to predict death totals, but they now might be losing meaning because of the testing of individuals coming to the hospital for other reasons, only to find they have mild or asymptomatic cases of COVID-19 to boot.
Hospitals may test all admissions for any reason for COVID-19, regardless of whether the stay at the hospital was due to COVID-19, and any patient in the hospital with the virus is recorded as a COVID hospitalization.
“As we look to shift from cases to hospitalizations as a metric to drive policy and assess level of risk to a community or state or country, we should refine the definition of hospitalization,” Tufts Medical Center’s Shira Doron, an infectious-disease physician and hospital epidemiologist and a co-author of the study, told The Atlantic.
“Those patients who are there with – rather than from – COVID, don’t belong in the metric.”
The study look at the electronic records for nearly 50,000 COVID-19 admissions at Veterans Affairs hospitals in the U.S., checking blood oxygen levels below 94% and whether the patient required supplemental oxygen. Failing either of those conditions, the study deemed the COVID-19 case as mild or asymptomatic.
In the pre-vaccination period March 2020 to early January 2021 – before the rise of the delta variants – mild or asymptomatic COVID hospitalizations were 36%.
But, vaccines have brought on a higher rate of mild cases among the hospitalized, representing 48% from mid-January to June 2021, according to the report.
Also, according to the findings, the vaccinated that were hospitalized had even a higher percentage of mild or asymptomatic COVID cases (57%) than the unvaccinated (45%).
Doron suggested the latter data point might be impacted by younger patients, who are less vulnerable to serious COVID-19 complications and are more likely not opt against vaccination because of youth, good health, or a past infection, The Atlantic reported.
There are some limitations to the findings, according to the report, because VA patients are not necessarily representative of the U.S. population, because of fewer women and children. Also, the VA hospitals test all admissions for COVID-19, but not all hospitals are required to.
And, finally, the data is only through June, so the data might have since changed.
“People ask me, ‘Why am I getting vaccinated if I just end up in the hospital anyway?'” Daniel Griffin, Columbia University infectious-disease specialist, told The Atlantic. “But I say, ‘You’ll end up leaving the hospital.'”
Lawmaker in another state plans to duplicate Texas Heartbeat Act
‘I am absolutely going to file a bill as soon as I can’
A Missouri pro-life legislator has announced she plans to introduce a bill similar to the Texas Heartbeat Act. The unique Texas law empowers citizens to enforce the state’s restriction on abortion once an embryonic heartbeat can be detected by allowing them to sue abortionists and others who aid in the abortion. The child’s mother is exempt from liability.
Rep. Mary Elizabeth Coleman vowed last week to introduce a version of this Texas legislation that aims to end abortion in Missouri. “I am absolutely going to file a bill as soon as I can,” she said. “We are committed as a group to work together to do absolutely any and all procedural or legal avenues to end abortion.”
Missouri passed a law in 2019 meant to restrict abortion to the first eight weeks of pregnancy, but that law is currently not in force and is tied up in the court system. The Supreme Court is set this fall to hear the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which centers on Mississippi’s restriction on abortion at 15 weeks. In the meantime, Coleman and other pro-life Missouri legislators could write a bill similar to the Texas Heartbeat Act and have it signed by Gov. Mike Parson by early next year. They have hope that the law would go into effect since the Supreme Court allowed the Texas Heartbeat Act to take effect, making it the first successful heartbeat act to do so.
But that isn’t to say the bill won’t face challenges. Pro-abortion organizations are already gearing up to fight any and all pro-life legislation. “History continues to show us that this will not remain a Texas problem for very long,” said NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri Executive Director Mallory Schwarz. “Given the precedent set earlier this week by the highest court in the land by allowing this law to stand, we anticipate we’re going to see a copycat bill come to Missouri as soon as filing opens.”
NARAL and other pro-abortion groups plan to rally abortion enthusiasts to help fund organizations that pay for abortions in Missouri and Texas as well as to put pressure on Missouri legislators to not pass pro-life laws. But according to NPR, Republican supermajorities are in both houses of the Missouri legislature and are likely to vote pro-life.
“We are absolutely going to do everything we have in power to try to eliminate abortion in Missouri,” said Coleman. “And not just eliminate it, but make it unthinkable.”






DeSantis May Buy COVID Antibody Treatment Directly From Manufacturer, Will Bypass Fed. Gov’t
On Thursday, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said that he was, “very very concerned” about President Joe Biden’s decision to restrict distribution of monoclonal antibodies to states while there is a rise in COVID-19 cases prompting a surge in the demand for the treatment in mainly southern states.
Late last week, Biden announced that the administration would be increasing shipments for the month of September by 50%.
But earlier this week, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced that it was seizing control of the nationwide supply of the COVID-19 treatment, and would be controlling distribution.
Fighting COVID In The Sunshine State
Immediately after the announcement that HHS would be controlling the supply of monoclonal antibodies came another statement that the supply that would be used in Florida would be cut by 50%.
DeSantis explained, “So this is a dramatic reduction, and I’d say it’s doubly problematic because what Shane Strum and folks in Tampa General and these other hospital systems that have been doing this, they’re not getting it from the state.”
DeSantis continued, saying that from the reduced amount given to the state, that anyone providing monoclonal antibody treatment in Florida, including hospitals will have to obtain their supply from the state.
The Governor added that he is going to, “work like hell to make sure” that Florida “can overcome the obstacles that HHS and the Biden administration” are placing not just on Florida, but other states as well. He continued, “There’s going to be a huge disruption and patients are going to suffer as a result of this.”
DeSantis also said that he had spoken with executives at GlaxoSmithKline, one of the manufacturers of monoclonal antibodies, and he believes that Florida will be able to order the treatment directly from them.
Are There Ulterior Motives?
Also on Thursday, HHS issued a statement that read in part:
According to U.S. News & World Report, just seven states, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, and Louisiana have accounted for roughly 70% of orders from the manufacturer.
However, with the exception of Louisiana, all of these states have on thing in common.
They all have Republican governors.
During a press conference on Thursday, President Biden attacked DeSantis and Texas Governor Greg Abbott and claimed they were undermining “the life-saving requirements” being touted by his administration.
Biden also said, “This is the worst kind of politics, because it’s putting the lives of citizens of their states, especially children, at risk and I refuse to give into it.”
In a tweet, Donald Trump Jr. also speculated that Biden’s actions may be the result of political payback, “Americans will die because of Biden’s despicable decision to punish his political enemies in red states by restricting their ability to secure life-saving monoclonal antibody treatments for all that need them. Their blood is directly on Joe’s hands.”
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) also accused Biden and his administration of playing politics with the lives of Floridians. “Antibody treatments aren’t a substitute for vaccines But they have prevented thousands of hospitalizations including in breakthrough cases. Now in a move that reeks of partisan payback against states like Florida, the Biden administration is rationing these treatments.”
History Between Biden And DeSantis
The slap fight between Ron DeSantis and Joe Biden has been an ongoing one since Biden suggested that any governors who opposed restrictive COVID rules should “get out of the way.”
DeSantis was having none of it, and immediately ripped into Biden, mentioning his poor job on the southern border, and declared he would do what he needed to in order to keep Floridians safe.
Later, when asked about DeSantis’ statements, Biden smirked and said, “Governor who?” Joe Biden has continued to make comments about GOP governors that criticize their handling of COVID in their respective states.
DeSantis called him out yet again.
This time blasting him for the chaos of the withdrawal in Afghanistan, “If he spent a little less time talking about Florida and more time doing his job as Commander-in-Chief, we might not have 13 service members who were killed in action in Afghanistan because of his ineptitude and dereliction of duty.”