Home Blog Page 3323

The Incidence of Cancer, Triggered by the Covid 19 ‘Vaccine’

(Global Research) Months have passed, and the vaccine madness has amplified, leading to the refusal of patients without a passport in hospitals (which, as is well known, are intended to receive only healthy people) and to the demand that patients be vaccinated  before receiving any treatment, including cancer patients.

We are in a world gone mad and yet these stories are multiplying, such as this young man of 22 years who had a chronic cough leading to an X-ray discovering a mediastinal mass. The two big Paris hospitals that received him refused to start the treatment (without it being explained in detail) if the patient refused the experimental injection, of absolutely unknown effects on the development of cancers.

The doctors’ justification? None: “that’s the way it is”, and we have accepted it!

Silence on the colleagues suspended for lack of obedience and even more on the objective reasons that made them prefer to lose their jobs, their remuneration, their houses, their families intolerant to these decisions as well, rather than submit to the presidential ukase to accept experimental drugs…

Would more than three hundred thousand caregivers (a figure that is probably highly underestimated given the number of hospitals and clinics currently forced to close beds and postpone interventions due to lack of personnel) be crazy, conspiratorial or delusional to the point of putting themselves in great personal, social, family, professional and psychological danger?

Have the doctors who claim that vaccination is safe taken the time to look at the statistics of the effects reported and accepted by the official agencies? Are the FDA, EMA, MHRA also “conspiratorial” when they release statistics as in the case of VAERS, which is entity of the CDC:

VAERS as of September 26, 2021

More than 726,000 Covid vaccine-related adverse events reported to VAERS as CDC and FDA overturn advisory committee recommendations on Pfizer’s third vaccine.

VAERS data released by the CDC included a total of 726,965 adverse event reports from all age groups following Covid vaccines, including 15,386 deaths and 99,410 serious complications between December 14, 2020, and September 17, 2021.[1]

Or Eudra Vigilance pharmacovigilance body of the European Medicines Agency

Or even the ANSM, our French agency, which shows more than 1200 deaths accepted as at least possibly related to these experimental injections.

All therapeutic trials for fifty years were stopped after a few deaths for investigation (53 deaths stopped the H1N1 vaccine). Here, thousands of deaths throughout the world and children are shamelessly attacked[2]. How can we continue to believe that this is a health policy?

Why this denial of the most solid sects on the part of theoretically educated doctors, capable of obtaining information directly from reliable sources and equipped with a brain?

Fear of the boss, of the director, who in a few months’ time will inevitably be called into question, since many countries are backtracking and even Germany wants to get out of vaccine terrorism, perhaps on the occasion of Mrs Merkel’s departure[3].

“The leading organizations of contracted physicians in Germany are demanding an immediate end to the “anti-corona” measures and an end to the “horror rhetoric and panic politics”. Obviously, French hospital doctors in Paris and elsewhere do not read German newspapers and are terrorized by the threats of their professional association, their minister, and become kapos[4] and terrorize their patients.

More and More Testimonies are Coming In 

Whatever their unacceptable reasons, testimonies are multiplying.

A young girl accompanies her friend to her mother’s funeral… such a mother, mother of a high school friend, 34 years old, in remission from breast cancer for two years, who is injected with the vaccine and collapses a few days later in a coma and dies after three days of hospitalization… Politically correct explanation: the cancer exploded and took her away. Close the chapter and the coffin.

What would Maigret have said? [Historic Police Investigator] 

But too many coincidences shock the police investigators in front of a corpse. Only doctors would not have the right to think about coincidences of time, for example: “temporality” is their key word…

Like the misleading slogan, “the numbers are always right”. Yes, if they are true and observed in the real world.

But how much confidence can we have in the rigged simulations that the government and the media feed us without ever specifying that they are only predictions or estimates? 5] But one can do what one wants with the figures, when one chooses them, or creates them to justify the chosen hypothesis, and the the results are totally blurred.

In any case, as far as “cancer and gene injection” is concerned, the vagueness unfortunately dissipates in front of the multitude of terrible stories.

From the colleague who sees multiple “balls” appearing under her armpits, which the check-ups in the hospital do not explain… Obviously no possible link with the vax. And yet the ganglions that appear some time after the injection are a frequent observation after these vax.

So clearly there seems to be three situations:

  • The appearance of a cancer rapidly after the injection (two weeks to a few months) and very progressive, in a person who was previously free of known carcinological pathologies.
  • The resumption of cancer in a patient who has been in complete remission for several months or years.
  • The rapid, even explosive, evolution of a cancer that is not yet controlled.

Beyond the testimonies that are pouring in from relatives and friends and on social networks, a Swiss newspaper has finally addressed the subject in a broader way.

Here are some excerpts from their article[6] and their references[7]:

“Can covid vaccines cause cancer?

In some cases, the answer seems to be yes. Certainly, there is no evidence that the covid vaccines themselves are carcinogenic. However, it has been shown that in up to 50% of vaccinees, covid vaccines can induce temporary immunosuppression or immune dysregulation (lymphocytopenia) that can last for about a week or possibly longer.

Furthermore, covid mRNA vaccines have been shown to “reprogram” (i.e., influence) adaptive and innate immune responses and, in particular, to downregulate the so-called TLR4 pathway, which is known to play an important role in the immune response to infections and cancer cells.”

Thus the authors conclude that it is quite possible that these immune changes could have unintended consequences on the condition of the recipient of the gene injection. A matter of common sense indeed!

“Thus, if there is already a tumor somewhere – known or unknown – or if there is a predisposition to a certain type of cancer, such a state of vaccine-induced immune suppression or immune dysregulation could potentially trigger sudden tumor growth and cancer within weeks of vaccination. It should be noted that lymphocytopenia was also frequently observed in cases of severe covid.

Post-vaccination reactivation of latent viral infections, including shingles virus, EBV (Epstein-Barr) and hepatitis virus, has also been observed.

“Vaccine-induced temporary immunosuppression is also a factor that may contribute to the post-vaccination spike in coronavirus infections seen in many countries.”

Frequency of Vaccine Related Adverse Event in Cancer 

There are already a few thousand observations in official adverse event reporting and online patient groups. There are certainly true coincidences or diagnostic delays due to delayed diagnosis related to containment. But we should not dismiss the huge problems that these real people affected in their daily lives and even more the responsibility that cancer doctors take by imposing the injection before any treatment or protocol continuation. Their main argument: “we did it right, without discussion” does not seem worthy of a once thoughtful profession.

In August 2021, Dr. Ryan Cole,[8] an American pathologist for many years, described a significant increase in certain types of cancer (e.g. endometrial cancer, uterine cancer) since the beginning of the covid mass vaccination campaign. More recently, German pathologists have also noted the problem of post-vaccination immune dysregulation and sudden tumor growth in some patients.

On the French networks, several testimonies coincide with the reappearance of vaginal hemorrhages in women over 85 years of age leading to the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and rapid death… The spike protein produced by the body following the injection is particularly attracted to the genitals, and this would be a new demonstration of this.

So until we know more, let’s be careful, both doctors and caregivers, and not play the sorcerer’s apprentice!

Caution is required with all experimental treatments and even more so when they are the result of a technique never used before in infectious pathology. First, do no harm must guide the decisions of any physician faithful to his Hippocratic oath.

Dr. Nicole Delépine: Pediatrician, oncologist, former head of the pediatric oncology department at the R Poincaré Garches Hospital APHP France

Website www.docteurnicoledelepine.fr and ametist.org for the defense of children with cancer

Ron DeSantis Announces Florida’s Job Growth Rate Is 3X the National Rate

Florida’s job growth rate is three times the national rate, seeing 17 consecutive months of growth, Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) announced Friday.

“Happy to report at a time of economic uncertainty, a lot of headwinds coming out of Washington, DC, that for the month of September, Florida added over 84,000 new jobs,” the Florida governor, who has continued to face a wave of scrutiny from the establishment media and blue state leaders for refusing to implement restrictive mandates, announced Friday. 

“That’s a big chunk of the national numbers that were reported in September,” he added, vowing to continue to work to provide an environment for people to “work and live and thrive for themselves and their families.”

Overall, Florida gained 84,500 jobs total, 72,500 of which are private sector jobs. It added 50,000 workers over the last month, representing a “5.4% increase over-the-year, which is significantly higher than the national rate of 0.8%,” according to DeSantis’s office. 

The Sunshine State has added over one million jobs since April 2020, near the beginning of the Chinese coronavirus pandemic. The state’s unemployment rate currently sits at 4.9 percent. 

“We’re happy to be able to continue to momentum. We’ve got a lot more to do, and we’ve to a lot of challenges with some of the things that are happening at the national level,” he said, adding they are “going to continue to fight hard to make Florida a great place.”

This month, the Labor Department announced that the U.S. economy added 194,000 jobs in September — a “sluggish” pace, “as they predicted about 500,000 jobs created, but the economy fell short again.”

Jobs Creators Network reacted harshly to the Biden administration’s latest figures, slamming his “failed policies” and blaming him for “wrecking small businesses” nationwide. 

“Even the termination of Biden’s overly-generous unemployment benefits – which kept workers on the sidelines for almost half a year – failed to stimulate job growth because Biden’s agenda is wrecking small businesses,” Alfredo Ortiz, President and CEO of the Job Creators Network, said in a statement.

“Higher taxes, vaccine mandates, record spending triggering rapid inflation – this is all part of Biden’s ‘War on Small Business,’” he added. 

All the while, Florida, under DeSantis’s leadership, has earned the reputation as an oasis for both economic growth and individual liberty. 

The importance of integrity and truth for Christians working in the media

Christians working in the media have been speaking about integrity and truth, and the challenges they face in their jobs, with several leading journalists taking part in a special online service organised by the network Christians in Media.

Lucy Denyer, associate editor of The Telegraph magazine, explained: “For me integrity means doing my job to the best of my ability, even when it’s uncomfortable, because I trust God that he’s called me to be there.”

She admitted: “It can be a tough working environment. Journalists are trained to ask hard questions, often they’re cynical. But they are also taught to hold everything up to the light and question it for rigour or for truth – which is not so different to being a Christian after all.”

Warren Nettleford, ITV News and Channel 5 presenter, spoke about covering stories where teenagers had been killed.

He said: “I’ve had to interview parents who have suffered a terrible loss, and you are there, knowing that your editor wants a story that will engage with viewers. At the same time you are there to ensure that the parents can say what they want to say. You don’t want to verge on being sensationalist.

“So it’s really important that you make sure that the parents can be heard – but you’re not going over the edge to make it into entertainment.”

Tim Levell, programme director for Times Radio told the service: “Truth and integrity have always been important to me, but not just in the on-air output, but in my off-air dealings with people too.”

He also spoke about the importance of keeping confidences when colleagues have shared private information with him.

Sandra Godley, BBC CWR radio presenter and gospel singer, recalled having to ‘whistle-blow’ on a work colleague.

“It was difficult, but it was the right thing to do,” she explained.

Tim Pemberton, Head of Religion and Ethics for the BBC’s audio output, was the keynote speaker at the service that had been viewed around 500 times within hours of its launch.

He spoke on Peter’s denial of Jesus from Luke 22, and pointed out, “Speaking the truth can be threatening and costly. Jesus ended up on a cross for it.

“We have to face the fact that serious truth telling can lead to loss – of money, employment, relationships, status and, as we see in the gospel story, even your life.”

He said, looking across society, “Truth is now a cudgel, a weapon with which to beat and shame your opponents into submission. We are no longer open, honest enquirers. We are all warriors keen to prove our point. We no longer see people who simply disagree with us on an issue. We have to impugn their integrity and question their motives.”

He contrasted this with St Paul, writing to the Ephesians, and encouraging them to seek unity by “speaking the truth in love.”

Pemberton encouraged people “to seek one-ness by caring how my telling of the truth impacts my family, my friends, my opponents and my enemies. We all have a choice in this – to follow the status quo and add to the cycle of abuse and anger or to fulfil the promise of our good intentions, listen to others and make sure our contribution is insightful, courteous and positive. This is a radical, counter-cultural idea.”

He added: “Hopefully, none of us will face death for speaking the truth, like Martin Luther King, but we may need to confront the threat of ridicule, of loss of job, of loss generally. All we can do is prepare ourselves.”

Other participants in the online service, led by comedian Paul Kerensa, included young people currently taking part in a mentoring scheme run by Christians in Media.

The service was held ahead of the annual Day of Prayer for Media, when churches and individual Christians have been encouraged to take part on Sunday October 31st.

Rev Peter Crumpler is a Church of England minister in St Albans, Herts, UK, a former communications director with the CofE, and the author of ‘Responding to Post-truth’ (Grove Books).

Millions Of Unchurched Americans Went To Virtual Church Via Online Streaming Services During Pandemic: Poll

According to a recent Lifeway Research poll, over half of Americans attended virtual religious services during the COVID-19 outbreak, even those who seldom attend in-person services.

Christian Headlines reports that the survey indicated that 45% of Americans viewed a virtual religious service during the outbreak. 30% of those polled regularly attend church in person, whereas 15% don’t.

Americans between the ages of 18 and 34 (18%) and 50 and 64 (18%) are the most likely to report having viewed a streaming service, despite the fact that they seldom go to church. This includes 42% of people who would never go to church otherwise, as well as 10% of those who do.

The research also says that millions of Americans who aren’t members of a church used a streaming service when they were cooped up at home.

On the flipside, over half of Americans claim they didn’t participate in any virtual services throughout the outbreak. About 42% don’t go to church at all, while about 10% do.

Nonetheless, Scott McConnell, executive director of Lifeway Research, remarked that “the distance to one’s nearest church has changed almost overnight” wherein “a form of communication that was not even used by most churches before the pandemic has now reached almost half of Americans.”

Comparative reports

When Lifeway Research surveyed Protestant pastors before the emergence of COVID-19, 41% of them indicated they didn’t often broadcast or publish their sermons online. Only about a quarter of those polled (27%) claimed to have livestreamed the entire service or just the sermon.

Most congregations responded quickly to the outbreak of the coronavirus and new social distancing standards by providing digital alternatives. According to Lifeway Research, 92% of Protestant pastors planned to offer sermons or worship sessions through video on their websites by March 2020. That figure went up to 97% in April.

Over 85% of Protestant churchgoers polled by Lifeway Research in early 2021 stated their congregation offers livestreamed worship sessions, and over 76% reported their churches uploaded videos of the religious service for later viewing.

More than half of churchgoers reported watching more online worship sessions in 2020 compared to 2019, with 21% saying they did the same at other churches.

Pastors have also reported that during the outbreak, formerly unaffiliated individuals have shown up at their church or joined online.

In response to the question “Have you viewed an online Christian church service during the COVID pandemic?” several people said yes. Some 45% claim they have, with 30% of those who regularly attend in person and 15% of those who don’t.

People who have never attended church but have at least looked at a video of a service during the outbreak, according to McConnell, are utilizing internet choices to see what it’s like to be in a church.

Furthermore, evangelicals are three times more likely than the general population to report that they viewed religious services online during the outbreak and that they typically go to church on Sunday.

Young adults 18-34 (18%) and African Americans (22%) are among those most likely to have viewed religious services online during the outbreak but aren’t regular churchgoers.

Biden’s Unlawful Plan to Federalize Elections

It’s not only unsettling, but unconstitutional.

(American Spectator) The White House recently issued a statement regarding new actions dozens of federal agencies are taking related to voter registration. These actions come in response to an order President Joe Biden issued back in March.

The order commanded the heads of every federal agency to submit a plan outlining their strategy to engage in voter registration and mobilization efforts to the director of the White House Domestic Policy Council, Susan Rice. This is an unlawful effort by the Biden administration to federalize elections and keep the president and his political party in power.

In September, as Democrats’ efforts to federalize elections stalled, these agency plans began to land on the desk of Rice. With her approval, those proposals are now moving forward.

The impetus behind the president’s plan is obvious. If Congress fails to pass an election bill to override the sensible election integrity laws passed in more than 18 states across the nation, then the president will do so through executive order.

Utilizing federal agencies strategically scattered across the country will allow Democrats to mobilize voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts for 2022 and 2024 with the stroke of a pen.

Democratic leaders don’t deserve all the credit. This plan was created by a well-funded left-wing think tank, Demos, and then carried out by two of its architects who were strategically appointed to key posts in the Biden administration. Former Demos President K. Sabeel Rahman now serves as senior counselor for the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs and former director of legal Strategies at Demos, Chiraag Bains reports directly to Susan Rice.

The plan is simple: Use the resources and reach of the federal government to direct voter registration efforts across the country primarily through federal welfare agencies. Presumably, their presumption is that focusing voter registration efforts on welfare recipients will enable the administration to target mostly Democrat voters, under the guise of a non-partisan effort.

The president’s order instructs federal agencies to use their current infrastructure, activities, services, and resources to help distribute voter registration and vote-by-mail application forms, assist applicants in filling out those forms, and invite and support approved third-party organizations to provide voter services on agency premises.

Exactly who decides which non-government organizations are “approved” and what criteria that approval is based on is left to the imagination.

According to the president’s statement, the Department of Agriculture plans to utilize its offices located across the country to further the plan. The Department of Labor will do the same using its state offices, while also handing out federal workforce development funding to support voter registration efforts. It remains unclear to which groups this funding will be provided. There are legitimate concerns that funding may go to groups that focus on registering voters belonging to the president’s party.

In response to the order, the Department of Education will prepare a “tool kit of resources and strategies” to be shared with more than 67 million students. Nowhere is it mentioned whether parents will be consulted before these “strategies” are employed. Parents and teachers who believe schools should teach kids how to think, not what to think (or who to vote for), may take issue with this new initiative.

The president’s order also called for a restaffing and retooling of the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, transforming it into a political weapon. This has already been realized as evidenced by the appointment of Kristen Clarke to head the Civil Rights Division and by the subsequent filing of meritless lawsuits against states like Georgia.

This venture by the president into election law making is not only unsettling, but unconstitutional. The Constitution places primary responsibility for the creation of election laws squarely upon the shoulders of the state legislatures with limited congressional oversight. Nowhere is the president authorized to legislate through executive order.

Besides violating the Constitution, the president is also ignoring the view of American voters.

Recent polling by the Center for Excellence in Polling reveals that 81 percent of Republicans oppose the federalization of voter registration efforts. What may come as a shock is that 60 percent of Independent voters agree. Even including Democratic voters in the sample reveals that only 26 percent of all voters support what the president is doing, while 58 percent oppose it.

Clearly, the president’s executive order is not being driven by public opinion, nor does it appear to have anything to do with promoting voting access. Instead, this order is about power, that is, keeping the president and his political party in power.

he White House recently issued a statement regarding new actions dozens of federal agencies are taking related to voter registration. These actions come in response to an order President Joe Biden issued back in March.

Hot demand for bitcoin ETF as ‘Wild West’ meets Wall St

(Financial Times) Wall Street threw open its doors to the crypto industry this week as the first US exchange traded bitcoin fund attracted more than $1bn of investor cash and sent the price of the biggest digital currencies to new highs.

Similar vehicles already trade elsewhere, but the launch of a crypto ETF on the world’s biggest equities market represents a significant milestone for crypto advocates after eight years of lobbying regulators.

For the first time, mainstream investors can now hold a US-listed bitcoin-linked security in their portfolios alongside traditional financial assets like stocks and bonds.“This is the fastest ETF to get to $1bn in assets . . . From an asset growth and trading volume perspective this is unprecedented and is a sign of the pent-up demand,” said Todd Rosenbluth, head of ETF and mutual fund research at CFRA.

The well-received debut of the bitcoin ETF shows how traditional financial companies are racing to snag a slice of the digital asset industry. It also highlights the acknowledgment among many financial watchdogs that the sector has become too large and is growing too fast to brush off.

Retail investors accounted for only around 12-15 per cent of net buying in the ProShares ETF on the first two days of trading, pointing to significant interest among institutions, according to data from JPMorgan. Another similar vehicle sponsored by Valkyrie Funds launched on Friday, three days after the ProShares product, in a move analysts expect to be replicated many times over.

Other announcements this week, including a blockbuster fundraising round by crypto exchange FTX backed by a clutch of blue-chip investors, have added to the hype surrounding digital assets.

Line chart of $ per coin showing Bitcoin bounces back to fresh record

These signs of broadening interest, as well as a rise in professional traders using crypto as a base for sophisticated market bets, helped propel the price of bitcoin above $66,000 on Wednesday for the first time before receding to about $61,000 by Friday. Shares in Coinbase, the biggest listed exchange, soared more than 10 per cent in the days leading up to the launch.

However, many analysts say the launch of the ProShares ETF is just the start of a much longer battle to convince the Securities and Exchange Commission that a product providing a direct hook-up to largely unregulated crypto markets should trade on Wall Street bourses.

For the SEC, the decisive factor in allowing the ProShares ETF to go ahead was that the vehicle holds futures contracts traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, a fully regulated venue, rather than digital coins outright.

Cryptocurrencies are typically bought and sold through a wide variety of venues in a market the commission’s chair Gary Gensler has referred to as the “Wild West”.

“What you have here is a product that’s been overseen for four years by [the Commodity Futures Trading Commission] and that’s being wrapped inside of something within our jurisdiction . . . we have some ability to bring it inside of investor protection,” Gensler said in an interview with CNBC.

Interactive Brokers, the retail broker, unveiled crypto trading for financial advisers on Monday but Thomas Peterffy, its chair, was more circumspect on the value to investors of holding the ProShares fund or ones like it.

Peterffy, who helped usher computing on to Wall Street in the 1970s when he used machines to help calculate the value of securities and options, said the only utility for crypto was as a fallback when the monetary or banking system experienced some trouble.

“I believe when such trouble occurs, these ETFs will go to an incredible discount to the value of the coins. So I think it has no utility. As long as people don’t think about it, the price will move with the price of bitcoin.”

Others pointed out that an ETF that relies on futures can become unglued to the asset it is supposed to track. USO, the $2.9bn oil ETF, has often diverged significantly from the price of US crude oil over the past decade.

One factor is the “roll cost” — when the fund manager regularly shifts to a new futures contract when the previous one expires. This could be more costly if the market expects the price of bitcoin to rise in future. A situation in which the futures price is higher than the spot price could mean the ETF undershoots the returns that would be provided by owning bitcoin outright by around 7 per cent a year, said Andy Kapyrin, co-chief investment officer at RegentAtlantic, a $5bn registered investment advisory group.

That makes the product more expensive for investors wanting to hold a position over the long term, Kapyrin added. “This will keep it relegated to shorter-term trading portfolios, rather than long-term holders,” he said. It is “a no-go for advisers” recommending long-term positions to hold but admitted it was “a good product for trading”.

That is why several asset managers are already making a push to get the SEC go-ahead to start funds linked directly to crypto prices. Some ETF sponsors also pulled back from their own futures-based products.

Invesco said it would focus on gaining approval for an ETF that holds digital tokens. Just before Wall Street opened for trading on Tuesday, digital asset manager Grayscale Investments announced plans to convert its $40bn Bitcoin Trust, the biggest crypto investment fund globally, into an exchange traded fund that will own digital tokens outright.

“There is a bit of euphoria in the industry that we now have an ETF, but it’s the first step,” said Dave LaValle, global head of ETFs at Grayscale. “Ultimately the goal is that investors should have a choice between ETFs that are futures and physical bitcoin based.”

It may be a dream many years away. Brett Harrison, president of the US arm of crypto derivatives exchange FTX, said the SEC’s decision this week not to stand in the way of the ProShares fund was unlikely to be the first in a series of regulatory dominoes to fall.

“I think the SEC wants to see the spot crypto exchanges come under some regulatory envelope before agreeing to that,” he said.

SEC chair Gensler has called on US lawmakers for powers to oversee crypto trading platforms, and he wants the companies to register with the agency.

The SEC is also in the middle of a fraught legal debate over whether digital coins should even be registered as securities. Many leading crypto players challenge that view.

Video: Vindicated Rand Paul Blasts Lying Fauci Over “Civilization-ending” Experiments

“If you have half a brain you know if you combine two viruses it might be more deadly”

Senator Rand Paul, who was again proven right after the National Institutes of Health admitted it did fund gain of function experiments on bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, has blasted Anthony Fauci for lying for a year and a half about research that “could destroy civilization.”

Appearing on Fox News Thursday, Paul urged that Fauci has intentionally “been parsing words” as a way of never admitting that gain of function took place in NIH funded Chinese labs.

“They still to this day are trying to get around the truth,” Paul said, adding “They say ‘well it was unexpected that it gained function’.”

The Senator continued, noting that Fauci’s “declination is this: it’s inadvertent, we didn’t know they were going to gain function. That is what a gain of function experiment is,’” Paul explained.

“You don’t know when you combine two viruses that they will be more deadly, but it might be if you have half a brain you know if you combine two viruses it might be more deadly,” Paul proclaimed.

The Senator also noted that while he has referred Fauci to the Justice Department for investigation, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland is more concerned with targeting “moms complaining about what they are teaching in school.”

Watch:

Earlier Paul had tweeted “I told you so doesn’t even begin to cover it here,” after NIH Principal Deputy Director Lawrence A. Tabak admitted in a letter to Rep. James Comer (R-KY) that a “limited experiment” was conducted to determine whether “spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model.”

Joe Biden Loses His Mind on Air, Claims to Have Been a Senator for 370 Years

Throughout his time serving as president, Biden has puzzled millions with his many gaffes, blunders and awkward mishaps.

One video from Thursday’s presidential town hall stands out as particularly peculiar, however, with Biden at one point appearing to lose his mind.

Speaking with CNN’s Anderson Cooper, Biden appears to have said “I was a Senator for 370 years.”

Don’t believe it? Watch for yourself:

The exchange began with Cooper asking Biden if he was close to closing a deal on the “Build Back Better” proposal.

“I think so. You know, look, I’ve been a … I was a Senator for 370 years and I was never … I was relatively good at putting together deals.”

Now, it could very well be that Biden was attempting to make a joke at his own expense, exaggerating the facts to poke fun at his old age. The audience did erupt into laughter as soon as he said it.

But, even if that was the case, there’s no way to tell if he was serious or not from listening to his tone.

As Biden spoke, he appeared distant and absentminded, as if he had no idea where he was.

Could this analysis be a bit of a stretch? Could Biden have simply been tired?

Of course, but given his long history of similar gaffes, Biden hasn’t exactly earned the benefit of the doubt.

In fact, he made several others on Thursday night alone.

In yet another stunning display, the president at one point completely loses his train of thought.

While addressing a question regarding his administration’s failure to solve supply-chain issues, Biden said the following:

“With 40 percent of all products coming into the United States of America on the West Coast go through, uh, Los Angles and, uh, and, uh, um, uh, um, what am I doing here?” Biden said.

Cooper had to step in to save him, saying “Was it Long Beach or…”

“Long Beach, thank you,” Biden responded.

Can the American people truly put their faith in this man to lead them?

As each day passes, when it comes to that question, more and more Americans are answering no.

UK’s Boris Johnson Admits Vaccines Do Not Prevent Contracting, Spreading COVID

The UK Prime Minister admitted that the COVID-19 vaccines don’t work as initially advertised.

United Kingdom Prime Minister Boris Johnson admitted on video that the COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent individuals from catching or spreading coronavirus.

Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Boris Johnson just admitted that the COVID-19 vaccines available in the country do not prevent individuals from spreading or catching coronavirus. This comes as the United Kingdom is contemplating a vaccine passport to enter various public places, including night clubs.

Before the shocking admission, the UK PM claimed that the vaccine provides “a lot of protection against serious illness and death.” However, he ultimately conceded that the vaccine “doesn’t protect you against catching the disease, and it doesn’t protect you from passing it on.” Johnson, who has grown highly unpopular due to his handling of COVID-19, added “so now, it’s time to get you a booster.”

Many people falsely believe that the COVID-19 vaccine prevents the transmission of coronavirus despite evidence indicating that it doesn’t, even refuting frequent statements made by health officials confirming the same. This comes as people continue to be infected with COVID-19 despite being vaccinated.

As National File reported, the CDC director admitted this in August: “Walensky said that the controversial vaccines are working ‘exceptionally well’ at keeping people from experiencing severe illness and death after they contract COVID-19, but admits, ‘what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.’ She then urged the vaccinated to go back to wear masks.”

During a CNN Town Hall with Anderson Cooper, Joe Biden yesterday mocked Americans who want the freedom to not be injected with a vaccine that does not prevent them from catching or spreading coronavirus.

“Freedom!” Biden said, mocking Americans. “I have the freedom to kill you with my COVID. No, I mean, come on! Freedom?”

Biden’s rhetoric appears to contradict Johnson’s, as the President appears to be suggesting that unvaccinated people pose a risk to others, despite vaccination failing to prevent the transmission of COVID-19.

Given that the vaccine does not prevent transmission of COVID-19, the CDC is considering changing the guidelines of what it means to be “fully vaccinated” in an effort to push “booster” shots.

“Right now, we don’t have booster eligibility for all people, currently, so we are going to, we have not yet changed the definition of fully vaccinated. We will continue to look at this. We may need to update our definition of fully vaccinated in the future. But right now, what I would say is if you’re eligible for a booster, go ahead and get your booster. And we will continue to follow,” said CDC Director Rochelle Walensky.

Despite widespread vaccination and claims it will keep people from suffering serious COVID-19 symptoms, over 40% of people who recently died of the virus in the state of Maryland were “fully vaccinated” against the virus, according to former CDC Director Robert Redfield.

“A lot of times people may feel it’s a rare event that fully vaccinated people die. I happen to be the senior advisor to Governor Hogan in the state of Maryland. In the last 6-8 weeks, more than 40 percent of people who died in Maryland were fully vaccinated,” Redfield said in response to the death of Colin Powell.

Biden Gets $455,000 ‘Security Fencing’ Around His Luxury Beach Home After Halting Border Wall Funds

Biden has canceled contracts for southern border fencing

The DHS has approved a $455,000 contract to build a security fence around Joe Biden’s luxury beach home in Delaware. The contract was awarded to Turnstone Holdings LLC on September 21 and construction is expected to be completed by the end of the year.

The DHS, while ordered to stop construction of President Donald Trump’s wall along the southern border, is listed as the main awarding and funding office of the contract while the Secret Service is listed as the subagency. One of Biden’s first acts as president was to halt funding for a border wall along the border with Mexico.

Biden bought the North Shores home in 2017 and paid $2.7 million for the property, according to county tax records. He has visited the property twice during his presidency, prompting strict security measures for local residents.

During his first visit in June, several checkpoints were set up and a local pond was closed. For his second visit, the U.S. Coast Guard created security zones in the Lewes-Rehoboth Canal and the Atlantic Ocean.

Biden’s taxpayer funded fence for his beach house comes as the southern border continues to experience a record illegal immigration surge. This week, data released by US Customs and Border Protection revealed that 1.7 million migrants have crossed the border in 2021, the highest number since 1986.

It was recently announced that other border security projects would also be shelved. This month, the DHS announced it would be cancelling “the remaining border barrier contracts located within US Border Patrol’s  Laredo Sector and all border barrier contracts located in the Rio Grande Valley Sector.”

Per the department, the unspent funds will be spent on environmental projects including “biological, cultural, and natural resource surveys” in the border region.

1...3,3223,3233,324...3,907Page 3,323 of 3,907
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2025 American Faith Media Network. All rights reserved.