Home Blog Page 201

Joe Manchin Breaks Ranks, Backs Trump on Immigration and Crime

manchin
Senator Joe Manchin (Photo by Jemal Countess/Getty Images for JDRF)

Former West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin voiced his support for key elements of President Trump’s second-term agenda in a recent interview with MSNBC, backing the administration’s stance on border security, asylum reform, and law enforcement. Manchin’s comments mark a clear departure from the Democratic Party line and signal growing bipartisan support for Trump’s focus on law and order.

During the MSNBC interview, Manchin stated, “We’ve got to have a secure border,” and criticized the current asylum system as unsustainable. He emphasized the need for real reform and encouraged Democrats to work with President Trump to achieve practical solutions. Manchin praised the administration’s renewed efforts to secure the southern border and restrict abuse of asylum claims.

Manchin also expressed support for Trump’s crime policies, including the deployment of the National Guard to high-crime cities. He noted that public safety should not be a partisan issue and said Americans deserve safe neighborhoods regardless of political leadership at the local level. “The people want order. They want to feel safe in their communities,” he said.

These statements come at a time when Democrat-led cities continue to struggle with rising crime and migrant surges at the southern border. Manchin’s willingness to acknowledge policy failures and affirm Trump’s approach underscores internal fractures within the Democratic Party and increasing public pressure for practical action over ideological rhetoric.

Erika Kirk Forgives Her Husband’s Killer During Memorial: ‘It’s What Charlie Would Do’

(Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

Erika Kirk, widow of slain conservative leader Charlie Kirk, publicly forgave her husband’s killer during an emotional address at his memorial service in Glendale, Arizona. Speaking to a packed crowd at State Farm Stadium, she declared her forgiveness for the man charged with the murder, saying it was the path of Christ—and what Charlie himself would have chosen. Her powerful words brought thousands to tears and underscored the enduring strength of Christian faith in the face of unspeakable tragedy.

Charlie Kirk was shot and killed on September 10, 2025, while speaking at a Turning Point USA event at Utah Valley University. Tyler Robinson, 22, is in custody and faces multiple charges, including first-degree murder and domestic terrorism. The shooting, which appeared to be politically motivated, has shocked the nation and galvanized conservatives across the country.

During the memorial on September 21, Erika Kirk addressed the crowd with a message of hope and forgiveness. “I forgive him because it’s what Christ did,” she said, referring to the shooter. “And it’s what Charlie would do.” She recounted the moment she first saw Charlie’s body, noting his peaceful expression and faint smile. She told attendees that he did not suffer and that his unwavering faith was evident even in death.

Erika’s message stood in sharp contrast to the anger and calls for justice that have followed the killing. While not dismissing the need for legal accountability, she made clear that vengeance would not define her response. Her words echoed the biblical command to “forgive those who trespass against us” and reminded believers that grace, not hatred, should lead.

Trump and Musk Reunite at Charlie Kirk Memorial in Powerful Display of Unity

Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

President Donald Trump and tech mogul Elon Musk publicly reunited during the memorial service for conservative leader Charlie Kirk, marking their first appearance together since their political fallout earlier this year. The two were photographed shaking hands and speaking warmly inside a VIP suite at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, as thousands gathered to honor Kirk’s legacy. The moment is being widely interpreted as a symbolic reconciliation and a potential turning point for the conservative movement.

Musk and Trump had previously clashed over a major legislative disagreement. Musk resigned from his role in the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) after opposing the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” a comprehensive spending package he claimed undercut limited government reforms. Despite tensions, both men attended the September 21 memorial service and appeared to set their differences aside in a highly visible show of respect and unity.

The reunion drew significant attention from political observers, given both men’s influence on the future of conservative politics. Trump remains the undisputed leader of the Republican base, while Musk has become a prominent voice on free speech, anti-censorship, and pushing back against progressive overreach in the tech world. Their handshake was seen by many as more than cordial—it was a message of solidarity during a time of national mourning.

Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, was assassinated on September 10 while speaking at Utah Valley University. His death shocked the conservative world, with tributes pouring in from church leaders, lawmakers, and commentators. The memorial service, attended by thousands, featured speeches on faith, courage, and perseverance—principles Kirk championed throughout his life.

NFL Tribute: Browns Honor Charlie Kirk During Arizona Memorial

super
Football (Dave Adamson/Unsplash)

The Cleveland Browns honored slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk during their Sunday game against the Green Bay Packers as his memorial service took place in Glendale, Arizona. A photo of Kirk with his family was displayed on the stadium videoboard at Huntington Bank Stadium, giving thousands of fans an opportunity to reflect during a moment of national mourning. The tribute came amid widespread conservative and Christian remembrance of Kirk’s life and influence.

Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, was shot and killed on September 10, 2025, while speaking at an event at Utah Valley University. His death sent shockwaves through the conservative movement, drawing tributes from leaders, pastors, and public figures across the country. Kirk was known for his outspoken defense of Christian values, American exceptionalism, and constitutional liberty, especially among younger generations.

On Sunday, September 21, thousands gathered for a public memorial at State Farm Stadium in Arizona. The event featured speeches, prayers, and musical tributes to Kirk’s legacy. At the same time, the Cleveland Browns used their platform to recognize his life, making them one of several NFL teams to acknowledge Kirk in recent days.

The Browns’ tribute is a significant gesture in a cultural environment where conservative voices are often ignored or dismissed by major institutions. Honoring Kirk during a nationally televised NFL game signals that his message reached far beyond political circles, influencing Americans from all walks of life. It also reflects the continued impact of his ministry and advocacy, particularly among Christian families and youth.

Transgender Twist in Kavanaugh Assassination Plot Case

United States Supreme Court Justices (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Nicholas John Roske, the man who attempted to assassinate Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, now identifies as a transgender woman named “Sophie Roske,” according to newly filed court documents. The revelation comes just months after Roske pleaded guilty to attempting to kill the justice outside his Maryland home in 2022. Federal prosecutors are seeking a 30-year prison sentence, citing the political motivation and grave threat to the U.S. judiciary.

Roske traveled from California to Kavanaugh’s home armed with a handgun, ammunition, zip ties, pepper spray, and burglary tools. He told investigators he planned to kill Kavanaugh in response to expected Supreme Court rulings on abortion and the Second Amendment. The attack was halted when Roske saw federal marshals outside the residence and called 911 to turn himself in.

The Department of Justice is treating the act as an ideologically driven threat to a federal official and a form of domestic terrorism. In court filings, prosecutors said Roske planned to kill at least three justices in hopes of changing the Court’s ideological balance. They argue that the seriousness of the crime and its premeditated nature merit the maximum sentence.

Defense attorneys have requested leniency, proposing an 8.5-year sentence. They argue that Roske suffered from mental illness, had suicidal intentions, and ultimately chose not to go through with the assassination. The defense also asked the court to refer to Roske using the name “Sophie” and female pronouns, though no legal name change has been filed. The official case name remains United States v. Nicholas John Roske.

Roske is scheduled for sentencing in October. If prosecutors prevail, the sentence would be among the longest ever issued for an attempted political assassination in recent U.S. history.

Trump Calls Out Harris for False Praise Claim in New Book

Kamala Harris on "The View" (Screenshot from X/@NickFondacaro)

President Trump has publicly denied a claim made in Kamala Harris’s new book that he privately praised her following the 2024 election. Harris alleges that Trump referred to her as a “tough, smart customer” during a post-election concession call. Trump dismissed the statement, saying he doesn’t recall ever using that phrase and clarified that while he was courteous, the claim of personal admiration is fiction.

Harris’s book recounts that Trump told her, “You are a tough, smart customer, and I say that with great respect.” She also claims Trump said he would “be nice and respectful”. The anecdote is being used to paint Harris as a respected opponent, even by political adversaries.

Trump responded in an interview with Fox News’s Peter Doocy, stating, “I met her a couple of times. I was always nice. I don’t remember saying that.” Trump added that Harris “would have done a better job than she did in terms of running” but affirmed, “We won. We won by a lot.”

This denial comes as Harris attempts to reshape her political image after a failed presidential campaign and a historically low approval rating during her vice presidency. Her book, part memoir and part political message, positions her as a capable leader who earned the respect of even her fiercest critics.

Ignored Warnings: Revolution Wind’s Compliance Failures Raise National Security Alarm

Image via Unsplash

Newark‑offshore wind project Revolution Wind is under fire after federal agencies claim its developers, Ørsted and Skyborn Renewables, repeatedly failed to provide crucial information required for national security and fisheries protection. Despite having many wind turbines already installed and significant investment committed, the project faces a stop‑work order due to missing disclosures.

The Department of Interior (DOI) says the developers were ordered to submit detailed plans addressing how the project construction and operations would affect U.S. defense activities and federal marine research. These plans remain unfulfilled. In a September 12 affidavit, DOI’s acting assistant secretary for land and minerals management stated, “still DOI not received any information that these requirements have been satisfied…”.

Though the Revolution Wind project had been granted approval in November 2023, DOI allowed extensions for required filings—such as a plan to protect federal fisheries surveys, originally due by July 2025—yet it’s claimed those were not submitted. A related agreement with the Department of Defense called for coordination over defense interests—like avoiding interference with undersea monitoring systems and foreign investment issues—but key documentation has not arrived.

Because of the lack of compliance, the Trump administration issued a stop‑work order when remnants of required documentation remained outstanding. Construction was close to 80% complete: about 45 out of 65 turbines had been installed. Rhode Island and Connecticut have sued to force DOI to allow construction to resume, citing jobs, electricity contracts, and climate goals that depend on the wind farm.

Spanberger Hides on Bathrooms While Sears Hits Hard in Virginia Governor’s Race

Virginia Republican Lt. Governor Winsome Sears (AP Photo/Cliff Owen, File)

Democrat Abigail Spanberger is refusing to answer direct questions about whether she supports biological males accessing women’s bathrooms, locker rooms, or participating in women’s sports. The issue, which played a key role in Republican Glenn Youngkin’s victory in 2021, has reemerged as a flashpoint in Virginia’s 2025 governor’s race. Republican Lt. Governor Winsome Sears is using Spanberger’s silence to draw sharp contrasts on cultural and parental rights issues.

When asked by a reporter if she supports males identifying as females entering women’s private spaces, Spanberger avoided giving a yes or no. Instead, she focused on federal law, executive orders, and judicial interpretations of Title IX. She claimed that past Republican efforts, including those by President Trump, endangered education funding over similar issues. Spanberger did not clarify whether she personally agrees with allowing biological males in female-only spaces.

Sears quickly seized on the moment. Referencing her role as a mother and Marine, she accused Spanberger of dodging a simple question that matters to Virginia families. Sears highlighted the importance of protecting girls’ privacy, safety, and fair competition in sports. She emphasized that voters deserve straightforward answers on issues impacting their children.

The contrast is stark. While Spanberger leans on legal nuance and federal bureaucracy, Sears speaks directly to parents who want common-sense boundaries in schools and public facilities. The issue is resonating with suburban voters who helped swing the state red in 2021. Political analysts note that Democrats often avoid the bathroom and sports debate due to internal divisions and fear of alienating the progressive base.

Spanberger’s evasion reflects broader Democratic discomfort with gender-related policies. Her campaign has yet to present a clear stance, even as pressure mounts. Meanwhile, Sears is campaigning hard on protecting women’s spaces and parental rights—issues that continue to energize conservative voters across Virginia.

With early voting approaching, the bathroom debate may prove to be a decisive factor. Voters are watching closely to see who will stand firm on issues of privacy, safety, and truth.

Anti-Israel Groups Defend NYC Attacker

New York
New York (Cris Tagupa/Unsplash)

A coalition of anti-Israel activist groups is rallying behind Tarek Bazrouk, a man who pleaded guilty to violently attacking Jewish individuals in New York City in 2024 and 2025. Despite Bazrouk’s admission of guilt to federal hate crime charges, groups including Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and the Palestinian Youth Movement are calling for his immediate release and portraying him as a victim of government repression. The campaign has drawn criticism for legitimizing antisemitic violence under the guise of political protest.

Bazrouk targeted three individuals in separate incidents because they were visibly Jewish or Israeli. He assaulted one person wearing a Star of David necklace, attacked another individual in an Israeli military shirt, and punched a third while shouting antisemitic slurs. All three attacks occurred during or shortly after pro-Palestinian demonstrations in New York.

Federal prosecutors charged Bazrouk with hate crimes, and he pleaded guilty in 2025. In response, activist groups labeled him a “political prisoner” and accused the U.S. government of criminalizing Palestinian advocacy. A statement released by SJP declared their “unwavering support” for Bazrouk and demanded his “immediate liberation.” Other organizations, including Within Our Lifetime, Pal-Awda, and Columbia University Apartheid Divest, have joined the campaign.

These groups deny that Bazrouk’s actions were antisemitic, framing his attacks as political resistance. Critics argue that the defense of a convicted violent offender by university-affiliated organizations reflects a broader trend of excusing bigotry when aligned with progressive or anti-Israel narratives. The public support for Bazrouk underscores growing concern that campus and activist groups are fostering environments where Jewish students and faculty feel unsafe.

Berkeley Hands Over 160 Names to Trump Administration

University of California
University of California-Berkeley (Georg Eiermann/Unsplash)

UC Berkeley has disclosed the names of 160 students, faculty, and staff to President Trump’s Department of Education in connection with an ongoing antisemitism investigation. The move has triggered outrage among campus activists and leftist faculty, who claim it undermines free speech and academic freedom. University officials say the disclosure was a legal obligation under federal law.

The investigation, led by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), follows a rise in antisemitic incidents tied to pro-Palestinian demonstrations on campus. The Department of Education requested internal communications, including names, related to protests and classroom activity that may have created a hostile environment for Jewish students. On September 4, the individuals whose names were handed over were notified by email.

Among the names released is Judith Butler, a well-known leftist philosopher and vocal anti-Israel advocate. Butler and others claim they were not informed of any charges or allowed to respond. She described the process as “Kafka-land,” a sentiment echoed in a letter signed by over 600 professors who accused the university of violating its own values of academic freedom and expression.

The protest letter complains that UC Berkeley “capitulated” to federal pressure from President Trump’s administration. Signatories argue that the university betrayed its supposed commitment to due process and transparency by handing over personal data without first notifying those involved. Faculty unions and legal groups are now considering lawsuits against the Department of Education and the UC system.

Despite the backlash, UC Berkeley officials have defended the action, citing their obligation to comply with federal investigations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. The law requires schools that receive federal funding to address discrimination, including antisemitism. The Trump administration has made campus antisemitism a priority, especially after a wave of anti-Israel activism intensified following the Hamas terror attacks and Israel’s military response.