Home Blog Page 180

AAUP President’s False Labeling of Kirk Assassin Ignites Fury

(Photo by Rebecca Noble/Getty Images)

Todd Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), is under fire for publicly calling Tyler Robinson—the accused assassin of Charlie Kirk—a “right‑wing kid,” despite substantial evidence that Robinson held left‑leaning views. Wolfson’s statement appears inconsistent with AAUP’s own guidelines that demand accuracy and restraint in public commentary.

Robinson is charged with assassinating conservative activist and commentator Charlie Kirk at an event held at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025. Utah prosecutors have announced intent to seek the death penalty.

Wolfson’s public post asserted that Robinson “was a disturbed right wing kid … that likely murdered Kirk because he was not right wing enough.” Yet multiple sources report that Robinson had adopted leftist political positions before the attack. The AAUP policy mandates that its members “at all times be accurate … exercise appropriate restraint … make every effort to indicate that they are not speaking for the institution.”

The clash highlights deeper tensions in academia’s role amid political violence. The AAUP recently defended professors’ free speech rights following Kirk’s assassination—but stopped short of explicitly condemning the shooting. Critics argue that Wolfson’s remarks damage the credibility of faculty free‑speech advocacy when leaders violate their own standards.

Swalwell Blames Trump for FBI’s Missed ICE Shooting

Trump fires FBI officials
FBI (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

During an appearance on MSNBC’s “The Last Word” on Friday, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) suggested that recent shootings, including one at a Texas ICE facility, may be tied to the FBI being “distracted” by prosecutions connected to President Donald Trump. He framed the attack as a “political assassination” and questioned the FBI’s ability to protect the public while pursuing legal cases involving Trump.

Swalwell claimed, “Americans are being squeezed in every way,” and argued that public trust is shaken when media coverage focuses on legal actions against political opponents. He went on to link the ICE facility shooting to broader political violence, calling it “the second political assassination in the last three weeks.”

The shooting in question occurred earlier in the week at an ICE detention center in Texas. A gunman reportedly opened fire, killing one detainee and injuring another. The suspect may have been targeting ICE officials. Swalwell noted that the shooter had an online presence, suggesting a possible ideological motive, though no official motive has yet been confirmed.

Swalwell questioned whether the FBI, in pursuing prosecutions related to President Trump, has been too distracted to prevent violent acts. “Are they able to protect the public from sick individuals who are willing to carry out these sick executions?” he asked.

The congressman’s remarks draw a direct line between federal law enforcement’s current priorities and their ability to address growing threats of political violence. His comments imply that resources focused on Trump-related cases might be undermining national security. Critics have called the statement politically charged, while others see it as part of a broader attempt to redirect public concern toward Trump and his influence on law enforcement actions.

Baker Resurfaces at Knight-Georgetown Censorship Hub

Image via Canva

James Baker, the former top lawyer at the FBI during the Russiagate investigation and later a key figure in Twitter’s pre-Musk censorship system, now serves on the board of a newly formed “counter-disinformation” group. The Knight-Georgetown Institute (KGI), launched in 2024 by the Knight Foundation and Georgetown University, is advancing policy strategies aimed at regulating online speech through direct influence on state legislatures.

KGI has begun promoting a legislative “toolkit” for state lawmakers. This toolkit provides guidance on how to reshape social media algorithms and regulate content feeds under the pretense of improving “quality” and reducing “toxicity.” Baker’s presence on the board represents a continuation of government-aligned efforts to control digital speech through institutional partnerships.

Other board members include Alondra Nelson, who directed the Biden administration’s Office of Science and Technology Policy and oversaw a wide-reaching federal disinformation program involving 26 federal agencies and numerous universities and nonprofits. Also on the board is Nahiba Syed, an attorney who defended the Steele Dossier, a discredited document central to the Russia collusion narrative.

In March 2025, KGI released its flagship policy document, Better Feeds. The proposal outlines three strategies for reshaping social media platforms: “Bridging,” which prioritizes so-called positive dialogue over high-engagement content; “Surveys,” in which platforms regularly poll users to steer preferences; and “Quality Metrics,” a system to downgrade content flagged as “toxic” while boosting content from establishment-approved sources.

The metrics for evaluating “quality” are deliberately subjective, allowing those in control to suppress disfavored content. KGI endorses tools like NewsGuard and Google Jigsaw’s Perspective AI, which have been used to blacklist conservative news outlets including Breitbart News, Newsmax, and The Federalist.

These mechanisms allow censorship to be enacted quietly, without direct bans, using algorithmic downgrading and reputational smears. Under the guise of fighting disinformation, KGI is building a framework to institutionalize digital censorship, leveraging government influence, academic partnerships, and nonprofit funding.

Baker’s involvement marks a strategic link between past federal surveillance efforts and future content regulation schemes. His role indicates the long-term goal of transforming online speech governance into a permanent institutional enterprise backed by legislative power.

Dallas ICE Agents Brave Sniper Fire to Save Migrants

Texas Flag
Texas flag (Pete Alexopoulos/Unsplash)

Surveillance footage from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Dallas captures the moment federal agents risked their lives to save detainees trapped under sniper fire. The dramatic video, released Friday, shows agents shielding shackled migrants and rushing them to safety inside the facility as bullets struck nearby.

Fox News Dallas reporter Brooke Taylor first posted the footage on social media, noting how agents were seen ducking behind transport vans while frantically ushering detainees into the building. Once inside, video shows agents guiding the migrants down a hallway to a secure location, before several officers reportedly returned outside to aid those injured in the attack.

ICE officials praised the agents’ actions, describing them as “heroic, clearly willing to risk their lives to save the detainees, rather than focus on dangerous anti-ICE rhetoric.” Officials emphasized that the Dallas Field Office is “upset, devastated, and frustrated that the public can’t see they are just doing their jobs and protecting the community.”

Details on casualties remain limited. Reports identify Angel Garcia-Hernandez, a Mexican national with multiple criminal convictions, as critically wounded after sustaining several gunshot injuries. Another migrant, Venezuelan national José Andrés Bordones-Molina, was also struck. The condition of a third man, Norlan Guzman-Fuentes, remains unclear. Guzman-Fuentes reportedly has a history of violent crimes, including aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and firearm-related charges.

The shooter, who opened fire on the ICE transport van, has not yet been identified publicly. Federal investigators continue to probe the incident, which comes amid escalating attacks and threats targeting ICE personnel across the country.

Officials hope the video sheds light on the daily risks ICE officers face. “Our agents are protecting the community from dangerous criminals,” one official said. “What they did in Dallas was nothing short of courageous.”

Florida Nutaku Segpay Lawsuit Puts Age Verification in Spotlight

Florida
Flag of Florida (Karl Callwood/Unsplash)

Florida has filed lawsuits against adult gaming platform Nutaku, its parent company Aylo, and payment processor Segpay, accusing them of failing to comply with the state’s new age verification law, HB3. The law, which went into effect in January, requires online platforms to ensure that Florida-based visitors are at least 18 before accessing explicit material.

Nutaku, operated by Aylo — which also owns Pornhub and other major adult sites — runs two platforms: nutaku.com, which hosts “safe-for-work” content, and nutaku.net, which offers sexually explicit games. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier alleges that Nutaku and another Aylo-owned site, Spicevids, violated HB3 by continuing to allow access through a simple click-to-confirm age gate instead of verifying users’ identities. By contrast, Aylo blocked access to other adult platforms in Florida when the law took effect.

In a separate filing, Uthmeier targeted Segpay, a Florida-based payment processor that works with high-risk adult entertainment clients. The complaint alleges Segpay enabled the adult game site Lustyheroes to operate without conducting proper age verification, making the company complicit in violating HB3.

Aylo has pushed back, saying it believes both Spicevids and Nutaku are in compliance. A company spokesperson claimed that Spicevids has implemented verification systems consistent with HB3, while Nutaku’s explicit content makes up less than the law’s 33.3% threshold for classifying a site as pornographic.

Florida’s lawsuits follow similar actions last month against other porn platforms, including XVideos, XNXX, Bang Bros, and Girls Gone Wild. The state is one of 20 nationwide that now mandate digital age checks for adult content.

Uthmeier defended the aggressive enforcement, stating:
“Multiple porn companies are flagrantly breaking Florida’s age verification law by exposing children to harmful, explicit content. As Attorney General, and as a father, this is unacceptable. We will hold them accountable.”

Three Women Charged After Livestreaming Stalking

ICE reporting bill
Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers (Photo by Bryan Cox/U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement via Getty Images)

Three women from California and Colorado have been indicted on federal charges after allegedly stalking a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent in Los Angeles and broadcasting the pursuit on Instagram.

According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California, the women followed the agent from the Los Angeles Civic Center to his residence, livestreaming the drive and providing real-time directions to their audience. Once outside his home, they shouted to neighbors that “ICE lives on your street” and publicly disclosed his address, encouraging viewers to “come on down.”

Acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli condemned the incident, calling it a deliberate threat against law enforcement:
“Our brave federal agents put their lives on the line every day to keep our nation safe. The conduct of these defendants is deeply offensive to law enforcement officers and their families. If you threaten, dox, or harm in any manner one of our agents or employees, you will face prosecution and prison time.”

The defendants, identified as Cynthia Raygoza, 35, Ashleigh Brown, 38, and Sandra Carmona Samane, 25, were each indicted on one count of conspiracy and one count of disclosing personal information of a federal agent. If convicted, they face up to five years in prison.

Prosecutors reported that Brown also faces an unrelated charge of assaulting a federal officer and is being held without bond. Samane was released on a $5,000 bond, while Raygoza remains at large. ICE Homeland Security Investigations and U.S. Marshals are assisting in the search.

Authorities emphasized that targeting federal employees will be prosecuted aggressively to deter harassment and protect agents’ safety.

Danish Drone Sightings at Military Bases Raise Security Concerns

Drone (Ricardo Gomez Angel/Unsplash)

The Danish defense ministry reported Saturday that drones were spotted overnight at multiple military installations, the latest in a string of unexplained incursions unsettling northern Europe.

According to the ministry, drone activity was confirmed over Skrydstrup Air Base and the Jutland Dragoon Regiment. Local media also reported sightings near Karup Air Base — Denmark’s largest — though the ministry declined to confirm, citing operational security and an ongoing investigation.

Public broadcaster DR reported that drones flew inside and outside Karup’s perimeter fence around 8 p.m. Friday, prompting a temporary closure of the airspace. While there is no civil aviation at Karup, the incident underscored growing concern over the frequency of drone flyovers.

Earlier in the week, drones disrupted operations at four Danish airports, including Copenhagen, where flights were grounded for hours. Justice Minister Peter Hummelgaard warned that the intent was to sow “fear and division,” pledging new legislation to allow infrastructure owners to shoot down unauthorized drones. Ahead of next week’s EU summit, Denmark accepted Sweden’s offer of a military-grade anti-drone system.

Neighboring Germany has also reported drone sightings in Schleswig-Holstein, which borders Denmark. Interior Minister Sabine Sütterlin-Waack said police have stepped up counter-drone defenses in coordination with other northern states. Chancellor Friedrich Merz framed the threat as part of a wider pattern of hybrid warfare: “We are not at war, but we are no longer living in peace either.”

NATO leaders meeting in Riga, Latvia, echoed the alarm. Adm. Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chair of NATO’s Military Committee, condemned repeated Russian airspace violations over several allies as “escalatory, reckless and endangering lives.” Latvian President Edgars Rinkēvičs said NATO’s new Eastern Sentry operation demonstrates the alliance’s resolve to defend its eastern flank.

With tensions rising, officials across Europe agree: bolstering air defense is now an urgent priority.

Maher Says Democrats Have No Agenda, Only Trump Hate

Ed Rollins PAC
U.S. Flagpole (Christopher Burns/Unsplash)

During the “Overtime” online segment of HBO’s Real Time on Friday, liberal host Bill Maher openly admitted that Democrats are failing to present a coherent vision for voters. Reviewing fresh polling numbers, Maher said that while President Donald Trump’s overall approval has dipped, especially among key demographics, Democrats still cannot capitalize on the opportunity.

“Trump’s numbers are down. They’re down with Latinos. They’re down with blacks. They’re down 15 points with whites,” Maher explained. “And yet, in the other poll, on issues, Trump’s still winning. So, this is your big opportunity, Democrats. He’s down in the numbers, and you still can’t score.” Maher suggested that part of the problem stems from voter misinformation but also conceded that Democrats themselves offer little substance beyond relentless opposition to Trump.

Maher highlighted one polling figure in particular: Democrats only hold a slim two-point edge when voters were asked which party better represents “respect for democracy.” For Maher, that statistic is alarming, but he also blamed Democrats for failing to connect. “Some of this is just because people are f*cking stupid,” he bluntly said, underscoring his frustration with both voters and his own party.

CNN host Michael Smerconish, who joined Maher in the discussion, went further, stating, “The only thing the Democratic Party stands for today is opposition to Donald Trump.” Maher quickly agreed with that assessment. Smerconish also criticized former Vice President Kamala Harris’ recently released book for presenting no forward-looking policy ideas, calling it “indicative of the party at large.” Maher again agreed, reinforcing the point that Democrats appear rudderless heading into future elections.

The exchange reflects growing concerns—even within liberal circles—that Democrats remain a party defined by Trump rather than one with a substantive platform of their own.

Ro Khanna Trump Prosecuting Enemies

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) used his Friday appearance on MSNBC’s The Briefing to argue that while health care is a major sticking point in the looming government shutdown, the larger problem is what he called the Trump administration’s “unconstitutional” conduct.

Host Jen Psaki pressed Khanna on what Americans should expect if the government shuts down September 30, with Republicans and Democrats still locked in a standoff over health care subsidies. Khanna acknowledged that the health care dispute is central, warning that premiums on the exchanges could spike:

“The premiums for people are going to go up 80 to 90% if you are on health care on the exchange. And one of the issues is that they shouldn’t be taking away the health care.”

But Khanna then broadened his critique, arguing that Democrats oppose more than just subsidy cuts:

“There’s a much bigger issue as well, Jen. And that is, this is an administration that is prosecuting its enemies. It’s an administration that is deporting people without due process. It’s an administration that is threatening people’s free speech if they criticize the views of Charlie Kirk. It’s an administration that is putting blanket tariffs that are raising people’s prices.”

Khanna accused President Donald Trump of failing to meet his promise to lower costs:

“So much for Donald Trump’s promise, I’m going to reduce and lower your prices on day one. All he’s done is raise prices.”

The California Democrat framed the standoff as a matter of principle, saying his party will not help advance what he views as unconstitutional governance:

“The Democrats are just saying, we’re not going to be complicit. We’re not going to be complicit with an unconstitutional government that is raising your prices, that is making your health care less affordable.”

With just days until the deadline, both parties remain far apart on a funding deal. Khanna’s remarks highlight Democrats’ broader political message: that the shutdown fight is not only about health care subsidies, but also about resisting Trump’s broader governing agenda.

Khanna also linked the shutdown crisis to what he sees as a broader erosion of democratic norms. He argued that when a government uses the justice system against political opponents, it undermines public trust and creates a chilling effect on dissent. “If critics fear retaliation simply for speaking out, then we stop being a free society,” Khanna said, warning that the stakes extend beyond budget negotiations.

The congressman stressed that Democrats are not merely posturing but drawing a line in the sand against practices they view as unconstitutional. “We’re not refusing to negotiate because we don’t care about governance,” he explained. “We’re refusing because what this administration is doing goes against the very principles of democracy and fairness that Americans expect.”

Hakeem Jeffries Bipartisan Medicaid Talks

Hakeem Jeffries
(Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

House Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) said Friday on CNN’s The Source that he sees “bipartisan opportunity” to address Medicaid cuts recently enacted by Republicans, despite skepticism about whether the GOP would undo legislation it just passed.

Host Kaitlan Collins pressed Jeffries on whether Democrats truly believe Republicans would roll back the Medicaid funding reductions included in President Trump’s major spending package. While some Senate Republicans have signaled openness to negotiating on health care subsidies, the Medicaid issue has become a flashpoint.

Jeffries framed the cuts as both a moral and political liability for Republicans:

“Donald Trump promised, I think it was on January 30, that he was going to love and cherish Medicaid. And then they turned around, passed their one big ugly bill, and enacted the largest cut to Medicaid in American history, along with stealing food from the mouths of children.”

He argued the motivation behind the legislation was to “reward their billionaire donors with massive tax breaks,” a move he described as deeply unpopular with the public. According to Jeffries, Republicans are already feeling political blowback as health facilities in their districts are shuttering:

“Hospitals, nursing homes, and community-based health clinics in our communities are closing. We told them that was going to happen. Now they’re starting to see the consequences.”

While GOP leadership has stood by the spending bill, Jeffries emphasized that Democrats see an opening to forge bipartisan fixes, particularly as constituents pressure Republicans to address local health care disruptions.

“Yes, we do think that there’s some bipartisan opportunity to deal with their assault on Medicaid and all of the things related to the health care of the American people,” Jeffries concluded.

With a government shutdown looming and negotiations intensifying, the battle over Medicaid cuts could become a decisive test of bipartisan cooperation in Congress.