Home Blog Page 15

Sharon Osbourne Gets Emotional Over President Trump’s Voicemail After Ozzy’s Death

Ozzy Osbourne
Heavy metal singer Ozzy Osbourne performs circa 1988. (Photo by Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images)

Sharon Osbourne became visibly emotional when she shared a condolence voicemail left by Donald Trump after the death of her husband, rock icon Ozzy Osbourne. Speaking on the family podcast, she described the message as a gesture that “he didn’t have to call” but one she deeply appreciated.

In the voicemail, President Trump told Sharon: “Hi Sharon, it’s Donald Trump and I just wanted to wish you the best and the family… Ozzy was amazing, he was an amazing guy. I met him a few times and I want to tell you he was unique in every way and talented. … I just wanted to wish you the best… Take care of yourself. Say hello to the family. Thanks, bye.”

Sharon said the call stood out because of its sincerity, noting she had only worked with Trump briefly (on Celebrity Apprentice in 2010) and had never expected such a personal contact. She emphasized that the call was “really kind of him.”

The Osbourne family also received a handwritten letter of condolence from King Charles III, which Sharon described as deeply meaningful. She praised the king for his compassion and noted the recognition from global figures made the family feel supported during a difficult time.

Ozzy Osbourne died on July 22, 2025 at age 76. His cause of death was listed as cardiac arrest, acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease and Parkinson’s disease.

For Sharon, the gesture by President Trump—and the way she publicly acknowledged it—offers a moment of human connection in the midst of grief. The story also reflects how personal relationships can transcend political divides, even in highly‑polarized times.

Prediction Markets Slash Odds of President Trump’s Tariff Victory at Supreme Court

(Getty Images/John Baggaley)

Prediction markets have lowered the likelihood of President Trump prevailing in a key Supreme Court case concerning his tariff authority to just 24 percent. The case, centered on the legality of tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), has drawn national attention due to its potential to redefine executive control over trade policy.

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in early November 2025. Multiple justices signaled doubt over whether the IEEPA grants the president authority to impose tariffs without direct congressional approval. Questions from Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch focused on whether the law was intended to permit such broad economic actions, or merely authorize sanctions and embargoes in times of national emergency.

Following the hearing, trading activity on prediction markets responded sharply. Kalshi and Polymarket both reported steep declines in the probability of a favorable ruling for the Trump administration, dropping to roughly 24 percent. These platforms reflect real-time sentiment among political analysts, legal observers, and market participants.

The Trump administration has defended its interpretation of IEEPA as consistent with longstanding presidential discretion in foreign policy and national security matters. Supporters argue the tariffs were a necessary tool to counter unfair trade practices and protect American industries. Critics contend the approach bypassed congressional authority and may set a precedent for unilateral executive action on economic issues.

A ruling against the administration could invalidate significant portions of the tariffs and prompt future limitations on executive power. It may also affect revenue generated through duties imposed under the policy.

The case represents one of the most consequential legal tests of presidential trade authority in recent history. With a decision expected in the coming months, the outcome could reshape how future administrations leverage emergency powers in economic matters.

Vanderbilt Faculty Revolt Against Trump’s Higher Ed Overhaul

DEI
DEI (Amy Elting/Unsplash)

More than 300 students and faculty at Vanderbilt University protested on November 5, 2025, against the Trump administration’s Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education. The agreement ties increased federal funding to a set of policy reforms that would reshape university governance, admissions, and curriculum oversight.

The compact, distributed to nine top-tier universities including Vanderbilt, outlines several key requirements: a ban on the use of race and gender in admissions decisions, a 15 percent cap on international student enrollment, a five-year tuition freeze, and structural changes to diminish academic units deemed hostile to conservative viewpoints. It also calls for increased transparency and limits on administrative costs.

While Vanderbilt has not signed the compact, its administration acknowledged receiving the proposal and stated it was engaged in discussions. That position drew criticism from a large segment of the university community. Protesters on campus voiced concern that accepting the deal would compromise academic freedom and institutional independence. A graduate student speaker warned of parallels to authoritarianism, citing 1930s Europe.

Internal polling reported by student media indicated overwhelming opposition among undergraduates. Eighty-four percent opposed continuing any engagement with the compact, and nearly 80 percent favored cutting off all discussions.

Supporters of the compact argue it brings accountability and ideological balance to institutions increasingly dominated by left-wing perspectives. They point to declining affordability, unchecked administrative growth, and one-sided curricula as reasons for federal intervention. The proposal’s backers say it prioritizes merit-based systems and fiscal responsibility without directly interfering in classroom content.

Critics counter that federal conditions—particularly ideological oversight—could undermine the autonomy of higher education. Legal scholars have raised questions about whether such terms would survive court challenges under existing First Amendment and Title IX protections.

Vanderbilt’s decision remains pending. Its next steps may set a precedent for how elite institutions respond to federal funding offers tied to cultural and structural reforms. The outcome could influence how universities nationwide handle rising scrutiny over cost, ideology, and governance.

Seattle Mayoral Race Chaos, Recount Could Cost Taxpayers $400K

Seattle
(Andrea Leopardi/Unsplash)

The Seattle mayoral race is headed for a potential taxpayer-funded recount as progressive challenger Katie Wilson has overtaken incumbent Mayor Bruce Harrell by a razor-thin margin. With just 1,346 votes separating the candidates—50.1% of the total—Washington state law could soon trigger an automatic machine recount, the first in a Seattle mayoral contest in over two decades.

Under Washington law, an automatic recount is required if the margin is under 2,000 votes and less than 0.5% of total votes cast. With roughly 1,500 ballots remaining and a margin hovering just above the threshold, the city is bracing for what could be a prolonged and costly battle.

King County Elections officials estimate the recount could cost Seattle taxpayers around $400,000, depending on final ballot totals and recount logistics. If the final margin disqualifies the race from an automatic recount, either candidate could still request one—but would have to pay the cost upfront unless the outcome is reversed.

So far, 273,996 ballots have been counted. A candidate-requested machine recount would require a deposit of $41,099, while a hand recount would cost $68,499. Late-counted ballots from progressive-leaning neighborhoods like Capitol Hill have shifted momentum in Wilson’s favor—a common trend in Seattle elections.

Originally trailing by over 10,000 votes on Election Day, Wilson has steadily gained ground. Her campaign manager Alex Gallo-Brown declared cautious confidence: “We want to wait until every vote has been counted to declare victory, but we believe that we’ve won this race.”

If Wilson’s lead holds, she would become mayor after one of the tightest races in city history, rivaling only the 2001 contest where Greg Nickels edged out Mark Sidran by just over 1%.

Mayor Harrell’s campaign has not commented publicly on the latest developments.

AI Will Destroy Humanity? Majority Say Yes in Shocking Yahoo Poll!

AI, Artificial Intelligence (Just_Super/Getty via Canva Pro)

A new Yahoo/YouGov survey reveals a deep undercurrent of fear among Americans regarding the future of artificial intelligence. Despite Silicon Valley’s excitement and Wall Street’s investment boom, over half of Americans—53 percent—now believe it is likely that AI will eventually “destroy humanity.”

The poll, conducted in late October among 1,770 U.S. adults, comes amid major AI advancements, including the rise of tools like OpenAI’s ChatGPT Atlas and Nvidia’s record-breaking $5 trillion market cap. While 85 percent of those who’ve used AI chatbots say they’re at least somewhat helpful, the optimism ends there.

More than half of respondents (59 percent) said they encounter AI-generated content online too often, and 56 percent admitted they’ve mistaken it for real content. Though 54 percent feel confident in their own ability to distinguish AI-generated content from real content, only 21 percent believe the average person can do the same.

When asked how AI impacts personal intelligence, only 16 percent said AI makes them smarter. Thirty percent believe it helps in some areas but makes them “dumber” in others. Just 17 percent see AI having a mostly positive effect on their lives, while nearly twice as many (32 percent) expect a negative impact.

The poll also presented respondents with predictions about AI’s future. Sixty percent believed AI will eventually help solve complex problems like curing cancer. But even more—63 percent—said they believe AI will become so advanced that humans will lose control over it. Most alarming: 53 percent said it’s “somewhat” or “very” likely that AI will destroy humanity.

Even when asked about AI’s greatest promise, like curing cancer, only 15 percent said that outcome was “very likely.” In contrast, 20 percent said the total destruction of humanity by AI was “very likely.”

Tax the Rich? She IS the Rich

Jasmine Crockett
(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

In the grand theater of American politics, few acts are more tiresome than the Democrat elite's annual performance of "I'm Just Like You." They descend from their ivory towers—coastal estates, private jets, and Botox-fueled fundraisers—to lecture the working class on humility, all while their Federal Election Commission filings read like a Neiman Marcus catalog. . .

This content is only available for American Faith Premium Subscribers. For as low as $3.99/mo, you can access all our Premium content, learn more here.

If you are already a Premium subscriber, please log in to view this content.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Michael Burry Drops Bombshell, Big Tech Cooking the Books?

AI
Image via Canva Pro

Michael Burry, famed for predicting the 2008 financial collapse and dramatized in The Big Short, is now sounding alarms about the AI boom—accusing major tech firms of using deceptive accounting practices to overstate profits. In a new warning posted on X, Burry alleges that leading “hyperscalers”—companies providing cloud and AI infrastructure—are manipulating depreciation schedules to artificially inflate earnings.

Burry claims these companies are extending the estimated lifespan of expensive AI chips and servers beyond realistic timelines, minimizing annual depreciation costs and boosting reported profits. “Understating depreciation by extending useful life of assets artificially boosts earnings – one of the more common frauds of the modern era,” Burry stated.

He estimates this tactic will understate depreciation by a staggering $176 billion from 2026 through 2028, allowing firms to present an overly optimistic picture to investors. Specifically, he singled out Oracle and Meta, projecting their earnings could be inflated by 27% and 21% respectively by 2028.

Burry’s allegations target the heart of the AI investment frenzy, which has driven tech valuations to record highs. Under GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), companies have some flexibility in estimating asset lifespans. However, Burry argues this leeway is being abused to mask the true cost of fast-depreciating equipment like Nvidia AI chips, which typically follow a 2-3 year product cycle.

The accusations follow Burry’s earlier moves to short AI heavyweights. Regulatory filings from Scion Asset Management reveal put options against Nvidia and Palantir, signaling a bearish bet that these companies are overvalued. Burry hinted more revelations are coming, promising to release additional findings on November 25.

Palantir CEO Alex Karp responded by dismissing Burry’s positions as “super weird” and “batshit crazy,” but the high-profile investor has a history of being early—and right.

Google Sues Chinese Cyber Gang, Massive Scam Exposed

google
Google App (Brett Jordan/Unsplash)

Google has filed a groundbreaking lawsuit against a Chinese cybercrime syndicate responsible for a global smishing operation that has scammed over a million victims across 120 countries. The lawsuit, filed under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, the Lanham Act, and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), targets the group’s phishing-as-a-service platform known as “Lighthouse.”

The operation, dubbed the “Smishing Triad” by cybersecurity researchers, used sophisticated SMS phishing messages to impersonate reputable brands like Google, E-ZPass, and the U.S. Postal Service. Victims were tricked into clicking malicious links that directed them to counterfeit websites designed to steal Social Security numbers, bank credentials, and credit card information.

Google alleges the gang may have compromised between 12.7 million and 115 million U.S. credit cards. Halimah DeLaine Prado, Google’s general counsel, stated the Lighthouse software was built to mimic real brands, enabling criminals to launch coordinated attacks at scale.

The smishing network is organized and multi-layered, with public Telegram channels used to coordinate attacks. Roles within the operation include “data brokers” who provide contact lists, “spammers” who distribute phishing texts, and a “theft” group that exploits stolen data. Over 2,500 individuals are estimated to be involved.

The scam relies on SIM farms—industrial setups loaded with thousands of SIM cards—to blast text messages globally. These scams are also linked to a broader fraud ecosystem where stolen credit card numbers are installed on digital wallets and used to purchase iPhones, luxury goods, and gift cards.

While legal experts question how much impact a U.S. civil lawsuit can have against criminals in communist China, Google is also backing three bipartisan anti-fraud bills to enhance protections: the GUARD Act, the Foreign Robocall Elimination Act, and the Scam Act.

ICE Nabs Illegal Scumbags, Noem Says ‘Self-Deport or Else’

Sakhorn38/Getty via Canva Pro

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have arrested multiple illegal aliens with violent criminal records, continuing what Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem describes as a targeted crackdown on the most dangerous offenders. In a statement to Breitbart News, Noem made it clear that under President Donald Trump’s leadership, the administration is prioritizing public safety and aggressive enforcement.

“Sex offenders. Violent thugs. Drug traffickers. These are just a few of the scumbags here illegally who we have arrested thanks to President Trump,” Noem said. She urged illegal aliens to “self-deport” using the CBP Home App or face arrest and removal.

Among those recently arrested are:

  • Modesto Morales-Bernabe of Mexico, convicted of third-degree sexual assault in Gunnison County, Colorado.
  • Mario Joel Marquez of Honduras, convicted of assault and two counts of aggravated assault in Davidson County, Tennessee.
  • Gabriel Rodriguez-Martinez of Mexico, convicted in McAllen, Texas, of conspiring to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine.
  • Gilbert Ruiz-Broche of Cuba, convicted of methamphetamine distribution in Austin, Texas.
  • Claudio Alejandro Ayvar of the Dominican Republic, convicted of fentanyl distribution in Lynn, Massachusetts.

Secretary Noem emphasized that the new DHS approach under President Trump includes a strong incentive for self-deportation. Through the CBP Home App, illegal aliens can schedule their own deportation and may qualify for stipends if they can prove voluntary compliance.

The arrests underscore the administration’s commitment to restoring law and order amid rising concerns about border security and violent crime tied to illegal immigration. ICE officials have maintained that more than 70% of current immigration enforcement targets have prior convictions or pending criminal charges.

Tim Kaine Torches Trump’s Venezuela Move

uss harry truman

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) sharply criticized President Donald Trump’s military strategy in the Caribbean during an interview on CNN’s The Situation Room, calling recent naval actions and lethal strikes on alleged drug boats near Venezuela a “catastrophic blunder.”

Host Wolf Blitzer pressed Kaine, a member of both the Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations Committees, about Venezuela’s reported military mobilization in response to the U.S. buildup of warships and personnel. Kaine warned the administration’s approach could provoke a dangerous escalation with Venezuela.

“I think this policy is a catastrophic blunder,” Kaine said. “Treating this as a military intervention is a big mistake.”

Kaine pointed to growing diplomatic fallout from the Trump administration’s aggressive posture in the region. “You saw yesterday that our closest ally, the United Kingdom, has now stopped sharing intelligence with the U.S. on activities in the Caribbean and the Pacific… because they believe the U.S. strikes are violating international law,” he added.

The senator expressed concern that the U.S. naval buildup could be misinterpreted by the Venezuelan military as a prelude to an attack, increasing the likelihood of a hostile response. “When you amass such naval presence near Venezuela, you are dramatically raising the risk that Venezuela… will think they’re going to be under attack and then respond in kind.”

Kaine further cautioned that Venezuela possesses “significant weapons” purchased from U.S. adversaries, suggesting that any miscommunication could endanger American service members. “The last thing I want to see… is Venezuela get the mistaken impression that an attack is imminent and start using these weapons against American sailors and troops.”

His remarks signal deepening Democratic concerns over the Trump administration’s foreign policy strategy in Latin America, particularly the risk of triggering unnecessary conflict with a heavily armed regime on America’s doorstep.

1...141516...3,835Page 15 of 3,835
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2025 American Faith Media Network. All rights reserved.