A coalition of 207 female state and federal lawmakers has filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to review cases involving the protection of female athletes in women’s sports. The brief supports state laws that restrict participation in female athletic competitions to biological females. Lawmakers argue the issue carries nationwide consequences for fairness, safety, and the future of women’s athletics.
The brief was submitted as the Supreme Court considers whether to hear challenges to state laws regulating eligibility in women’s sports. The lawmakers contend that lower courts have issued conflicting rulings, creating uncertainty for schools, athletic associations, and families. They argue that Supreme Court intervention is necessary to establish a uniform legal standard.
According to the filing, women’s sports were created to ensure equal opportunities for female athletes, particularly in light of biological differences that can affect strength, speed, and endurance. The lawmakers state that allowing biological males to compete in female categories undermines those original protections. They also argue that the issue extends beyond competition to include concerns over locker rooms, scholarships, and injury risk.
The brief emphasizes that the lawmakers represent a wide range of states and legislative bodies. Many signatories have backgrounds in athletics, education, or public policy related to women and girls. They argue that elected officials have a responsibility to protect sex-based distinctions in law when they are tied to fairness and safety.
The case before the court stems from challenges to state-level sports laws passed in recent years. Supporters of the laws argue they are consistent with the intent of Title IX, while opponents claim they discriminate against transgender athletes. Federal courts have issued mixed decisions, prompting requests for Supreme Court review.
The issue has drawn national attention as cultural debates over gender identity continue to influence schools and youth sports. Athletic organizations, parents, and coaches have testified in legislatures across the country about competitive balance and athlete welfare. Several states have paused enforcement of their laws while litigation proceeds.
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will take up the case. If accepted, the ruling could set a precedent affecting school sports policies nationwide. The lawmakers argue that clarity from the nation’s highest court is overdue given the rapid policy changes occurring at the state level.
