U.S. Supreme Court Could ‘Remove’ President, VP, Hundreds in Congress for ‘Treason’: ‘Brunson v. Adams’ (Case No. 22-380) Docketed

“The refusal of the Respondents to investigate this congressional claim (the enemy) is an act of treason,” says case.

  • Raland J. Brunson’s lawsuit against 388 federal officeholders, including President Joseph Biden Jr., Vice President Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and former Vice President Michael Pence, was docketed by the United States Supreme Court on October 24, 2022. The U.S. Supreme Court “dockets” a lawsuit when it officially adds the case to its record, scheduling it for consideration by the Supreme Court Justices (more).
  • According to the case, Brunson seeks retribution for the President, VP, and Congress’s refusal to investigate evidence presented during the 117th Congress Proceeding on January 6, 2021 that claimed the 2020 Presidential election had been rigged.
  • The plaintiff, Brunson, alleges that the defendants violated their oath of office by refusing to investigate insistence of election rigging during the 2020 Presidential election, also claiming that this refusal constituted an act of “treason and fraud,” according to the lawsuit.
  • Brunson is the plaintiff, but the suit also claims he represents “every citizen of the U.S.A.” because the defendants’ alleged acts of treason and fraud—ultimately bringing the destruction of Americans’ fundamental freedoms, per the suit—”unilaterally violated” the rights of “every person living, and all courts of law.”
  • The plaintiff also seeks the Respondents (defendants) to be immediately removed from office “without leaving this country vulnerable without a President and Vice President,” the lawsuit states.
  • Brunson’s content is featured on 7discoveries.com.

“This petition is set forth in the interest of justice in protecting Brunson’s right to petition for a redress of grievances against the Respondents, and ensuring his right of due process against the encroachment of the doctrine of equitable maxim, and charging the Respondents who failed to investigate the allegations of a rigged election by having them removed from office without further delay.”

Read the case here: