President Donald Trump has intensified measures to enforce the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America,” as per an executive order signed on January 20, 2025. The administration has barred Associated Press (AP) journalists from key White House events until the news organization adopts the new nomenclature. This action underscores the administration’s commitment to its “America First” agenda and highlights ongoing tensions between the White House and media outlets.
The executive order, titled “Restoring Names That Honor American Greatness,” mandates federal agencies to use “Gulf of America” in all official communications and publications. Major corporations, including BP, Chevron, and Shell, have complied by updating their materials to reflect the change. Google Maps has also adjusted its platform, displaying “Gulf of America” for users within the United States, while retaining “Gulf of Mexico” for users in Mexico and showing both names elsewhere.
Despite these changes, the AP has maintained its use of “Gulf of Mexico,” citing adherence to its internationally recognized Stylebook and a commitment to clarity for its global audience. In response, the White House has restricted AP journalists from accessing the Oval Office and Air Force One, with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stating that access to such events is a privilege, not a right. Leavitt emphasized the administration’s stance, noting, “It is a fact that the body of water off the coast of Louisiana is called the Gulf of America.”
The AP has defended its position, arguing that the government’s attempt to dictate language used by independent media infringes upon First Amendment rights. Executive Editor Julie Pace described the administration’s actions as “a deeply troubling escalation” and reaffirmed the organization’s commitment to journalistic integrity.
Internationally, the renaming has sparked diplomatic tensions, particularly with Mexico. President Claudia Sheinbaum has criticized the unilateral decision, asserting that Mexico retains sovereignty over its territorial waters and that the renaming does not alter international agreements. Sheinbaum has also threatened legal action against companies and organizations that adopt the new name, emphasizing the cultural and historical significance of the original designation.
Public opinion in the United States appears divided. Polls indicate that a significant majority of Americans oppose the renaming, with many viewing it as an unnecessary alteration of a historically recognized name. Critics argue that the move is a symbolic gesture that could strain international relations without tangible benefits.
As the situation develops, the administration remains steadfast in its policy, while media organizations, international entities, and the public continue to navigate the implications of the enforced nomenclature change.
