Chase Strangio, a transgender-identifying lawyer and co-director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) LGBT & HIV Project, will argue before the Supreme Court this week in a high-stakes case regarding gender transitions for minors. The case, United States v. Skrmetti, challenges Tennessee’s law banning irreversible gender transition procedures for children.
Strangio, a biological woman who identifies as a transgender man, has publicly advocated for minors to access so-called “gender-affirming care,” which includes puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries. Speaking about her own experience with transgender medical treatments, Strangio said, “I want to preserve the ability for other people to access that care.”
The Tennessee law is one of over 24 enacted nationwide to protect children from these procedures, which critics say are experimental and carry significant physical and mental health risks. If upheld, Tennessee’s law could set a national precedent, potentially shielding children across the U.S. from such treatments.
Strangio’s appearance marks the first time a transgender-identifying lawyer will argue before the Supreme Court. However, Strangio’s advocacy has not been without controversy. Earlier this year, the lawyer faced internal criticism within the ACLU for allegedly alienating LGBTQ leaders, prompting the deletion of her X account.
Supporters of the Tennessee law argue that it safeguards vulnerable minors from irreversible decisions. Judicial Crisis Network’s Carrie Severino called the ACLU’s case “feeble,” questioning its reliance on equal protection arguments.
The Supreme Court’s decision will likely have sweeping implications for state-level protections against these procedures and the role of parents in guiding their children’s healthcare.
