First Amendment

Bans federal agencies from engaging with social media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression or reduction of content containing protected free speech."

After an official for the American Library Association allegedly provided recommendations for how librarians can limit Christians' freedom of speech, a legal team is calling for a federal investigation into the matter.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, who wrote the majority opinion, declared, "The First Amendment’s protections belong to all, not just to speakers whose motives the government finds worthy. In this case, Colorado seeks to force an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance."

DHS "expanded its mission to surveil Americans’ speech on social media, colluded with Big Tech and government-funded third parties to censor by proxy, and tried to hide its plainly unconstitutional activities from the public."

The next generation is at stake

The Michigan House also recently passed a bill to prosecute "hate speech."

"Making sure the government is pursuing a policy of peace and free trade abroad is also essential to promoting liberty at home."

"This amendment would allow for DHS to evaluate the role that Gain of Function has to our national security, something DHS should already be doing."

Carlson's new series on Twitter, "Tucker on Twitter," achieves significant traction with a staggering 169 million views across its first pair of episodes.

Colorado's governor and several officials are facing a lawsuit over free speech restrictions near abortion clinics.