SUNY Oswego has made Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) statements mandatory for applicants across multiple job postings. Critics argue the move enforces ideological conformity and sidelines merit in hiring practices.
The State University of New York at Oswego now requires DEI statements for at least nine positions, including roles unrelated to social advocacy. Positions affected include a lecturer in physics, an assistant professor of computer science, a construction project coordinator, an X-ray research associate, a reporter for the campus news network, and several administrative and director-level positions. Each job listing demands a written statement on how the applicant’s values align with DEI principles.
Applicants must submit this DEI statement alongside traditional materials such as a résumé, cover letter, and professional references. The school’s website directs candidates to its “Strategic Diversity and Inclusion Plan” as a guide for constructing their statement. The policy is enforced by SUNY Oswego’s Affirmative Action Officer and Human Resources department.
This policy formalizes an ideological filter in the hiring process, prompting concern that personal beliefs and political views are being prioritized over professional qualifications. The inclusion of DEI statements in science and technical job applications has drawn specific criticism for introducing politics into areas traditionally driven by objective expertise.
SUNY Oswego is part of the broader SUNY system, which has been under scrutiny for promoting mandatory DEI policies. While the university claims these measures enhance diversity and campus climate, opponents warn such mandates restrict viewpoint diversity and may discriminate against those with religious or conservative perspectives.
These developments follow a national trend where universities expand DEI frameworks despite legislative efforts in several states to curtail or ban them. Institutions that continue to embed DEI requirements into hiring processes risk legal challenges and reputational damage for prioritizing ideology over competence.
