Russia Accuses Ukraine of ‘Genocide,’ Ukraine Responds, Accuses Russia of Genocide, Too: Read Both Sides

Read one report representing the Russian side, two reports representing the Ukrainian side.

Russia accuses Ukraine of “genocide” and Western nations of wilfully covering it up, via Sputnik:

Russia on 24 February launched a “special operation” in Donbass aimed at protecting Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics (DPR and LPR), which were recognised as independent entities by Moscow on 21 February. The Western media called the operation “an invasion” they have long warned about.

The “Russia invasion” narrative wasn’t the West’s “prophecy” but rather a cover-up for a new attempt to return the breakaway Donetsk and Lugansk republics by force to Ukraine, according to George Eliason, an American investigative journalist who lives and works in Donbass. Bringing back Donbass would have paved the way for Ukraine’s NATO membership: in accordance with the alliance’s rules, a country having territorial disputes cannot be admitted to the bloc.

“First of all, Zelensky ordered the attack during a speech a few weeks ago,” Eliason says. “He made it very clear Ukraine’s buildup was for that purpose.”

By December 2021, the Kiev government had amassed up to 125,000 troops along the contact line with the Donbass republics. At the same time, OSCE reported more frequent use of heavy weapons, prohibited under the Minsk Agreements, by the Ukrainian Armed Forces against the breakaway regions.

The Western smoke-and-mirrors media campaign speculating about Russia’s “imminent invasion” began in spring 2021, according to the investigative journalist. The mainstream press claimed that Russia was about to invade Ukraine.

“This is a huge breach in what constitutes a fact in the media. Published satellite images of Russian army positions accompanying these news reports showed the Russian army on bases over a day’s travel away. In real terms this translated into 160 miles to 460 miles from the border,” says Eliason, stressing that the Russian army could hardly launch a surprise land attack from these positions.

In November 2021, the “Russian invasion narrative” caught its second breath with the mainstream press and prominent social media influencers publishing maps and “false flag” scenarios of the supposed assault.

Former US Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul launched nothing short of a tweet storm claiming that Ukrainian civilians will fight to the bitter end against Russian “occupiers”. For his part, Hollywood star Sean Penn arrived in Ukraine to film a documentary about “Russian aggression.”

It was a coordinated infowar operation aimed at presenting Russia’s possible reaction to Ukraine’s offensive against Donbass as a full-fledged invasion, according to Eliason. Ukrainian President Volodymur Zelensky was also pushing the Information Operation narrative worked out for him by US infowar consultants, says the investigative journalist.

Invisible War in Donbass

At the same time, the Western mainstream media have kept silence for years about the shelling of the Donetsk and Lugansk Republics by the Ukrainian government forces and neo-Nazi battalions.

Just a limited number of independent American and European journalists and freelance photographers have been working in the Donbass region, chronicling the invisible war of the Ukrainian government against its own people. According to the UN, over 13,000 have been killed in the region since the Maidan coup d’etat of February 2014.

“The barrage has been a constant feature in both republics for the last eight years,” says Eliason. “The primary targets have always been civilian housing and infrastructure.”

Over the past several weeks the Ukrainian military had intensified bombardment of the Donbass region, prompting the leadership of the DPR and LPR to launch an evacuation of children and elderly people to Russia. However, “Ukrainian spec ops groups have been targeting evacuees leaving to Russia with mines and shells,” says Eliason.

The US openly dismissed Russia’s warnings about the ongoing genocide of Russian-speakers and crimes against humanity in Eastern Ukraine. For his part, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz claimed at the annual Munich Security Conference on 19 February that it is “really ridiculous” to say that “there is something like genocide” in Donbass.

Coming this from the German chancellor is “scandalous but expected,” says Eliason. By turning a blind eye to crimes committed by Ukrainian military and neo-Nazi militias in Eastern Ukraine, the Scholz-led coalition is indirectly supporting “what amounts to second generation 1930s-40s political Nazi thought” in Ukraine, according to the investigative journalist.


Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated on Thursday that Russia started a military operation to protect Donbass in order to clear the country of Nazis. “Ideally, it is necessary to liberate Ukraine, clear it of Nazis, as well as pro-Nazi people and ideology,” Peskov told reporters.

In the wake of the 2014 Maidan coup, a number of corporate media sources questioned the role of Ukraine neo-Nazi groups in the nation’s political life but very then it was largely scratched from the Western mainstream narrative.

In May 2018, Stephen F. Cohen, an influential American historian on Russia, warned in his op-ed for The Nation that “neo-fascists play an important official or tolerated role in the US-backed Ukraine.” He bemoaned the fact that many Americans are unaware of 2 May 2014 “pogrom” in Odessa where roughly 50 people were burnt alive in the Trade Unions House by Ukrainian radical nationalists and neo-Nazis.

The professor continued that the mainstream media has similarly overlooked the fact that the Azov Battalion, which is an official component of Kiev’s armed forces, has a pro-Nazi ideology. Back in 2017, the Hill quoted Azov’s commander, Andriy Biletsky, as saying that the mission of Ukraine is to “lead the White Races of the world in a final crusade for their survival … against the Semite-led Untermenschen.”

What’s more, the rehabilitation of neo-Nazism in Ukraine has been tolerated by successive American administrations since the time of the 2005 “Orange Revolution” and continued to thrive, under George Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump, according to Cohen.

The administration of Joseph Biden, who used to be Obama’s appointee in Ukraine, went even further, by providing tonnes of weapons and training to the Ukrainian military as the latter concentrated along the line of contact with Donbass. On 16 December 2021, the UN General Assembly discussed a resolution that called for combating the glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism and other practices fuelling racism and xenophobia. The only two countries that voted against it were the US and Ukraine.

Ukraine responds to Russia’s allegations, via Ukraine’s Government Portal:

Already over the past two days, the world continues to see unprecedented and brutal aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine. Looking for justification of its groundless and unfair invasion into Ukraine, the Russian Federation has cynically distorted to perversion of the international community’s most solemn human rights commitments.

In 1948, after emerging from the horrors of World War II, the international community came together to create the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Together, the world defined the crime of genocide and pledged to prevent and punish it. But the Russian Federation has twisted the concept of genocide, and the solemn treaty obligations concerning genocide, in order to justify aggression and its own blatant human rights violations.

Top military and political leadership of the Russian Federation has publicly tried to justify its own aggression against Ukraine as a mean of preventing and punishing the genocide that is purportedly taking place in our country.

This brazen manipulation has no real basis, as the whole world knows. Ukraine strongly denies Russia’s allegations of genocide and denies any attempt to use such manipulative allegations as an excuse for unlawful aggression. The crime of genocide is defined in the Genocide Convention, and under that Convention Russia’s claims are baseless and absurd.

Russia’s claims of genocide as justification for its lawless conduct are an insult to the Genocide Convention, and to the work of the international community in preventing and punishing the world’s most serious crime.

Russia must immediately cease its unlawful aggression against Ukraine taken under this baseless pretext.

Russia’s lie is all the more offensive, and ironic, because it appears that it is Russia planning acts of genocide in Ukraine. Russia is intentionally killing and inflicting serious injury on members of the Ukrainian nationality. These acts must be viewed together with President Putin’s rhetoric denying the very existence of a Ukrainian people, which is suggestive of Russia’s intentional killings bearing genocidal intent.

Ukraine accuses Russia of “genocide,” via FOX News:

Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Sunday called for Russia to lose its voting power as a member of the U.N. Security Council, alleging its attack on his country, which started last week, amounted to “criminal actions” that bore “signs of genocide,” according to a report.

“This is terror,” Zelenskyy said in a video message, referring to the military invasion ordered by Russian President Vladimir Putin, which spread across Ukraine in recent days to include targets in Kyiv, the capital, and Kharkiv, the nation’s second-largest city, among other locations.

“They are going to bomb our Ukrainian cities even more, they are going to kill our children even more subtly,” he added, according to Reuters. “This is the evil that has come to our land and must be destroyed.”

“Russia’s criminal actions against Ukraine bear signs of genocide,” he added, according to the report.

Also on Sunday, Zelenskyy said he was ready for talks with Russia – but rejected its offer of holding the negotiations in Belarus, claiming the country was a staging area for Russia’s invasion last week.

“Warsaw, Bratislava, Budapest, Istanbul, Baku. We proposed all of them,” Zelenskyy said, referring to alternative locations for the proposed talks, Agence France-Press reported.

“And any other city in a country from whose territory missiles do not fly would suit us,” he added.

On Sunday, the Kremlin announced it had sent a negotiation team to Belarus for talks with Ukrainian officials.

“The Russian delegation is ready for talks, and we are now waiting for the Ukrainians,” said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, who noted the delegation includes military personnel and diplomats, according to Reuters.

But Ukrainian officials claimed the potential peace talks were not “real” and were instead “propaganda,” the report said.