A growing polygraph dispute inside the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is fueling questions about transparency and accountability at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, as DHS pushes back against reports involving its acting director and access to highly sensitive intelligence.
Politico reported that acting CISA Director Madhu Gottumukkala sought entry into a tightly restricted intelligence program that required a counter-intelligence polygraph, and that multiple career officials were later placed on administrative leave amid internal turmoil. DHS strongly disputed that characterization, saying the test in question was not properly authorized.
“Acting Director Madhu Gottumukkala did not fail a sanctioned polygraph test. An unsanctioned polygraph test was coordinated by staff, misleading incoming CISA leadership,” DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said. She added, “The employees in question were placed on administrative leave, pending conclusion of an investigation.”
According to Politico, the reporting relied on interviews with current and former cybersecurity officials who described a breakdown in internal processes surrounding classified access. The outlet reported that Gottumukkala continued pressing for access to the intelligence even after senior staff questioned whether he had a legitimate need-to-know.
DHS defended its actions, emphasizing standards and discipline. “We expect and require the highest standards of performance from our employees and hold them directly accountable to uphold all policies and procedures,” McLaughlin said, noting that Gottumukkala has “the complete and full support of the Secretary.”
Letters reviewed by Politico show that at least six career officials were accused of providing “false information” regarding polygraph requirements and temporarily lost access to classified material. The investigation continues, placing the polygraph dispute at the center of renewed concerns over national security oversight inside DHS.
