Home Blog Page 6

Trump to Meet with Socialist Mayor-Elect

(Photo by Alexi J. Rosenfeld/Getty Images)

President Trump said he plans to meet with New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani to “work something out.”

“The mayor of New York, I will say, would like to meet with us and we’ll work something out,” Trump told reporters, adding, “He would like to come to Washington and meet and we’ll work something out. We want to see everything work out well for New York.”

Mamdani told NBC New York last week that he will be “reaching out to the White House as we prepare to actually take office because this is a relationship that will be critical to the success of the city.”

President Trump previously condemned Mamdani’s communist aims, saying, “If you want to see what congressional Democrats wish to do to America, just look at the result of yesterday’s election in New York, where their party installed a communist as the mayor of the largest city in the nation.”

“We’re going to see how that works out,” Trump said. “We‘ll help them. We want New York to be successful. We’ll help them a little bit.”

“As long as I’m in the White House, the United States is not going communist in any way, shape, or form,” he added. “We’ll stop it. Stop this nonsense.”

New York Governor Kathy Hochul (D) signaled that she has reservations regarding some of Mamdani’s campaign promises.

“We’re spending a lot of money, so I cannot set forth a plan right now that takes money out of a system that relies on the fares of the buses and the subways,” Hochul stated during an event. “But can we find a path to make it more affordable for people who need help? Of course we can.”

Court Blocks Duffy’s License Restrictions

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

A federal appeals court temporarily blocked a Department of Transportation (DOT) policy narrowing the conditions under which states may issue commercial driver’s licenses to noncitizens.

The ruling, issued last week, said the federal government could not “articulate a satisfactory explanation for how the rule would promote safety.”

“Whereas the FMCSA does not appear to have demonstrated any safety benefit from the rule, the county petitioner has furnished evidence that the rule would harm public safety by forcing it to replace safer experienced drivers with less-safe new drivers,” it stated.

Circuit Judge Karen L. Henderson, who dissented from the decision, argued that the government has made a “reasonable determination” that allowing commercial drivers’ license holders with “unverified driving histories on our roadways is unsafe.”

The case centers on an interim rule that “restores the integrity of the commercial driver’s license (CDL) issuance processes by significantly limiting the authority for [State Driver’s Licensing Agencies] to issue and renew non-domiciled commercial learner’s permits (CLPs) and CDLs to individuals domiciled in a foreign jurisdiction,” the Federal Register explains.

Last week, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced that the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) admitted to illegally issuing 17,000 non-domiciled Commercial Driver’s Licenses (CDLs) to foreign drivers endangering Americans.

“After weeks of claiming they did nothing wrong, Gavin Newsom and California have been caught red-handed. Now that we’ve exposed their lies, 17,000 illegally issued trucking licenses are being revoked,” Duffy said in a statement. “This is just the tip of the iceberg. My team will continue to force California to prove they have removed every illegal immigrant from behind the wheel of semi-trucks and school buses.”

The Threat of Demonic Infiltration: Real or Imaginary?

Fire
Photo by Jiawei Chen, Unsplash

In our sophisticated, postmodern world, some try to explain away the Bible’s accounts of demonization. They say first-century people were just misreading mental illness, epilepsy, or trauma. But the Gospels simply don’t support that reduction. . .

This content is only available for American Faith Premium Subscribers. For as low as $3.99/mo, you can access all our Premium content, learn more here.

If you are already a Premium subscriber, please log in to view this content.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Rubio Goes After Maduro’s Narco-Terror Group

(Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the Cartel de los Soles, linked to Venezuelan leadership, will be designated as a terrorist organization.

In a statement on X, Rubio said, “[State Department] intends to designate Cartel de los Soles as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO). Headed by the illegitimate Nicolás Maduro, the group has corrupted the institutions of government in Venezuela and is responsible for terrorist violence conducted by and with other designated FTOs as well as for trafficking drugs into the United States and Europe.”

The designation is to take effect on November 24.

According to a press statement, the Cartel de los Soles is linked to Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and other high-ranking leaders of the “illegitimate Maduro regime who have corrupted Venezuela’s military, intelligence, legislature, and judiciary.”

“Neither Maduro nor his cronies represent Venezuela’s legitimate government,” the statement read. “Cartel de los Soles by and with other designated FTOs including Tren de Aragua and the Sinaloa Cartel are responsible for terrorist violence throughout our hemisphere as well as for trafficking drugs into the United States and Europe.”

The statement comes as President Trump recently told reporters that he may hold discussions with Maduro.

Meanwhile, the Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group entered the U.S. Southern Command’s area of responsibility on November 11, set to focus on alleged drug trafficking boats.

Earlier this year, the Treasury Department designated the Cartel de los Soles as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, saying it has provided support to other criminal networks involved in the drug trade and human trafficking.

Supreme Court Showdown: Treasury Secretary Bessent Defends Trump Tariffs

Scott Bessent (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Scott Bessent, Treasury Secretary under Donald Trump, affirmed during a recent interview on Sunday Morning Futures With Maria Bartiromo that he expects the Supreme Court of the United States to uphold the administration’s tariff authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). He argued the Court typically avoids overturning a president’s “signature policy.”

Bessent described three key points in his defence: first, that the tariffs represent one of President Trump’s hallmark policies; second, that the emergency powers of IEEPA have precedent in national security or economic urgency cases; and third, that a ruling against the administration could trigger complex refund obligations and unintended windfalls for importers and exporters. He questioned whether the Court would “want to wade into a mess like that.”

The legal stakes are high. During oral arguments on Nov. 5, the Court signalled serious concerns over the scope of the administration’s tariff authority under IEEPA. Chief Justice John Roberts questioned whether Congress would truly grant the president power to impose “tariffs on any product, from any country, in any amount, for any length of time.”

If the Court rules the tariffs illegal, the federal government may face massive refund liabilities. Analysts suggest tens or even hundreds of billions could be at risk—though questions remain about the mechanics of reimbursement and whether the Court will require full or limited refunds.

As the decision looms, the case underscores the balance of power between the executive branch and Congress in trade and emergency powers. The outcome may reshape how future administrations deploy economic tools in national security and trade policy.

Marjorie Taylor Greene Apology: Breaking Free from Toxic Politics

Marjorie Taylor Greene
(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) publicly apologized on Sunday, November 16, 2025, for her role in what she called “toxic politics,” signaling a rare moment of introspection from one of the House’s most polarizing figures. Her remarks came as tensions with President Trump escalated, following his public denunciation of her as a “traitor” and the withdrawal of his endorsement.

Speaking on CNN’s State of the Union, Greene acknowledged criticism that she had overlooked inflammatory political rhetoric until she became a target herself. “I think that’s fair criticism,” she said. “I would like to say, humbly, I’m sorry for taking part in the toxic politics. It’s very bad for our country.”

Greene cited the recent assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk as a sobering moment that pushed her to reconsider her approach. She expressed a desire to move toward “kindness and unity,” vowing to “put down the knives in politics.”

The rift between Greene and President Trump intensified after she called for the release of classified documents tied to convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Trump responded with a series of harsh attacks, calling Greene a “ranting lunatic” and suggesting he would back a primary challenger in her Georgia district. Greene said Trump’s rhetoric—including the term “traitor”—could endanger her safety.

Her apology marks a significant shift for a lawmaker known for her combative style. As internal divisions in the Republican Party become more visible, Greene’s comments highlight growing concerns over the long-term consequences of political infighting and incendiary rhetoric.

Wikipedia Under Fire for Anti-Christian Bias in Articles on Jesus

Wikipedia
Wikipedia (Oberon Copeland/@veryinformed via Unsplash)

Wikipedia’s editorial integrity is once again being questioned after its entries on Jesus Christ were found to promote fringe theories that contradict traditional Christian doctrine. A recent Fox News report highlights how the platform includes speculative and controversial claims about Jesus’ sexuality and relationships, raising concerns about religious bias on one of the world’s most-visited websites.

The article “Sexuality of Jesus” on Wikipedia devotes significant space to theories suggesting Jesus may have had romantic or sexual relationships with men. These claims, which lack support from orthodox Christian scholarship or Scripture, appear alongside traditional teachings without clear distinction. In one section titled “Homoeroticism,” Wikipedia editors cite sources speculating on a special bond between Jesus and the Apostle John, suggesting pederastic interpretations that most theologians reject outright.

Critics argue this reflects a pattern of ideological slant on the platform. While Wikipedia maintains a “neutral point of view” policy, its editing practices often allow activist contributors to insert unorthodox views under the guise of academic balance. This trend is not limited to religious articles. Conservative figures like Charlie Kirk and President Trump have also seen their Wikipedia pages subjected to negative framing, while left-leaning counterparts receive comparatively favorable treatment.

Wikipedia’s open-edit model has long made it vulnerable to misuse. Though volunteer editors are tasked with enforcing sourcing standards, the platform frequently elevates minority viewpoints—especially those critical of traditional values—without appropriate disclaimers or context. In cases involving Christian doctrine, this can create confusion, especially for younger readers or those unfamiliar with church history.

The inclusion of speculative content about Jesus’ sexuality undermines Wikipedia’s credibility and risks promoting misinformation about one of the most significant figures in human history. Faith leaders and scholars have called for greater editorial accountability, warning that the platform’s handling of religious topics distorts centuries of well-documented teaching in favor of contemporary ideological trends.

$40 Billion Power Play: Google’s Massive AI Investment Targets Texas

black
Google (Adarsh Chauhan/Unsplash)

Google has announced a $40 billion investment in new data centers across rural Texas, launching one of its largest infrastructure projects to date. The expansion will support the tech giant’s artificial intelligence ambitions while reshaping local economies in Armstrong and Haskell counties.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott confirmed that this is Google’s single largest investment in any state. The company will build facilities near the city of Abilene and in Armstrong County, with full deployment projected by 2027. The move is part of a growing AI infrastructure race among major tech firms like Microsoft and Meta.

Beyond construction, the initiative includes workforce training in electrical trades, college internships, and energy efficiency efforts. Google will also partner with local organizations to provide digital skills education, targeting underserved communities and youth programs.

This announcement comes as AI technology demands unprecedented computing power. Data centers are the backbone of generative AI platforms, which rely on massive cloud infrastructure. Google’s expansion reflects its commitment to outpacing rivals and controlling more of the AI supply chain.

For Texas, the project signals a significant economic shift. Once overlooked rural counties will see job creation, land development, and long-term tax revenue. Supporters point to the value of free enterprise and private investment driving local growth without federal oversight or new regulations.

However, the investment also raises questions about energy usage and land use. Data centers consume large amounts of electricity, straining grids and raising concerns about environmental impact. While Google has promised clean energy commitments, local leaders and utility companies will face increased pressure to balance growth with sustainability.

The scale of this project confirms that tech companies are consolidating power not just in markets, but in infrastructure. Control over AI data centers will shape the pace and direction of innovation for years to come.

Campus Protest Trump ‘Authoritarianism’: Princeton Leftists Strike

Princeton University (Joshua Jen/Unsplash)

Around 100 Princeton University students and left-leaning groups staged a protest on November 7, 2025, to oppose what they described as the “authoritarianism” and “oppression” of President Trump’s administration. The demonstration, held outside the university’s Firestone Library, featured speeches, music, and signs advocating for a range of progressive issues.

The protest was led by student organizations such as Sunrise Princeton and Students for Prison Education, Abolition & Reform (SPEAR). Organizers linked their grievances to federal immigration enforcement, academic freedom, climate policy, and U.S. foreign policy. The event also expressed solidarity with Palestinian causes, with signs referencing Gaza and calls to end university ties to military and law enforcement entities.

Speakers claimed that academic institutions had been pressured by government policies under President Trump. Andrew Cole, a professor of political theory, accused Cornell University of accepting $60 million in what he called “extortion” from the federal government. Kristin Nagy, a student with SPEAR, referred to the Trump administration as “unabashedly fascist.”

Protesters also called for the abolition of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and criticized university cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Several signs labeled ICE enforcement as “state violence” and demanded that Princeton cut ties with any entities linked to detention or deportation efforts.

The protest went beyond specific Trump-era policies and included broader criticism of systemic issues in American governance and higher education. Demonstrators displayed artwork and banners linking climate justice, immigrant rights, and anti-racism campaigns.

Despite being promoted as a rally for democratic values and free expression, the demonstration reflected the growing intersection of multiple activist agendas on college campuses. The convergence of domestic and international issues underscores how campus protests are evolving into platforms for broader ideological coalitions.

Trump Hit with MAGA Backlash Over Epstein Files Silence

State of Florida; Public domain/Wikimedia Commons

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) claimed Sunday that President Donald Trump is losing support from his core MAGA base due to his handling of records related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Speaking on NBC’s Meet the Press, Khanna said, “You know why Trump is losing his MAGA base on this? He ran saying, ‘There’s a corrupt governing elite that has shafted you’… he’s forgotten those forgotten Americans.” Khanna argued that the lack of transparency on the Epstein files contradicts Trump’s populist message.

Khanna, along with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), has led a bipartisan effort to release Epstein-related documents. Their discharge petition to force a vote passed the required signature threshold this week, setting up a House vote. The petition received support from every Democrat and four Republicans, with Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz.) becoming the final signer shortly after being sworn in.

Khanna also urged President Trump to meet with survivors of Epstein’s abuse and back full disclosure of related records. While Khanna did not accuse Trump of direct involvement, he emphasized the need for accountability from members of the elite who were connected to Epstein and his network.

The Trump administration and its allies have faced renewed pressure from across the political spectrum to declassify files related to Epstein’s associates and operations. Critics argue that both parties have failed to fully investigate and prosecute figures tied to the disgraced financier.

The bipartisan push to release the documents adds new urgency to the controversy, and the upcoming House vote is expected to test lawmakers’ willingness to expose figures linked to Epstein, regardless of political affiliation.

1...567...3,834Page 6 of 3,834
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2025 American Faith Media Network. All rights reserved.