What were those “days of Noah”? They were days of supernatural corruption, demonic interference, and moral chaos—a time when the boundaries between the natural and spiritual realms were breached. To understand the prophetic hour we live in, we must revisit this ancient mystery: the Nephilim. . .
Syrian President to Visit White House
Syria’s interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa is expected to visit the White House next week. The event marks the first official visit by a Syrian president.
“President al-Sharaa is scheduled to visit the White House this month, where he will hold discussions on Syria’s post-war reconstruction,” Syria’s Foreign Minister Asaad Hassan al-Shaibani said, according to a statement published by state-run media. The meeting is expected to center on sanctions.
“There will be many issues on the table, starting with the lifting of sanctions and opening of a new chapter between the United States and Syria. We want to establish a very strong partnership between the two countries,” the official added, as per Reuters.
President Trump met with al-Sharaa in May. At the time, he described the Syrian leader as a “[y]oung, attractive guy. Tough guy. Strong past. Very strong past. Fighter.”
“He’s got a real shot at holding it together,” Trump said. “He’s a real leader. He led a charge and he’s pretty amazing.”
In June, President Trump signed an order lifting sanctions placed on Syria. “This order supports United States national security and foreign policy goals by directing additional actions, including the removal of sanctions on Syria, the issuance of waivers that permit the relaxation of export controls and other restrictions on Syria, and other actions,” the order says, adding that the efforts will be made “without providing relief to ISIS or other terrorist organizations, human rights abusers, those linked to chemical weapons or proliferation-related activities, or other persons that threaten the peace, security, or stability of the United States, Syria, and its neighbors.”
Trump Warns Troops May Go ‘Guns-a-Blazing’ into Nigeria
President Trump signaled he would be open to positioning U.S. troops in Nigeria to confront “Islamic Terrorists” engaged in the country.
“If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the U.S.A. will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now disgraced country, ‘guns-a-blazing,’ to completely wipe out the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities,” the president wrote on Truth Social over the weekend. “I am hereby instructing our Department of War to prepare for possible action. If we attack, it will be fast, vicious, and sweet, just like the terrorist thugs attack our CHERISHED Christians! WARNING: THE NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT BETTER MOVE FAST!”
War Secretary Pete Hegseth responded to Trump’s direction: “Yes sir.”
“The killing of innocent Christians in Nigeria — and anywhere — must end immediately,” Hegseth wrote on X. “The Department of War is preparing for action. Either the Nigerian Government protects Christians, or we will kill the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities.”
Nigerian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Yusuf Maitama Tuggar denied the idea of a genocide occurring in the country. “For the avoidance of any doubt, and out of respect for all the victims and survivors around the world of this unique and appalling crime against humanity, let the record show that there is no genocide, now or ever, in Nigeria,” he told Newsweek.
Meanwhile, Nigerian President Bola Tinubu argued that the country is one with “constitutional guarantees to protect citizens of all faiths.”
“Our administration is committed to working with the United States government and the international community to deepen understanding and cooperation on protection of communities of all faiths,” he said.
The statements follow President Trump declaring on Friday that Nigeria will be designated as a “country of particular concern.” He wrote that Christianity faces an “existential threat” in Nigeria, adding that the United States “cannot stand by while such atrocities are happening in Nigeria, and numerous other Countries.”
Radical Anti-Israel Activist : Linda Sarsour Vows She Will “Hold Zohran Accountable”
Anti-Israel activist Linda Sarsour declared she will “hold Zohran accountable” if New York City mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani wins the election. In a weekend livestream, Sarsour emphasized that her support comes with expectations, particularly regarding his pledge to dismantle the NYPD’s Strategic Response Group, which handles terrorism threats, protests, and riots.
During the livestream obtained by Fox News Digital, Sarsour told followers, “Voting for Zohran is not, ‘We’re going to vote for Zohran and just let him do whatever the hell he wants when he gets to City Hall.’ Our job as a movement is we have to hold whoever goes to City Hall accountable.” She added, “I just want you all to know I’m not going to work for the Zohran administration… there gotta be people like me willing to stay outside.”
Sarsour, who co-founded MPower Action and the Muslim Democratic Club of New York, has long been politically aligned with Mamdani, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America. The two have campaigned together since 2017, and she previously endorsed his successful New York Assembly bid. Both activists have participated in anti-Israel demonstrations since Hamas’ October 7, 2023, terror attacks sparked widespread protests across New York.
Mamdani has promised to retain NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch but direct her to disband the elite Strategic Response Group. “I think everyone will follow my lead. I’ll be the mayor,” Mamdani said in a podcast. Sarsour criticized his decision to keep Tisch but agreed that “the police commissioner works for the mayor.” She added, “Now, if she doesn’t… then that’s when we’re going to have to go to Zohran and be like, ‘You definitely made the wrong decision here.’”
Sarsour concluded by urging her coalition to stay vigilant: “Our friends on the inside need people on the outside to hold them accountable. To say, ‘We see you. We’re paying attention.’”
Erika Kirk to Receive Patriot Award
Turning Point CEO and Charlie Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, is set to receive the inaugural Charlie Kirk Legacy Award as part of Fox Nation’s Patriot Awards. The award honors one who “embodies Charlie’s mission and his spirit of free speech, faith, and family,” Fox explained.
The ceremony will be held at the Tilles Center for the Performing Arts in Brookville, New York, with Sean Hannity serving as the master of ceremonies.
Country singer Jason Aldean and his wife, Brittany Aldean, will join Fox News’ Jesse Watters in presenting the award to Erika Kirk.
Erika Kirk was recently named one of TIME’s “most influential rising stars” in the world.
Reporter Nik Popli wrote for TIME that Erika Kirk “offered something rare in today’s politics: forgiveness.”
“Her words may frame the future of the organization her husband launched as a teen and built into a political powerhouse mobilizing young conservatives across the country. Along the way, Erika Kirk emerged as an influential voice for that same audience. With his death, the Turning Point USA board named her CEO and chair,” Popli wrote, adding that “what Erika Kirk models to America’s political leadership is the strength of resilience and grace.”
Mrs. Kirk also accepted the Presidential Medal of Freedom on behalf of her late husband. President Trump bestowed the honor, calling Charlie Kirk a “fearless warrior for liberty” and “a patriot of the deepest conviction.”
Discussing her husband’s legacy, Erika said, “It’s such an honor, and the recognition of a life lived fighting for freedom.”
Trump Says Maduro’s Days as Venezuela’s President Are ‘Numbered’
In a recent interview on 60 Minutes, President Donald Trump stated that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s time in power is “numbered,” while clarifying that he does not expect a war between the U.S. and Venezuela. The comment reflects continued U.S. pressure on Maduro’s regime, especially concerning border security and regional stability.
Trump connected Venezuela to illegal immigration and drug trafficking, claiming the country had “emptied their prisons” and “mental institutions” into the United States. He also confirmed that U.S. forces have conducted operations against vessels near Venezuela suspected of drug activity.
When asked whether he believed Maduro’s presidency was nearing its end, Trump replied, “I would say yeah. I think so, yeah.” However, when pressed on whether military conflict was likely, Trump responded, “I doubt it. I don’t think so,” while criticizing how the regime has treated the U.S.
The administration’s position on Venezuela continues to draw attention amid broader concerns over Latin American instability and its effects on the southern U.S. border. With increasing scrutiny on immigration enforcement and regional security, Venezuela remains a focal point in foreign policy discussions heading into the next election cycle.
Newsom Affirms No Doubt About Biden’s Ability to Serve Through 2029
In a recent interview on Meet the Press, California Governor Gavin Newsom said he saw “nothing … to suggest” that former President Joe Biden could not serve through January 2029. He noted that in his personal interactions with the president, no signs emerged that suggested otherwise.
When asked by host Kristen Welker if he believed Biden was capable of serving a full term through 2029, Newsom responded: “Yeah … there was no interaction I had that suggested otherwise.”
Newsom, a Democrat, also praised Biden’s tenure, calling him “one of the most successful presidents in the last century.” The governor said his focus remained on preventing the return of Donald Trump rather than micromanaging the president’s future.
The exchange comes amid ongoing questions within the Democratic Party about leadership, succession and the health and readiness of senior figures. While Newsom offered his personal confidence in Biden’s capacity, he did not delve into broader concerns about public perceptions of the former president’s fitness for office.
Manhattan DA Releases Repeat Offenders While Focusing on Trump Prosecution
New York City continues to grapple with a rise in violent repeat offenders being released without significant consequences, drawing scrutiny toward Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s priorities. While Bragg’s office has pursued high-profile charges against President Donald Trump, critics point to a pattern of leniency in cases involving serial offenders with extensive criminal histories.
Several recent cases highlight the issue. Clive Porter, who has more than 60 felony charges and over 20 misdemeanors, was arrested for multiple assaults in one day, including pushing a woman onto subway tracks. Jaia Cruz, with a prior record of knife-related incidents, pleaded guilty to first-degree manslaughter in a fatal stabbing. Michael Wilson, with over 230 arrests, was released after Bragg’s office declined to prosecute, citing the “interest of justice.” Another case involved Harold Gooding, who had at least 134 prior arrests and was released without bail.
NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch has expressed concern that some suspects are back on the streets before paperwork is completed. The trend has sparked broader questions about the enforcement of existing laws and the balance between criminal justice reform and public safety.
These developments come amid ongoing efforts by Bragg’s office to prosecute President Trump, raising questions about resource allocation and prosecutorial focus. Some legal analysts have noted that while district attorneys have discretion in prioritizing cases, declining to pursue charges against violent repeat offenders may have long-term consequences for public confidence in the justice system.
New York’s bail reform laws have also played a significant role, limiting judges’ ability to impose pretrial detention for many offenses. The combined effect of reduced prosecution and restrictive bail policies has led to increased concern among residents and law enforcement alike.
Going forward, attention will likely focus on whether the Manhattan DA’s office adjusts its approach to habitual offenders and how future policy decisions impact safety and accountability in the city.
SNL Mocks NYC Mayoral Candidates in Saturday Night Debate Parody Sketch
“Saturday Night Live” (SNL) aired a cold‑open parody on November 2, 2025, spoofing the New York City mayoral race. The sketch featured Ramy Youssef as frontrunner Zohran Mamdani, Shane Gillis as GOP candidate Curtis Sliwa, and Miles Teller as former governor and candidate Andrew Cuomo.
Youssef’s Mamdani opened with a tongue‑in‑cheek remark about his name’s pronunciation and made satirical promises: “free healthcare, affordable housing, free WiFi… As mayor, can I make that happen? I’m not sure yet.” Gillis’ Sliwa joked about getting shot five times in a yellow cab and other exaggerated NYC‑type danger references. Teller’s Cuomo touted his dislike among New Yorkers as pre‑qualifying him for the job.
A surprise appearance by Donald Trump (played by James Austin Johnson) crashed the debate saying, “They can pretend this election is about housing and taxes, but we all know it’s about me.”
From a conservative media and culture angle, the sketch captures several themes: the media framing of progressive candidates like Mamdani, the satirization of liberal policy promises, and the underlying skepticism of big‑city political theatrics.
Jeffries Rejects Claim That Mamdani Represents Democratic Party’s Future
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said he does not view Zohran Mamdani as the future of the Democratic Party, despite having recently endorsed him for New York City mayor.
Jeffries made the remarks during an appearance on State of the Union, when asked directly by host Jake Tapper if Mamdani was the party’s future. “No,” Jeffries replied. He added that the future for Democrats lies in the work being done by the House Democratic Caucus across the country.
This comes shortly after Jeffries formally endorsed Mamdani in the mayoral race, praising his focus on affordability and inclusive leadership, while also noting “areas of principled disagreement.”
Conservative‑leaning analysts view this tension as revealing deeper fault lines within the Democratic Party—between its moderate, establishment wing and the progressive or socialist flank represented by Mamdani. The question of “who really speaks for the party” gains urgency ahead of the 2026 mid‑term elections.
