The economy fell far short of predictions and added just 235,000 new jobs in August as the delta variant of COVID-19 surged.
Economists had projected that 750,000 jobs would be gained.
The unemployment rate fell to 5.2% despite the weak job growth, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.
The Friday report adds to the economic anxiety in the United States as it attempts to claw its way out from the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The economy is far from where it was before the health crisis, when the unemployment rate hovered at about 3.5% and millions of more people were employed than are now.
“To have today’s numbers, 235,000, is really surprising. This is way below expectations,” said former Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao during a phone call with the Washington Examiner.
Chao, who led the department from 2001 to 2009, pointed out that as the delta variant increased over the past month, consumer confidence and workers returning decreased. She also noted that the impact could be seen in the travel sector, where business travel has been lagging behind estimates from just a couple of months ago.
Job growth in the leisure and hospitality industries stalled out in August as households pulled back on outings because of the virus.
There are also shortages of labor across the country, with some employers, especially those in the leisure and hospitality industry, reporting that they are having trouble finding and retaining employees. In order to entice workers, some companies have had to boost wages and offer other incentives such as signing bonuses.
At the same time, the economy is facing rising inflation, which has been running much hotter than economists at the Federal Reserve and in the Biden administration had predicted.
Consumer prices increased 5.4% in the year ending in July, according to the most recent Department of Labor report. The figure was slightly above expectations but less pronounced than the enormous price increases seen over the previous few months.
Consumer sentiment has additionally taken a hard hit because of the delta variant, dropping to the lowest level in a decade, according to the University of Michigan. The decline from July to August marked the third-sharpest plunge after April of last year, when it fell 19.4%, and during the 2008 recession, when it fell 18.1% in October of that year.
The Friday jobs report is the last one before the expanded federal unemployment benefits program, which provides $300 per week on top of state funding, ends on Monday. Just over half of the states ended the program early, but high-population states such as New York and California did not, and some economists think that the continuation of the program has held back the economy.
In 2020, at the World Economic Forum, David Solomon, the CEO of Goldman Sachs, proclaimed that the investment firm wouldn’t take corporations public unless they had at least one “diverse” member on their board. The ostensible logic: a diverse leadership performs better by avoiding groupthink. But the proclamation came too late. Six months before, the last S&P 500 company with an all-male board had inducted a woman. Goldman was actually virtue-signaling to divert attention from its role in the 1Malaysia Development Berhad scandal, described in 2016 as the “largest kleptocracy case to date.” Goldman had paid $1 billion in bribes to win work raising money for 1MBD, a slush fund linked to then-Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak and corrupt officials. Fined $5 billion for its machinations, Goldman was embracing “woke” to burnish its credentials.
It’s not just Goldman. Corporate America has learned to invoke buzzwords like ‘stakeholder capitalism’ and ‘social justice’ to boost its profile, cachet, and profits. In Woke, Inc.: Inside Corporate America’s Social Justice Scam, biotech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy lays bare this duplicitous con. He writes in the introduction, “Here’s how it works: pretend like you care about something other than profit and power, precisely to gain more of each.” Worryingly, this deception is subverting democracy.
Like most American capitalists, Ramaswamy believes that the job of business is to provide products, maximize profit, and deliver value to shareholders. It’s not the realm of business to impose one particular vision of “social responsibility” on society. Corporate law limits boards’ focus to the financial interests of shareholders. This protects democracy from corporate overreach, for with financial power, businesses can easily crowd out dissent, whether from employees or from ordinary Americans.
On the other hand, corporations are granted the privilege of limited liability — protection from being pursued for business failure — so that they can innovate without fear. The business judgment rule (BJR) also protects CEOs and boards from being sued for bad decisions. But when corporations engage in social activism, they use the power of that immunity against democracy. They are able to work from behind shields denied to genuine activists, who may have a different social vision. They are also able to go unquestioned for funding fashionable but unprofitable causes in conflict with the interests of shareholders, who may not subscribe to those causes. In both ways, as Ramaswamy writes, this concentrates “the power to determine American values in the hands of a small group of capitalists rather than the hands of the American citizenry at large, which is where the dialogue about social values belongs.”
The newfangled “stakeholder model,” which dilutes corporate accountability to shareholders, gives corporations a virtual carte blanche as long as they pretend to have everyone’s best interest in mind. Therefore, they can claim to have pursued “policies with conscience” to explain away bad performances. Or cheat, as Volkswagen did, when it claimed it was the most “climate conscious” automaker while using defeat devices on emission tests.
Ramaswamy exposes how top government officials leverage corporate ties to accomplish what they can’t get done in Congress. By allying with major woke companies, woke politicians get a megaphone for their message, while the corporates get to project moral superiority. There’s even a certification system for corporate wokeness — the environment, social, and corporate (ESG) index — devised, not surprisingly, by the U.N. Economist Milton Friedman viewed such regulations as big government interference, adversely affecting a company’s performance and ultimately damaging the economy. Instead, executives committed to a particular cause should make products in consonance with their ideologies.
The author declares that he’s a defector from corporate America. He’s fed up with its pretense of caring about justice, all the while wreaking havoc on democracy and robbing people not only of their money but also their identity and voice. Wokenomics allows corporations to provide influence and money to “woke” people and gain a cloak of moral superiority to hide wrongdoing. When companies are sued, part of the settlement money typically goes to left-wing nonprofits as tax-deductible “donations” that can result in a huge discount of the original “fine.” The Department of Justice thus deprives taxpayers of the benefits from a class-action suit; it also deprives the treasury of taxes.
The book describes scenarios in which dictators — even the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) — can become stakeholders. First, the BLM and environmental and feminist activists front for American companies to win consumer approval. The companies monetize the trust, generating clicks, selling ads, charging fees, and thus gathering huge amounts of personalized data. When they do business in China, the CCP demands access to that data. The companies comply, ignoring gross human rights abuse in China while hyperventilating about systemic racism and transphobia in America.
Disney happily filmed in China, where Uighurs are forcibly sterilized or aborted, but demurred about filming in Georgia when the “heartbeat” abortion ban was implemented. With wokenomics, corporations arbitrarily decide who should speak and who should be censored as a hater or hate group. Support for BLM is de rigueur; criticism of China is verboten. The American government can be condemned, not the CCP.
So-called woke corporations have also become propaganda machines and censors for the government, doing for it what the Constitution forbids. Big Tech, especially firms controlling social media, interferes in elections by restricting debate and deciding in advance what information the electorate gets to access. In effect, they legislate a value system, ban alternative narratives, and render the democratic process irrelevant. In the past, monopolies fixed prices; now they fix ideas. Congress gave Big Tech immunity (Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act) from any liability for censoring or regulating content; in exchange for the protection, Big Tech makes massive one-sided campaign contributions.
Woke idea-fixing has also changed corporate America into a dogma-bound Church of Diversity — not of thought but of skin-deep factors like race and sex. Employees who don’t share a particular worldview are fired. A particular skin color is absurdly conflated with one particular left-wing opinion. A black person who espouses a conservative viewpoint is “not black.” And it’s impossible to be racist towards whites. The utterly racist implication of wokeness — race and gender being the only woke diversity metrics — is that genetics alone reveals how a person thinks.
As a solution, Ramaswamy advocates critical diversity theory. The idea is that organizations should screen for diversity of thought and experience. They should define their purpose, demarcating areas where they would prefer alignment with the organizational view rather than diversity of opinion and where the latter is valued more.
He concludes that the underlying issue is the lack of a shared American identity, rather than lingering racism or sexism. Woke diversity, without an all-American communality, divides people into tribes in conflict. Woke capitalism arrogates to corporations what should be adjudicated through our democracy — racial justice, gender equality, climate change, and beyond. Two things, he says, define us as a nation: the American Dream, and E Pluribus Unum. The first is best achieved through capitalism; the second through democracy. Wokeism is noxious because it destroys democracy.
A U.S. national labor agency is investigating two charges against tech giant Apple Inc. filed by employees, records on its website show.
The charges, filed on Aug. 26 and Sept. 1, are being reviewed by the U.S. National Labor Relations Board’s office in Oakland, California. The agency declined to comment.
“We take all concerns seriously and we thoroughly investigate whenever a concern is raised,” Apple, which is based in Cupertino, California, said in a statement that cited employee privacy in declining to discuss specifics.
Ashley Gjovik, a senior engineering program manager at Apple, told Reuters that she filed the Aug. 26 charge, which cites harassment by a manager, reduction of responsibilities, and increases in unfavorable work, among other complaints.
The Sept. 1 charge was filed by Cher Scarlett, an Apple software engineer who said the company repeatedly stopped discussions of pay among employees.
The documents she sent the agency, which she provided to Reuters, say Apple “engaged in coercive and suppressive activity that has enabled abuse and harassment of organizers of protected concerted activity.”
The labor relations agency investigates all charges it receives and launches a prosecution against the employer if merited.
In recent weeks, some current and former Apple workers have critiqued company culture on Twitter, using the hashtag #AppleToo. U.S. law allows employees to openly discuss certain topics, such as working conditions.
In addition, workers have engaged in a heated debate on the messaging platform Slack about Apple’s move to scan U.S. customer phones and computers for child sex abuse images, Reuters reported.
In a letter accompanying her NLRB charge, Scarlett wrote that Apple employees began a pay equity survey in April, but the company blocked them, citing privacy concerns.
It also halted subsequent surveys, including one that aimed to address the privacy issues, Scarlett added.
In late August, Apple denied employees’ request to create a Slack channel to discuss pay equity, which Scarlett told Reuters was “the last straw” that led her to file the complaint.
Gjovik told Reuters that after Apple started investigating her complaints, as well as accusations of sexism, her managers began re-assigning her work to colleagues and loading her up with undesirable tasks.
The company put her on paid administrative leave in early August. She said Apple had not finished its investigation.
Desperate abortion-seekers and abortion providers described their “race against time” in the final hours before Texas’s new ban on abortions kicked in Wednesday, and it shows just how little thought is given to countless unborn lives that are routinely terminated.
What are the details?
At a Whole Woman’s Health clinic in Fort Worth, it was “a race to perform as many abortions as possible until midnight,” the 19th reported. After that, the new state law — which prohibits abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, or roughly six weeks gestation — would make having the procedure nearly impossible.
That Tuesday, scores of patients gathered outside the clinic hoping to undergo a last-minute operation, but there were too many patients and too little time.
Inside the clinic, Marva Sadler, the director of clinical services, tried to motivate her team of eight, saying, “We are not the bad guys here. We are doing everything right and we’re going to help everybody that we can. If there’s someone that we can’t help, it’s not our fault.”
A similar scene played out at Whole Woman’s Health clinics across the state. The abortion provider wrote in a tweet thread that “waiting rooms are filled with patients” and that doctors and other staff would be working until the very last minute to service them.
From Whole Woman’s Health CEO @AmyHM: We have staff and doctors providing abortions in Texas – still at this hour – and they are all in to provide care until 11:59 tonight. Our waiting rooms are filled with patients and their loved ones. Right now.
“This is what abortion care looks like. Human right warriors,” the group said.
What else?
Abortion-seekers, too, gave little thought to the life inside of them while describing the chaotic final days before the ban took effect.
“It was a race against time for me,” said 21-year-old Hope Hanzlik, an Army service member, in conversation with the Lily.
She recalled scheduling her abortion procedure on Aug. 23, knowing that the Texas ban could take effect soon. On the day of the appointment, she got approval from her commanding officers and then drove three hours to the clinic with a friend. She arrived 48 hours before the ban was implemented.
Hanzlik said she felt “relieved,” adding, “I’m not ready to have a child.”
Anything else?
Another woman, a 21-year-old sex worker who remained anonymous for fear of reprisal, told Jezebel she was “sick with worry” that she would “have to have the baby” due to the new Texas law.
“Ever since I was a teenager — and then especially when I started doing sex work — I knew that if I got pregnant I would get an abortion,” recalled the woman, referred to in the article as “Jen.”
“I know Texas is very conservative, and I figured there might be a lot of judgment and it might be a little hard, but I never seriously considered it that I wouldn’t be able to get an abortion at all,” she added.
Jen, however, was able to get an appointment on the last day before the law kicked in. She said the clinic was packed with at least 30 people at a time when she was there. Afterward, she said she felt “happy” and “relieved” but sad for others who weren’t able to have the procedure.
“I feel a little woozy from the sedative still, but other than that I feel very fine and very happy,” Jen said. “I feel so relieved — this is a big weight off my shoulders.”
Send a photo within 15 minutes or the police are sent out.
The government of South Australia is running a trial for a system that could eventually force citizens to take a photo of themselves via a government app to report their location on demand within 15 minutes of authorities requesting it, or face a police investigation.
Yes, really.
The revelation was highlighted in an Atlantic piece by Conor Friedersdorf which questions whether Australia can still call itself a liberal democracy in light of the crippling restrictions it has placed on its own population.
With no end in sight for the lifting of the country’s brutal lockdown, Aussies could face even more invasive state intrusion into their private lives under the justification of stopping the spread of the virus.
The South Australian government is preparing to roll out an app that “will contact people at random asking them to provide proof of their location within 15 minutes,” according to reports.
If people refuse to report their location or are unable to do so, police are then dispatched to hunt them down.
“We don’t tell them how often or when, on a random basis they have to reply within 15 minutes,” said Premier Steven Marshall.
This is barely much different from literally fitting people with electronic ankle bracelets that track their every movement like prisoners under home arrest, a policy that was actually considered by Australian authorities earlier this year.
No matter your views of COVID, what's happening in Australia is alarming, extreme and dangerous. https://t.co/Ep7fOqiHUJ
“No matter your views of COVID, what’s happening in Australia is alarming, extreme and dangerous,” remarked journalist Glenn Greenwald.
As we have exhaustively highlighted, Australia has enforced one of the most draconian lockdowns in the world in an effort to pursue a disastrous ‘zero COVID’ strategy.
Last month, the Premier of Victoria asserted that authorities “won’t hesitate” to go “door-to-door” to carry out mandatory COVID tests on Australians.
Aussies were also ordered not to talk to each other, even while wearing masks, while people who merely post anti-lockdown information online could also face fines of up to $11,000 dollars under an absurdly authoritarian new law.
NPR said Chinese broadcasters were told to “resolutely put an end to sissy men” — an insulting slang term for effeminate men (niang pao, or literally, “girlie guns”) — as well as “other abnormal esthetics.”
There is concern that Chinese pop stars who are “influenced by the sleek, girlish look of some South Korean and Japanese singers and actors, are failing to encourage China’s young men to be masculine enough,” the outlet added.
It’s all part of an eight-point plan introduced Thursday by China’s National Radio and Television Administration that calls for “further regulation of arts and entertainment shows and related personnel,” Variety reported.
More from the magazine:
Announcing the measures, the Communist Party of China‘s propaganda department accused some in the entertainment industry of bad influence on the young and of “severely polluting the social atmosphere.”
One of the eight sections to one one “boycotting being overly entertaining” explained a need to put more emphasis on “traditional Chinese culture, revolution culture and socialist culture.” It said that authorities will establish a “correct beauty standard,” and boycott vulgar internet celebrities.
It also called for Chinese media to spread more positive values, and for trade associations in the television and internet entertainment sectors to provide more training and self-discipline.
NPR added that President Xi Jinping wants a “national rejuvenation” that includes tighter Communist Party control of business, education, culture, and religion.
What else is out?
The outlet noted that Chinese broadcasters have been instructed to avoid promoting “vulgar internet celebrities” as well as admiration of wealth and celebrity.
Performers who “violate public order” or have “lost morality” also are on the outs, as well as programs about the children of celebrities and “idol audition shows,” Variety said.
More from the magazine:
China’s LGBTQ community may also feel deeply uneasy. While homosexuality is no longer classified as a mental illness in China and was decriminalized in 1997, same sex relations remain mostly taboo.
Gay entertainment content has remained in a gray zone, and foreign films with gay themes such as “Call Me By Your Name,” and “Bohemian Rhapsody” have been heavily censored or removed from screens.
Earlier this year the dominant messaging app Weixin/WeChat erased all past content of the accounts for the campus LGBTQ groups of China’s top universities.
The producers of The Riot and the Dance have teamed up with Angel Studios for the distribution of its multi-part nature documentary series intended to show God’s hand in the beauty that surrounds us.
The faith-based series showcases the vast and beautifully intricate planet while explaining to viewers that it was intentionally designed by the Divine Creator.
The show’s host, Dr. Gordon Wilson, who’s also a scientist and devout Christian, told The Christian Post (CP) that working on the project was a “dream come true.”
“For a scientist and animal lover, there’s nothing like adventuring in the field. And now, thanks to our fantastic production crew, I can bring millions of families along for the ride, celebrating creation and the Artist behind every fantastic critter,” he told CP in a statement.
“Faith-based nature docs have never had space in the industry,” he added. “I’m still amazed that such a shake-up is really happening, and I’m beyond blessed to be a part of it.”
The Riot and the Dance is crowdfunded like the hit series The Chosen. At the time of publication, the producers had raised more than $117,000 toward the goal of $1 million for production costs.
The series is supported by several celebrities who are Christians, including Kirk Cameron, Kanye West, and The Chosen creator, Dallas Jenkins.
In a video promoting the series, Jenkins said, “What I love about this series is both what it isn’t and what it is. So what it isn’t, is some sort of conspiracy theory or an ‘us versus them’ thing or a sermon series, but what it is, is twofold.”
“Number one, it’s a look what God did, like, check out what God did,” he added. “Let’s learn about it. Let’s engage with it. Let’s teach our kids to love it more and to nurture it more. But then, also, it becomes a celebration. It’s like a worship experience. I feel like I love God more and want to worship Him more because of all the amazing things that this documentary series is showing me.”
Cameron called the nature series “amazing.”
“Wilson and Angel Studios are bringing together an incredible TV series that is going to thrill you, inspire you, and get you so excited,” Cameron pointed out on the series website. “Your family is going to love it!”
Jon Erwin, director of the film “I Can Only Imagine,” described the nature series as family-friendly entertainment.
“It shows that God’s fingerprints are all over the world. I think it is something your whole family will enjoy,” he said. “I’m backing it and I think you should back it too.”
Rapper Kanye West allowed the show creators to use his song “Selah” for its trailer.
US Labor Agency Probes Two Complaints From Apple Workers
A U.S. national labor agency is investigating two charges against tech giant Apple Inc. filed by employees, records on its website show.
The charges, filed on Aug. 26 and Sept. 1, are being reviewed by the U.S. National Labor Relations Board’s office in Oakland, California. The agency declined to comment.
“We take all concerns seriously and we thoroughly investigate whenever a concern is raised,” Apple, which is based in Cupertino, California, said in a statement that cited employee privacy in declining to discuss specifics.
Ashley Gjovik, a senior engineering program manager at Apple, told Reuters that she filed the Aug. 26 charge, which cites harassment by a manager, reduction of responsibilities, and increases in unfavorable work, among other complaints.
The Sept. 1 charge was filed by Cher Scarlett, an Apple software engineer who said the company repeatedly stopped discussions of pay among employees.
The documents she sent the agency, which she provided to Reuters, say Apple “engaged in coercive and suppressive activity that has enabled abuse and harassment of organizers of protected concerted activity.”
The labor relations agency investigates all charges it receives and launches a prosecution against the employer if merited.
In recent weeks, some current and former Apple workers have critiqued company culture on Twitter, using the hashtag #AppleToo. U.S. law allows employees to openly discuss certain topics, such as working conditions.
In addition, workers have engaged in a heated debate on the messaging platform Slack about Apple’s move to scan U.S. customer phones and computers for child sex abuse images, Reuters reported.
In a letter accompanying her NLRB charge, Scarlett wrote that Apple employees began a pay equity survey in April, but the company blocked them, citing privacy concerns.
It also halted subsequent surveys, including one that aimed to address the privacy issues, Scarlett added.
In late August, Apple denied employees’ request to create a Slack channel to discuss pay equity, which Scarlett told Reuters was “the last straw” that led her to file the complaint.
Gjovik told Reuters that after Apple started investigating her complaints, as well as accusations of sexism, her managers began re-assigning her work to colleagues and loading her up with undesirable tasks.
The company put her on paid administrative leave in early August. She said Apple had not finished its investigation.