Home Blog Page 3394

‘There’s no control’: Border chaos invades America’s heartland

Iron County in Utah is about the furthest thing from a border community.

But Sheriff Kenneth Carpenter says incidents like a traffic stop this month on the interstate, where a deputy nabbed a motorist for reckless driving and found 5 pounds of methamphetamine and $8,000 in cash, are the results of the chaos on the U.S.-Mexico boundary.

State officials have warned sheriffs that Honduran gangs have stepped up drug trafficking along the Wasatch Mountains, Iron County’s SWAT team callouts are “way up” and deputies are finding more guns when they serve search warrants, Sheriff Carpenter said.

“Since the border’s been just wide open now, there’s no control,” he told The Washington Times. “The floodgates have been opened, and we’re seeing it on a much more frequent basis. We’re seeing a surge in the [drug] pipelines, we’re seeing a surge in fentanyl houses, we’re seeing a surge in criminal activity.”

Some voices in Washington say what comes across the U.S.-Mexico boundary makes its way into the interior. In other words, every community is a border community.

Iron County’s experience suggests that’s true.

Communities have worried this year about a nexus between border crossings and the spread of COVID-19 as migrants disperse from border states.

The most significant issues, however, are drugs and what follows from that, Sheriff Carpenter said.

Demand for drugs is soaring, and some analysts blame the pandemic. Latin American cartels have been ready with supply.

Customs and Border Protection, the Homeland Security agency that mans the border and ports of entry and is charged with sniffing out contraband, has nabbed nearly 180,000 pounds of methamphetamine so far this fiscal year. That’s a record, even with one month to go.

At more than 10,000 pounds, fentanyl seizures have shattered the record set last year of about 4,800 pounds.

Of the drugs that come primarily across the southern border, only marijuana is showing a significant drop-off.

Border analysts say seizures are good yardsticks. If agents and officers report increases, it means more is getting through the border.

Rep. John Katko of New York, the top Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, challenged Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas over the issue at a hearing Wednesday.

“The fentanyl seized this year is enough to kill every man, woman and child in the United States six times over,” Mr. Katko said.

China has traditionally been the chief source of fentanyl but has been tightening its controls on export to the U.S. Mexican smuggling organizations have filled the gap. Most of the heroin reaching the U.S. also comes from Mexican poppy farms.

The flow is up for several reasons, but analysts repeatedly point to the level of distraction for agents and officers. They have been pulled from their regular duties and tasked with processing evacuees from the Afghanistan airlift and babysitting the record numbers of illegal immigrant children and near-record numbers of families that have come across the border since January.

One congresswoman challenged Mr. Mayorkas with a calculation that 75% of Border Patrol agents in one Texas sector have been pulled from regular patrol duties.

Sen. Rob Portman, Ohio Republican, said in another hearing with Mr. Mayorkas last week that a spike in overdose deaths has hit his state particularly hard over the past year.

“As far as I’m concerned, demand reduction remains the key,” he said. “The higher volumes reduce the price of these drugs on the streets, expands the number of drugs available and causes more devastation.”

The Biden administration has announced plans to ramp up pressure on the cartels that control the smuggling of people and drugs into the U.S.

The Treasury Department announced Wednesday that it had designated Sergio Valenzuela Valenzuela and seven of his associates under the Kingpin Act, effectively freezing their assets held in the U.S.

The government says Mr. Valenzuela Valenzuela is a player in the Sinaloa Cartel and moves heroin, methamphetamine and fentanyl out of Nogales, in Sonora, Mexico, right across the border from Nogales, Arizona.

Prosecutors also unsealed a set of 3-year-old drug trafficking charges against Mr. Valenzuela Valenzuela.

Sheriff Carpenter said drugs are tied to guns in his community.

He said addicts steal firearms and trade them for drugs, putting more weapons into the hands of dealers.

“Several years ago, we hardly ever saw guns involved with drug warrants. Now it’s commonplace, where we find stolen guns that have been traded for drugs, or stolen drugs that have been taken down to Las Vegas to be traded for guns,” he said. “It just seems like since the border’s been wide open that it’s become much more frequent for us to hit these pipelines.”

It’s not just border matters.

Sheriff Carpenter said one problem in Utah is the state’s Justice Reinvestment Initiative, which reduced the classification for some drug crimes.

The goal, he said, was to get people out of the state prison system and use the savings for more addiction treatment. The result, he said, was more incarceration in Iron County. The state hasn’t come through with the treatment money, so the addicts remain locked up.

“We’re seeing a huge uptick in recidivism and the frequency we’re dealing with these people, over and over again,” the sheriff said.

More Radical Than Roe: House Abortion Bill Would Repeal Existing Laws, Prohibit Future Pro-Life Laws

In response to pro-life policy victories like the Texas Heartbeat Act and an upcoming Supreme Court case asking the justices to provide a constitutional course correction to America’s arbitrary and unworkable abortion jurisprudence, pro-abortion legislators in Congress are advancing a deceptively named piece of legislation called the Women’s Health Protection Act. The radical, far-reaching proposal would entrench unfettered access to abortion in federal law.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her congressional allies—as well as the media—have characterized the Women’s Health Protection Act as simply “codifying Roe v. Wade.”

That’s an egregious mischaracterization that understates just how radical the proposal actually is. The Act goes far beyond the already permissive regime permitted under America’s existing abortion jurisprudence.

If enacted, the Women’s Health Protection Act would endanger essentially all state-level abortion restrictions, existing state and federal conscience protection laws, and various provisions limiting taxpayer funding for abortions. Congress should reject this radical proposal.

More Radical Than Roe

The Women’s Health Protection Act would expressly prohibit existing laws that regulate abortion and the abortion industry. The bill bans informed consent requirements, reflection periods, and provisions that give women the opportunity to view an image of their unborn child or listen to the child’s heartbeat.

The proposed federal policy would also preempt policies like the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which currently protects women and their unborn children in more than a dozen states from inhumane late-term abortions performed after 20 weeks. The scientific evidence suggests that a baby can feel excruciating pain during an abortion procedure performed after 20 weeks.

Bill Ignores Pro-Life Policy Consensus

The Women’s Health Protection Act would imperil policies like the Hyde Amendment, which prevents taxpayer dollars from paying for elective abortion in federal programs like Medicaid. Over the past four decades, the Hyde Amendment has saved more than 2.4 million lives.

It would also jeopardize longstanding policies that protect conscience and religious freedom, ignoring America’s proud tradition of respecting individuals and entities’ right to not participate in abortion.

These pro-life policies enjoy broad support across the political spectrum. A majority of Americans oppose using taxpayer dollars to fund elective abortions, including 65% of independents and 31% of Democrats, according to a January Marist poll commissioned by the Catholic organization Knights of Columbus. Likewise, a majority of Americans support conscience rights for individuals and entities that object to abortion.

States have enacted more than 500 life-protecting policies in the last decade. Congress would do well to remember that such policies are in in place precisely because elected representatives did what their constituents asked them to do: protect unborn human life and women’s health and safety.

Congress Must Reject Pro-Abortion Extremism

Americans broadly support policies that the sweeping Women’s Health Protection Act would disallow. Rather than prohibit pro-life policies where they exist, Congress should pursue policies that protect innocent unborn human lives—including those not yet born—and society should support women who face challenging or unplanned pregnancies.

Stock buybacks boom as corporate cash piles grow

The Delta variant is keeping more companies cautious about how to invest the mountains of cash they have at their disposal. That hesitancy has led, in part, to corporate spending on stock buybacks outpacing capital expenditures this year. 

Why it matters: Companies hoarded cash and raised prices over the past year — leaving them with a lot of money and decisions about what to do with it.

  • Many who wanted to reinvest in their businesses by spending on new equipment, found limited inventory to buy due to supply chain delays.
  • Buybacks, which were restricted last year, are viewed as a more flexible option. They are easier to pull back compared with other forms of capital investment, Howard Silverblatt, a senior index analyst at S&P Dow Jones Indices, told the Wall Street Journal. 

Driving the news: DellNews CorpMcDonald’s and Lockheed Martin all announced buyback plans last week.

Catch up quick: Buybacks among S&P 500 companies reached $370.4 billion, up 29% in the first half of this year versus the same period in 2020, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence via the Journal.

  • Capital expenditures reached $337.2 billion, up 4.8%. 

Yes, but: Buybacks from the top 20 companies made up the majority (55.7%) of last quarter’s buybacks — up from pre-pandemic historical averages (44.5%) but down from last year (87.2%), according to S&P Dow Jones Indices

The big picture: Capital spending started to pick up in the second quarter of this year, eclipsing pre-pandemic levels, especially in areas of technologyas the world moved to a remote work environment. 

What they’re saying: Even though the absolute number of dollars spent on buybacks is high, the yield — what’s been repurchased compared to market caps — is low and still below pre-pandemic levels, Saira Malik, chief investment officer for Nuveen, tells Axios. 

  • “Corporate buybacks are a sign of confidence in a company’s own business model [as well as] a sign of confidence in the stock market and with valuations where they are,” she added.

The intrigue: Part of the hesitation to repurchase shares even more strongly is because of this market rally, according to Malik.

  • “Some corporates are more concerned about the valuations of the stock price and want to make sure that if they’re going to increase buybacks, they’re doing it when they feel that their stock price is more attractive.”

What to watch: Buybacks may reach a peak by early 2022, says Malik.

  • New taxes, proposed to help pay for President Biden’s domestic spending plan, could play a role in decreasing buyback levels.

‘We’re NEVER Getting Back to Normal’: Australian Nightmare Intensifies

The scowling tyrant is back.

The scowling face of Australia’s dystopian COVID nightmare has let slip the truth.

No matter how hard you comply, no matter how much you humiliate yourselves, life is never returning to normal.

Americans’ Trust In Media Continues To Crumble

(Issues & Insights) Americans’ trust in the media declined in September to its second-lowest level ever, the latest I&I/TIPP Trust in Media index shows. It’s yet another sign that mainstream news outlets, websites, blogs and other online media providers are suffering a collapse in public credibility.

I&I/TIPP Trust in Media indexes for both traditional media and alternative media dropped.

The index for traditional media edged down from 44.8 in August to 43.7 in September. It was the second-lowest level since the index was created last March. Examples of traditional media would include the Washington Post, New York Times, NPR and CNN, among other major national news outlets.

The companion index for so-called alternative media also slipped, from 41.6 in August to 40.2 in September. Examples of these media include the New York Post, Washington Times, NewsMax, The Daily Caller, RealClearPolitics and other largely non-mainstream news sources, many primarily web-based.

The Alternative Media measure is a different story. Those largely conservative and centrist outlets enjoy more support from Republicans and independents than the Traditional Media. On a percentage basis, the Alternative Media Trust stood at 25% for both groups, and the “no trust” response garnered 68% for both.

In short, when it comes to media, Americans seem more divided than ever by their choice of information sources.

Even so, what stands out most of all is the high level of absolute distrust shown by Americans toward their main media sources. Some 25% of all those responding to the poll said they had “no trust at all” in the Traditional Media complex. 

That’s a significant number, one that suggests the media have abrogated their duty to keep bias out of their news feeds. For Democrats, only 6% said they have “no trust” in Traditional Media. But 23% total for members of that party said they had “little trust.”

One other troubling element lying behind the media’s dismal regard in the public eye: race.

White Americans are far less likely than Blacks and Hispanics to show trust in the media. While just 36% of Whites said they trusted the media, a whopping 58% said they didn’t. Meanwhile, 49% of Blacks and Hispanics, taken together, said they trusted the big media outlets, while 45% said they didn’t.

Disgruntlement with the media was a regional phenomenon, too. The Northeast (48%), Midwest (62%), South (55%) and West (47%) all showed significant distrust of the big media that feed us information daily.

Those looking for reasons behind this high level of distrust need look no further than recent news events that either were under-covered by the media or intentionally distorted. Examples abound.

In California, GOP gubernatorial candidate Larry Elder was smeared as the “black face of white supremacy” by the L.A. Times, an overtly racist commentary by the state’s most powerful newspaper, which largely served as a cheerleader for the dysfunctional state’s leaders during the recent recall campaign.

Meanwhile, national newspapers couldn’t be bothered to cover the blockbuster revelations about Hunter Biden’s apparent attempt to extort cash in his father’s name from the Ukraine, China and even, most recently, Libya.

“The Hunter Biden email cover-up may not be the most contemptible example of the modern political media’s corruption, but it is probably the most demonstrable,” wrote David Hasanyi in the New York Post.

Those who see an increasing unholy alliance between the Democratic Party and big media have some reason to be concerned: The recent “infrastructure” bill includes significant subsidies to new media, likely an unconstitutional breech of our nation’s traditional federal non-interference with First Amendment rights.

All in all, a glum picture of growing distrust for our nation’s media.

In the coming weeks and months, I&I/TIPP will continue to cull more data from polls in the on topics of interest to all Americans. TIPP has the distinction of being the most accurate pollster for the past five presidential elections.

Biden’s Approval Sinks to a New Low at 40% in Latest National Polling

(Rasmussen Reports) The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll, sponsored by The ANTIFA by Jack Posobiec, for Monday shows that 40% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Biden’s job performance. Fifty-eight percent (58%) disapprove.

The latest figures include 21% who Strongly Approve of the job Biden is doing and 50% who Strongly Disapprove. This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of -29. (see trends)

Regular updates are posted Monday through Friday at 9:30 a.m.  Eastern (sign up for free daily email update).

Some readers wonder how we come up with our job approval ratings for the president since they often don’t show as dramatic a change as some other pollsters do. It depends on how you ask the question and whom you ask.

To get a sense of longer-term job approval trends for the president, Rasmussen Reports compiles our tracking data on a full month-by-month basis.

Rasmussen Reports has been a pioneer in the use of automated telephone polling techniques, but many other firms still utilize their own operator-assisted technology (see methodology).

Daily tracking results are collected via telephone surveys of 500 likely voters per night and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. To reach those who have abandoned traditional landline telephones, Rasmussen Reports uses an online survey tool to interview randomly selected participants from a demographically diverse panel. The margin of sampling error for the full sample of 1,500 Likely Voters is +/- 2.5 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Results are also compiled on a full-week basis and crosstabs for full-week results are available for Platinum Members.

Videos: Israelis Rise Up Against Vaccine Passports After Being Told MORE Shots Needed To Be Considered ‘Fully Vaccinated’

Protests have finally erupted in Israel as it has slowly dawned on people there that the goalposts for vaccine passports keep being shifted by the government.

It is now expected to be announced that at least FOUR vaccinations will be needed to be considered ‘fully vaccinated’ and able to engage in society.

Over the weekend marches took place in the streets of Tel Aviv against the so called ‘Green Pass’:

Predictably, the media labeled the protesters ‘right wing extremists’ and anti-vaxxers:

As we recently noted, despite over 61 per cent of its population being fully vaccinated and having implemented a vaccine passport system, the Israeli Health Ministry has expressed concern about the fact that a recent downtrend in COVID-19 infections is reversing, potentially surpassing any levels previously seen.

Israeli health minister Nitzan Horowitz was caught on a hot mic admitting that vaccine passports were primarily about coercing skeptical people to get the vaccine and not for medical reasons.

Owner attempts to demonstrate dog is vegetarian by choice

The Worst of Times? If the Republic Is In Free Fall, Where Are the Happy Warriors?

Rep. Maxine Waters Proves Her Ignorance and Says Illegals Are Being Treated Worse Than Slaves