Home Blog Page 263

Van Jones Admits ‘Woke’ Workplace Activism Got Out of Hand: ‘We Need to Move On’

CNN

Former Obama advisor Van Jones has publicly criticized the direction of left-wing activism in corporate America, calling recent “woke” workplace trends excessive and counterproductive. Speaking during a forum on race and corporate responsibility, Jones said the progressive movement had overreached in its influence on businesses, especially in the aftermath of the George Floyd protests. He acknowledged that workplace activism has become “ridiculous” and warned that companies should return their focus to productivity and mission—not politics.

Jones, who once championed corporate involvement in social justice causes, now admits that he would not mourn the loss of political activism in the workplace. He noted that in the rush to be perceived as allies of progressive causes, many companies began implementing policies that alienated employees, distracted from core business goals, and ultimately diminished workplace cohesion. Jones stated, “At some point, we have to move on.”

His remarks come as companies across the country begin to scale back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Many firms are now reassessing whether their DEI programs have delivered meaningful results or simply created additional bureaucracy. This shift reflects growing dissatisfaction not only among conservative critics but also from within the left, as seen in Jones’ comments.

Conservative leaders and organizations have long argued that politicizing the workplace creates division, suppresses freedom of thought, and undermines merit-based advancement. Jones’ admission appears to validate these concerns. His call to “move on” signals a significant shift, as one of the left’s most prominent voices concedes that the ideological push in professional spaces may have gone too far.

The backlash against workplace activism mirrors wider cultural fatigue with political correctness and progressive overreach. Polling shows growing skepticism of DEI training, mandatory pronoun use, and other HR policies perceived as ideological enforcement. With figures like Van Jones now echoing those concerns, momentum may be shifting in favor of a more balanced, apolitical workplace culture.

All Options on the Table for Russia Sanctions, Bessent Warns

Scott Bessent (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

In a Fox Business interview, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reiterated that the Trump administration is prepared to impose new sanctions on Russia amid a renewed Russian bombing campaign in Ukraine. He emphasized, “all options are on the table,” suggesting readiness to escalate economic pressure unless President Putin alters his conduct.

This comes despite recent diplomatic overtures, including a high-level meeting in Anchorage and a follow-up White House phone call with European leaders and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy.

The warning follows intensified missile and drone assaults on Kyiv, which killed at least 17 civilians— including four children—highlighting the urgency behind a tougher U.S. response.

Bessent also used the platform to criticize India’s role in purchasing and reselling Russian oil, asserting that such actions help finance Russia’s war effort. While affirming the strategic importance of U.S.–India ties, he suggested these behaviors—along with stalled trade negotiations—contributed to the administration’s decision to impose tariffs on Indian imports.

Trump to Award Rudy Giuliani Presidential Medal of Freedom Amid Recovery

Trump Gold Card
President Donald Trump (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

President Trump has announced that Rudy Giuliani, his former lawyer and the ex-mayor of New York City, will receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian honor in the United States. Trump hailed Giuliani as “the greatest Mayor in the history of New York City” and “an equally great American Patriot,” in a statement on his Truth Social platform.

The announcement came just two days after Giuliani, aged 81, sustained serious injuries in a car accident in New Hampshire while stopped to assist a domestic violence victim. He suffered a fractured thoracic vertebra, lacerations, and contusions, but his condition is improving and he is expected to be released from the hospital soon.

Giuliani’s recognition reflects Trump’s enduring alliance with him. Once heralded as “America’s Mayor” for his leadership following the September 11 attacks, Giuliani later faced disbarment, sanctions, and a staggering $148 million defamation judgment tied to false claims of election fraud. He also faces criminal charges in Georgia and Arizona related to post-2020 election efforts.

Despite these legal challenges, Trump’s decision to honor Giuliani underscores his prominent and loyal role in the president’s political orbit.

California’s Deepfake Election Ad Ban Struck Down as Unconstitutional

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

A federal judge has ruled that California’s “deepfake” election ad ban is unconstitutional, stating that the legislation goes beyond reasonable regulation and infringes on free speech. The decision, authored by U.S. District Judge John Mendez, highlighted multiple constitutional flaws: it suppresses too much speech, imposes content and viewpoint discrimination, and compels expressive content in a selective manner, all of which breach the First Amendment.

California enacted two bills aimed at combating AI-generated political misinformation—AB 2655 and AB 2839—following a satirical deepfake video mocking Vice President Kamala Harris. Governor Gavin Newsom signed the measures, citing concerns over election integrity. Judge Mendez rejected AB 2655 on the grounds that it violated Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects online platforms from liability over third-party content.

In a broader ruling, the judge also invalidated AB 2839, which permitted any individual to sue over AI-generated political content perceived as “materially deceptive.” Mendez found this to be a blunt, censorship-style approach that could stifle satire and parody. He noted the law only penalized content that could harm a candidate, not content that might benefit one—clear evidence of impermissible viewpoint discrimination.

The court also took issue with enforcement provisions that allowed anyone to file a lawsuit against content creators and mandated overly burdensome disclaimers. Such requirements, Mendez wrote, could effectively kill the joke in a satirical video: “a mandatory disclaimer for parody or satire would kill the joke.”

Wuhan Ph.D. Student Pleads No Contest in U.S. Bioweapons Smuggling Case

Science Lab (Hans Reniers/Unsplash)

A Chinese Ph.D. student, Chengxuan Han, pleaded no contest on August 19, 2025 to multiple federal charges—including smuggling biological materials into the United States and making false statements to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials. Han, a doctoral candidate at Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, China, had shipped four improperly documented packages containing biological materials related to roundworms to researchers at the University of Michigan between 2024 and 2025.

Upon arriving at Detroit Metropolitan Airport on a J‑1 visa in June, Han was stopped for inspection. She initially lied to CBP officers, downplaying her knowledge of the packages and mislabeling their contents as plastic plates or books. Authorities discovered that data on her electronic device had been erased just days before her arrival. Later, during further questioning, she admitted to both sending the packages and misrepresenting their contents.

If convicted, Han faces a prison term of up to 20 years for smuggling and an additional five years for making false statements. Her sentencing is scheduled for September 10, 2025.

This case marks a troubling pattern. Earlier this year, two other Chinese nationals—postdoctoral researcher Yunqing Jian and her boyfriend Zunyong Liu—were charged with conspiring to smuggle Fusarium graminearum, a toxic agricultural fungus and potential agroterrorism agent, into the United States via the University of Michigan. Han’s arrest is the third in a series of such incidents, prompting heightened federal concern over biosecurity risks tied to foreign researchers.

Justice Department officials underscored the severity of the offenses. U.S. Attorney Jerome Gorgon Jr. condemned Han’s actions as part of an “alarming pattern that threatens our security,” stressing that American taxpayers should not bear the burden of facilitating illicit biological transfers.

Stephen Miller Rebukes Press Over Deportation of Suspected MS-13 Gang Member

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Stephen Miller, Deputy Chief of Staff under President Trump, forcefully defended the administration’s decision to deport Kilmar Abrego-Garcia to Uganda rather than his native El Salvador, stating, “We are not a travel booking agency.” The comment came during a press exchange in which a reporter questioned the choice of destination for the Salvadoran national, who is alleged to have ties to the violent MS-13 gang.

Miller clarified that the deportation destination was determined by an existing relocation agreement with Uganda, not by the preferences of the individual being deported. Abrego-Garcia reportedly refused to return to El Salvador, prompting the administration to proceed with deportation to a third country willing to accept him. The administration has maintained that such actions are necessary to enforce immigration law and prevent dangerous individuals from remaining in the United States.

Legal challenges have emerged in response to the deportation, with some courts examining the extent to which non-citizens can object to the destination of their removal. Immigration enforcement officials argue that the law provides flexibility in removing individuals who pose a threat or who refuse to cooperate. The Trump administration’s stance on third-country deportations has become a flashpoint in ongoing legal battles, particularly involving individuals with criminal affiliations.

Miller reiterated that the government’s duty is to protect American citizens, not to accommodate foreign nationals evading lawful removal. The incident has reignited debate over sovereignty, national security, and the proper limits of judicial intervention in executive immigration enforcement.

NYC Schools Set National Record with $42,168 Spending Per Student as Results Lag

school choice
Image via Canva

New York City’s public schools are projected to spend $42,168 per student in the upcoming 2025–26 school year, setting a new national benchmark for per-pupil spending. This figure significantly exceeds budgets in other major U.S. cities and marks a sharp increase even amid declining enrollment.

This comes despite a substantial drop in student numbers—around 100,000 fewer since the 2019–20 school year—bringing heightened scrutiny to the soaring educational costs. Budget analysts attribute the growing per-pupil spending to increased expenses in food, transportation, pensions, debt, and support services.

While the city claims the investment supports smaller class sizes, higher staffing levels, and enhanced services for high-need students, critics argue the spending lacks accountability. Student outcomes remain disappointing: only 33% of fourth graders and 23% of eighth graders scored proficient in math on national assessments.

Adding to the controversy, more than 3,000 NYC teachers have turned to DonorsChoose, a crowdfunding platform, to raise money for basic classroom essentials—bandages, hygiene products, pencils, and clothing—despite the record-breaking per-student budget. Many educators say school-provided funding covers only a fraction of their needs, with one art teacher reporting just $3 per student for supplies.

Right-Wing Populist Surge Reshaping Europe’s Political Landscape

Nigel Farage (AP Photo/(AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)

Right-wing populist movements are gaining momentum across Europe’s largest democracies, with parties in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom now leading in national opinion polls. Economic instability, rising immigration, and public distrust in establishment parties are fueling a growing wave of support for nationalist alternatives.

In France, Marine Le Pen’s National Rally continues to dominate polling ahead of upcoming national elections. The party’s hardline stance on immigration and its critique of European Union bureaucracy have resonated with working-class voters. President Emmanuel Macron’s centrist administration faces mounting challenges as dissatisfaction grows over inflation, crime, and cultural unrest. The National Rally has widened its appeal beyond its traditional base, drawing support from younger and first-time voters disillusioned with legacy parties.

Germany has also seen a sharp rise in support for the Alternative for Germany (AfD), particularly in the country’s eastern regions. Once on the political fringe, the AfD has positioned itself as the primary voice for Germans opposed to unchecked migration and rising energy costs. Despite being labeled “extremist” by domestic intelligence agencies, the party now polls second nationally and has overtaken the ruling Social Democrats in several state-level polls. The German government’s ongoing struggles with inflation and immigration policy have only strengthened the AfD’s appeal.

In the United Kingdom, Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party has overtaken both Labour and the Conservatives in some national surveys. The party’s platform, which includes strict border enforcement, indefinite migrant detention, and mass deportations, is drawing widespread support amid ongoing frustration with Britain’s immigration system. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s government has faced increasing criticism for failing to deliver on post-Brexit border control promises. Reform UK’s rise marks a dramatic shift in British politics, signaling the collapse of confidence in traditional parties.

Elsewhere in Europe, right-wing parties continue to make significant gains. In Poland, Karol Nawrocki recently won the presidency with backing from the conservative Law and Justice party, a strong ally of President Trump’s nationalist agenda. This victory further cements Poland’s shift toward conservative populism, with the electorate rejecting EU-imposed social policies.

The European Union faces increasing pressure as nationalist parties push back against globalist frameworks and mass migration. Calls for greater sovereignty, tighter borders, and cultural preservation have become central themes in political debates across the continent. These populist parties are not merely protest movements—they are reshaping the political order and challenging the authority of Brussels and traditional governing coalitions.

UC-Berkeley Declared ‘Hostile Campus’ by CAIR in New Report Targeting Anti-Muslim Bias

protest
Protest (Photo by Kent Nishimura/Getty Images)

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has designated the University of California, Berkeley as a “hostile campus” for Muslim students in its latest 2024–2025 report. The organization accuses the university of enabling Islamophobia and stifling pro-Palestinian activism, despite the school’s long-standing reputation as a hub for leftist politics and social movements.

The report, titled Islamophobia in Higher Education: Combating Systemic Islamophobic Infrastructure in Academia, identifies UC-Berkeley as one of nine “Tier 1” institutions alleged to have “the most hostile campus environments for Palestinian students and their supporters.” CAIR claims the university has punished faculty and students for expressing support for Gaza and failing to protect Muslim students from harassment or intimidation.

Among the specific complaints, CAIR cites disciplinary actions against pro-Palestinian faculty, the cancellation of events related to Gaza, and alleged collaboration between the university and Zionist organizations. The report contends that such actions create a “systemic infrastructure” of Islamophobia embedded within academic institutions, and calls for sweeping changes in university policy.

CAIR has faced longstanding criticism over its own history, including past ties to organizations accused of supporting Hamas, a U.S.-designated terrorist group. While the group positions itself as a civil rights organization for Muslims, its stance on Israel and involvement in campus activism has remained controversial across the political spectrum.

UC-Berkeley Lecturer Launches Starvation Protest Over Gaza

University of California
University of California-Berkeley (Georg Eiermann/Unsplash)

A UC-Berkeley lecturer has started a self-imposed “starvation diet” to protest Israel and pressure the university to sever ties with defense-related research. The protest includes a demand that the school acknowledge Israel’s alleged “genocide” and “apartheid,” while also labeling the university complicit through its tech development and corporate partnerships.

Peyrin Kao, a lecturer in UC-Berkeley’s Electrical Engineering and Computer Science department, has reduced his daily intake to just 250 calories—a number he says reflects the food Palestinians allegedly receive in Gaza. His protest, featured on the EECS department’s class homepage, warns students he may appear “in poor health” due to the diet and includes links to political content supporting the Palestinian cause.

Kao stated he is not at risk of starvation or displacement but intends the protest to show symbolic solidarity. His meals include plain pasta and water, and he admits experiencing extreme fatigue. He framed the diet as a moral stance, accusing Israel of operating an “illegal occupation” and demanding action from the university.

His protest marks a growing trend of activism within elite academic institutions, where anti-Israel sentiment has escalated and university policies are increasingly targeted for ideological reform. Critics argue that such classroom activism undermines academic integrity and crosses the line between teaching and political indoctrination.