Home Blog Page 235

Columbia Ranked Worst University for Free Speech in Nation

Trump antisemitism investigations
Columbia University (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Columbia University has been named one of the worst colleges in America for free speech, according to the 2026 College Free Speech Rankings published by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). The university landed at 256 out of 257 schools surveyed, just above Barnard College, which came in dead last.

The FIRE report evaluated 257 institutions based on how well they protect and promote free expression. Columbia received failing grades in categories like “Administrative Support” and “Comfort Expressing Ideas,” contributing to its near-bottom ranking. The survey results reflect growing discontent among students who feel silenced by rigid ideological environments and administrative indifference.

More than 60 percent of schools in the survey received a failing grade for free speech. Columbia’s low ranking suggests that students there are among the least confident in expressing differing views. The report specifically noted that conservative and religious students feel especially targeted or marginalized.

Southern universities dominated the top of the rankings, with schools like the University of Florida and Auburn earning high marks. In contrast, Northeast schools like Columbia, Barnard, and others showed consistent hostility to open dialogue. Only ten schools from the Northeast made it into the top 100, despite the region’s high concentration of elite institutions.

One admissions counselor, reacting to the rankings, said students are now actively avoiding campuses known for ideological strife. “I don’t want to go to a college where everybody’s angry at each other, and everybody’s fighting over everything,” the counselor told FIRE.

The report follows years of controversy at Columbia over censorship, disinvited speakers, and a pattern of administrators failing to defend academic freedom. Critics argue that elite institutions are abandoning their responsibility to uphold the free exchange of ideas, especially when those ideas challenge left-wing orthodoxy.

Union Dues Funding Jew-Hate: Campus Labor Leaders Accused in Explosive Testimony

US Congress
U.S. Capitol (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File)

Jewish graduate students and academic experts testified before Congress this week, exposing widespread antisemitism within university labor unions. Allegations included forced union membership, denial of religious accommodations, and union-backed support for anti-Israel protests that have left Jewish students feeling threatened and isolated.

On September 10, 2025, the House Education and the Workforce Committee heard testimonies from students at MIT, Stanford, and Cornell detailing disturbing trends of union-linked antisemitism. Witnesses reported being forced into union membership by the United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America (UE), with mandatory dues funding political activities aligned with the anti-Israel BDS movement.

At MIT, union leaders reportedly supported the “Gaza Solidarity Encampment,” which occupied parts of the campus, blocked access to buildings, and promoted antisemitic rhetoric. Jewish students said the encampments created a hostile learning environment, yet the union refused to represent their concerns. Similar issues were raised at Stanford, where students were denied religious exemptions from dues despite the union’s open support of BDS—a movement widely condemned as antisemitic.

Testimonies also highlighted that some unions have partnered with radical activist groups, further politicizing academic environments and isolating Jewish students. Faculty and administrators have largely remained silent, according to the witnesses, while union activists continue to push one-sided, anti-Israel narratives on campuses.

The House committee, chaired by Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC), has broadened its investigation into how campus culture—shaped by DEI programs, academic departments, and organized labor—has become hostile toward Jews. This week’s hearing followed earlier inquiries into university leadership, DEI offices, and federally funded academic centers. Foxx reaffirmed the committee’s commitment to holding institutions accountable for failing to protect Jewish students.

These testimonies come amid rising antisemitic incidents across American colleges, particularly following the October 7 Hamas attacks on Israel. A March 2025 poll revealed that 74% of Jewish college students believe antisemitism is now rampant on their campuses.

Tennessee Drone Terror Plot Foiled Before Substation Attack

Tennessee flag next to US flag (Nashvilledino2/Getty via Canva Pro)

A Tennessee man has pleaded guilty to federal terrorism charges after plotting a drone attack on an electrical substation in a plan that could have caused widespread blackouts and threatened critical infrastructure, including hospitals.

Skyler Philippi, 24, of Columbia, admitted to attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction and attempting to destroy an energy facility, the Department of Justice announced Tuesday. Prosecutors say Philippi was motivated by a “violent ideology” and harbored ties to white supremacist groups, including Atomwaffen Division and the National Alliance.

The FBI says Philippi began discussing violent attacks in mid-2024, initially considering a mass shooting at a YMCA before shifting his focus to high-impact infrastructure targets. After researching past attacks, he determined firearms wouldn’t do enough damage. He turned to explosives and drones, building a plan to deploy a homemade drone equipped with TATP and C-4.

Philippi communicated his plans with undercover FBI agents, even sharing a manifesto that called for chaos in “high tax cities” and industrial zones. He praised the potential financial damage such attacks could cause. By fall 2024, he had scouted a specific substation, ordered explosives, and acquired materials to construct pipe bombs.

On November 2, 2024, Philippi met agents at a hotel before traveling toward his intended target. According to the DOJ, he participated in a Norse pagan ritual and declared, “It’s time to do something big.” As he prepared to deploy the drone, agents arrested him. At the time of arrest, the drone was fully powered with explosives attached.

Philippi is scheduled to be sentenced on January 8, 2026. He faces life in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Federal officials praised the FBI for thwarting what they called a serious and imminent threat to public safety and the national power grid.

Julie Read Enters Phoenix Council Race, Pledges Common-Sense Leadership

Arizona
Arizona state flag (Levi Meir Clancy/Unsplash)

Fourth-generation Arizonan and longtime community advocate Julie Read has officially entered the race for Phoenix City Council District 2, bringing with her a track record of local engagement and bipartisan problem-solving.

Read, a former Deer Valley Unified School Board member, co-founder of BlockWatch Phoenix North, and small business executive, has been a fixture in north Phoenix community affairs since 2016. She told The Center Square on Wednesday that her campaign is focused on preserving the area’s strong foundation while guiding it through its next phase of growth.

“I really want to carry forward the legacy of the councilmen that have served before me,” said Read. “They built a really strong foundation, and I would love the honor of taking that and continuing to build upon it.”

District 2, which contains the largest section of state trust land in Phoenix, is seen as a prime area for development. Read emphasized the need for responsible planning that respects the desires of local residents while addressing future infrastructure needs.

As a Republican candidate, Read said she plans to approach governance with a nonpartisan mindset. “I don’t think that city politics is red or blue,” she said. “Regardless of which party you agree with, we all want the same things.”

Read’s grassroots experience includes organizing more than 6,500 residents to pass bipartisan public safety legislation. If elected, she says she’ll continue focusing on public safety, responsible growth, and expanding investment in arts and parks.

“I’m looking forward to bringing a commonsense viewpoint to the council,” she said, stressing her dedication to safe neighborhoods and the responsible management of natural resources.

Read joins a growing field in the 2026 race to represent one of Phoenix’s fastest-developing districts.

Georgia Paper Mill Closures Trigger $2.9B Economic Crisis

Trump Paris Climate Accords withdrawal
Lucas Sankey/Unsplash

The shutdown of five paper mills in southeast Georgia is expected to slash $2.9 billion annually from the state’s economy, lawmakers were told during a House Rural Development Committee hearing on Wednesday.

International Paper is closing four facilities—two in Riceboro and two in Savannah—by the end of September. Georgia-Pacific shut down its Cedar Springs mill in July. The closures are delivering a “gut punch” to local communities, according to Devon Dartnell, Forest Utilization Chief at the Georgia Forestry Commission.

Dartnell broke down the economic toll: $1.7 billion in direct impact, $845 million in indirect effects, and $318 million in lost wages.

Bert Brantley, president of the Savannah Area Chamber of Commerce, said job fairs are being held this week to help affected workers. Liberty County also hosted a job fair Wednesday to assist those displaced.

Agriculture Commissioner Tyler Harper stated that the International Paper closures caught state officials off guard. House Speaker Jon Burns echoed the sentiment and noted that southeast Georgia still hasn’t recovered from Hurricane Helene, which devastated timber across multiple counties a year ago.

Much of the downed timber from that storm remains unrecovered, and with mills shutting down, there’s even less opportunity for salvage. Burns expressed sorrow at the sight of unusable timber still littering counties like Coffee and Effingham.

State officials are weighing both short- and long-term solutions. Jake Matthews, vice president of the Georgia Forestry Association, urged support for federal efforts to remove international trade barriers affecting Georgia’s forest exports. Matthews also pointed to bioenergy as a key opportunity for future growth, particularly for small-diameter wood and residuals.

Bioenergy could help fuel data centers, which Matthews said could consume up to 1.2 million tons of wood annually for a 100-megawatt operation.

Gavin Newsom Condemns Kirk Shooting After Violent Rant

California Governor Gavin Newsom (AP Photo/Eric Thayer, File)

California Governor Gavin Newsom condemned Wednesday’s shooting of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk—but his words of concern come just weeks after he used violent rhetoric to attack Republicans.

Kirk was shot in the neck during a student Q&A event at Utah Valley University. As of this writing, he remains in critical condition. The university confirmed the suspect is in custody, and authorities say a single shot was fired targeting the conservative speaker.

Shortly after the incident, Newsom posted to X: “The attack on Charlie Kirk is disgusting, vile, and reprehensible. In the United States of America, we must reject political violence in EVERY form.”

Critics were quick to highlight Newsom’s hypocrisy. Just last month, on “The Siren Podcast,” Newsom declared, “I’m going to punch these sons of bitches in the mouth,” referring to Republicans including President Donald Trump and Texas Governor Greg Abbott. He claimed they were “vandalizing democracy” and vowed to “fight fire with fire.”

Breitbart’s Joel Pollak, who first reported the comments, noted the governor’s double standard: condemning political violence publicly while fueling hostility behind the microphone.

President Trump also responded to the Kirk shooting with a Truth Social post: “We must all pray for Charlie Kirk, who has been shot. A great guy from top to bottom. GOD BLESS HIM!”

The incident has reignited concerns about political violence in America, particularly as rhetoric escalates heading into the 2026 election season. Kirk has been a frequent target of left-wing hostility due to his strong defense of traditional values, conservative policies, and outspoken opposition to the transgender movement.

Ironically, Newsom hosted Kirk on his own podcast earlier this year, where Kirk pressed the governor on his support for transgender athletes in women’s sports—leading Newsom to admit the issue was “deeply unfair.”

Remembering Charlie Kirk: A Good and Faithful Servant

Charlie Kirk
(Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

In the quiet aftermath of tragedy, we pause to remember a man whose voice echoed across campuses and airwaves, challenging the status quo with unyielding conviction. Charlie Kirk, the visionary founder of Turning Point USA, was taken from us far too soon in a senseless act of violence at Utah Valley University. As a nation grapples with this loss, let us reflect not on the darkness that claimed him, but on the light he brought into the world—a light rooted in faith, family, and an unwavering passion for America’s future.

Charlie was, above all, a man of God. His life was a testament to the principles he drew from Scripture, guiding his every step with a moral compass that pointed toward truth and righteousness. He wasn’t just a public figure; he was a devoted husband to his wife, Erika, and a loving father to their young children. 

In the intimate moments away from the spotlight, Charlie built a home filled with love, laughter, and the quiet strength that comes from shared faith. Those who knew him personally speak of a man who prioritized his family, drawing from them the inspiration to fight for a better world. His passion wasn’t performative—it was personal, born from a deep-seated belief that the values he held dear were worth defending at all costs.

Yet, Charlie lived in a time when such convictions could prove perilous. Our nation stands at a precipice, deeply divided by ideologies that pit neighbor against neighbor. In this fractured landscape, the First Amendment, once the bedrock of free expression, feels increasingly under siege. Dissenting voices are silenced not just through censorship, but through violence. 

Charlie’s death is a stark reminder that people are being targeted, even killed, for their political beliefs. He was no elected official, no career politician chasing power. He was a citizen activist with a heart for the youth, dedicated to shielding tomorrow’s leaders from what he saw as a demonic agenda eroding the very fabric of our society. This insidious force, in his view, sought to corrupt hearts and minds, promoting confusion over clarity, division over unity, and moral relativism over timeless truths. Charlie stood as a bulwark against it, touring colleges and engaging young people in debates that sparked critical thinking and renewed patriotism.

His legacy is not one of mere words, but of action and impact. Through Turning Point USA, Charlie empowered millions of young conservatives to reclaim their campuses and their country. He built a movement that transcended partisanship, focusing on core American ideals: freedom, opportunity, and faith. Even in his final moments, speaking before a crowd of eager students, he embodied the passion that defined him—fierce, articulate, and unapologetic. 

There is no doubt that as Charlie entered heaven’s gates, he heard those cherished words: “Well done, good and faithful servant.” It’s a commendation he earned through a life of service, not to fleeting trends, but to eternal principles.

In our grief, we must not retreat. 

Charlie’s passing charges us to press on, to continue the fight he championed. He would want us to honor his memory not with despair, but with determination—to protect the vulnerable, to speak truth boldly, and to foster a generation equipped to resist the forces that seek to undermine our nation’s soul. 

Let us unite in prayer for his family, drawing strength from the same faith that sustained him. And let us commit to carrying his torch forward, ensuring that his vision for a freer, more faithful America endures.

Stephen King Pushes Gun Control After Charlie Kirk Shooting, Before Facts Known

Charlie Kirk Shot
(Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Author and outspoken gun control advocate Stephen King called for tighter gun laws Wednesday, immediately following the shooting of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk—despite little information being available about the incident at the time.

Kirk was shot during a speaking event at Utah Valley University. Details surrounding the attack remain under investigation, including the identity and motive of the shooter. Still, King quickly posted on X (formerly Twitter), turning the focus toward firearms rather than awaiting confirmation of the facts.

King’s reaction follows a pattern. Less than two weeks earlier, after the August 27 Catholic school shooting in Minneapolis, King also deflected from growing concerns about the transgender identity of the shooter. Instead, he redirected the conversation to gun access, writing: “Trans is not the problem. He had a gun. That’s the problem.”

Critics argue that King is exploiting tragic events to push a political agenda without waiting for evidence. His comments came while Kirk remained hospitalized and the public had little information about the attacker, the weapon used, or whether existing laws had failed.

Second Amendment advocates note that King’s quick jump to gun control ignores the broader issues often at play in violent crimes—ranging from mental health to social breakdown and weak law enforcement policies. They also stress that pushing political narratives before facts are known undermines public trust.

Charlie Kirk is known for his conservative activism and outspoken defense of constitutional rights, including the Second Amendment. The shooting has prompted concerns about political violence and the safety of public figures, particularly as the 2026 election cycle intensifies.

For now, the investigation into the shooting continues—but for King, the blame appears settled.

France Erupts: “Block Everything” Protests Paralyze Nation on New PM’s First Day

Image via Canva

France descended into chaos Wednesday as tens of thousands flooded the streets in the nationwide “Block Everything” protests, demanding an end to deep budget cuts and denouncing President Emmanuel Macron’s embattled government. The mass unrest marked Sébastien Lecornu’s first day as prime minister—and it was nothing short of a political firestorm.

Flames lit up roads, buses burned, and riot police clashed with demonstrators in scenes reminiscent of the Yellow Vest uprising. Over 80,000 police were deployed to contain more than 800 protest actions across France, with nearly 200,000 protesters in the streets according to Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau. The CGT union claimed the number was closer to 250,000.

From Paris to Marseille, from Rennes to Grenoble, rail lines were severed, streets blocked, and tear gas filled the air. In Paris, students held signs reading “Macron Explosion” and “Lecornu, You’re Not Welcome.” Fires burned in the Châtelet district, and riot police broke up roadblocks and scuffles during morning rush hour.

Lecornu, a close Macron ally, stepped into office following the ouster of Prime Minister François Bayrou, who lost a confidence vote on Monday. The protests were largely a reaction to Bayrou’s proposed $51 billion in spending cuts and a controversial plan to eliminate two national holidays.

Fueling the unrest was widespread frustration with Macron’s repeated attempts to govern through unelected technocrats and his alliance with elites in a fractured National Assembly. Protesters accused his government of forcing the working class to bear the burden of France’s mounting debt.

Online organization played a key role in mobilizing crowds. The protests were coordinated via social media and encrypted messaging apps like Telegram—whose Russian-born founder is now under investigation in France.

Despite hundreds of arrests and injuries to police officers, protests remained widespread by nightfall. France’s long-festering discontent has once again boiled over—this time into Lecornu’s political baptism by fire.

Don Lemon Fires Back at Cuomo’s Claim of ‘Fake Bromance’

Former CNN host Don Lemon has denied Chris Cuomo’s allegation that their on-air camaraderie was staged by then-CNN president Jeff Zucker. Cuomo recently claimed Zucker instructed him to linger during the handoff to Lemon’s show in order to manage him, suggesting the “bromance” between the two anchors was manufactured for ratings.

In a response reported by the New York Post, Lemon said the handoff idea was his own and not a directive from management. Lemon explained that Zucker had asked for continuity between programs but left the execution up to the anchors. “I came up with the handoff and went to Chris with it,” Lemon stated, calling Cuomo’s version “sad.”

Lemon emphasized that his friendship with Zucker remains intact and dismissed Cuomo’s allegation that Zucker engineered the segments. According to Lemon, Zucker laughed at Cuomo’s claims when told about them. The once-friendly relationship between Lemon and Cuomo has deteriorated since Cuomo’s 2021 firing over ethical violations tied to his brother, former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. Lemon confirmed he has not spoken with Cuomo in recent years.

CNN insiders also rejected Cuomo’s claims, describing them as self-serving. Reports earlier this year highlighted lingering tensions between Cuomo and Zucker, with some colleagues accusing Cuomo of “stabbing Zucker in the front” by fueling internal controversy that contributed to Zucker’s resignation in 2022.

The dispute underscores the public unraveling of CNN’s former primetime lineup. Both Cuomo and Lemon have attempted comebacks—Cuomo at NewsNation and Lemon through digital media projects—but their feud over credibility and loyalty has continued to resurface.