Home Blog Page 197

Victor Davis Hanson: Charlie Kirk Assassination Marks Turning Point for Western Civilization

American Flag, Church (Brad Dodson/Unsplash)

Historian Victor Davis Hanson says the assassination of Charlie Kirk is more than a national tragedy—it is a historic turning point for the future of Western civilization. In a video commentary for The Daily Signal, Hanson argued that Kirk’s murder has become the “ignition” for a broad popular uprising against radical leftist agendas in the U.S. and across Europe. According to Hanson, elites pushed too far, and ordinary citizens are beginning to push back.

Hanson described the political climate as “fuel that had built up” before Kirk’s death, with growing discontent over open borders, cultural extremism, and globalist policies. The killing, he said, was the spark that lit the fire. Unlike top-down movements led by institutions or political parties, Hanson emphasized that this is a grassroots backlash driven by everyday people demanding accountability, security, and stability.

He pointed to Europe as evidence of a wider trend. In Ireland, mass protests erupted over immigration. Britain is facing political instability. France’s government fell, and the Netherlands has been rocked by unrest. Hanson argued these events reveal a public no longer willing to accept unchecked immigration, economic strain, and cultural policies that undermine national identity.

Hanson contrasted Western Europe with Eastern European nations, which he said are more secure in their traditions, borders, and national defense. These countries, he argued, have resisted extreme energy restrictions, upheld fossil fuel production, and strengthened their militaries based on lessons from their own histories. He suggested that these policies provide a model for what Western nations must rediscover.

The assassination of Charlie Kirk, Hanson warned, crystallizes the dangers of political extremism and violence but also highlights a breaking point for citizens weary of cultural decline. He believes the West is entering a moment of reckoning that could determine whether nations reclaim order and tradition or collapse under ideological radicalism.

Maher Slams Reiner Over Refusal to Talk to GOP Without ‘Conditions’

Podcast (Will Francis/Unsplash)

Liberal commentator Bill Maher confronted Hollywood director Rob Reiner over the growing tendency on the Left to refuse dialogue with conservatives unless certain “conditions” are met. The exchange took place during a recent episode of Maher’s “Club Random” podcast, where Maher criticized Democrats for isolating themselves from political discourse while out of power. Reiner insisted that any engagement with Republicans should begin only after they accept basic facts.

Maher pointed out that many Republicans still show up to debate and engage across the aisle, while many on the Left reject discussion outright. He cited the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, noting that GOP figures continue to participate in dialogue despite political tensions. Reiner disagreed, arguing that Democrats should not engage with those who “deny facts,” adding, “you can’t have a conversation if we don’t agree 2 + 2 = 4.”

Maher pushed back, warning that insisting on agreement before even speaking creates a dangerous precedent. “You have to talk to people regardless of whether you agree,” Maher said, challenging Reiner’s view that Democrats should only engage with Republicans who align with their definition of truth. He further stated that demanding pre-conditions for conversation is a privilege only afforded to those with political power—something Democrats currently lack.

Reiner maintained that a “shared factual baseline” was necessary for functional dialogue, but Maher emphasized that avoiding conversations because of ideological differences only deepens national division. “It’s a slippery slope,” Maher argued, saying Americans cannot wait for perfect agreement before having necessary conversations about the country’s future.

The exchange highlights the Left’s growing discomfort with political pluralism. As Maher, a longtime liberal, continues to call out his own side for intolerance toward opposing viewpoints, his clashes with figures like Reiner expose internal fractures among progressives over how to engage with conservatives in an increasingly polarized environment.

Exposed: University of Toledo’s Sex- and Race-Based Scholarships Face Civil Rights Showdown

Image via Canva

Eight scholarships at the University of Toledo are under federal scrutiny after a civil rights complaint filed by the Equal Protection Project (EPP) on September 16. The complaint accuses the public university of unlawful discrimination by offering scholarships limited by sex and race in violation of Title IX, Title VI, and the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Seven scholarships explicitly favor female students, while one is restricted to minority applicants.

The complaint, submitted to the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights, argues that the scholarships unlawfully exclude students based on protected categories. The university’s automatic awarding of these funds—based on application data like race, sex, or ethnicity—constitutes illegal discrimination under federal law. Because the University of Toledo is a publicly funded institution, the programs also face constitutional challenges under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Scholarships challenged in the complaint include the Dr. Mary Louise Glen Scholarship, limited to female students in Women’s & Gender Studies; the Irene Ambers Hill Scholarship for female education students; and the Georgina Miranda Bentley Scholarship for women raising children. The Patricia Hanf Memorial Scholarship targets female accounting majors, while the Dr. Daniel Neusom Memorial Scholarship excludes non-minority applicants entirely.

Title IX prohibits sex-based discrimination in educational institutions receiving federal funds. Title VI bars discrimination based on race, color, or national origin in similar contexts. The Equal Protection Project argues that these scholarships violate both statutes and constitutional protections, even when labeled as preferences. The group emphasizes that such programs would be illegal if reversed—i.e., reserved only for men or whites—highlighting the double standard at play.

The University of Toledo has responded by stating it has not yet received formal communication from the Department of Education but is reviewing scholarship agreements to ensure compliance. The Equal Protection Project is urging the Department to open a full investigation and take enforcement action if violations are confirmed.

Hate Unleashed: Israeli Professor’s Zoom Lecture Hijacked With Antisemitic Slurs

israel gaza
(Photo by Alexi J. Rosenfeld/Getty Images)

A public Zoom lecture hosted by Queens College was hijacked by a barrage of antisemitic slurs, violent threats, and obscene images. The speaker, Israeli law professor Yofi Tirosh, was targeted by a single individual who used multiple accounts to flood the session with vulgar and hateful content, including calls to “kill all the Jews.” The college has condemned the incident, calling it an act of antisemitism.

Tirosh, a professor at Tel Aviv University, was invited to speak on gender equality and democratic backsliding in Israel. The lecture was organized by Queens College’s Center for Jewish Studies and began as a public academic discussion. Moments into her remarks, the Zoom session was overrun by graphic pornography, violent imagery, and antisemitic slogans referencing the Holocaust.

The disruption prompted a brief pause while moderators worked to remove the infiltrators. Despite the chaos, Tirosh resumed her lecture after the attackers were removed. According to a college spokesperson, the disruption was traced to one individual using multiple logins to exploit Zoom’s screen-sharing feature. The college stated it had taken “immediate action” and had adjusted its security protocols for future events.

In a post-event statement, Queens College denounced the incident as “a heinous act of antisemitism” and reaffirmed its commitment to fostering a safe and inclusive environment for all students and faculty. The statement emphasized the need to stand against bigotry and hate in all forms.

Tirosh criticized the attack, stating that disrupting a scholarly lecture does not advance any cause. She added that the actions of the disruptor were not only offensive but completely unrelated to the subject of the event. The professor expressed disappointment but praised the college for continuing the session despite the interruption.

The incident reflects a troubling trend of online antisemitic harassment, particularly targeting Israeli academics and Jewish institutions. It raises concerns about the security of public academic events and the broader implications of allowing hate speech to derail open dialogue in educational settings.

The college’s response signals an ongoing effort by academic institutions to confront antisemitism while preserving the freedom to engage in scholarly discourse.

Ted Cruz Slams FCC’s Brendan Carr as “Mafioso” Over Jimmy Kimmel Threats

Ted Cruz
Sen. Ted Cruz (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)

On the podcast Verdict with Ted Cruz, the Texas Republican tore into Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr, blasting him as “dangerous as hell” for suggesting action against Jimmy Kimmel and ABC after Kimmel falsely claimed Charlie Kirk’s suspected assassin was part of “the MAGA gang.”

Carr, speaking last week, hinted that the FCC could investigate the matter, calling it “an intentional effort to mislead the American people about a very important matter.”

Cruz likened Carr’s comments to mafia-style intimidation.

“That’s right out of Goodfellas,” Cruz said. “That’s a mafioso move — ‘Nice bar you got here, shame if something happened to it.’ This kind of bullying is dangerous.”

While Cruz acknowledged Kimmel’s comment was misleading, he warned that allowing the FCC to police speech sets a precedent that could easily be turned on conservatives.

“They will silence us,” Cruz said. “They will use this power ruthlessly. And that is dangerous.”

But not everyone in the GOP agrees. President Donald Trump defended Carr, telling reporters: “Brendan Carr is a great American patriot. So I disagree with Ted Cruz on that.”

Democrats on the Senate Commerce Committee, which Cruz chairs, have urged him to hold a hearing on Carr’s conduct. “Free speech is under threat, and this hearing could not be more important for the American people,” they wrote in a letter.

Meanwhile, Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) supported Carr’s approach, stating the FCC has “well within their bounds” to question broadcast licensing when misleading content is aired.

As for Kimmel, a week has passed since his false claim aired — and there’s been no retraction.

Polling reflects public confusion: 40% of Americans don’t know the political affiliation of Kirk’s alleged killer. The FCC chair hinted Thursday that more action may come, saying bluntly, “We’re not done yet.”

Howard Stern Cancels Disney+ Over Jimmy Kimmel’s ABC Fallout

Disney
A sign near an entranceway to Walt Disney World on MAY 22, 2023 in Orlando, Florida. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Radio legend Howard Stern is taking a stand — and a subscription hit — after ABC affiliates dropped Jimmy Kimmel’s show following his controversial remarks about slain conservative icon Charlie Kirk’s suspected killer.

On his SiriusXM broadcast Monday, Stern blasted the network, saying, “I can no longer keep my mouth shut. I feel obligated to say something, because sht’s getting outta control.” The shock jock accused ABC of caving under pressure, calling their move “dumb and f**in’ horrible.”

“I feel for Jimmy and ABC,” Stern added. “Everyone knows what happened. The bottom line is something really horrible happened at ABC.”

But critics quickly countered Stern’s narrative. The controversy ignited after Kimmel falsely claimed the suspected assassin of Charlie Kirk was part of “the MAGA gang.” He made that statement on-air using public broadcast channels, without issuing a retraction or correction. Despite intense backlash, neither Kimmel nor ABC have addressed the inaccuracy.

White House press secretary Abigail Jackson responded sharply to Stern’s comments, stating: “This isn’t about free speech. Kimmel can say whatever dumb jokes he wants. But no private company is obligated to hemorrhage money producing shows no one watches.”

According to Jackson, “Kimmel’s ratings have cratered by 63 percent since moving to his current time slot and dropped over 43 percent since President Trump returned to office. This isn’t censorship. It’s failure.”

Stern, however, wasn’t buying it. He announced he’d canceled his Disney+ subscription in protest.

Meanwhile, ABC leadership — including Dana Walden and deputy Rob Mills — still haven’t decided what will fill Kimmel’s now-vacant 11:30 p.m. slot. A meeting is reportedly scheduled this week to determine the show’s future. For now, Kimmel and his team are on paid leave.

Protesters in NYC Shout ‘Lula Thief!’ as President Arrives

New York
New York City (Image from Roberto Vivancos/Pexels via Canva Pro)

Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was met with loud protest outside his hotel in New York City Sunday. As he prepares to deliver the traditional opening speech at the United Nations General Assembly, dozens of demonstrators gathered to denounce him, accuse him of corruption, and demand accountability.

The protestors, many wearing Brazil’s yellow and green or symbols tied to conservative movements, shouted slogans like “Lula thief, your place is prison,” and “communist,” among others. Some held banners associated with the Workers’ Party (PT), Lula’s political base, while a smaller number supported him. Security forces—including the U.S. Secret Service—were on the scene, keeping the groups separated and preventing escalation.

Lula has been preparing his policy priorities in New York: to address climate change, democracy, and the Israeli‑Palestinian conflict. Under Brazil’s foreign ministry plans, he is expected to call for greater recognition of Palestine, increased climate action ahead of COP30, and cooperation from other nations to defend democratic values. Domestically, Lula has a controversial record with legal cases from past administrations still under public scrutiny, especially from political opponents who argue he has leveraged the judicial system against conservatives.

The demonstrations reflect sharp divisions in Brazil both at home and among its diaspora. Many protesters appear deeply distrustful of Lula’s past convictions and perceive his current terms as hostile to political opposition. Others view his leadership as a return to progressive priorities after Bolsonaro. The mix of chants, symbolism, and presence of both critics and supporters encapsulates the complicated political landscape King Brasil is navigating.

Despite the protests, Lula did not confront or engage with the protesters directly. He offered only a brief wave from a safe distance before continuing with his diplomatic engagements. The event raises questions about how world leaders are received abroad, the reach of popular dissent, and how President Lula’s image will shift ahead of his first UN speech of this term.

Roy Cooper Blasted in NRSC ‘Shotgun Rider’ Ad Over Radical Record

Governor Roy Cooper (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)

The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) has launched a hard-hitting digital ad slamming North Carolina Senate candidate and former Governor Roy Cooper, branding him “Democrat’s Favorite Shotgun Rider.” The ad accuses Cooper of blindly following the far-left agenda of national Democrats, while abandoning the working people of his own state.

The timing of the ad is no accident. Cooper recently appeared at his first in-person Senate campaign event, a move critics say comes too little, too late after mounting backlash over his record. The NRSC ad pulls no punches, calling out Cooper’s alleged failures on public safety, tax policy, and disaster response.

“Career politician Roy Cooper spent nearly 40 years loyally pushing the Democrats’ far-left agenda in North Carolina,” said NRSC Regional Press Secretary Nick Puglia. “He left the state less safe, less prosperous, and more radically woke than he found it.”

The ad, partially generated with AI, mocks Cooper for being “chauffeured around North Carolina for years,” claiming he used that detachment to justify raising taxes, keeping schools closed during the pandemic, and allowing biological males to compete in women’s sports.

But it doesn’t stop there. The voice-over criticizes Cooper for praising President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris after what the NRSC calls a “botched” hurricane response. It reminds voters Cooper once labeled Donald Trump a “threat to democracy”—a line that’s already raising eyebrows among North Carolina’s conservative base.

Cooper is expected to face Michael Whatley, the former RNC chair and a Trump ally, in the 2026 general election. Republicans are framing the race as a referendum on Cooper’s gubernatorial legacy—and if this ad is any indication, the gloves are already off.

Angelina Jolie Says She “Doesn’t Recognize” America Amid Free Speech Turmoil

Image via Canva

Actress Angelina Jolie shocked audiences at the San Sebastián Film Festival in Spain on Sunday, stating she no longer recognizes the United States due to what she views as growing threats to free speech. The emotional moment came during a press conference where Jolie promoted her latest project, Couture.

Asked by a reporter what she fears most as an American and as an artist, Jolie gave a deep sigh and replied, “I love my country, but at this time, I don’t recognize my country.” She went on to explain that her worldview has always been international, and she sees freedom of expression as a non-negotiable human right.

“Anything anywhere that divides or limits personal expressions and freedoms from anyone, I think, is very dangerous,” she said, visibly shaken.

Jolie’s remarks come in the midst of heated national debate over the boundaries of free speech, particularly in the entertainment industry. While she didn’t name specific incidents, her comments came days after Disney’s decision to suspend Jimmy Kimmel following criticism of his controversial comments on the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The fallout has sparked widespread reactions among celebrities and political figures, many accusing Disney of caving to political pressure.

Known for her long-standing activism, Jolie is no stranger to political statements. She previously lobbied Congress and worked with global organizations to advocate for human rights. Still, her latest comments mark a stark condemnation of the current cultural climate in her home country.

Observers say her remarks are another signal that Hollywood’s elite are increasingly uneasy with what they see as creeping censorship and politically motivated corporate decisions.

Disney Stock in Spotlight After Jimmy Kimmel Suspension

Disney+ website on computer screen (American Faith Media)

Marvel actor Mark Ruffalo is sounding the alarm over Disney’s recent suspension of Jimmy Kimmel Live, warning that the entertainment giant could face major financial fallout if the show is canceled.

Ruffalo took to social media to say Disney’s stock is in danger of a steep decline, stating, “It’s going to go down a lot further if they cancel his show. Disney does not want to be the ones that broke America.” His comments reflect the growing outrage among celebrities and fans, who view the suspension of Kimmel as a blatant act of censorship.

Jimmy Kimmel was suspended after comments made on his late-night show referencing the assassination of conservative figure Charlie Kirk. In his monologue, Kimmel made statements that critics said mocked the tragedy and falsely associated the accused killer with a political movement. The backlash was swift, with several ABC affiliates removing the show and calls for his cancellation spreading rapidly.

The response from celebrities has been strong. Kimmel thanked Ruffalo for standing up for him, calling him “on the right side of history.” The hashtag #BoycottDisney began trending soon after, with consumers flooding forums to report canceling their Disney+ and Hulu subscriptions in protest.

Although rumors of a major stock dip have circulated, the financial picture remains unclear. What is clear is that Disney is facing mounting pressure from both sides — with critics accusing it of political bias and supporters accusing it of bowing to right-wing outrage.

Whether the company chooses to reinstate Kimmel or let the controversy escalate may determine not just the future of a show, but the perception of free speech and corporate integrity in the entertainment world.