New Hampshire Judge Challenges Parents Over Gender Preferences in Legal Dispute on Pro-Girl Sports Protests

A contentious legal battle over free speech and the inclusion of transgender athletes in girls’ sports has unfolded in New Hampshire, where Judge Steven McAuliffe is presiding over a case involving parents who wore pro-girl wristbands to protest a transgender athlete competing on a high school girls’ soccer team.

The wristbands, featuring “XX” to symbolize biological female chromosomes, have become a rallying cry for those advocating for the preservation of girls’ and women’s sports as spaces exclusively for biological females.

The parents, Fellers and Foote, were issued no-trespass orders after refusing to remove their wristbands at a soccer game where 15-year-old transgender athlete Parker Tirrell competed for Plymouth Regional High School.

The parents contend that their peaceful protest was an exercise of free speech and that school officials violated their First Amendment rights by ejecting them. The no-trespass orders have since expired, but Judge McAuliffe is considering whether the parents should be allowed to wear the wristbands and display signs at future school events while the case proceeds.

Tensions were further inflamed after another federal judge, Landya McCafferty, appointed by President Obama, ruled that transgender athletes could compete in girls’ sports, overriding a state law designed to preserve gender-based sports categories. Critics of the ruling argue it undermines fairness in competition and erases the hard-won protections for women’s sports under Title IX.

During the proceedings, Judge McAuliffe pushed back against the parents for repeatedly referring to the transgender athlete as a boy, reflecting the polarized views surrounding the issue.

Supporters of the parents see their protest as part of a broader women’s rights movement to uphold the integrity of female sports. Opponents argue that such protests foster hostility toward transgender individuals.

This case has become emblematic of the larger cultural and legal debate over transgender inclusion and free speech, with significant implications for schools, athletics, and the rights of parents to express dissent.