A new Nature editorial urges replacing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs in science with “decolonization” that elevates Indigenous knowledge systems to equal status with Western science. The proposal has drawn sharp criticism from those warning it could erode scientific standards.
The editorial claims DEI is superficial and fails to address the “colonial foundations” of research. It calls for reshaping science around place-based Indigenous epistemologies, treating them as equally valid as empirical, reproducible methods. Supporters say this would correct historic marginalization. Critics counter that replacing the scientific method with ideology risks politicizing research and undermining objectivity.
The push mirrors global academic trends, including recent debates in New Zealand over giving Māori traditional knowledge equal weight in science education. Opponents there argued such moves blur the line between cultural traditions and scientific fact.
The Nature stance signals a growing willingness in elite institutions to challenge the universality of the scientific method itself—an approach some see as less about inclusion and more about rewriting the rules of science to fit activist agendas.
