An analysis of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines found that the inoculations skipped the “laws or regulations that we count on to protect use from potentially harmful, or deadly, medical products…”
Debbie Lerman, writing in The Epoch Times, explained that the vaccines were “acquired and authorized through mechanisms designed to rush medical countermeasures to the military during emergencies involving weapons of mass destruction (WMD).”
In other words, Lerman noted, the idea of “safe and effective” vaccines was merely the belief of the government.
“The Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization for the vaccines was based on clinical trials and manufacturing processes conducted with no binding legal standards, no legally prescribed safety oversight or regulation, and no legal redress from the manufacturer for potential harms,” the report explains.
The analysis goes on to say that the government compared the pandemic to a country at “war,” implying that millions of civilian lives were at stake. As a result, “medical countermeasures” were developed.
An agreement reached between the government and Pfizer echoed military language, the author describes.
“The important point to recognize is that all of these bodies are charged exclusively with military objectives: ‘ensuring military readiness,’ ‘enhancing the mission effectiveness of military personnel,’ and ‘supporting the Army and Unified Land Operations, anytime, anywhere,” Lerman writes.
