Kent State Professor Faces Backlash Over Comments Praising October 7 Attacks

Imam Nader Taha, a mathematics professor at Kent State University and religious leader at the Islamic Society of Akron and Kent (ISAK), is facing widespread condemnation after a video of his sermon praising the October 7 terrorist attacks surfaced. The sermon, delivered on December 13, 2024, described the attacks as a “miracle” and a victory against the “Children of Israel.”

The watchdog group MEMRI TV shared the video on Friday, revealing Taha’s inflammatory statements. He reportedly said, “Gaza had planted the ‘seed of freedom’ for the entire world,” and described the October 7 attacks, which included mass violence against civilians, as evidence of “miracle, after miracle, after miracle.”

In an earlier sermon on November 10, 2023, Taha claimed that Al-Aqsa Mosque was “insulted and disgraced” and called on Muslims to “purify it.” He alleged that the attacks on October 7 fulfilled a divine promise to humiliate and defeat the “Children of Israel.”

Taha’s comments sparked outrage, prompting Kent State University to issue a statement on January 2, 2025, condemning his remarks as “antisemitic.” The university emphasized its commitment to peaceful dialogue and respect, noting that the sermon was not delivered on campus or as part of any official university program.

“References to the October 2023 massacre are abhorrent and stand in stark contrast to our institutional commitment to peaceful dialogue,” the statement read.

Despite the condemnation, Taha remains scheduled to teach four mathematics courses at Kent State, including Pre-Algebra and Basic Algebra I and II, according to Liberty Affair. His continued association with the university has drawn criticism from students and community members who argue that his remarks undermine Kent State’s stated values.

Taha’s involvement in interfaith activities and his position on County Executive Ilene Shapiro’s advisory council on diversity and inclusion further complicate the controversy. The remarks have ignited calls for greater accountability and scrutiny of public figures who promote divisive rhetoric.