Dem Rep. Indicted Over Physical Confrontation with Federal Agents

The ICE Clash outside Delaney Hall has become a national flashpoint after U.S. Attorney Alina Habba announced federal charges against Rep. LaMonica McIver, intensifying a heated debate over congressional oversight and political motives.


The ICE Clash on May 9 saw Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) and Newark Mayor Ras Baraka attempt a congressional oversight visit at Delaney Hall, a privately run immigration detention center. When federal agents arrested Baraka for trespassing, McIver allegedly took action, encircling him and making contact with officers. On June 10, a grand jury indicted McIver on three counts of assaulting and impeding federal officials, with potential prison terms ranging up to 17 years.

Acting U.S. Attorney Alina Habba stressed her role: “No one is above the law—politicians or otherwise,” adding, “I have persistently made efforts… but she unfortunately declined” offers to settle outside court. Habba simultaneously dropped charges against Baraka, inviting him back to tour the facility, stating, “The government has nothing to hide.”

McIver denied wrongdoing, calling the charges “purely political” and saying ICE “created an unnecessary and unsafe confrontation.” Her attorney called prosecution “political intimidation,” emphasizing that lawmakers have a legal duty to inspect federal detention facilities.

House Democrats condemned the charges as “extreme, morally bankrupt and lacks any basis,” while GOP figures, including DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, defended prosecutorial action after reviewing bodycam footage.

Journalists at The Washington Post reviewed video footage and noted that while contact between McIver and agents occurred, its intent remained unclear in the chaotic scene. Public figures remain divided, some warning this sets a dangerous precedent that could chill future congressional oversight.

As McIver prepares to plead not guilty, the case strikes at the heart of legislative authority and executive enforcement. It challenges both the boundaries of congressional privilege and the DOJ’s approach to handling political dissent

MORE STORIES