Four Questions for Climate Change Alarmists

Why is the change in global temperature between 1875 and today significant? How do you explain periods of global “cooling?” How much warming is okay before disaster strikes? What percent decrease in CO2 emissions will achieve the desired decrease in temperature? These questions address the largest issues in current climate rhetoric. Some argue that there is no scientific basis for what defines a temperature fluctuation as “good,” “bad,” or “neutral.”

From Daily Caller:

The claim that “the science is settled” is of course itself anti-scientific. Science is never settled. Newton settled it, then Einstein unsettled it, then Bohr settled it, and so on. Most scientists understand that every scientific discipline, with the notable exception of climate change, advances. Scientists who normally concede the fallibility of science gloss over the climate change debate without a shred of skepticism.

LATEST VIDEO