Conservative MP Andrew Bridgen claims that a senior member of the charity was suppressing data on vaccine harms, The Times of London reported.
Bridgen made the claims earlier this month in a parliamentary debate in which he also called for the “immediate and complete cessation” of the country’s vaccination program.
He argued that regulators and government advisers were merely pawns of the pharmaceutical industry and Bill Gates.
The MP called for vaccinations to stop in light of “clear and robust data of significant harms and little ongoing benefit” after receiving the jab, as he quoted an analysis by Aseem Malhotra, a cardiologist who opposes the vaccines.
Bridgen also said he had information that someone in a “prominent leadership role” in the foundation was “covering up clear data that reveals that the mRNA vaccine increases inflammation of the heart arteries,” according to The Times.
The North West Leicestershire representative asserted that the public as well as doctors were ignoring the “serious and common” side effects of the vaccine, either because of “wilful blindness” or conflicts of interest.
Bridgen then told parliament that the “benefits of the vaccine are close to non-existent,” the Times noted, and that there was a “clear case for complete suspension of these emergency use authorization vaccines.”
BRIDGEN CITES SCHOLARLY REFERENCES FOR HIS CLAIMS:
Immediately following his speech, Bridgen published on his website a “List of supporting references used in vaccine harms debate speech” containing “supporting scientific references” for the claims he made during the debate.
“Following my speech on vaccine harms in the House of Commons earlier this week the following list contains a list of supporting scientific references,” Bridgen’s website reads. “The list was proactively sent to journalists immediately after my speech.”
On the list, Bridgen backs up the claim he made during his speech that there is “clear and robust data of significant harms and little ongoing benefit” from the COVID vaccine by citing a publication in the Journal of Insulin Resistance that concludes by asserting that a “pause and reappraisal of global vaccination policies for COVID-19 is long overdue.”
In order to support his claim that “Since the roll out in the UK of the Biontech/Pfizer mRNA vaccine we have almost half a million yellow card reports of adverse effects from the public,” the North West Leicestershire MP cites U.K. government data: “As of 23 November 2022, for the UK, 177,925 Yellow Cards have been reported for the monovalent and bivalent COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech, 246,866 have been reported for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, 47,045 for the monovalent and bivalent COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna, 52 for the COVID-19 Vaccine Novavax and 2,130 have been reported where the brand of the vaccine was not specified,” the U.K.’s “Coronavirus vaccine – summary of Yellow Card reporting” says.
And to support his claim that reports of adverse vaccine reactions “by the public is thought to only represent 10% of the true rate of serious adverse events occurring in the population,” Bridgen cites a publication in the Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London that says “it is rare for more than 10% of serious reactions to be reported” to the government.
Those represent only three out of the 29 citations Bridgen offers in his list, which includes references to mainstream news outlets, peer-reviewed journals, and government databases.
