“Merriam-Webster defines “anti-vaxxer” as “a person who opposes … regulations mandating vaccination” and NBC poll finds majority of Americans oppose vaccine mandate.”
- Aaron Siri, lawyer and Managing Partner of Siri & Glimstad, pointed out on Substack how the “zealous and often illogical promotion of vaccines by the government” appears to have “officially turned a majority of Americans into anti-vaxxers” after Merriam-Webster changed its definition of ‘anti-vaxxer’ to “a person who opposes … regulations mandating vaccination.”
- “So, if you oppose a vaccine requirement, you are an anti-vaxxer,” says Siri.
- The lawyer came to this conclusion because an official NBC News Survey by Hart Research found that 50% of American adults opposed “requiring that everyone who is now eligible must get a COVID-19 vaccine.”
- “It appears half of Americans are now officially anti-vaxxers,” Siri quipped.
MORE FROM SIRI’S SUBSTACK POST:
In reality, based on the more common, colloquial use of this term, even more Americans are anti-vaxxers. According to mainstream media, if you raise questions about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines – anti-vaxxer! If you raise questions about the efficacy of this vaccine – anti-vaxxer! If you question the FDA, CDC, or White House guidance on this vaccine – anti-vaxxer! If you want pharma companies to be liable for vaccine injuries – anti-vaxxer! If you want long term placebo-controlled trials prior to licensure – anti-vaxxer! If you raise concerns about breakthrough cases – anti-vaxxer! If you think natural immunity has anything to offer without a vaccine – anti-vaxxer!!!
Obamacare was used as a pejorative and was turned by many into a term of honor. Could it be that the same fate awaits the term anti-vaxxer? That does appear the natural result of retorting with “anti-vaxxer” to reasonable and rational questions about these products.
Those supporting these vaccines would do much better to actually address the substantive and legitimate questions being raised, instead of retorting with “anti-vaxxer!” At some point, they are going to make this term a badge of honor as it may come to mean “someone that raises valid questions about certain vaccines and is met with only ad-hominem responses.”