Shapiro, Trump Is Silencing Dissent Over Media Criticism

On Sunday’s edition of Meet the Press, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro accused President Donald Trump of trying to silence dissenting voices, particularly in relation to recent events involving comedian Jimmy Kimmel. Shapiro expressed concern that removing Kimmel from the airwaves for making a joke about Trump—and then for criticizing his response—represents a dangerous precedent for free speech in America.

Shapiro reminded viewers that freedom of expression is a foundational principle in this country, tracing its roots back centuries. He said that firing or otherwise punishing individuals just for making jokes or criticizing the president—no matter how clumsy or controversial their words—undermines the ideals of open discourse. According to Shapiro, when people are targeted for their viewpoints rather than any violation of law, it sets the stage for erosion of basic democratic rights.

Host Kristen Welker asked Shapiro whether he believed the Trump administration was actively trying to suppress dissent. He responded directly: yes. Shapiro cited recent remarks by the president about possibly reviewing licenses or certifications of media outlets that are highly critical of him as evidence that the administration wants to “stifle dissent.” He emphasized that free speech must be defended, especially when speech is uncomfortable or offensive to those in power.

Shapiro also noted that these issues do not only affect comedians or media figures but anyone who disagrees with the narrative promoted by those in government. He warned that selective silencing of criticism could discourage citizens from speaking out and weaken democratic accountability. He called upon both lawmakers and ordinary citizens to stand up in defense of speech rights.

While acknowledging that some of Kimmel’s comments were controversial, Shapiro maintained that the response was disproportionate and politically motivated. He argued that in a healthy democracy, criticism—whether humorous or harsh—should be met with counter‑speech rather than punishment. For Shapiro, protecting free expression is not about condoning all speech, but about safeguarding the right to dissent without fear of retribution.

MORE STORIES