Researchers at the University of Washington leading the Coastal Atmospheric Aerosol Research and Engagement (CAARE) project launched aerosols into the atmosphere to analyze “global warming.”
The project, part of the Marine Cloud Brightening Program, aims to “study how clouds respond to particles — also called aerosols — in the atmosphere.”
“This research aims to further our understanding of how interactions between aerosols and clouds impact our climate system, and to investigate the feasibility and potential impacts of reducing climate warming by intentionally increasing the reflection of sunlight from marine clouds,” the program’s website reads. “An overarching goal of the research is to provide open, objective scientific information to help improve society’s ability to understand the climate system and to address near-term climate risks.”
Researchers used the USS Hornet to launch the particles above San Francisco Bay.
The project, which runs through May, was not announced “to avoid public backlash,” according to Scientific American.
American Faith reported that President Joe Biden claimed that the only existential threat in the world is climate change.
“There is only one existential threat we face in this world, and that’s the environment,” Biden told guests at a campaign reception. “I mean, it literally is the existential threat.”
A study from Canadian and Australian researchers published in the journal Energies claimed that one billion people will die from climate change in the next century.
The study uses the “1000-ton rule,” which stipulates that a “future person is killed every time humanity burns 1000 tons of fossil carbon.”
Burning a trillion tons of “fossil carbon will cause 2 °C of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) which in turn will cause roughly a billion future premature deaths spread over a period of very roughly one century,” according to the study.
However, Nobel Prize winner John F. Clauser has argued the mainstream climate narrative “reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people.”
“In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis,” Clauser stated. “There is, however, a very real problem with providing a decent standard of living to the world’s large population and an associated energy crisis. The latter is being unnecessarily exacerbated by what, in my opinion, is incorrect climate science.”
