Home Blog Page 50

Harrison Ford Calls President Trump ‘Greatest Criminal in History’

Image via Canva

In a blistering interview, actor Harrison Ford described Donald Trump as “a greater criminal in history” due to what Ford argues is negligent and destructive policy‑making, especially on environmental issues. The remarks inject celebrity commentary into the national discourse ahead of the 2026 election.

Ford, age 83, told The Guardian that Trump “doesn’t have any policies, he has whims,” and singled out what he calls the president’s “ignorance, hubris, lies, and perfidy.” He added: “It’s unbelievable. I don’t know of a greater criminal in history.”

At the core of Ford’s criticism is the environmental agenda. He blasted Trump’s decisions to roll back climate regulations, exit international agreements like the Paris Accord, and promote fossil‑fuel production. Ford framed those actions as contributing to global crisis.

Ford is no stranger to activism; over the years he has supported conservation causes and made public endorsements of political candidates. He asserted that if political will is lacking and policy precision absent, society risks losing significant ground. Yet, his vocabulary—labeling a president “the greatest criminal”—has ignited a sharp response.

The timing is notable. With the 2026 midterm election season underway, high‑profile comments like Ford’s may energise both critics and backers of Trump‑style politics. For supporters of Trump, the remarks reinforce a belief that Hollywood elites are disconnected from grassroots concerns. For critics, the statements serve as a vivid expression of frustration with current governance and perceived inaction on critical issues.

Still, questions remain around Ford’s claim. Historically, many figures accused of mass atrocities or systemic crimes are regarded as more culpable—raising scrutiny of Ford’s comparative language. Analysts may view the remark as hyperbolic political rhetoric rather than a calibrated legal critique.

Overall, Ford’s statement crystallises a larger debate about celebrity engagement in politics and how public figures characterise opponents. Whether his remarks will sway voters or deepen cultural divides is uncertain—but they add a dramatic moment to the political conversation heading into the next election cycle.

Immigrants Flood SNAP, Welfare Use Skyrockets Amid Shutdown

Image via Canva Pro

As the federal government shutdown halts funding for key welfare programs, alarming data is surfacing about immigrant reliance on and abuse of taxpayer-funded benefits. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins revealed that “thousands and thousands” of fraud cases have been uncovered in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program.

Rollins said the Department of Agriculture requested state data to identify misuse by illegal aliens. Only 29 states cooperated. The findings? Shocking. “We found one guy in six different states getting benefits, and about 5,000 dead people still receiving food stamps,” she said. Rollins called for urgent reform to protect truly needy Americans and end systemic corruption.

Compounding the issue, a new analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) shows nearly half of all immigrant-headed households with young children are receiving SNAP, WIC, or both. Among native-born American households with young children, only 31 percent rely on these programs.

The disparity is even more striking among Latin American immigrant households—65 percent use either SNAP or WIC, and 28 percent rely on both programs. Even when accounting for legal status or naturalization, 43 percent of all immigrant-headed households with young children still receive government food aid.

Researchers Steven Camarota and Karen Zeigler warn that if the shutdown continues, immigrant communities will feel the pinch—but they also raise a critical policy question: “Should the U.S. continue an immigration policy that imports millions who ultimately rely on taxpayer support to raise their families?”

The data underscores a deeper issue. Once low-income immigrants settle in the U.S., detaching them from welfare systems becomes increasingly difficult. The report’s findings challenge open-border advocates to reconcile their immigration stance with the fiscal reality facing American taxpayers.

Pritzker’s Sanctuary Policies Blamed After Illegal Kills GOP Official

Police
Image via Canva

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker (D) is under fire after an illegal alien killed a Republican county board member and his wife in a car crash. The tragedy has intensified backlash against Pritzker’s sanctuary state policies, which critics say have repeatedly endangered law-abiding citizens.

On October 24, 34-year-old Edwin Pacheco-Meza, an illegal alien from Honduras, drove across the center line and struck Michael Clayton, 71, and Gail Clayton, 66, killing both instantly. Clayton served on the Coles County Board and was known for his dedication to local government.

Authorities revealed that Pacheco-Meza had entered the country illegally and was traveling with 18-year-old Juan Morales-Martinez, an illegal alien from Guatemala released into the U.S. interior under the Biden administration. The crash occurred in eastern Illinois, a region already reeling from multiple DUI-related deaths linked to illegal aliens.

State Rep. Adam Niemerg (R) slammed Pritzker, saying, “This hits home. Two upstanding, honest citizens are dead because our insane governor continues to put illegal aliens above law-abiding citizens.” Niemerg directly blamed the state’s sanctuary policies and the SAFE-T Act for creating a legal environment where non-citizens are protected while dangerous offenders remain free.

Morales-Martinez, who was released after the crash, was only taken into custody after federal immigration authorities intervened—highlighting what critics say is a breakdown in state and federal cooperation due to Illinois’s sanctuary stance.

State Sen. Chapin Rose (R) added, “The Claytons are at least the 5th and 6th DUI-related death in east central Illinois by an illegal in as many years.” Rose accused Pritzker of prioritizing political ambitions over public safety.

Pritzker recently floated the idea of prosecuting ICE and DHS agents under a future Democrat administration, doubling down on his anti-enforcement stance. His comments have drawn sharp criticism from conservatives, who say the governor is enabling chaos by shielding illegal aliens from accountability.

BBC Doctored Trump Speech Ahead of 2024 Election

Ashli Babbitt
Donald Trump; January 6; Capitol (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

The BBC edited a speech made by President Donald Trump during the January 6, 2021, protest, according to a whistleblower memo viewed by The Telegraph.

A Panorama program called “Trump: A Second Chance,” was broadcast a week before the 2024 election and showcased a “doctored” video of Trump saying, “We’re gonna walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be with you, and we fight. We fight like [removed], and if you don’t fight like [removed], you’re not gonna have a country anymore.”

Instead, Trump directed protesters to “peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

“We’re gonna walk down, and I’ll be there with you, we’re gonna walk down, we’re gonna walk down any one you want but I think right here, we’re gonna walk down to the Capitol and we’re gonna cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women and we’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll never take back our country with weakness, you have to show strength and you have to be strong,” Trump said in his speech. “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

What the BBC aired was a spliced version of three separate statements.

The whistleblower memo, written by former independent external adviser to the broadcaster’s Editorial Guidelines and Standards Committee (EGSC) Michael Prescott, explained that when the errors were presented to the BBC, managers “refused to accept there had been a breach of standards.”

“Examining the charge that Trump had incited protesters to storm Capitol Hill, it turned out that Panorama had spliced together two clips from separate parts of his speech,” Prescott wrote in the memo. “This created the impression that Trump said something he did not and, in doing so, materially misled viewers.”

See the original video below:

Google Pulls AI After Senator Exposes Lies

black
Google (Adarsh Chauhan/Unsplash)

Google has pulled its AI, called Gemma, from its AI Studio following Senator Marsha Blackburn’s (R-TN) letter to CEO Sundar Pichai, saying the model created fake headlines and criminal allegations surrounding events that never occurred.

The company explained that Gemma can still be found in an application programming interface, or API.

“We’ve now seen reports of non-developers trying to use Gemma in AI Studio and ask it factual questions,” Google said. “We never intended this to be a consumer tool or model, or to be used this way. To prevent this confusion, access to Gemma is no longer available on AI Studio. It is still available to developers through the API.”

Google further explained that factual errors, called “hallucinations,” are “challenges across the AI industry, particularly smaller open models like Gemma.”

Last week, Blackburn accused the AI model of generating links to “fabricated news articles to support” the following story:

“During her 1987 campaign for the Tennessee State Senate, Marsha Blackburn was accused of having a sexual relationship with a state trooper, and the trooper alleged that she pressured him to obtain prescription drugs for her and that the relationship involved non-consensual acts.”

Blackburn asserted, “None of this is true, not even the campaign year which was actually 1998. The links lead to error pages and unrelated news articles. There has never been such an accusation, there is no such individual, and there are no such news stories. “

“This is not a harmless ‘hallucination.’ It is an act of defamation produced and distributed by a Google-owned AI model,” she wrote.

‘No Kings!’ Until the EBT Card Needs a Refill

No Kings Protest
(Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

We've cultivated a culture that roars "No Kings!" from the rooftops, all while clutching the government's apron strings like a lifeline. Generations of expansive welfare, regulatory safety nets, and entitlement expansions have bred a dependency that's as addictive as it is invisible. . .

This content is only available for American Faith Premium Subscribers. For as low as $3.99/mo, you can access all our Premium content, learn more here.

If you are already a Premium subscriber, please log in to view this content.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Microsoft Moves Billions to UAE After U.S. OKs Chip Exports

Microsoft
Microsoft (BoliviaInteligente/Unsplash)

Microsoft announced that it is investing $7.9 billion in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) between 2026 and 2029 following approval from the United States to ship Nvidia AI chips to the UAE.

“This is not money raised in the UAE. It’s money we’re spending in the UAE,” Microsoft said in its announcement of the investment. “And as we do everywhere in the world, we’re focused not just on growing our business but also on contributing to the local economy. This involves bringing together three critical factors – technology, talent, and trust.”

The company’s latest move brings the total investment in the UAE to $15.2 billion.

Discussing its deal to ship Nvidia’s graphics processor units, called GPUs, Microsoft explained that the chips will “provide access to advanced AI models from OpenAI, Anthropic, open-source providers, and Microsoft itself.”

Microsoft has also agreed to train one million people on AI technology in the UAE by the end of 2027.

Microsoft’s export of chips appears to contradict a recent statement from President Trump, who told CBS’s “60 Minutes” that Nvidia’s advanced chips are not to be obtained outside of the United States.

“We will not let anybody have them other than the United States,” he said, specifically addressing the possibility of China obtaining the technology.

Microsoft’s investment with the UAE comes as the UAE has pledged to invest in the United States. The framework will “substantially increase the UAE’s existing investments in the U.S. economy in AI infrastructure, semiconductors, energy, and American manufacturing,” according to the White House.

FDA Pulls Plug on Children’s Fluoride

toothepaste
(Roman Marchenko/Unsplash)

The Food and Drug Administration moved to limit the use of unapproved fluoride products for children, taking action to restrict their sale.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in a statement that the agency is “driving a stake through the heart of outdated science and protecting our kids from the risks associated with ingestible fluoride. It’s scary that these products have been used for decades without approval. Today’s action raises public awareness, informs medical professionals, and builds on President Trump’s commitment to Make Our Children Healthy Again.”

The action fulfills a plan announced in May, when the FDA took steps to remove ingestible fluoride prescription drug products from the market. These products were never approved by the FDA.

FDA Commissioner Marty Makary explained that there are “better ways” to protect children’s dental health than “taking unapproved ingestible fluoride,” which can affect the gut microbiome.

The FDA has also published a scientific evaluation of the use of unapproved ingestible fluoride products, explaining that they appear to “reduce tooth decay
in permanent teeth but not primary teeth.”

“An effective method to prevent tooth decay in all children is through good dental hygiene, including the topical application of fluoride via tooth brushing with fluoridated toothpaste,” the evaluation explains. “For children who do not receive adequate fluoride through water and other dietary sources, however, it may be beneficial to supplement their dietary intake with ingestible fluoride drug products based on patient specific factors.”

Similar actions to protect children from fluoride products were taken by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who asserted that companies have engaged in deceptive advertising in targeting children in their marketing.

Erika Kirk Recibirá El Premio Patriota

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Erika Kirk, viuda del fundador de Turning Point, Charlie Kirk, recibirá el primer premio Charlie Kirk Legacy durante los Premios Patriota de Fox Nation. El galardón reconoce a quienes “encarnan la misión y el espíritu de Charlie: libertad de expresión, fe y familia”, explicó Fox.

La ceremonia tendrá lugar en el Tilles Center for the Performing Arts en Brookville, Nueva York, con Sean Hannity como maestro de ceremonias.

El cantante country Jason Aldean y su esposa, Brittany Aldean, acompañarán al presentador de Fox News, Jesse Watters, en la entrega del premio a Erika Kirk.

Recientemente, Erika Kirk fue nombrada una de las “estrellas emergentes más influyentes” del mundo por la revista TIME.

El periodista Nik Popli escribió en TIME que Erika Kirk “ofreció algo raro en la política actual: perdón”.

“Sus palabras podrían moldear el futuro de la organización que su esposo fundó de adolescente y convirtió en una potencia política que moviliza a jóvenes conservadores en todo el país. A lo largo del camino, Erika Kirk se convirtió en una voz influyente para esa misma audiencia. Con su muerte, la junta de Turning Point USA la nombró directora ejecutiva y presidenta”, escribió Popli, agregando que “lo que Erika Kirk muestra al liderazgo político de Estados Unidos es la fortaleza de la resiliencia y la gracia”.

La Sra. Kirk también aceptó la Medalla Presidencial de la Libertad en nombre de su difunto esposo. El presidente Trump otorgó el honor, llamando a Charlie Kirk “un guerrero intrépido por la libertad” y “un patriota de convicción profunda”.

Hablando sobre el legado de su esposo, Erika dijo: “Es un gran honor, y un reconocimiento a una vida dedicada a luchar por la libertad”.

El Ex Príncipe Andrés Enfrenta El Golpe Real Final Mientras El Rey Carlos Se Mueve Para Retirarle Su Último Honor Militar

(Photo by Jordan Pettitt - Pool/Getty Images)

El Ex Príncipe Andrés podría enfrentar otra humillación pública mientras el Rey Carlos III supuestamente se mueve para retirarle su último título militar honorario, lo que marcaría el fin de sus lazos formales con las Fuerzas Armadas Británicas. El desacreditado miembro de la realeza, ahora conocido simplemente como Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, podría perder pronto su estatus como vicealmirante honorario, rango que conservó después de verse obligado a renunciar a sus otros cargos militares en 2022.

El Secretario de Defensa británico, John Healey, confirmó el domingo que el gobierno “está revisando ahora la única posición que le queda, que es la de vicealmirante honorario, y tenemos un proceso en marcha para ello”. Hablando más tarde con la BBC, Healey añadió: “Este es un movimiento correcto, es un movimiento que el rey ha indicado que debemos tomar, y estamos trabajando en eso en este momento”.

Andrés, quien sirvió 22 años en la Marina Real y pilotó helicópteros durante la Guerra de las Malvinas, recibió el título en 2015 por su 55º cumpleaños. Sin embargo, su imagen pública colapsó tras el amplio escrutinio por su asociación con el pedófilo convicto Jeffrey Epstein y las acusaciones de Virginia Giuffre, quien afirmó haber sido traficada por Epstein y obligada a tener relaciones sexuales con Andrés cuando era adolescente.

Aunque Andrés resolvió la demanda civil de Giuffre en 2022 sin admitir culpa, las consecuencias llevaron a la Reina Isabel II a despojarlo de sus funciones reales, títulos y del uso de “Su Alteza Real”. Con el Rey Carlos ahora preparado para retirarle su último rango honorario, Andrés enfrenta una exclusión permanente de la vida pública de la familia real.

1...495051...3,840Page 50 of 3,840
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2025 American Faith Media Network. All rights reserved.