Home Blog Page 3539

Christian teacher who quit over ‘equity’ policies attributes courage to ‘walk with the Lord’

A Christian teacher who resigned in protest of her school district’s curriculum said it was “by the grace of God” that she found the courage to take a stand.

Laura Morris, who formerly taught at Lucketts Elementary School in Leesburg, Virginia, announced her resignation at a Loudoun County School Board meeting Tuesday, declaring that the district “promotes political ideologies that do not square with who I am as a believer in Christ.”

Morris told the board that she refused to continue serving as a “cog in a machine that tells me to push highly politicized agendas on” her students. 

In an interview on Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Morris elaborated on her decision to quit her job.

“It was a very hard decision to come to. It was not taken lightly,” she said in the interview that aired Thursday. While Morris regretted that she was “leaving behind” her students and her colleagues, she expressed gratitude for the outreach she had received in the 48 hours since announcing her resignation. “It’s been a life-changing experience and I’m just honored and I’m humbled by it all,” she added. 

When Carlson characterized Morris as “brave,” the teacher maintained that the term “doesn’t feel like it can describe me because … this was all done by the grace of God.” She attributed “the protection I have had” and “the provision I have had” since the resignation as well as “the courage to get up and do it” in the first place to her “walk with the Lord.”

Carlson concluded the interview by asking Morris if she knows of any other teachers planning to resign rather than teach controversial curriculum such as critical race theory. While she didn’t answer that question, she shared that she had received an email from a man who told her, “It’s been said that one candle can illuminate a thousand others without diminishing its own illumination,” before likening Morris to that candle.

“I was so moved by those words because I never would have thought of myself in that position but I don’t feel at all diminished by what’s happened. In fact, I feel the amazing blessings of God just pouring down on me from what has happened,” she added. “I’m so excited that what I did and said might spark others, might illuminate in others the desire to … put some action to their words.”

In her speech before the school board Tuesday, Morris lamented that she was told in one of her “so-called equity trainings that white, Christian, able-bodied females currently have the power in our schools and that ‘this has to change.’” She indicated that she saw that statement as a signal from district leadership that “you no longer value me.”

Additionally, Morris said she received emails from the district superintendent giving her the impression that “a dissenting opinion is not allowed” regarding “the controversial policies being promoted by this school board and adopted in this county.” She added that a form was distributed to faculty encouraging them to report colleagues who spoke out against the new policies.

Loudoun County Public Schools, which is located near Washington, D.C., has received intense scrutiny from parents in recent months over its curriculum and policy changes. At a school board meeting earlier this year, parents read aloud excerpts of books that their children were exposed to in ninth grade English classes, which included graphic descriptions of sex acts as well as depictions of domestic violence.

Throughout the spring, parents, students and concerned residents spoke out against a proposed policy that would force teachers to refer to students by their preferred pronouns, regardless of their biological sex.

The policy would also allow trans-identified students to use restrooms, locker rooms and showers that correspond with their gender identity as opposed to their biological sex. The board voted 7-2 Wednesday to approve the policy.

During her remarks before the school board Tuesday, Morris contended that its members “shut the doors to the public” by refusing to let opponents of its transgender policy into the meeting, noting the empty room. The vote on the policy was initially scheduled to take place Tuesday but it was postponed until Wednesday.

Morris concluded her speech at the board meeting by urging parents and staff to “flood the private schools.” During her appearance on Fox News Thursday, she emphasized that “when people do something bold, when people put action to their words, actions speak louder than words and that seems to be captivating people.” \

The educator said she’s also looking forward to seeing “what other actions might be taken,” suggesting that she hoped to see more parents and teachers speak out against similar policies at school districts across the country. 

Graphene oxide used in coronavirus vaccines linked to adverse events, even death

 The toxic components in Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines have caused the death of many inoculated Americans. One particular component – graphene oxide – played a huge role in many fatalities linked to COVID-19 vaccines. However, a new report revealed that this major ingredient in mRNA vaccines was included as part of a larger depopulation agenda.

Graphene oxide is often used in medicine for detecting diseases, carrying different drugs and producing antibacterial materials.  True enough, it served as a key component of the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna. Graphene oxide deprived organ systems of much-needed oxygen, which led to serious adverse reactions in many inoculated individuals.

In a piece for State of the Nation, Steven Fishman elaborated on how lethal graphene oxide kills vaccinated individuals. Fishman spoke to his friend Dr. Mylo Canderian about the matter. The Greek-born scientist and medical contributor to the World Health Organization developed the patent for graphene oxide as a bioweapon in 2015.

Outside of his medical achievements, Canderian ardently supported Klaus Schwab and his idea of the Great Reset. Fishman described his friend as a “genocidal globalist” who believed in the extermination of the “plague” that is humanity.

According to Canderian, 95 percent of the world’s population are “useless eaters” that need to be exterminated as quickly as possible. “Look at downtown Chicago, Baltimore or Los Angeles and you will clearly see why the useless eaters must be put down like rabid dogs,” he said Canderian expressed similar disdain for educators promoting critical race theory, calling them “infectious.”

The End of Cycle Formula – the so-called “depopulation equation”

Fishman noted that Canderian was confident of the COVID-19 vaccine putting an end to the “cancer” that is humanity. He asked the scientist about how vaccinated individuals can know with certainty their remaining time on Earth after they get the vaccine. Canderian then revealed information about the easy to calculate End of Cycle Formula (EOCF).

He told Fishman: “There is a maximum cycle of 10 years from injection to end of cycle [i.e. death], and it is extremely easy to determine.” According to Canderian, the percentage of a vaccinated person’s blood contaminated with graphene oxide was multiplied by the decade-long maximum cycle to determine the person’s remaining lifespan in years. He added that any hematologist can immediately determine graphene oxide levels in the blood using either a standard or electron microscope.

Based on the formula, a vaccinated person whose blood had 20 percent graphene oxide would still live for eight years after inoculation (10 – [10*0.20] = 8). Similarly, a vaccinated person with 70 percent graphene oxide in their blood would not live beyond three years following inoculation (10 – [10*0.70] = 3).

Fishman also asked about the effects of succeeding vaccine doses and their effects on the EOCF. Canderian replied that the additional doses would increase graphene oxide levels in the blood. “The more shots … [they] get, the worse their blood will look under a microscope – and the quicker they will turn into fertilizer,” he said.

Endgame: All COVID-19 vaccines have this toxic ingredient

Former Pfizer employee Karen Kingston confirmed that the company’s BNT-162b2 mRNA vaccine, made in partnership with German company BioNTech, did contain graphene oxide. Podcast host Stew Peters asked her if the New York-based company’s vaccine had the toxic ingredient. “100 percent it is, and it’s irrefutable,” Kingston answered.

Peters also acknowledged the findings of La Quinta Columna, a group of independent researchers from Spain. The group revealed in a video that the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine contained traces of graphene oxide. Further scrutiny by La Quinta Columna also unveiled that vaccines from Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine and AstraZeneca’s two-dose adenovirus vaccine also contained the dangerous chemical.

Prior to Kingston’s appearance, Peters invited Dr. Jane Ruby to his podcast. During her interview, Ruby showed Peters some blood samples that showed the negative effects of graphene oxide. Ruby also revealed the discoveries of La Quinta Columna regarding graphene oxide in COVID-19 vaccines during her conversation with the podcast host.

Infrastructure ‘paid for’ with borrowed money

Congress ‘relying on gimmicks and quirks of the budget scoring process’

Over the course of the pandemic, federal overspending has exploded even by Congress’s lofty standards. While trillion-dollar deficits were a cause for concern before 2020, spending over just the last two years is set to increase the national debt by over $6 trillion. It’s bizarre, then, that the only thing that members of opposing parties in Congress can seem to work together on is fooling the budgetary scorekeepers with phantom offsets for even more spending.

In total, the bipartisan infrastructure deal includes around $550 billion in new federal spending on infrastructure to take place over five years. Advocates of the legislation claim that it is paid for, but they are relying on gimmicks and quirks of the budget scoring process to make that claim.

Take the single biggest offset claimed — repurposing unused COVID relief funds, which the bill’s authors say would “raise” $210 billion (particularly considering that at least $160 billion have already been accounted for in the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) baseline). Only in the minds of Washington legislators does this represent funds ready to be used when the national debt stands at over $28 trillion.

Imagine you take out a $20,000 loan to pay for your upcoming wedding. At the last moment, your spouse-to-be backs out. Do you then decide that you just got a free $20,000 to buy a new car with? Of course not, you still have to pay back that $20,000 loan. And did I mention that you’re already $28 trillion in debt?

Congress intends to use this trick a second time as well, this time with $53 billion from states that elected to end the federal unemployment insurance subsidy early. In total, $263 billion, or nearly half of the alleged “offsets,” come from pretending that unspent funds that weren’t paid for in the first place can be used to pay for something else.

Another major “pay-for” that is essentially budget voodoo is $51 billion from delaying the Medicare Part D rule. President Trump proposed a regulation intended to reform how insurers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) handle prescription drug rebates that budget experts said would result in about $177 billion in additional federal spending on Medicare and Medicaid premiums. President Biden has delayed implementation of the rule until 2023, and now lawmakers are proposing to “pay for” their infrastructure package by delaying the rule even longer. The rule has yet to even go into effect, but still Congress gets to count its delayed implementation as “savings.”

Congress also is counting $56 billion in projected additional revenue from economic growth resulting from the infrastructure package. Those old enough to remember will recall how bitterly Democrats in Congress fought the use of dynamic scoring as an offset for the 2017 tax reform law, though they seem happy enough to embrace it here. That’s backwards, considering how the evidence is far stronger that tax cuts boost economic growth than spending. What’s more, the CBO has stated that private investment has twice the rate of return as public investment.

The rest of the so-called pay-fors in this package are generally more of the same on a smaller scale. The National Taxpayers Union and National Taxpayers Union Foundation have each gone line by line and explained how proposed pay-fors, from mortgage guarantee fees to Strategic Petroleum Reserve sales to extending the mandatory sequester, are unlikely to offset the cost to taxpayers much at all.

Though Congress is keeping up the pretense of paying for new spending, taxpayers shouldn’t be fooled — very few of the offsets laid out in the bipartisan infrastructure will ameliorate the budget impact of this legislation. If new spending is truly necessary, it shouldn’t be too hard for Congress to trim the fat elsewhere.

We’re Fleeing Afghanistan. Now What?

(American Thinker) The surge of the Taliban and the ongoing collapse of the Afghan government is a tragic development for many Afghans, particularly women and those who have been associated with American forces.  It’s also a disgrace and significant setback for both the Biden administration and for the U.S. itself. 

The withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan began with President Trump, who said Americans were tired of a war with no end in sight.  He was correct.  Americans were tired of seeing our brave young soldiers coming home with their arms, legs, and faces blown off or not coming home at all.  What was it for?  What was the purpose? 

Questions from family members are rightfully asked, “What did my son die for?”  “The life of our family is ruined.  The father of my children lost both legs and an arm…why?”  The stories are heartbreaking, and there are no convincing answers to the questions. 

Former secretary of state Mike Pompeo rightfully blamed the Biden administration for its reckless and thoughtless sudden withdrawal without some sort of deal in place with the Taliban and other stakeholders.  But that’s just near-term politics.  It avoids the important questions.

If blame is to be assigned, we have to look at leaders of both parties who don’t understand history, the dynamics of the region, the basic tenets of radical Islam, or the meaning or purpose of war.  Biden’s spokesperson Jen Psaki warned the Afghans that if they continue their attacks on the Afghan government, they will risk isolation from the international community.  Does anybody in his right mind think that these people care about that?  Nothing could be more naïve.

What we are seeing is a possibly historic victory for Islamic jihad, the radical Islamic conquest of a people.  

Pat Buchanan quotes Democrat Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut, who summarized the situation

The complete, utter failure of the Afghan national army, absent our hand-holding, to defend their country is a blistering indictment of a failed 20-year strategy predicated on the belief that billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars could create an effective democratic central government in a nation that has never had one.

In other words, we have been caught in a trap of our own making.  George W. Bush sent our troops into Afghanistan after 9/11 almost 20 years ago with the primary purpose of knocking out the Taliban and tracking down Osama bin Laden.  In retrospect, there was no planned exit strategy once the Taliban was defeated.  There was no visible strategic plan beyond trying to modernize the country with the forlorn hope that freeing women from the shackles of radical Islam and giving Afghans a new kind of freedom would be sufficient to keep the Islamists at bay.  But in fact, the Taliban was merely pushed back and, with the help of Pakistan, never really defeated.  No strategy often means catastrophic results.

American policy-makers in both parties have ignored the appeal and power of radical Islam.  Bush meant well.  But he was naïve to think that any Muslim nation could be turned into a mirror of our democracy, certainly not in the time frame of just a generation or even two. 

A glance at the region shows that Islam takes many different forms, from Turkey to Egypt to Dubai to Iran to Saudi Arabia to Pakistan and, finally Afghanistan.  But at the core of it all are the basic beliefs.  “There is no God but Allah.” 

In his book The History of Jihad: From Muhammad to Isis, Robert Spencer says it is taken for granted among many Washington policymakers that Islam is a fundamentally peaceful religion and that Islamic jihad terrorism is something relatively new, a product of the economic and political ferment of the twentieth century.  But in fact, he says, Islamic terror is as old as Islam itself, as old as Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, who said, “I have been made victorious through terror.”

Tracing the 1,400-year war of Islamic jihadis against the rest of the world, the book details the jihad against Europe, including the 700-year struggle to conquer Constantinople; the jihad in Spain, where non-Muslims fought for another 700 years to get the jihadi invaders out of the country; and the jihad against India, where Muslim warriors and conquerors wrought unparalleled and unfathomable devastation in the name of their religion.  Jihad warfare has been a constant of Islam from its beginnings.  Spencer says present-day jihad terrorism proceeds along exactly the same ideological and theological foundations as did the great Islamic warrior states and jihad commanders of the past.

Afghanistan is a special kind of wilderness, both culturally and geographically, where radical Islam cannot be easily obliterated without the amount of indiscriminate bloodshed that hasn’t been unleashed since WWII.  No major foreign power has ever been determined or strong enough to conquer Afghanistan.  It was a graveyard for the British; the Soviets; and now, to a lesser degree, us.  The Chinese are already sniffing around, drooling over the potential mineral wealth in Afghanistan.  We’ll just have to see how that goes.  The Chinese are history’s leading experts in large population control.

So now what?  American and European weakness against the radical Islamic beliefs of the ragtag Taliban is on global display for all to see.  Allies, such as Taiwan and Israel, will have their own interpretations in considering whether they can rely on U.S. support when the going gets tough.  We will understand the full consequences of what’s happened only as the months and years unfold.

In the meantime, at a minimum, the Chinese, the Russians, and the Iranians certainly see Biden as a decrepit paper tiger.  This is an open invitation for global mischief and a green light for the radical Islamists.  America at this moment is not mentally, morally, or physically strong enough to defeat radical Islam.  Expect the onslaught in many different forms to continue if not accelerate. 

CNN’s Jake Tapper Calls Out Biden for Being ‘So Wrong’

CNN anchor Jake Tapper confronted Secretary of State Antony Blinken Sunday over the imminent collapse of Afghanistan, grilling the top American diplomat over comparisons to America’s humiliating evacuation from Vietnam.

Viral images showed Sunday that American helicopters were evacuating U.S. personnel from the U.S. Embassy in Kabul as Taliban soldiers began seizing control of the Afghan capital city. Comparisons were immediately drawn to the evacuation of American personnel from the U.S. Embassy in Saigon when communist soldiers seized the then-South Vietnam capital city in April 1975.

What happened?

During an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Blinken squarely denied that America is experiencing another “Saigon moment.”

“With this troop surge to airlift Americans out of Afghanistan, aren’t we already in the midst of a Saigon moment?” Tapper asked.

Blinken quickly rejected the comparison, and claimed that America’s mission in Afghanistan has been successful.

“No, we’re not,” Blinken responded. “Remember, this is not Saigon. We went to Afghanistan 20 years ago with one mission. And that mission was to deal with the folks who attacked us on 9/11. And we have succeeded in that mission. The objective that we set, bringing those who attacked us to justice, making sure that they couldn’t attack us again from Afghanistan, we have succeeded in that mission.”

“And, in fact, we succeeded a while ago,” he added. “And, at the same time, remaining in Afghanistan for another one, five, 10 years is not in the national interest.”

Tapper followed up by questioning Blinken whether he thinks “Afghanistan now is going to become a hotbed of terrorism.” Blinken responded, “I can’t tell you what the Taliban is going to do.”

Earlier in the interview, Tapper grilled Blinken over Biden’s comments from last month, when he declared that it was “highly unlikely” the Taliban would overrun Afghanistan.

Blinken, however, kept attempting to steer the conversation away from the Biden administration’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan.

“You keep changing the subject to whether or not we should be there forever. And I’m not talking about that,” Tapper chided Blinken. “I’m talking about whether or not this exit was done properly, taking out all the service members before those Americans and those Afghan translators could get out. That’s what I’m talking about. And then you have to send people back in. That’s the definition of, ‘Oh, we shouldn’t have taken those troops out, because now we have to send twice as many back in.'”

What did Tapper say about Biden?

Before interviewing Blinken, Tapper shredded Biden for the disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal, saying, “it seems shocking that President Biden could have been so wrong.”

“He was wrong,” Tapper said again, later referring to Biden’s promises that the Taliban would not overrun the Afghan government.

Taliban Seizes Presidential Palace, to Soon Declare Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan

The Taliban has entered the presidential palace in the capital city Kabul and is now in control of the entire country, according to a highly placed source. The group is soon expected to declare the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

An anonymous source inside the Afghan Defense Ministry confirmed the high ranking source’s report of the seizure of the presidential palace, which The Times of India has also reported.

President Ashraf Ghani left Kabul after stepping down from power on Sunday. Rumors of his resignation had been circulating since Friday, while fears of the Taliban attacking the capital were also high that night.

However, in a video message released on Saturday afternoon, Ghani didn’t announce his resignation but said negotiations were ongoing. The source inside the Defense Ministry told The Epoch Times that Ghani’s announcement meant he will not step down until the whole country surrenders or falls to the Taliban.

“All soldiers said their commanders, after receiving messages to surrender from Kabul decided to surrender,” said the source. It wasn’t however clear under what circumstances these orders were given, and this hasn’t been confirmed with additional sources.

“Two of the biggest army corps in west and north of Afghanistan surrendered without any resistance with all their armored vehicles. Each of them has over 10,000 personnel on their compounds,” said the source on Saturday night.

Kunar and Paktia provinces fell to the Taliban on Saturday and by Sunday morning there were many messages on social media about the Taliban coming to Kabul from different directions, as panic and uncertainty spread among the people in the capital. There were also rumors about a transitional government being formed.

By Sunday morning the Afghan media had started to report that two Taliban officials have told Reuters that they will take over power completely, and there’ll be no transitional government.

However, the Taliban in a statement in Pashtu released on the same day said that their fighters are ordered not to enter Kabul as they are “negotiating a peaceful transition of power” with the current government.

By Sunday night sources confirmed that the Taliban have entered the presidential palace and taken over Kabul and the country. They are soon to declare the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, sources said.

U.S. Homeland Security Says ‘Grievances Over COVID Restrictions’ Are a ‘Terror Threat’

“This is not based on any threats.”

QUICK FACTS:
  • The U.S. Department of Homeland Security released a National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) bulletin stating that “opposition to COVID measures” qualifies as a “potential terror threat.”
  • The advisory instructs citizens to “Be prepared for emergency situations and remain aware of circumstances that may place you at risk.”
  • NBC News reported that even a “grievance” qualifies as a “terror threat.”
  • However, DHS admits there aren’t any such threats that “they know of,” according to NBC.
  • Critics say the advisory signifies how the Biden administration “has weaponized the Dept of Homeland Sec for the purposes of political persecution & intends to prosecute people as ‘terrorists’ for exercising their first amendment rights.”
WHAT ELSE THE ADVISORY SAYS:
  • “These actors are increasingly exploiting online forums to influence and spread violent extremist narratives and promote violent activity,” the advisory reads.
  • “Such threats are also exacerbated by impacts of the ongoing global pandemic, including grievances over public health safety measures and perceived government restrictions,” it goes on to say.
  • “These extremists may seek to exploit the emergence of COVID-19 variants by viewing the potential re-establishment of public health restrictions across the United States as a rationale to conduct attacks.”
  • The advisory also voices “concerns that the broader sharing of false narratives and conspiracy theories will gain traction in mainstream environments,” but without specifying what these “false narratives” or “conspiracy theories” are.
CRITICISM:
  • British radio host Paul Joseph Watson took to Twitter saying, “If you oppose forcing children to wear face diapers, you might be a terrorist.”
  • Former Trump admin. member Kyle Hooten also tweeted, “‘I don’t want to wear a mask,’ is now a ‘potential terror threat.'”
  • Author and venture capitalist D. J. Vance tweeted, “If you oppose COVID restrictions or worry about election integrity you’re now a ‘potential terror threat.'”
  • And Newsmax White House correspondent Emerald Robinson tweeted, “Good morning to all the patriots or, as the Department of Homeland Security now calls you: ‘potential terror threats!'”

Jon Fleetwood is Managing Editor for American Faith.


Companies’ mixed messages about Delta variant’s impact

Companies are experiencing different degrees of impact from the recent COVID spike.

Why it matters: While many businesses have adapted to new realities and many people have become fully vaccinated, Delta’s spread is proving somewhat disruptive.

What they’re saying: In the past week, a number of companies have addressed questions regarding the spike since the beginning of the third quarter.

  • Southwest Airlines warned of a sharp deterioration in business in recent weeks, a challenge that is affecting all airlines.
  • Airbnb, however, said, “in the last few weeks, we had our biggest night ever in the U.S. and our biggest night globally since the pandemic began.”
  • Aramark, which provides on-site food services, says the disruption is “really limited mostly to companies and their return-to-work strategies.” Though executives don’t think it’ll impact colleges, sporting arenas and entertainment venues.
  • Foodservice competitor Sysco shared that sentiment, noting it did not experience any impact in July tied to Delta. However, CEO Kevin Hourican cautioned that they couldn’t predict whether the government might step in with new restrictions.
  • Casper Sleep president Emilie Arel said Tuesday that people were still out shopping, saying, “To date, we are seeing week-over-week improvements on foot traffic.”
  • Bumble has experienced no slowdown in activity on its dating app. “When COVID accelerates and loneliness climbs, people turn to us for connections,” Bumble CEO Whitney Wolfe Herd said on Wednesday.

The big picture: “With the rise in mortality and hospitalization rates expected to be far smaller than during the second wave, we expected policy restrictions to be limited and the turn towards caution by the private sector to be more modest,” says JPMorgan chief economist Bruce Kasman.

Yes, but: Callaway Golf CEO Chip Brewer warns that U.S. demand isn’t the issue.

  • “It has caused further supply disruptions from factories based in and around Southeast Asia, primarily Vietnam,” Brewer said. “These shutdowns will have an estimated $55 million negative impact on second-half revenues.”

An ACE in the Hand of Childhood Trauma

“It is easier to build strong children than to heal broken men,” Frederick Douglass once said. Douglass spoke of a generation living in the 1800s, but the same seems to ring true today. Oprah, Christian radio, media outlets, and more all appear to have something to say about childhood trauma. Although the idea is sadly nothing new.

Much of what is known today about childhood trauma relates back to a landmark Kaiser study about the Adverse Childhood Experiences, or ACEs. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “the original ACE Study was conducted at Kaiser Permanente from 1995 to 1997 with two waves of data collection. Over 17,000 Health Maintenance Organization members from Southern California receiving physical exams completed confidential surveys regarding their childhood experiences and current health status and behaviors.”

ACEs fall into three categories: abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction. Divorced parents? That’s an ACE. A household with alcohol or prescription drug use abuse? Another ACE. They add up quickly, and individuals can discover their ACE score by taking a quick 10-question assessment, which is accessible through the following link to the American Society for the Positive Care of Children.

The ACE study has limitations, which is true of any research project. When researchers conduct a study, they have to select variables and data that they can quantify and measure. Does the ACE study measure every childhood trauma that exists? Certainly not. The researchers selected 10 traumas to measure. Therefore, it is important to realize that while the ACE assessment is an effective research-based tool for measuring trauma, it is not inclusive of every trauma that one might experience in childhood.

Trauma can also be a very vague and broad-based term, so while the ACE assessment does not quantify every trauma, it does add meaning and context to how trauma is defined. This context could be helpful to a person who does not perceive trauma as “real,” but more of a concept that is manufactured by society. Therefore, a person who thinks that life is hard and that people need to “pull themselves up by their bootstraps” might take a different perspective when they recognize that sexual abuse is one form of trauma or one ACE.

Trauma or ACEs experienced in childhood and teen years are linked with a higher risk of many health issues later in adult life such as depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, heart disease, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, stroke, drug or alcohol dependence, cancer, liver disease, suicide attempts, and the list goes on and on. One out of every five people with seven or more ACES will attempt suicide

The more adverse childhood experience one has, the more significant likelihood that a person has of experiencing difficulties with his/her mental and physical health and overall well-being later in life. An ACE score of four or more decreases one’s life expectancy by 20 years and makes one twice as likely to die by the age of 65.

The good news is that awareness about childhood trauma can lead to proactive behaviors that promote positive childhood experiences and therefore decrease the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs). Strategies for creating positive childhood experiences can be found in the following CDC infographic:

Similarly, another CDC infographic shows the long-term health benefits of preventing ACEs:

Let’s take the words of Frederick Douglass to heart by building healthy children through ACE awareness and preventative measures. Additionally, for those broken men and women who are still experiencing the effects of a difficult childhood, let’s use the ACE assessment as a starting point to uncover these traumas. Then, we can leverage church, community, and healthy lifestyle practices to help repair harm and to also build hope and a future.