Home Blog Page 3451

Gen Z Will be Lost in the Woods Because They Crucify Everyone Who Would Guide Them

Being young is weird, to put it bluntly, and a lot of it comes from not having the world quite figured out. Even well into one’s late teens and early twenties, the sufficient amount of life experience to be considered worldly hasn’t occurred to the vast majority of kids and it seems to be getting pushed back more and more. This, in particular, is not Gen Z’s fault, it’s the generations that came before them who wanted their kids to have a better life.

“Better life” means fewer hardships and fewer hardships means fewer life-molding lessons, but I digress.

Navigating this weirdness can sometimes be difficult but not at all impossible thanks to many guiding lights that came before them. This can come in the form of parents, mentors, books, culture, and heroes to name a few. When one fails, a kid can look to other outlets for cues on what to do in any given situation.

But this isn’t just the information age, it’s also the age of oversharing. Even being dead and gone doesn’t stop the deepest secrets of your life from being exposed to anyone who wants to learn about it. Knowledge about a person’s deepest secrets and greatest shame can minimize anyone, including the aforementioned heroes.

Gen Z, having been born after the start of the internet, is drowning in thoughts, opinions, secrets, and revelations about people. You’d think that knowing so much about someone would be a good thing. With this info, you can avoid pitfalls, know who to trust and who to cast aside. Who to venerate and who to ignore. That sounds good on the surface until you get to know our culture, and humanity, a bit more. Pulling the camera back, you see we live in a very intolerant culture that only approves of “perfection,” and I put those in quotes because what is considered good changes often.

This has created something of an odd moral definition for Gen Z who doesn’t know what it’s like to live outside of the internet’s influence. If parents don’t actively teach their children, they get their cues from online trends and these “morals” look increasingly like they were thought up by people who live in “The Capitol” from The Hunger Games. These people increasingly dress like them too if red carpet walks are observed.

This leads to what we know as “cancel culture.” Someone falters in some way and the world seemingly comes down on them, driving them off the internet, and if possible, forcing them to lose their job, money, and more. It’s one of our modern culture’s greatest diseases and it’s infected Gen Z like a pandemic.

I could go on about how true morality is often looked down on and that wisdom is often laughed at in favor of trendy morality, but I’d rather draw attention to the fact that Gen Z’s use of cancel culture comes with two very real issues.

Firstly, its heroes are fake. Secondly, it kills its heroes constantly.

Looking back at my childhood, I had a plethora of heroes to look up to. I remember sitting in front of my television to watch Captain Richard Winters lead Easy Company into battle during WWII in the “Band of Brothers” mini-series and thinking how great of a man he was. Intellectually, and on matters of faith, C.S. Lewis was a hero of mine. In the world of fantasy, I thought you didn’t get cooler than Spike Spiegel of Cowboy Beebop (I still think that).

One other hero was Bob Ross, the soft-spoken PBS painter that everyone knows and loves. Not only did he teach you how to create beautiful works of art, but he was also a man who knew how to work with very little to create something great and encouraged people to push pursue their interests and turn them into talents. He was a positive force in the universe…and then the Netflix documentary about him was released. It’s here you learn that Ross had a darker side when the cameras were turned off, specifically with the ladies. He was a womanizer and cheated on his wife.

Ross broke the rules and as such, Ross is somehow less. Gen Z reacted by turning their back on the painter. One created a TikTok video about it, but one member of Gen Z called her own generation out for their massive problem. Watch the video below.

She’s right.

Gen Z was raised in the midst of an age where cultivation of one’s image is the norm and some of the best put on a show that paints themselves as altruistic, loving, good-natured, and uplifting. Gen Z supports and loves them to the point where their good nature becomes meme-worthy. Something develops called “stan culture,” where fanaticism becomes akin to worship. However, in the age of information, the skeletons people keep in the closet are going to come out. As it turns out, the person isn’t as perfect as their carefully crafted public persona let on. There are varying degrees of cancelation, but cancelation happens nonetheless.

Gen Z robs themselves of a hero that should, for all intents and purposes, be looked up to.

If tomorrow, someone revealed to me that Major Winters cheated on his wife and once kicked a dog, I would be disappointed, but I wouldn’t really think him any less of a hero. I would think he was a flawed human…just like me. Prone to mistakes and doing things I later regret. Ross is much the same. A flawed man who made a very positive impact.

No one is perfect. Everyone makes errors, and sometimes these errors are massive. People fall into sin and vice more easily than some think. Many in Gen Z, as young as they are, haven’t gone through enough life experiences to understand the full weight of this fact. At some point, they too will make a major mistake and they’ll hope for grace and mercy from those around them, and I hope they get it.

Of all the lessons Gen Z should be learning right now and doesn’t seem to, it’s that one. No one is perfect and forgiveness is one of the greatest virtues we have. Cancel culture seems to derive from the lack of this understanding but it will hit them like a ton of bricks down the line. When they learn perfection is unattainable, it’ll be a hard lesson.

Gen Z will have to learn to forgive, not just others but themselves. They should understand that perfection is unattainable and that their heroes are still heroes despite their flaws. Many may even be more heroic because of their flaws. Some have flaws so great and are still so loved by those closest to them that it should give hope that forgiveness isn’t unattainable.

King David sent his best friend off to war to die so he could cover up the fact that he impregnated his wife Bathsheba, and he suffered major consequences for it, but God still favored David.

Gen Z should pick its heroes wisely, but when those heroes inevitably prove to be flawed, they shouldn’t crucify them. Without guides, you’ll find yourself lost in the woods pretty easily, and at that point, you’ll believe anyone who can claim to lead you out of it.

GOP Reps. Accuse State Dept. Of Taking Credit For Private Operation To Rescue 4 Americans

Moments after Texas Rep. Ronny Jackson (R) announced the safe return of four of his constituents from Afghanistan, the State Department appeared to take credit for the operation that brought them home. Republican lawmakers are outraged by that attempt.

Early Monday, Jackson tweeted about the life threatening ground evacuation. He went on to thank Cory Mills, a veteran of the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division, and his team for launching the operation that brought the four home.

A little more than an hour later, however, Jackson followed up his announcement with a tweet laden with disgust. He shared a link to a CNN story that cited an unnamed State Department official who said that this was the first operation that “we’ve facilitated in this manner.” Jackson pushed back while explaining that after weeks of inaction, it was his office that coordinated with Mills team to get them out of Afghanistan.

Oklahoma Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R), who also was a part of the operation, echoed Jackson’s outrage. He called the CNN article a “flat out lie” and reiterated the point that it was Mills’ team that was on the ground working around the clock.

The exact details of the operation have not been shared to allow for the overland route used by Mills’ team to be used again in future missions. The State Department has yet to release a public statement on the controversy.

Abbott Signs Texas Election Integrity Bill Into Law; Democrats Sue

Texas Governor Gregg Abbott signed a sweeping election integrity bill on Tuesday, after state Democrats delayed the legislation for months when they fled the Capitol in May (and spread Covid-19 throughout Washington DC).

The legislature finally approved the bill last week, which Abbott signed in the city of Tyler, accompanied by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R) and lead Senate sponsor Sen. Bryan Hughes (R), according to The Hill.

The new legislation bars 24-hour polling stations, places new restrictions on drive-through voting and vote by mail, and gives more authority to partisan poll watchers to be able to observe elections. It also requires voter IDto cast a ballot.

What’s more, elections officials will no longer be able to distribute vote-by-mail applications to people who haven’t requested them after clerks in large TX counties were found to have been sending out unsolicited applications. The bill also requires the Secretary of State’s office to check voter rolls every month to attempt to identify illegal migrants who are illegally registered to vote.

Election integrity is now law in the state of Texas,” said Abbott.

“One thing that all Texas can agree and that is that we must have trust and confidence in our elections,” he continued, adding that the bill “ensures that every eligible voter will have the opportunity to vote.”

Abbott also touted provisions in the bill which expand early voting hours in the 12 days leading up to an election.

“Texas provides 12 days of early voting and this law even adds more hours during those early voting days. By comparison, the president’s home state of Delaware provides zero days and zero hours of early voting,” he said. “It ensures that Texas provides even more opportunities for people to engage in the voting process than the president’s home state of Delaware as well as many other states across the entire country.”

Democrats sue

Shortly after Abbott signed the legislation, Democratic operative attorney Marc Elias and his team launched a lawsuit on behalf of four Texas organizations, “Two Hispanic advocacy groups, a retiree organization and the state’s largest teacher’s union. The lawsuit will challenge the law under the First and Fourteenth amendments to the Constitution, and under two sections of the Voting Rights Act,” per The Hill.

“Year after year, Texas has one of the lowest voter turnout rates in the country, yet Republicans in the state remain intent on limiting access to the ballot box, particularly for voters of color,” said Elias. “After Texas Democrats blocked the passage of past iterations fo the bill in the regular legislative session and the first special session, Republicans finally achieved their goal of enacting a law, Senate Bill 1, that limits almost every method of voting in the state.”

Trump Showing More Signs He’ll Run in 2024

An increasing number of signs point to former President Donald Trump running for the White House again in 2024, Politico reported.

Besides taking expected steps — hiring staffers in Iowa, increased fundraising, a presence in the national media — Trump has been buoyed to run after seeing President Joe Biden’s declining job approval numbers following the disastrous troops withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the resurgence of coronavirus, Politico reported Tuesday.

“Trump sees Biden is on the ropes. He wants to throw punches as a combatant, not a heckler from the stands,” Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., told Politico.

Gaetz added that Trump is in no rush to announce his intentions because “the base is rightly loyal to him. And a good rule in politics is to be a candidate for as short a time as necessary.”

Trump’s campaign adviser Jason Miller told Politico on Thursday that the chances of the former president running are “between 99 and 100 percent.”

“I think he is definitely running in 2024,” Miller said. “I had a good conversation with him last night. I’m going to go see him in another couple days here.”

Another person who has discussed Trump’s plans told Politico that “he really hasn’t decided, but we all think he’ll run … he wants to get in a position to where it’s a turnkey operation once he says yes. So, he’s maximizing his position … the super PAC is ostensibly to help win back the House and the Senate. If he does that, it makes his position stronger.”

An official announcement likely will not happen before the 2022 midterms, several people close to Trump told Politico.

The former president has been active with statements through the super PAC Save America, and has dropped hints of running in private conversations with confidantes and advisers, according to Politico, which spoke to a dozen Trump associates.

Gaetz declined to disclose details of his conversations with Trump but said it was more likely than not the former president will run again. The Congressman told Politico that the GOP regaining control of the Senate and/or the House in next year’s midterms would motivate Trump even more.

While Trump has taken a more hands-on approach with his web ads and has planned several rallies for the fall — including in Iowa and Florida — perhaps the most revealing recent move was the PAC’s hiring of two top operatives from Iowa dedicated to “advancing Save America’s goals of electing strong, pro-Trump, America First conservatives.”

Iowa traditionally holds the first-in-the-nation presidential contest. Hawkeye State staffers also will help Trump keep an eye on the other potential Republican presidential candidates visiting the caucus state.

A recent Emerson College poll showed Trump defeating Biden in a 2024 rematch of last year’s election. Trump was favored by 47% of respondents, while 46% chose Biden.

San Francisco’s archbishop blasts Catholics Biden and Pelosi for coming out against controversial Texas abortion law

The archbishop of San Francisco has criticized President Joe Biden, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Catholic politicians who have attacked new abortion law in Texas, suggesting they have violated core church doctrine.

“As a faith leader in the Catholic community, I find it especially disturbing that so many of the politicians on the wrong side of the preeminent human rights issue of our time are self-professed Catholics,” Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone wrote in a Washington Post op-ed published on Sunday. He added that “everyone who advocates for abortion, in public or private life, who funds it or who presents it as a legitimate choice participates in a great moral evil.”

The Texas law, which came into effect last week, bans most abortions from being carried out more than six weeks after conception. It also enables private citizens to sue those who facilitate violations of the new restrictions. Biden on Thursday blasted the US Supreme Court for rejecting an appeal to block the legislation, calling it “an unprecedented assault on a woman’s constitutional rights.”

Pelosi, whose congressional district includes San Francisco, called the ruling a “cowardly, dark-of-night decision to uphold a flagrantly unconstitutional assault on women’s rights and health.” She and other House Democrats aim to pass an abortion-rights bill in response, while Biden called for a “whole-of-government effort” to overcome the Texas law.

“Prominent politicians lost no time in reacting hyperbolically to the Supreme Court’s decision refusing to enjoin Texas’s new law banning abortions after the detection of a fetal heartbeat,”Cordileone said. He added that “you cannot be a good Catholic and support expanding a government-approved right to kill innocent human beings.”

Cordileone noted that Catholic bishops caused “uproar” in June, when they questioned whether Biden and other politicians who support abortion should be allowed to receive Holy Communion. The archbishop said church leaders were accused of inappropriately injecting religion in politics, but bishops have a duty to respond when prominent laymen “openly oppose church teachings.”

He gave the example of New Orleans Archbishop Joseph Rummel as a church leader who didn’t “stay in his lane.” In the 1940s-1960s, the late Rummel integrated the local Notre Dame Seminary and ordered desegregation of Catholic churches and schools. He shut down a congregation that refused to accept a black priest. Rummel’s actions infuriated many white Catholics and led to protests and boycotts. Undaunted, he excommunicated some desegregation opponents.

“Was that weaponizing the Eucharist?” Cordileone asked. “No. Rummel recognized that prominent, high-profile public advocacy for racism was scandalous. It violated core Catholic teachings and basic principles of justice, and also led others to sin.”

Just as Rummel called racial segregation a “denial of the unity and solidarity of the human race,” Cordileone said abortion is the most egregious such affront in present day.

Abortion is “the most pressing human rights challenge of our time,” the archbishop said, adding, “If anything, Catholic political leaders’ response to the situation in Texas highlights the need for us to say it all the louder.”

Biden’s National Security Council China Director Is Former Fellow At Chinese State-Funded Group Advising Communist Officials Sanctioned For Human Rights Abuses.

Julian Gewirtz, Joe Biden’s China Director at the National Security Council, is a former fellow at the Chinese regime-funded Ash Center, which has also advised Chinese Communist Party officials sanctioned by the U.S. government for human rights abuses. 

Hosted within the Harvard Kennedy School, the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation is funded by several Chinese Communist Party-backed entities. Among its donors are China Southern Power Grid Corp, whose management is “directly appointed by China’s central government.”

Additional donations come from New World China Enterprises Project, a Chinese company whose board is composed of virtually all Chinese Communist Party members. Chairman and Executive Director Cheng Kar-Shun served as a Standing Committee Member of the regime’s Political Consultative Conference, an arm of the party-state responsible for conducting overseas influence operations.

As a result, the center has routinely produced studies amplified by Chinese state-run media outlets and regime officials. A July 2020 report – “Understanding CCP Resilience: Surveying Chinese Public Opinion Through Time” – contends that the Chinese Communist Party is “as strong as ever” and that “Chinese citizen satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board.”

For two decades, the Ash Center has also hosted the “China’s Leaders in Development Program,” which describes itself as being “widely recognized by the Chinese government as one of the best overseas training programs for government officials.”

“Taught both at Tsinghua University, China, and Harvard Kennedy School, this multi weeks training program is specifically designed to help prepare senior local and central Chinese government officials to more effectively address the ongoing challenges of China’s national reforms,” the summary continues.

Beyond collaborating with a university that has attempted to hack the U.S. government, the program brings Harvard professors’ prestigious advice to senior leaders from the brutal Chinese Communist Party, handpicked by the party’s own Organization Department of the Central Committee. Several years, members of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corp, which has been identified as an “instrument of repression” against Uighurs by the Washington Post and accordingly sanctioned by former President Donald Trump, have joined the delegation.

Despite these ties, Gewirtz served as a fellow at the center from 2017 to 2018.

Gewirtz has also been a fellow at the Columbia-Harvard China and the World Program, which has hosted the Chairman of the China United States-Exchange Foundation (CUSEF)  C.H. Tung as a speaker. CUSEF functions as part of China’s “United Front,” which the U.S.-China Security and Economic Review Commission identifies as seeking to “to co-opt and neutralize sources of potential opposition to the policies and authority of its ruling Chinese Communist Party” and “influence foreign governments to take actions or adopt positions supportive of Beijing.”

Similarly, Gewirtz’s father, Paul, is the Director of Yale Law’s Paul Tsai China Center, which has taken millions in Chinese Communist Party cash and counts Chinese government and military-linked individuals as fellows and speakers. The center re-established itself in 2016 following a $30,000,000 donation from the son of the late Paul Tsai, Vice Chairman and co-founder of Alibaba Joseph Tsai.

Alibaba, founded by Jack Ma, has close financial and personnel ties to the Chinese Communist Party. Tsai is also a “patron” of CUSEF.

Antony Blinken Will Testify Before House And Senate On Afghanistan Withdrawal

Secretary of State Antony Blinken will testify before Congress on the United States’ withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Blinken has been scheduled to appear before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Tuesday, September 14, for a hearing titled “Examining the U.S. Withdrawal from Afghanistan.”

Blinken is also expected to appear before the House Foreign Affairs Committee for a similar hearing.

The Secretary of State’s testimony on the Afghanistan withdrawal will follow his September 5-8 trip to Doha, Qatar and Ramstein, Germany. The trip was touted by the State Department as an opportunity for Blinken to offer thanks to allies and partners.

“While there, he will reaffirm and strengthen our partnerships to promote peace, security, and human dignity,” State Department spokesman Ned Price tweeted.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin embarked on a similar trip to the Arabian Gulf, as well.

Austin said his trip was part of an effort “to thank our partners there who have done so much to help save and shelter Afghan civilians.”

NY Times: Biden Admin Officials ‘Relieved’ SCOTUS Restored Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ Policy

The New York Times reported Monday that members of President Joe Biden’s administration felt “relief” after the Supreme Court allowed former President Donald Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” policy to be reinstated.

Late last month, the high court declined to block an order from a Texas federal judge requiring the policy, officially known as the Migrant Protection Protocols, to be put back in place.

“The applicants have failed to show a likelihood of success on the claim that the memorandum rescinding the Migrant Protection Protocols was not arbitrary and capricious,” the Supreme Court’s order said.

In June 2020, the justices prevented Trump from ending the Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals program, employing similar reasoning.

The court’s ruling against the Biden administration on rescinding the Migrant Protection Protocols was welcomed by some in its ranks, according to the Times.

“[A]mong some Biden officials, the Supreme Court’s order was quietly greeted with something other than dismay, current and former officials said: It brought some measure of relief,” the paper reported.

“Before that ruling, Mr. Biden’s steps to begin loosening the reins on migration had been quickly followed by a surge of people heading north, overwhelming the southwest border of the United States. Apprehensions of migrants hit a two-decade high in July, a trend officials fear will continue into the fall.”

“Concern had already been building inside the Biden administration that the speed of its immigration changes may have encouraged migrants to stream toward the United States, current and former officials said.”

“May have encouraged” — now that is an understatement.

On his first day in office, Biden issued executive orders ending border wall construction and shutting down the Migrant Protection Protocols, prompting the worst migrant crisis in 21 years.

There have been over 1.3 million illegal border crossings in the current fiscal year, including approximately 212,000 in the month of July alone.

The Times reported that some Biden officials “were already talking about reviving Mr. Trump’s policy in a limited way to deter migration.”

“Then the Supreme Court order came, providing the Biden administration with the political cover to adopt the policy in some form without provoking as much ire from Democrats who reviled Mr. Trump’s border policies,” the paper reported.

“But the ambivalence within corners of the Biden administration reflects a broader worry: that the border crisis could have electoral repercussions for the Democrats, potentially dooming hopes of pushing through a more significant overhaul of the nation’s migration and asylum systems.”

Their concern is well-founded.

An ABC News/Ipsos poll taken during the last week of August found 56 percent of those surveyed disapproved of Biden’s handling of immigration and the U.S.-Mexico border, while 41 percent approved.

Only the president’s handling of Afghanistan scored worse, with 59 percent disapproving and 38 percent approving.

The administration, no doubt, is hopeful voters will mostly forget about Afghanistan by next fall, but the border crisis is ongoing, and without a policy change will likely not get any better.

So the Supreme Court, at least temporarily, has given Biden a break from carrying one of his two heaviest political weights.

Meanwhile, the Times story seems designed to reassure moderate or swing voters that the president’s team already recognized the border is a mess and something needs to change.

Squires: The real ‘American Taliban’ wages a war on children by promoting abortion and death culture

There’s a short video showing a British instructor explaining to an Afghan woman why she should appreciate an early 20th-century artist who turned a urinal into conceptual art. The scene epitomizes the failure of Western cultural imperialism. 

It also reminded me that the left is engaged in a high-stakes conflict that it is winning: its all-out war on American children.

After Texas lawmakers recently passed a bill prohibiting abortion after a baby’s heartbeat is detected, the phrase “American Taliban” trended across Twitter. It’s hard to understand how the people who don’t want babies dismembered in the womb would be seen as the backward theocrats while the people who would legalize abortion up until birth would be seen as caring and compassionate.

This development shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone who understands that abortion — the intentional taking of innocent human life — is one of the left’s most deeply held values. The Democratic Party paints itself as a pro-woman and pro-child coalition concerned for the marginalized and oppressed. Its legislative and cultural priorities reveal a very dark alternate reality. The truth is that the left hates women and children.

Like the immoral woman described in Proverbs, the lips of Nancy Pelosi’s party drip honey and its speech is smoother than oil. It all sounds tempting until you realize it’s a worldview that leads to death. 

Abortion is the most obvious front of the left’s war on children. There were over 600,000 abortions performed in 2018, according to the CDC. Democrats are quick to point out that most of the women having abortions are low-income and many are ethnic minorities. Both points are true. Apparently the party that decries the twin evils of capitalism and racism has no problem with fewer babies being born if they are poor and black. The party that boldly proclaims “black lives matter” while on a perpetual heat-seeking mission for any institution that honors bigots from the past has no issue with Margaret Sanger’s racist views or the legacy of eugenics still seen in our nation’s largest abortion provider. Planned Parenthood traces its roots back to Sanger’s first birth control clinic in Brooklyn in 1917. To this day, about half of all black babies in New York City are killed in the womb before they draw their first breaths. 

The left seethes with apoplectic rage whenever it feels abortion is being threatened, but it also has plans for the children who actually are born. Its first goal is to get the babies out of the arms of their mothers. They see women who stay home with their children as a step back in feminism’s long march to turn women — in terms of priorities and temperament — into men who can give birth. Even though the research demonstrates the benefits of mothers staying home to care for their young children — something most Americans support — the left acts as if a woman has more value to her employer than to her own family. Part of the left’s motivation is the knowledge that recruiting the next generation into its culture war requires thousands of hours of basic training. 

That instruction starts in day care and moves to the school for some children as young as three. Once there, many kids are bombarded by teachers who have swapped a focus on reading, writing, and arithmetic for racial narcissism, activism, and protesting. Los Angeles teachers’ union President Cecily Myart-Cruz recently admitted this when she claimed that it was fine if students didn’t learn multiplication last year because now they know the words “insurrection” and “coup,” as well as the difference between a riot and a protest. She is not alone. The Chicago Teachers Union claimed, “The push to reopen schools is rooted in sexism, racism, and misogyny.” The education establishment in this country has been hijacked by partisan advocates who could not care less whether our children are literate and numerate as long as they come out every election to vote for Democrats once they turn 18. They have no problem openly admitting that critical theory is more important to them than critical thinking. What’s the result? Our children are not learning. There was a time when American children learned Latin in high school. Now most need remedial English in college.

American children face attacks on all sides, from their personhood in utero to their minds in the classroom. The last ten years have been marked by growing intensity on the gender identity battlefront. Democrats are completely on board with the notion that people — including school-aged children — can pick their gender. They would never encourage an anorexic teenage girl to get gastric bypass surgery, but when it comes to other intense feelings of conflict between mind and body, they promote the radical alteration of the body. What most people probably don’t know is that John Money, the man who introduced the term “gender identity,” was a psychologist who was involved in the sex reassignment of a child named David Reimer in the 1960s. Money forced Reimer, who was raised as a girl, to perform sex acts with his twin brother while he photographed them. Both brothers committed suicide in their 30s.

The left hates your children. Democrats don’t believe pre-born babies have inherent worth. They have no problem undermining parental authority if it means getting the opportunity to shape the minds and morals of the next generation of voters. Decades of research show children have the best outcomes when they are raised by their married biological parents. Yet it is easier to get an elected Democrat to promote pornography and sex work than to publicly affirm the role of marriage and the nuclear family in producing positive social outcomes.
Liberal ideology couldn’t make Afghan women accept bathroom art as normal because the people in that country actually believe in something more important than superficial notions of identity. That may come as a surprise to American elites whose views are a mile wide and an inch deep. The quickness with which the Afghan government folded to the Taliban demonstrated that a small group of highly committed people can drive off a well-funded enemy who lacks the courage of its convictions. It’s time for parents in this country to use their own weapons — prayer, petition, public pressure — to fight for what they hold most dear.