Home Blog Page 3368

The Ten Commandments: What You Should Know

Questions to Ask an Atheist

Tucker: Who is really in charge?

Leaked Pfizer Emails Confirm Aborted Fetal Tissue Used in COVID Vax Testing: Project Veritas Whistleblower (Video)

“One or more cell lines with an origin that can be traced back to human fetal tissue has been used in laboratory tests associated with the vaccine program.”

QUICK FACTS:
  • Melissa Strickler, Pfizer Insider and Manufacturing Quality Auditor, leaked internal emails to Project Veritas that show corporate executives telling staff to be secretive about the company’s use of human fetal tissue in laboratory testing of the Covid-19 vaccine.
  • “From the perspective of corporate affairs, we want to avoid having the information on the fetal cells floating out there,” wrote Vanessa Gelman, Pfizer’s Senior Director of Worldwide Research, in one email.
  • “We have been trying as much as possible not to mention the fetal cell lines,” Gelman wrote in another email.
  • Gelman goes on to admit that Pfizer has “tried really hard not to share” the fact that “[o]ne or more cell lines with an origin that can be traced back to human fetal tissue has been used in laboratory tests associated with the vaccine program.”
  • In another leaked email, Pfizer Chief Scientific Officer Philip Dormitzer reveals the company utilizes what are called “HEK293T” cells “for the IVE assay” in making Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine and that these HEK293T cells “are ultimately derived from an aborted fetus.” “HEK” stands for “human embryonic kidney” cells which come from a human fetus who was aborted in 1973 and have been grown and copied since then to be used in pharmaceutical experimentation. “293” stands for the 293rd experiment performed by Dr. Frank Graham to develop these HEK cells.
  • “We have not received any questions from policymakers or media [regarding fetal cells being used in the production of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine] in the last few weeks, so we want to avoid raising this, if possible,” wrote Gelman. “The risk of communicating this right now outweighs any potential benefit we could see, particularly with general members of the public who may take this information and use it in ways we may not want out there.”
WATCH THE PROJECT VERITAS INTERVIEW WITH PFIZER WHISTLEBLOWER MELISSA STRICKLER:

Jon Fleetwood is Managing Editor for American Faith.

Taiwan Defense Ministry: China Capable of ‘Full Scale’ Invasion by 2025

China will be capable of staging a “full scale” invasion of Taiwan by 2025, Taiwan’s defense minister warned legislators in Taipei on Wednesday.

“By 2025, China will bring the cost and attrition to its lowest. It has the capacity now, but it will not start a war easily, having to take many other things into consideration,” Taiwanese Defense Minister Chiu Kuo-cheng said at a Taiwanese parliamentary session on October 6.

Lawmakers asked Chiu “about Beijing’s ability to attack Taiwan on all fronts” during the meeting.

“The Chinese Communists already have the ability to do so now, but they need to think about the cost and consequence of starting a war,” Chiu responded, as quoted by the South China Morning Post (SCMP).

Chiu Kuo-cheng, the new chief of Taiwan’s main intelligence agency National Security Bureau (NSB), attends his first press conference since taking office at NSB headquarters in Taipei on August 2, 2019. (Photo credit should read SAM YEH/AFP via Getty Images)

A military expenditure committee of Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan, or unicameral legislature, met on Wednesday to review a proposed spending plan for the island. The plan’s budget is “worth T$240 billion ($8.6 billion) over the next five years for homemade weapons including missiles and warships,” Reuters reported.

Relations between Beijing and Taipei are currently “the most serious” Chiu has seen in the more than 40 years since he joined Taiwan’s Armed Forces, the defense minister revealed on October 6. He told the island’s military expenditure committee there was a legitimate risk of a “misfire” across the Taiwan Strait, which separates China from Taiwan, due to the heightened tensions.

“For me as a military man, the urgency is right in front of me,” Chiu added.

China’s People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) has ordered daily or near-daily flyovers through Taiwanese airspace for years as a way to intimidate the island, which Beijing considers a renegade province of China. The PLAAF ramped up its air sorties over Taiwan to historic levels during the past weekend, however, signaling Beijing may be seeking to back up its 2019 threat to “reunify” the island with mainland China.

From October 1 to October 4, the PLAAF ordered a record-breaking 149 Chinese aircraft, including fighter jets and bombers, to penetrate Taiwan’s Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ). The detachments broke records on October 1, 2, and 4 for the highest number of Chinese military aircraft to penetrate Taiwan’s ADIZ in a single day.

Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen, right, and Yu Shyi-kun, speaker of the Legislative Yuan, cheer with audience during National Day celebrations in front of the Presidential Building in Taipei, Taiwan, Saturday, Oct. 10, 2020. (AP Photo/Chiang Ying-ying)

“While most of the warplanes flew into the southwest of the island’s air defense zone, some headed to the southeast part of the zone which posed an even bigger threat to Taiwan because of its proximity to the self-ruled island’s military zone in eastern Taiwan. The PLA has also sent nighttime sorties, [which is] a rarity,” the SCMP observed on October 6.

Christian Schools, Female Athletes Fight Biden’s Transgender Mandate to Restore Fairness to Women’s Sports

Several female student-athletes and an organization representing 3,000 U.S. Christian schools have asked a federal district court to let them join a lawsuit fighting for women’s rights and privacy. The suit challenges a move by President Joe Biden to allow biological males to compete on women’s athletic teams while also granting them access to female locker rooms and bathrooms.

Attorneys with the Alliance Defending Freedom filed a motion on Monday with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee on behalf of the Association of Christian Schools International (ACSI) and three female athletes in Arkansas to be allowed to participate in the State of Tennessee v. United States Department of Education.

As CBN News has reported, 20 state attorneys general, led by the state of Tennessee, sued the Biden administration in late August, seeking to stop the mandates that broaden federal sex discrimination protections to include LGBTQ people. The government mandates range from transgender individuals participating in school sports to the use of school and workplace bathrooms that align with a person’s gender identity.

Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery filed the lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Knoxville, TN, arguing that legal interpretations by the U.S. Department of Education and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission are based on a faulty view of U.S. Supreme Court case law.

Case History 

The Supreme Court ruled in June 2020 that the 1964 landmark Civil Rights law, under a provision called Title VII, protects gay, lesbian, and transgender people from discrimination in employment. The court ruled you can’t discriminate on the basis of sex. In 1964, the statute meant “male” or “female.” But now the Supreme Court says “sex” also applies to both sexual orientation and gender identity.

Last June, the Department of Education also issued a ruling that reinterpreted Title IX, a law passed in 1972 to protect against discrimination in education based on gender. The Biden administration’s new policy directive said discrimination based on a student’s sexual orientation or gender identity will now be treated as a violation of Title IX. 

Since Title IX was originally established to give women equality in sports, young women and girls are now fighting to have their rights restored.

“Girls deserve to compete on a level playing field, and states, schools, and individuals across America are rightly stepping up to safeguard equal athletic opportunity for female students,” said ADF Senior Counsel Ryan Bangert. 

“The Biden administration’s radical push to redefine sex in federal law has widespread impact and specifically threatens female athletes. This undermines one of the driving purposes of Title IX to promote equality for women in athletics, and it jeopardizes the safety of female athletes by allowing physically stronger, faster, and larger males to compete on women’s teams. Our Constitution protects against this gross overreach of executive power, and the athletes and the Association of Christian Schools International that Alliance Defending Freedom represent are committed to protecting safe and fair opportunities for female athletes,” he said.

In addition to representing ACSI, ADF attorneys are representing Anna Scarborough, Cate Ford, and Amelia Ford, student athletes who attend public schools in Arkansas. 

A Question of Fairness: Public Schools Would Allow Biological Males on Girls’ Sports Teams

ACSI’s schools have approximately 500,000 students enrolled throughout the U.S. Some of these schools compete against public schools that receive federal financial assistance and are required to adhere to the new federal mandate. 

The Christian schools and their female athletes argue they would be at a disadvantage because the public schools they compete against in athletic events would be required by the Biden administration to permit trans-identifying biological males to compete with girls.

“The female athletes and ACSI seek to provide equal opportunities for women in athletics by maintaining sex-separated sports teams as guaranteed by Title IX,” the motion to intervene states. “The female athletes will show how allowing physiologically bigger, stronger, and faster biological males to compete in women’s sports personally harms their chance at fair competition and eliminates their ‘chance to be champions.’”

The states of Tennessee, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, and West Virginia filed the lawsuit “to prevent federal agencies from usurping authority that properly belongs to Congress, the states, and the people and to eliminate the nationwide confusion and upheaval that the agencies’ recent guidance has inflicted on states and other regulated entities.”

Denmark and Sweden Halt Use of Moderna COVID Vaccine for Everyone Under 30

Public health officials in both Denmark and Sweden, countries which are routinely praised by the far left in America, have paused the use of Moderna’s vaccine for people under 30 years of age, citing an increased risk of heart problems associated with the COVID shot.

Both Nordic countries are commonly pointed to by so-called “democratic socialists” as models for good governance, social policies and medicine. Both countries also looked at the data and decided they would suspend Moderna’s vaccine, for now.

After reviewing research from Swedish and Nordic data sources, the Swedish Public Health Agency noted there was an increased risk for inflammatory conditions like myocarditis and pericarditis in young people who received the second Moderna shot.

“The Swedish Public Health Agency has decided to pause the use of Moderna’s vaccine Spikevax, for everyone born in 1991 and later, for precautionary reasons,” a translation of the health agency’s news release said. “The cause is signals of an increased risk of side effects such as inflammation of the heart muscle or heart sac. However, the risk of being affected is very small.”

Sweden’s health experts noted that heart inflammation issues “usually go away on their own,” but noted any symptoms “need to be assessed by a doctor.”

“The conditions are most common among young men, in connection with, for example, viral infections such as covid-19. In 2019, approximately 300 people under the age of 30 were treated in hospital with myocarditis.

“Data point to an increased incidence also in connection with vaccination against covid-19, mainly in adolescents and young adults and mainly in boys and men. For the individual, the risk of being affected is very small, it is a very rare side effect,” the agency said.

“New preliminary [analyses] from Swedish and Nordic data sources indicate that the connection is especially clear when it comes to Moderna’s vaccine Spikevax, especially after the second dose. The increase in risk is seen within four weeks after the vaccination, mainly within the first two weeks.”

The Swedish Public Health Agency is recommending young people use the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine if they wish. The agency will reassess the situation regarding Moderna’s shot in December.

The country said roughly 81,000 people born after 1991 have only received the first dose of the Moderna vaccine and will not be offered the second dose for the time being.

The agency said those who have received their first or second dose recently should be “vigilant,” adding that the risk for complications is small, but still there.

According to Reuters, Denmark has followed suit and will not use the Moderna vaccine while more information is gathered.

Both Denmark and Sweden have lifted all their COVID restrictions, as has Norway, Newsweek reported. Sweden never had many to begin with.

In 2020, the Swedes avoided lockdowns, tension inside retail stores, beach arrests, children being tormented by isolation and mandatory mask-wearing. Its people throughout the coronavirus pandemic have more or less lived life as normal.

When America’s leaders freaked out last spring and destroyed their economies and trampled on the Constitution, Scandinavians did what they wanted to, and respected the rights of others to do the same.

The countries that people such as Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont so often praise for being “democratic socialists” never arrested anyone for going to work.

For once, it’s actually easy to see what leftists like Sanders and his followers love so much about Nordic societies. Ironically, during one of the few times when conservatives might agree with them on something, our politicians couldn’t act less like their Northern European idols.

Northern Europe is free from tyranny, open for business and following the science.

Here in the Democrat-run U.S., nurses are being fired for avoiding a vaccine for a virus that many of them have already had. There is no choice beyond complete compliance, while there is little confidence that the Food and Drug Administration is looking at vaccine data with a critical eye.

Perhaps this tells us better than anything that those who say all they yearn for is a Scandinavian model of government aren’t asking for a small dose of “democratic socialism.” America’s power-hungry leftists are seeking nothing less than complete control of every facet of our lives.

BIDEN EFFECT: Average Family is Spending $175 More per Month on Basic Essentials Today

If you have noticed the sudden rise in prices this year on all goods from food, to gas, to household items, you are not alone.

The average family is paying $175 more a month on basic essentials today compared to last year.

This is the Biden Effect in action.

The New York Post reported:

Like millions of Americans whose income has not kept pace with inflation — up 5.3 percent in August compared with a year ago — Allison and her family are feeling the pinch of the rising cost of living and giving up some things just to make ends meet…

… Spurred by supply shortages and massive government spending, inflation has become an added tax on middle-class Americans coming out of the COVID lockdowns.

For households earning the US median annual income of about $70,000, the current inflation rate has forced them to spend another $175 a month on food, fuel and housing, according to Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics. 

And despite this inflation surge Democrats want to continue their profligate spending.

Via FBN

Why Masks? Control, Power, and Revenue

Some people say they don’t mind masks. I do. 

In regular settings of commercial life, they rob people of their personalities and overt signs of human differences. They take away a major part of non-verbal communication. For that matter, they throttle verbal connections between people. I’ve spent a year and a half trying vaguely to make out the meaning of mumbles through masks, and straining my own vocal chords by talking through paper. Put a sheet of plexiglass up and it all becomes nearly impossible. 

I thought I saw someone in the airport whom I recognized but couldn’t tell for sure based on ears, hair, height, and clothing alone. What to do? I tapped him on the shoulder and pulled down my mask: “Do you recognize me?” The slightly alarmed person shook his head no and kept moving. Oh well. 

It’s all crazy. All in the name of virus control but 20 months of experience all over the world has failed to turn up evidence that any of it means anything.

Yes, masks can be useful. In mines. In surgery. In burning buildings. One day when I was walking in Seoul, South Korea, the air was temporarily so bad that I wished I had one. Many people did. Strapping that on is not something anyone welcomes but when it helps filter smog, you do it. Smog is one thing; a virus is another matter entirely. 

I’ll spare you endless links to the absence of clear evidence that these paper coverings achieve virus control. Even if they did, we have given up a major part of what makes life wonderful, concealing our ability to communicate, recognize, and connect. They became a thing in the Spring of 2020 simply because our leaders couldn’t think of anything else to tell people to do to control the pathogen. They gave us a talisman. And they created a visual to remind everyone to panic. 

It was always silly: humanity long ago discovered how to coexist with pathogens while continuing normal life, and otherwise enlisting medical services and depending on the astonishing scalability of the human immune system. This reliance on dehumanizing edicts is new and it’s failed. 

So why do the mask mandates persist? There are many theories. The ruling class is unwilling to admit error so it keeps doubling and tripling down on absurdities. Maybe they have become sadistic. Masks also work to signal political obedience and ferret out enemies of the state who do not go along. If government wants a subjugated population of undifferentiated automatons, universal mask mandates take a solid step in that direction. 

And yet I just found out another reason: revenue. I’ll explain.

I was in a store the other day when the owner put on his mask when I walked in. I was the only person in the store. I said that he can take off his mask. He said that he despises masks but if he takes his off, he would get fined thousands of dollars just like the merchant next door. 

He said that the same is true if he fails to enforce the mask mandate against me. I don’t get in trouble with the police. He does. I asked how in the world anyone would know. He said there are two ways. Another person could walk by the shop and see me without the mask and call public health who would then call the police. He could take a picture and the merchant would be fined. 

He said that a second way is for the cops to directly enforce this. They come and sit in the parking lots, sometimes wearing plain clothes, watching for employees who fail to enforce the mandates. If they spot them, they walk in a few minutes later and issue all kinds of citations. They do this any time, any day. 

What they are after is not public health. They want money. The average local government lost 6% of their revenue in 2020 after many years of anticipating 3-5% increases in revenue year after year. They are now desperate to make it up. Local and state governments don’t have little Federal Reserves to print money for them. They can only spend what they can tax or raise through bond sales. 

So Covid compliance enforcement has, to some extent, become a form of taxation done in the name of public health. Even at the federal level. “If you break the rules,” says Biden, “be prepared to pay.” Last month, the White House announced a doubling of fines for non-compliers, as high as $1,000 for first offense and $3,000 for the second offense.

At this point, hardly anyone really pretends that these things are somehow slowing or stopping the spread. They don’t do anything but they provide great opportunities for government to further pillage private enterprise. It’s a remarkable example of how a bogus practice hatched in the name of health became captured by special interests hoping to make a buck.

What matters here is that the merchants don’t have to actually believe in these mandates. They really don’t care either way. They would mostly rather see the faces of the customers and they would probably like to enjoy the freedom to breathe. But they would rather mask up and make others do the same to avoid the tax.

My point is that for these merchants living amidst mask mandates, it’s more complicated than it first appears. They cannot just engage in civil disobedience because doing so threatens their very existence. They are barely hanging on as it is. And when they tell you to strap one on your face, even if you know it is dumb, it is not just a simple matter of asserting your right to breath. The merchant is being threatened and blackmailed to elicit your compliance.

Every law and regulation offers an opportunity to collect money from compliance. How much money has local government collected? I find no figures on that, only anecdotes. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is catching on and plotting a “mask blitz” this month. 

Governments around the world have discovered this fund-raising tool: 11,000 people in the Netherlands have received tickets. 

The longer the mask mandates exist, the more money government raises and the less incentive authorities have to relax them or allow them to go unenforced. Recall how Biden’s 100 days turned into masks in perpetuity, or at least until some new president is brave enough to call out the absurdity of it all.

Somehow this whole mess sums up everything about Covid policy. What started as a symbol that everyone knew was largely ineffective ends up as a bullying revenue racket.

Reprinted with permission from Brownstone Institute.