Leaked Pfizer Emails Confirm Aborted Fetal Tissue Used in COVID Vax Testing: Project Veritas Whistleblower (Video)
“One or more cell lines with an origin that can be traced back to human fetal tissue has been used in laboratory tests associated with the vaccine program.”
QUICK FACTS:
- Melissa Strickler, Pfizer Insider and Manufacturing Quality Auditor, leaked internal emails to Project Veritas that show corporate executives telling staff to be secretive about the company’s use of human fetal tissue in laboratory testing of the Covid-19 vaccine.
- “From the perspective of corporate affairs, we want to avoid having the information on the fetal cells floating out there,” wrote Vanessa Gelman, Pfizer’s Senior Director of Worldwide Research, in one email.

- “We have been trying as much as possible not to mention the fetal cell lines,” Gelman wrote in another email.
- Gelman goes on to admit that Pfizer has “tried really hard not to share” the fact that “[o]ne or more cell lines with an origin that can be traced back to human fetal tissue has been used in laboratory tests associated with the vaccine program.”

- In another leaked email, Pfizer Chief Scientific Officer Philip Dormitzer reveals the company utilizes what are called “HEK293T” cells “for the IVE assay” in making Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine and that these HEK293T cells “are ultimately derived from an aborted fetus.” “HEK” stands for “human embryonic kidney” cells which come from a human fetus who was aborted in 1973 and have been grown and copied since then to be used in pharmaceutical experimentation. “293” stands for the 293rd experiment performed by Dr. Frank Graham to develop these HEK cells.

- “We have not received any questions from policymakers or media [regarding fetal cells being used in the production of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine] in the last few weeks, so we want to avoid raising this, if possible,” wrote Gelman. “The risk of communicating this right now outweighs any potential benefit we could see, particularly with general members of the public who may take this information and use it in ways we may not want out there.”


WATCH THE PROJECT VERITAS INTERVIEW WITH PFIZER WHISTLEBLOWER MELISSA STRICKLER:
Jon Fleetwood is Managing Editor for American Faith.
BIDEN EFFECT: Average Family is Spending $175 More per Month on Basic Essentials Today
If you have noticed the sudden rise in prices this year on all goods from food, to gas, to household items, you are not alone.
The average family is paying $175 more a month on basic essentials today compared to last year.
This is the Biden Effect in action.
The New York Post reported:
Like millions of Americans whose income has not kept pace with inflation — up 5.3 percent in August compared with a year ago — Allison and her family are feeling the pinch of the rising cost of living and giving up some things just to make ends meet…
… Spurred by supply shortages and massive government spending, inflation has become an added tax on middle-class Americans coming out of the COVID lockdowns.
For households earning the US median annual income of about $70,000, the current inflation rate has forced them to spend another $175 a month on food, fuel and housing, according to Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics.
And despite this inflation surge Democrats want to continue their profligate spending.
Via FBN




Trump asks judge to force Facebook to reinstate his account
Former President Donald Trump on Thursday asked a federal judge to force Facebook to reinstate his account.
Mr. Trump‘s lawyers filed for a preliminary injunction in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, where the former president is suing Facebook and its CEO Mark Zuckerberg over allegations that the company’s ban of Mr. Trump violated the First Amendment.
The motion contends that Facebook “is censoring … a former President of the United States.” It says the social media platform has been “coerced by members of the United States Congress, operating under an unconstitutional immunity granted by a permissive federal statute, and acting directly with federal officials.”
“On January 7, 2021, Defendant indefinitely banned Plaintiff from its platform, a major avenue of public discourse,” Mr. Trump‘s lawyers stated. They said Facebook‘s action also “violates Florida’s newly enacted Stop Social Media Censorship Act.”
Facebook “exercises a degree of power and control over political discourse in this country that is immeasurable, historically unprecedented, and profoundly dangerous to open democratic debate,” the lawyers wrote.
Facebook first banned Mr. Trump in January for 24 hours after the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol. Mr. Zuckerberg then announced that the company would extend the ban for at least two weeks.
In June, Facebook announced that it would extend Mr. Trump‘s ban until at least January 2023, and Mr. Trump sued Facebook in July alongside other tech platforms that restricted his access.
Facebook declined to comment. Last month, Facebook sought to transfer Mr. Trump‘s case from a federal court in Florida to California.