Home Blog Page 227

1 in 3 Students Support Violence to Stop Campus Speech

Image via Canva

A new national survey reveals that a disturbing number of college students view violence as an acceptable tool to shut down speech they oppose. Conducted by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), the 2025 College Free Speech Rankings report highlights a growing trend of hostility toward free expression on American campuses.

The survey gathered responses from more than 68,000 students across 257 colleges and universities. One in three students said it is at least “rarely acceptable” to use violence to stop a campus speech. Specifically, 2% said it is “always acceptable,” 13% said “sometimes acceptable,” and 19% said “rarely acceptable.” Only 67% stated that violence is “never acceptable” in response to speech.

The report also measured views on less aggressive but still coercive actions. More than half of students said it is at least occasionally acceptable to block others from attending a speech. Among respondents, 3% said it is “always acceptable,” 19% said “sometimes,” and 32% said “rarely.” This suggests that disruption tactics—whether physical or procedural—are gaining broader acceptance among students.

Political identity did not provide a clear divide on the use of violence. Seven percent of self-identified liberal students and eight percent of conservatives said using violence to stop speech was “always acceptable.” This suggests a bipartisan erosion of foundational American values, particularly the right to express ideas without fear of retaliation.

These findings coincide with increased campus protests, especially around controversial speakers, religious topics, and Middle East politics. The growing tolerance for intimidation and even physical confrontation has placed new pressure on university administrators to respond decisively.

FIRE, which advocates for free speech rights on campuses, has used the survey to call for stronger protections for viewpoint diversity and disciplinary actions against those who seek to suppress debate through coercion or violence. The full rankings evaluate universities on speech climate, administrative tolerance, and student attitudes.

The report warns that unless institutions recommit to free speech principles, the next generation of leaders may carry into public life a deeply flawed understanding of civil liberty and democratic engagement.

Private Chats Reveal Antisemitism in Anti-Israel Student Groups

(Photo by Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)

Leaked private messages from student-led anti-Israel groups at a Canadian university reveal deeply disturbing content, including antisemitic imagery, praise for terrorist activity, and discussions of evading law enforcement. The chats, reviewed by the National Post, expose a radical undercurrent among pro-Palestinian activists at Western University in London, Ontario.

Two Jewish students infiltrated private chat groups following the October 7 Hamas terrorist attacks against Israel. The chats were associated with the Palestinian Cultural Club (PCC) and a separate group known as “Palestinian Solidarity Western.” The students, concerned about escalating antisemitism, joined the groups under pseudonyms and collected screenshots of messages, memes, and media shared over the course of several months.

According to the National Post, the chats contained cartoons mocking the Holocaust, memes portraying Hitler as a hero, and pro-Hamas propaganda. Members of the chat also exchanged tips on how to disguise faces during protests, advice on avoiding police scrutiny, and—most alarmingly—messages that discussed bringing knives to demonstrations under the guise of peaceful protest.

One image shared showed a Hamas fighter with the phrase “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE” overlaid on the photo. Another depicted Adolf Hitler with a caption implying regret for not completing the Holocaust. Students in the chat praised these messages, and no participants reportedly condemned the content. At least one member warned others not to post such material publicly to avoid attracting negative attention.

The Jewish students who exposed the chats have remained anonymous out of fear for their safety. They are reportedly working with legal counsel and have shared the evidence with university authorities. So far, Western University has not issued a public response.

The PCC denied the allegations, calling them “false, malicious, and defamatory.” A spokesperson said the club “stands firmly against hate and discrimination of any kind” and threatened legal action against those making the claims. However, the spokesperson did not deny the existence of the chats or the content reportedly shared within them.

The revelations raise concerns about the broader campus climate for Jewish students and whether institutions are doing enough to curb the spread of extremist ideology under the guise of activism. No charges have been filed, but legal observers note that if messages encouraging weapon use or glorifying terrorism are authenticated, law enforcement may become involved.

The report underscores a growing problem on college campuses in North America: radical elements using the Palestinian cause as a cover for antisemitic rhetoric and actions, sometimes crossing into praise for terrorism. These incidents challenge university leaders to respond decisively while protecting free speech and ensuring student safety.

Google Accused of AI Content Theft by Media CEO

Google Chrome (Rubaitul Azad/Unsplash)

People Inc CEO Neil Vogel has sharply accused Google of being the worst offender in using copyrighted content without compensation to train its AI tools. He claims that media companies produce high‑quality content only to see it harvested by Google algorithms—through articles, images, and video—without attribution or payment.

Vogel’s criticism is reminiscent of early disputes between publishers and Google two decades ago, when Google’s search engine would display snippets of original work without offering fair recompense. Vogel argues that today’s AI systems take that issue further by absorbing content internally—making it harder for content creators to track or benefit from their intellectual property.

The current frustration is that Google’s AI tools, including features that generate summaries or recommendations, use material behind paywalls or copyright protections. Media firms say this undermines the value of original reporting and creative work. Vogel emphasized that while many publishers tolerated snippet‑based search benefits in past years because they drove web traffic, today’s AI‑driven summaries reduce clicks—and income—while invisibly consuming content.

The dispute underlines a growing tension between media companies and tech platforms as AI gets more embedded in search, translation, and content recommendation. Media executives are pushing for rules that force tech firms to pay for the copyrighted works they use, go beyond attribution, and allow creators to opt out.

The matter also has regulatory momentum. Courts and competition watchdogs in multiple countries are beginning to examine whether Google’s use of content to train AI violates copyright laws or competition rules. Vogel’s statements may add pressure to legal and legislative efforts aimed at protecting intellectual property in the AI age.

Bullet Casings in Kirk Shooting Had Meme, Anti-Fascist Inscriptions

Bullet casings recovered from the scene of Charlie Kirk’s assassination were found to have messages etched into them, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox revealed. These inscriptions are being seen as possible clues to the shooter’s motive, and some may reflect online meme culture.

One fired casing was inscribed with: “Notices, bulges, OwO what’s this?” Unfired casings carried messages including “Hey fascist! Catch!”, “Oh bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao, ciao, ciao”, and “If you read this, you are gay LMAO.” The “Bella Ciao” reference ties to the Italian anti‑fascist resistance song. The “OwO” and “what’s this?” phrase is found in internet and gaming / furry meme communities.

Gov. Cox disclosed this during a Sept. 12 press conference, where 22‑year‑old Tyler Robinson was named as the suspect. Also revealed: a bolt‑action rifle believed to be the weapon was recovered wrapped in a towel in a wooded area near Utah Valley University, where Kirk was speaking.

Cox said the casing inscriptions “speak for themselves,” suggesting strong ideological elements may have been at play. He did not release any photos of the inscriptions, nor clarify exact spellings or formatting.

Investigation also uncovered online chats in which Robinson allegedly discussed retrieving a rifle, leaving it wrapped, and admitted political hostility toward Kirk. The suspect was later arrested after a family member shared evidence.

Washington Student Test Scores Inch Up, Still Trail Pre‑COVID Levels

Image via Canva

Washington state released new data showing slight improvements in student performance in both reading and math, but scores remain significantly below where they were before the COVID‑19 pandemic. The information was shared this week by the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI).

Using the Smarter Balanced Assessment for 8th‑ and 10th‑graders, OSPI reported that 71% of students met or exceeded grade level in English Language Arts, while only 63% reached that benchmark in math. Compared with 11 other states using the same test, Washington students rank in the upper half. Still, gaps persist among certain student groups.

Superintendent Chris Reykdal emphasized that efforts to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) have helped close the achievement gap in Washington. “There are student populations that need additional investment,” Reykdal said, warning that federal pressure to curtail DEI measures could jeopardize progress. He noted that inclusion and family involvement—core DEI principles—are under attack in some quarters, but remain relevant to improving outcomes in Washington.

State Representative Michael Keaton (R‑Puyallup) disagreed with the focus on DEI. He pointed to Washington’s per‑student spending of nearly $19,000 and questioned why scores aren’t higher, suggesting that too many social and political issues distract from core academic goals. “States like Idaho, Wyoming, especially Mississippi, that spend a lot less on public education than we do, their scores are rocketing up,” he argued.

Aaron Withe of the Freedom Foundation echoed that view, saying the classroom environment needs to prioritize learning and reduce political content. He expressed concern for the large number of middle students who, in his view, are being neglected—caught between high‑performers and those needing more help.

Superintendent Reykdal plans to request an additional $10 million in the 2026 legislative session to bolster educational services, especially for underperforming groups. Officials say while improvement is moving in the right direction, catching up to pre‑pandemic standards will require sustained investment and focus.

Kevin Coe Release Hearing Sparks Outrage Over Public Safety

(Photo by Alex Peña/Getty Images)

Kevin Coe, the infamous “South Hill Rapist,” is scheduled for an unconditional release hearing on October 2 in Spokane County. Now 78, Coe has been held at the Special Commitment Center on McNeil Island since the end of his prison sentence for a string of rapes that terrorized Spokane in the 1970s and 1980s.

After serving 25 years behind bars, Coe was deemed a sexually violent predator and confined under civil commitment. But state officials now argue that Coe no longer meets the criteria for confinement. Evaluators have concluded that he does not pose the same level of threat, and both state experts and attorneys are reportedly in agreement that the case for commitment should be dismissed.

If the court approves his release, Coe is expected to be transferred to an adult family home in Federal Way. He would be required to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life but would live without state supervision. The facility has reportedly accepted him, prompting local officials to express serious concern about community safety.

Lawmakers from both parties have criticized the process, calling for stronger public notification laws and longer lead times before the release of individuals classified as sexually violent predators. Some officials are pushing for legislation that would require a minimum of 30 to 180 days of public notice prior to any release of high-risk offenders.

Critics also argue that Coe’s age and declining physical condition should not overshadow the severity of his past crimes. Victims’ advocates have warned that the risk to vulnerable populations remains, even if the offender appears physically weakened.

Unless the court intervenes at the hearing, Coe could be released just 24 hours after the judge’s ruling.

Erika Kirk Promises Strength, Vows Charlie’s Mission Will Grow

(Photo by Rebecca Noble/Getty Images)

Erika Kirk, the widow of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, delivered her first public remarks since Charlie was fatally shot at Utah Valley University. Speaking from his studio next to his empty chair, Erica proclaimed that her husband’s message—rooted in patriotism, faith, and conservative values—won’t just endure, it will intensify.

“The evildoers responsible for my husband’s assassination have no idea what they have done,” she declared. “They killed Charlie because he preached a message of patriotism, faith, and of God’s merciful love. If you thought that my husband’s mission was powerful before, you have no idea. You have no idea what you just have unleashed across this entire country and this world.”

Erika pledged that Turning Point USA’s “American Comeback Tour” will continue this fall, and that Charlie’s influence will only grow bolder, louder, and more resolute. She stood firm: “The movement my husband built will not die. It won’t. I refuse to let that happen. No one will ever forget my husband’s name.”

She paid tribute to Charlie as a devoted father and husband, saying his faith remained central to his work. Through tears, she expressed gratitude for the support she has received from President Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and the broader conservative movement. She reassured him—and the many who mourn—that Charlie’s vision and mission will rise again, stronger than ever.

Charlie Kirk is survived by Erika and their two young children. The suspected shooter, 22‑year‑old Tyler Robinson, has been arrested. In honor of Charlie’s life and legacy, President Trump has said he will posthumously award him the Presidential Medal of Freedom and attend his funeral.

Secret Service Agent Suspended Over Charlie Kirk Social Media Post

Female Secret Service agent (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

A Secret Service agent has been placed on administrative leave and had his security clearance revoked after making public comments about Charlie Kirk, the conservative activist who was recently assassinated. The agent, Anthony Pough, allegedly posted that Kirk “spewed hate and racism,” adding that “you answer to GOD … karma … she doesn’t leave.” His remarks, seen by colleagues as inappropriate for someone in his position, surfaced within the Secret Service community and quickly drew scrutiny.

The Secret Service’s Director, Sean Curran, addressed the post in an internal memo, warning staff that politically motivated attacks are becoming more common, and that personnel must avoid contributing to the polarization. Curran emphasized that agents are expected to operate “with the highest standards of conduct on and off duty,” and that actions undermining the agency’s trust can compromise its mission.

The agency confirmed that Pough is in “Phase 2” of his career and is not currently assigned to protect the president—a detail that may limit but not eliminate concerns about his access during major security events. Also noted in the reports are Pough’s prior social media posts critical of President Trump and his administration, further complicating the situation.

The agent’s discipline follows a broader wave of repercussions aimed at public servants who celebrated or mocked Kirk’s assassination on social media. In various states, teachers have been suspended or fired. In addition, a website named charliesmurderers.com has collected over 20,000 user submissions showcasing posts celebrating Kirk’s death.

Other sectors are also responding: military leadership is investigating personnel for similar behavior. Pentagon officials insist celebrating or mocking the assassination of an American citizen is “unacceptable.”

Charlie Kirk was fatally shot in the neck on September 10 while speaking at Utah Valley University. Authorities arrested a suspect shortly thereafter, and the FBI continues gathering evidence.

Polarization Online, Right-Wing Extremism Vs. Left

MSNBC
(Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images)

During a segment on All In Friday, MSNBC senior reporter Brandy Zadrozny said right‑wing extremist content online is far more abundant than left‑wing extremism. On camera, Zadrozny told host Jacob Soboroff that while radicals of the left exist, those views are harder to find compared to extremist content on the right, which she described as “overflowing.”

When asked if there is any common political thread among recent shooters linked to online extremism, Zadrozny said many of them aren’t staunch supporters of any established political figure—Trump included. “They’re fans of nothing. They’re fans of extremism. They’re fans of burn it down,” she said. In her view, these individuals are driven more by alienation and destruction than coherent political ideology.

Zadrozny warned of an “asymmetric polarization” online: communities where extremist rhetoric and content on the right are far more visible, cultivated, and widespread. She suggested that being exposed to this constant flow of material may play a role in radicalizing people who already feel marginalized or unheard.

While discussing this growing online trend, Zadrozny acknowledged how difficult it is to draw clean lines. The “right‑wing” extremist content she described may vary in degree and context, from fringe message boards to more mainstream posts. But what she emphasized was the volume—and how that volume creates an ecosystem that normalizes extreme views.

Soboroff and Zadrozny both agreed that America faces a challenge: how to confront extremist ideas without amplifying them, and how to address the anger and chaos among those disillusioned with the system. According to Zadrozny, many of these actors are no longer motivated by traditional political identity, but by a desire to dismantle rather than engage.

Maher Defends Free Speech, Flag Burning on Real Time

Trump federal workforce reductions
American Flag (Samuel Branch/Unsplash)

Bill Maher closed out Friday’s Real Time by making a case for protecting free speech—even when it’s uncomfortable. He argued that while flag burning might offend many, criminalizing it undermines a core American value. He also warned that censorship and punishment of speech could make the U.S. resemble the U.K., where people reportedly face arrests for contentious social media posts.

Maher quipped: “New Rule: You can love America and still be okay with burning the flag… Flag burning is free speech, and free speech is one of the key things that makes America great.” He challenged those who defend speech restrictions against the left but protest infringement when it comes from the right.

Highlighting perceived hypocrisy, Maher criticized President Trump’s lawsuits against media outlets for unfavorable coverage, saying that such tactics pose a threat to open debate and press freedom. He pointed to recent U.K. measures as cautionary examples of where society might head if speech is policed based on offense.

He praised comedian Ricky Gervais’s take: “If you don’t believe in a person’s right to say things that you might find ‘grossly offensive,’ then you don’t believe in freedom of speech.” Maher concluded, “ugly is the price of a freedom so great as speech.”