Home Blog Page 10

Democrats Fight to Bring Back Deported MS-13 Suspect

American Flag
American Flag (Joshua Hoehne/Unsplash)

NewsNation host Chris Cuomo clashed with Democratic strategist James Carville on Wednesday over the Democratic Party’s efforts to bring deported alleged MS-13 member Kilmar Abrego Garcia back into the United States. The heated exchange aired on CUOMO, with Cuomo warning that the optics of a MS-13 deportation fight will damage Democrats politically. Carville, however, refused to back down.

Earlier that day, the Department of Justice released documents linking Garcia to the notorious MS-13 gang. Cuomo highlighted the risks of championing Garcia’s return, telling Carville that it makes Democrats appear to support bringing a known “gang banger” back into the country—something likely to backfire with voters. “You’re going to lose politically to the effort to get bad guys out of the country,” Cuomo warned.

Carville dismissed the concerns, doubling down on due process arguments and calling Garcia an “innocent person,” despite court filings showing his wife had previously filed a domestic violence restraining order. “Every court has said bring him back,” Carville argued, framing the case as a constitutional issue and accusing the Trump administration of ignoring judicial orders.

Garcia entered the U.S. illegally in 2011 and was arrested by ICE on March 12. Despite allegations tying him to MS-13 and a history of domestic violence, Carville insisted Democrats should make his return a top priority, stating on his podcast that “you got to do everything you can to get this guy back home.”

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) even traveled to El Salvador to push for Garcia’s return, though the Salvadoran government denied him access to meet Garcia, currently held in a mega-prison. Van Hollen met only with El Salvador’s vice president, not President Nayib Bukele as requested.

The broader public appears unsympathetic. A Fox News poll from March found that 63% of Americans support deporting illegal immigrants to their home countries. Cuomo acknowledged the complexity of due process but maintained Garcia was a “tough poster boy” for the Democratic cause.

The situation spotlights a growing divide within the Democratic Party—between those prioritizing immigration enforcement and those championing controversial deportation cases, even when gang ties and abuse allegations are present.

22 Lawmakers Just Sounded the Alarm—Will the Feds Step In?

gun
Firearm (Thomas Tucker/Unsplash)

Colorado Republicans are urging the U.S. Department of Justice to intervene after Gov. Jared Polis signed a sweeping new gun control law that places strict limitations on the purchase of semi-automatic rifles. The law, Senate Bill 25-003, is drawing fire from state lawmakers and pro-gun organizations who say it unconstitutionally burdens law-abiding citizens and violates Second Amendment protections.

Under SB25-003, the sale or purchase of semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines will be banned unless individuals obtain a “firearms safety course eligibility card” from law enforcement and complete a state-approved training course. The law is set to take effect in August 2026.

In response, 22 Colorado House Republicans signed a letter to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, calling the legislation an emergency for the state. “Because of the unconstitutionality as well as the imminent risk posed to Coloradans by eliminating their right to firearms as a means for self-defense, it is our belief that the passage of SB25-003 constitutes an emergency for our state and calls for federal intervention,” the letter stated.

The call for federal review aligns with the DOJ’s newly launched Second Amendment Task Force, spearheaded by Bondi to counter policies deemed burdensome to gun owners. Bondi said the task force was created to reverse the prior administration’s restrictions on gun rights and to advance President Trump’s pro-Second Amendment agenda.

Pro-gun advocacy groups, including the Colorado State Shooting Association and Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, are also mobilizing against the law. They are collecting signatures for petitions urging DOJ scrutiny and potential legal action.

SB25-003 has sparked a broader conversation about the growing use of red tape and fees to limit access to firearms. The Republican letter criticized the law for placing a “financial and bureaucratic burden on law-abiding citizens,” asserting that the law forces Coloradans to pay steep fees and navigate complex regulations to exercise a constitutional right.

The DOJ has not yet commented on whether it will review Colorado’s law, but the department’s recent investigation into California gun licensing policies suggests similar measures could be taken.

As Colorado prepares for the implementation of SB25-003, opposition is intensifying. With federal backing from the Trump administration’s DOJ and mounting pressure from state Republicans and gun rights groups, legal battles appear increasingly likely.

Housing Panic Builds, 70% Fear Market Crash in 2025

Image via Canva

Amid low inventory, rising prices, and economic uncertainty, a new national survey reveals that 70 percent of Americans are bracing for a housing market crash this year. Concerns are particularly strong in Illinois, where home sales remain stagnant and affordability fears are growing among homeowners and potential buyers alike.

Clever Real Estate’s latest data shows that one in three Americans worry they won’t be able to keep up with housing payments due to the shifting economic climate. Researcher Nick Pisano attributed the anxiety to lingering memories of the 2008 financial collapse. “Except for Gen-Z and younger homeowners, they all lived through the Great Recession and know what a housing crash looks like,” said Pisano. He added that inflation, federal policy changes, and tariffs are amplifying concerns.

In Illinois, low housing inventory continues to stall market activity. Illinois Realtors reported that home sales in February 2025 barely moved from the same period last year, with only 7,698 homes sold statewide—a number nearly identical to February 2024. However, prices are surging. The median home price jumped 6 percent year-over-year to $283,000, placing additional strain on buyers.

As uncertainty intensifies, Pisano noted a significant shift in buyer behavior. “We found that about one in four people who planned on buying a home this year are now delaying those plans,” he said. Economic caution is sidelining many would-be homeowners, despite historically low interest rates secured by existing owners.

Pisano emphasized that while fears are high, the fundamentals are stronger than in 2008. “There is a lot lower risk overall for a system-wide housing crash,” he explained, noting that today’s homeowners typically have more equity and lower mortgage rates.

Still, the broader U.S. market is cooling. According to Redfin, the average home took 47 days to sell in March 2025—the slowest pace for March since 2019. Experts blame slow demand and overpriced listings for the lag.

With inventory tight and consumer anxiety mounting, the housing market remains caught between a recovery and another potential downturn.

Democrat Demands Extreme Action, SCOTUS in the Crosshairs

Hakeem Jeffries
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 08: U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) speaks to reporters as he leaves a meeting at the U.S. Capitol on July 08, 2024 in Washington, DC. Jeffries reiterated his support for President Joe Biden saying the party is united behind Biden to defeat Republican Presidential candidate former President Donald Trump. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

House Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) declared that the U.S. Supreme Court must “aggressively enforce” its orders against the Trump administration, calling for the use of contempt powers to target officials allegedly defying judicial rulings. Jeffries Supreme Court demands, made during an interview on CNN’s Inside Politics, is part of escalating rhetoric by Democrat leaders who claim the former president is provoking a constitutional crisis.

Jeffries responded to questions about recent disputes between the Trump administration and the courts, including a case involving Kilmar Abrego Garcia and ongoing access restrictions against the Associated Press at White House events. A judge reportedly ordered the White House to treat the AP equally with other media outlets, but critics say the administration has not complied.

“The president is assaulting the economy, assaulting Social Security, assaulting health care, assaulting the American way of life, and assaulting our democracy,” Jeffries stated, labeling the situation a full-blown crisis. He added that if the Trump administration continues to defy the courts, the Supreme Court “needs to lean into that” and use “all of the tools available,” including contempt.

Jeffries’ comments raise concerns about potential overreach and politicization of the judiciary. The call to “aggressively enforce” court orders and hold administration officials in contempt could signal a push by Democrat leadership to involve the judiciary in political battles ahead of the 2024 election. While he accuses Trump of undermining democracy, Jeffries’ approach suggests Democrats are preparing to weaponize the court system in retaliation.

The Minority Leader pledged congressional support for the courts in any future legal confrontations with the Trump administration. The remarks underscore the deepening divide between Democrats and Republicans, particularly as President Trump continues to lead in GOP polls and remains a major influence on national policy discussions.

Murkowski Breaks Down, ‘We’re All Afraid’

Trump Gold Card
President Donald Trump (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), a longtime critic of President Trump, publicly admitted she is “afraid” to speak her mind, claiming that “retaliation is real.” The remarks, delivered in a somber tone during a recent interview, have raised eyebrows among conservatives questioning what kind of retaliation she’s referring to—especially as she failed to mention the aggressive lawfare and political targeting that President Trump and his supporters have endured in recent years.

Murkowski told the interviewer, “We are all afraid,” and added, “I’m oftentimes very anxious myself about using my voice.” She insisted that fear of backlash shapes how she navigates her role, noting she must sometimes use “my mother’s charm” to communicate with political peers. The senator said she’s trying to help “the many who are so anxious, and so afraid,” though she didn’t identify the source of their fear.

Her vague warnings stand in stark contrast to the documented legal and political attacks directed at Trump, his allies, and conservative activists during the Biden administration. From indictments to censorship, conservative voices have faced unprecedented levels of political pushback. Yet, Murkowski has largely remained silent on those issues, instead choosing to speak out about her personal discomfort and criticism of Trump’s leadership.

Murkowski’s remarks follow her endorsement of Nikki Haley during the GOP primary and continue a pattern of distancing herself from the America First movement. On MSNBC’s Morning Joe, she accused the executive branch of “blowing by Congress,” while simultaneously claiming that Republicans can support Trump and still defend constitutional authority—an assertion that many see as contradictory.

President Trump recently called out Murkowski on Truth Social, urging her to “get on the Republican bandwagon, for a change.” His criticism reflects ongoing frustration among GOP voters with lawmakers perceived as establishment figures unwilling to back the conservative base’s priorities.

Murkowski’s admission of fear, without naming the real political forces targeting conservatives, leaves questions about where her loyalties truly lie—and whether her voice is being used to represent her constituents or to appease liberal media outlets.

What 97% of Venezuelans Still Believe Will Shock You

Venezuela Protest (Photo by Jesus Vargas/Getty Images)

A new study found that 97 percent of Venezuelans believe in God, with the majority regularly engaging in prayer, even after over two decades of aggressive attacks against the Church by Venezuela’s socialist regime. The survey, titled “Religious Sociography: The Religiosity of Venezuelans,” was conducted by Delphos in partnership with the Jesuit-affiliated Gumilla Foundation. The findings highlight the enduring Christian faith of the Venezuelan people despite ongoing persecution and manipulation of religion by the Maduro government.

The report shows that 63 percent of Venezuelans identify as Catholic, 16 percent as Evangelical Christians, and another six percent as members of other Christian denominations. Only eight percent reported having no religious affiliation. A majority of adults—49 percent—want their children raised in the Catholic faith, while 30 percent prefer their children choose their spiritual path independently.

Belief in God was described as “almost unanimous,” with 97 percent affirming belief in God and a similar number expressing belief in Jesus Christ as the Son of God. While 72 percent of respondents say they pray frequently, only 40 percent attend Mass or read the Bible regularly. Just 15 percent actively participate in sacraments such as Confession or the Eucharist. Most Venezuelans cited family wellbeing and health as their primary reasons for prayer.

The socialist regime’s hostility toward the Church dates back to 1999 under Hugo Chávez, who frequently denounced Catholic leaders critical of his Marxist rule. In 2007, he told Evangelical critics to “go to Hell” and labeled Jesus Christ “the first socialist.” His regime began appropriating Christian imagery for political use, culminating in a blasphemous rewrite of the Lord’s Prayer to glorify Chávez after his death.

Under Nicolás Maduro, the repression has continued. In 2018, he ordered investigations into bishops who condemned state-induced hunger and corruption, labeling clergy as “devils in cassocks.” Like Chávez, Maduro has manipulated religious symbols for political gain, including launching propaganda cartoons and unilaterally moving Christmas celebrations to October. His version of socialism often includes appeals to divine support for policies that have deepened economic and social crises.

Despite this, 53 percent of Venezuelans still see the Catholic Church as capable of helping to heal the nation’s political divides. Nearly half of respondents continue to view the Church favorably, though past scandals and regime propaganda have influenced public perception.

The Venezuelan people’s resilience in faith reflects a deep-rooted spirituality that has withstood both economic collapse and authoritarian attempts to undermine traditional Christian values.

She Voted With Democrats—Now Students Are Paying the Price

(Kevin Dunlap/Unsplash)

Just three weeks before a shooting injured multiple students at Florida State University, Republican state Sen. Ileana Garcia joined Democrats to block a bill that would have allowed students to carry firearms for self-defense. Senate Bill 814, which aimed to restore Second Amendment rights on campus, was shut down in committee due to Garcia’s pivotal vote. The FSU shooting has reignited calls to reexamine Florida’s gun policies, particularly concerning self-defense on college campuses.

SB 814, sponsored by Republican state Sen. Randy Fine, sought to allow concealed carry permit holders to carry their firearms on public college and university campuses. Fine argued the bill was essential for student safety, pointing out that criminals do not abide by gun-free zone policies. He emphasized that students deserve the same rights on campus as they do off it, especially as antisemitism and threats of violence have escalated across universities.

Despite a Republican majority, the Senate Criminal Justice Committee rejected the measure on March 26 in a narrow 4–3 vote. Garcia’s decision to side with Democrats effectively killed the bill. Two Republican senators were notably absent, leaving the outcome in Garcia’s hands. The vote marked a significant setback for campus carry advocates who have pushed for this legislation for nearly a decade.

On April 17, an individual opened fire at the FSU student union, injuring at least six unarmed students. The suspect was apprehended by police and multiple firearms were recovered, including a handgun, a shotgun, and another weapon located in a vehicle. The shooting occurred in a gun-free zone, where law-abiding students were prohibited from carrying firearms for self-defense.

The incident has renewed concerns about the effectiveness of gun-free zones in preventing violence. Critics of Florida’s current policy argue that such zones leave students defenseless in the face of armed attackers. SB 814 would have allowed licensed adults to carry on campus, potentially deterring such attacks or enabling quicker response in active shooter situations.

Calls are now growing among conservatives and Second Amendment advocates for the Florida legislature to revisit the issue. With increasing threats on campuses, the debate over arming responsible students and staff is far from over.

ACLU Demands Defense Department Restore Books Indoctrinating Children

Library Books (Tom Hermans/Unsplash)

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit this week against the Defense Department’s school system after removing books discussing gender and race.

“Since January, their schools have systemically removed books, altered curricula, and canceled events that the government has accused of promoting ‘gender ideology’ or ‘divisive equity ideology,'” the ACLU claimed in a press release. “This has included materials about slavery, Native American history, LGBTQ identities and history, and preventing sexual harassment and abuse, as well as portions of the Advanced Placement (AP) Psychology curriculum.”

According to the group’s lawsuit, the Department of Defense Education Activity is “quarantining library books and whitewashing curricula in its civilian schools. Right now, DoDEA is scrubbing references to race and gender from its libraries and lessons with no regard to how canonical, award-winning, or age-appropriate the material might be.”

“DoDEA’s book and curricular removals violate students’ First Amendment right to receive information,” the filing says. “While the government has broad discretion to populate public school libraries and create curricula, the First Amendment imposes guardrails to ensure removals are justified.”

A mother of three children in the Defense Department’s schools said the executive orders removing the books were a “violation of our children’s right to access information that prevents them from learning about their own histories, bodies, and identities.”

President Trump issued an executive order in January that sought to end the “radical indoctrination” of children in K-12 schools.

“In many cases, innocent children are compelled to adopt identities as either victims or oppressors solely based on their skin color and other immutable characteristics,” the order said. “In other instances, young men and women are made to question whether they were born in the wrong body and whether to view their parents and their reality as enemies to be blamed.”

Supreme Court Schedules Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Case

Trump
President Donald Trump (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

The Supreme Court will consider the Trump administration’s challenge to the injunctions against the president’s order ending birthright citizenship.

Oral arguments will be heard on May 15.

“These cases – which involve challenges to the President’s January 20, 2025 Executive Order concerning birthright citizenship – raise important constitutional questions with major ramifications for securing the border,” the Trump administration argued.

The Trump administration further argued that the “nationwide injunctions exceed the scope of the federal courts’ equitable powers and disregard Article III’s limitations on the power of the judicial branch. By allowing single, unelected federal judges to co-opt entire executive-branch policies at the drop of the hat, they create needless interbranch friction and perpetrate a truly lupine encroachment by the Judiciary on the President’s Article II authority.”

President Trump’s order ending birthright citizenship has been consistently blocked by courts.

The order, titled Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” said the “Fourteenth Amendment has never been interpreted to extend citizenship universally to everyone born within the United States.”

“The Fourteenth Amendment has always excluded from birthright citizenship persons who were born in the United States but not ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’ Consistent with this understanding, the Congress has further specified through legislation that ‘a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ is a national and citizen of the United States at birth, generally mirroring the Fourteenth Amendment’s text,” the order explained.

Opponents argue that this interpretation contradicts over a century of legal precedent, notably the 1898 Supreme Court decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, which affirmed birthright citizenship for nearly all individuals born on U.S. soil, regardless of their parents’ nationality.

Declassified Documents Reveal Effort to Limit Gun Rights to Curb ‘Domestic Terrorism’

Gabbard
(Photo by Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)

Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard declassified Biden-era documents, exposing an effort to limit gun rights as a means of countering domestic terrorism.

The documents discuss how the government can “confront long-term contributors to domestic terrorism,” explaining how officials may “rein in the proliferation of ghost guns; encourage state adoption of extreme risk protection orders; and drive other executive and legislative action, including banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.”

According to the documents, the government sought to counter domestic terrorism threats by seeking to implement the “COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act” to address reporting barriers faced by “disadvantaged communities by promoting law enforcement training and resources to prevent and address bias-motivated crimes.” The documents specifically describe the effort to “mitigate xenophobia and bias.”

Sharing the declassified materials, Gabbard wrote on X, “As promised, I have declassified the Biden Administration’s Strategic Implementation Plan for Countering Domestic Terrorism.”

Second Amendment group Gun Owners of America condemned the previous White House administration’s efforts, describing the documents as “Biden’s secret plan to eliminate the Second Amendment in the name of ‘counterterrorism.’”

The declassification comes as Gabbard announced earlier this month that she formed a task force to investigate the Intelligence Community (IC) as a means of restoring transparency and accountability.

“In order to rebuild trust in the Intelligence Community and execute the tasks required by President Trump’s intelligence-related Executive Orders, I established the Director’s Initiatives Group to bring about transparency and accountability across the IC. We are already identifying wasteful spending in real time, streamlining outdated processes, reviewing documents for declassification, and leading ongoing efforts to root out abuses of power and politicization,” Gabbard said in a statement.

1...91011...3,167Page 10 of 3,167
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2023 American Faith News Media. All rights reserved.