Kilmar Ábrego García, a Salvadoran national illegally residing in the U.S. since 2011, was taken into ICE custody this week following a press conference held in Maryland. García, now 30, faces federal human smuggling charges and possible deportation to Uganda—a country with which he has no known ties.
García first entered the country illegally at age 16. Despite living in the United States for 14 years, he still does not speak English, according to footage from his press conference, which was delivered entirely in Spanish.
The detail has fueled public criticism over the lack of assimilation and renewed calls for merit-based immigration reforms. Critics argue that immigrants who legally pursue citizenship, contribute to society, and adopt American values should be prioritized over those who violate immigration law and fail to integrate.
In 2022, García was pulled over in Tennessee while transporting a group of migrants, including minors. Though not initially charged, he was later indicted by a federal grand jury for human trafficking. He pleaded not guilty in June 2025 and is scheduled for trial in January 2026.
Earlier this year, García was mistakenly deported to El Salvador despite a court order protecting him from removal. The U.S. Supreme Court later ordered his return. Upon his reentry, he declined a plea deal that included deportation to Costa Rica. His attorneys now claim ICE is retaliating by seeking to deport him to Uganda—a country where he has no legal status or personal connection.
A federal judge had ordered García’s release under strict conditions, including electronic monitoring and a 72-hour notification period before any deportation. ICE detained him shortly after his release, raising legal questions about compliance with the court’s order.
Conservative leaders have voiced concerns about the case. Larry Behrens of Power the Future said, “This country has the right and duty to remove individuals here illegally, especially those facing serious charges.” He emphasized the need for stronger enforcement and immigration policies that promote legal entry, accountability, and assimilation.
García’s legal team claims the government is engaging in coercive tactics for political purposes. Meanwhile, DHS maintains that removal is justified under existing immigration and national security laws.
This case highlights growing tensions between enforcement agencies and federal courts and underscores ongoing failures in the immigration system. Conservative policymakers continue to push for reforms that prioritize lawful entry, personal responsibility, and the cultural values foundational to the nation.
