Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz introduced an expansive gun control package Tuesday that includes a proposed tax on firearms and ammunition, a ban on certain semiautomatic weapons, and new storage mandates. The legislation would take effect January 1, 2027, if approved by lawmakers and signed into law. The proposal is already drawing sharp debate over Second Amendment rights and government authority.
Tim Walz outlined the package before the state legislature, making clear his support for a firearm and ammunition tax. According to KARE 11, the proposal also calls for firearm insurance requirements and expanded school safety resources. Walz framed the measures as part of a broader effort to reduce gun violence across the state.
Central to the package is HF 3433, which includes a ban on numerous semiautomatic rifles and certain pistols. The bill would also impose stricter gun storage requirements, specifically targeting semiautomatic firearms. Critics note that the storage provisions could allow law enforcement to enter homes to verify compliance, raising concerns about privacy and constitutional protections.
HF 3433 contains a grandfather clause allowing current owners of firearms that would become prohibited to apply for a “certificate of ownership” through law enforcement. Without such certification, possession of the affected firearms could become unlawful once the law takes effect. The delayed implementation date of January 1, 2027, would give owners time to comply.
The package also targets so-called “ghost guns,” a term used by Democrats to describe privately assembled firearms that lack serial numbers. Supporters argue the regulations are necessary to prevent untraceable weapons from being used in crimes. Opponents counter that such measures restrict lawful gun owners while doing little to deter criminals.
Minnesota’s debate reflects a broader national divide over gun policy. While Democratic-led states continue to advance stricter regulations, many conservatives argue that enforcement of existing laws and stronger prosecution of violent offenders would be more effective than new restrictions on law-abiding citizens.
The legislation now heads to committee consideration in the Minnesota legislature, where lawmakers are expected to engage in contentious debate over its scope and constitutional implications.
