Senator Chris Van Hollen’s recent trip to El Salvador has intensified the debate over U.S. immigration enforcement and foreign policy. The Maryland Democrat aimed to meet with Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national deported in March 2025 despite a U.S. court order preventing his removal. Initially denied access to the high-security prison where Abrego Garcia is held, Van Hollen eventually met with him, sharing a photo of their encounter on social media.
Van Hollen took to X, writing, “I said my main goal of this trip [to El Salvador] was to meet with Kilmar. Tonight I had that chance. I have called his wife, Jennifer, to pass along his message of love. I look forward to providing a full update upon my return.”
Abrego Garcia’s deportation has drawn criticism from Democratic lawmakers, who argue it violates due process. A federal appeals court recently upheld a lower court’s order for the Trump administration to facilitate his return, condemning the government’s actions as a “willful disregard” for judicial authority.
El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele has refused to release Abrego Garcia, labeling him a terrorist. Despite the lack of criminal charges, Bukele’s administration has maintained custody, citing alleged gang affiliations.
Republican officials have defended the deportation. Rep. Andy Harris criticized Van Hollen’s efforts as “far beyond the pale,” emphasizing the importance of enforcing immigration laws. Similarly, former ICE Director Tom Homan expressed disapproval of Van Hollen’s actions.
The case has highlighted tensions between the executive and judicial branches, as well as differing approaches to immigration policy. While Democrats push for Abrego Garcia’s return, citing legal protections, Republicans emphasize the need for strict enforcement and national security.
