China and Hong Kong Oppose BlackRock’s Acquisition of Panama Canal Ports

The recent agreement between Hong Kong’s CK Hutchison Holdings and U.S.-based BlackRock Inc. to transfer ownership of strategic ports at both ends of the Panama Canal has encountered significant opposition from Chinese and Hong Kong authorities. The $22.8 billion deal involves BlackRock acquiring the Cristobal and Balboa ports, located on the Atlantic and Pacific sides of the canal, respectively, as well as a controlling interest in 43 ports across 23 countries.

Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee expressed concerns about the transaction, stating it warrants “serious attention.” He emphasized the importance of fair international trade practices and opposed “coercion or bullying tactics” in economic relations, indirectly referencing U.S. involvement.

Chinese authorities are scrutinizing the deal for potential antitrust and national security implications. Beijing’s Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office reposted commentaries labeling the sale a betrayal of national interests, suggesting it could allow the U.S. to “use [the canal] for political purposes and promote its own political agenda,” thereby subjecting Chinese trade and shipping to U.S. influence.

CK Hutchison, controlled by Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing, maintains that the agreement is purely commercial and complies with all legal requirements. However, the company’s stock experienced a 3% decline following the backlash, leading to the cancellation of scheduled press and investor briefings.

The Panama Canal is a vital maritime route, facilitating approximately 5% of global trade. The proposed shift in port ownership aligns with U.S. efforts to reduce Chinese influence in critical infrastructure. President Donald Trump lauded the deal as the U.S. “reclaiming” the canal, reflecting broader geopolitical tensions between Washington and Beijing.

As the situation develops, the transaction faces potential delays or obstacles due to intensified scrutiny from Chinese and Hong Kong authorities. The outcome will likely have significant implications for international trade dynamics and U.S.-China relations.​

MORE STORIES